Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-13T06:37:14.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Nonlocality, Causation, and Lorentz Invariance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2022

Federico Laudisa
Federico Laudisa*
Affiliation:
University of Florence
*
†Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università di Firenze, Via Bolognese 52, 50139 Firenze, Italy; e-mail: laudisa@mailserver.idg.fi.cnr.it.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The status of a causal approach to EPR-Bell nonlocal correlations in terms of a counterfactual framework for causation is considered. It is argued that when the relativistic spacetime structure of the events is taken into due account, the adoption of this approach is best motivated by the assumption of a preferred frame of reference, an assumption that seems even more in need of justification than the causal theory itself.

Information

Type
Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 66 , Issue S3: Supplement. Proceedings of the 1998 Biennial Meetings of the Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers Sep., 1999 , 1999 , pp. S72 - S81
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

‡

I wish to thank Mauro Dorato and Erik Curiel for useful remarks on an earlier draft of the present paper.

References

Butterfield, Jeremy N. (1992), “David Lewis Meets John Bell”, Philosophy of Science 59: 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Gordon N. (1989), “Lorentz Invariant State Reduction and Localization”, in Fine, Arthur and Leplin, Jarrett (eds.), PSA 1988, vol. 2. East Lansing, MI, Philosophy of Science Association, 112–126.Google Scholar
Fleming, Gordon N. (1996), “Just How Radical is Hyperplane Dependence?”, in Clifton, Robert K. (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 11–28.10.1007/978-94-015-8656-6_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghirardi, Gian Carlo (1996), “Properties and Events in a Relativistic Context: Revisiting the Dynamical Reduction Program”, Foundations of Physics Letters 9: 313–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghirardi, Gian Carlo and Grassi, Renata (1994), “Outcome Predictions and Property Attribution: the EPR Argument Reconsidered”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 25: 397–423.10.1016/0039-3681(94)90059-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, Lucien (1992), “Quantum Mechanics, Local Realistic Theories and Lorentz-Invariant Realistic Theories”, Physical Review Letters 68: 2981–2984.10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2981CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, Lucien and Squires, Euan J. (1992), “On the Violation of Lorentz-Invariance in Deterministic Hidden Variable Interpretations of Quantum Theory”, Physics Letters A168: 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David (1973), “Causation”, Journal of Philosophy 70: 556–567 (reprinted in Ernest Sosa and Michael Tooley (eds.), Causation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993, 193–204; page references are to the reprinted edition).10.2307/2025310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (1994), Quantum Nonlocality and Relativity, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maudlin, Tim. (1996), “Space-Time in the Quantum World”, in Cushing, James T., Fine, Arthur, and Goldstein, Sheldon (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 285–307.10.1007/978-94-015-8715-0_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittelstaedt, Peter (1985), “EPR-Paradox, Quantum Logic and Relativity”, in Lahti, Pekka and Mittelstaedt, Peter (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics. Singapore: World Scientific, 171–186.Google Scholar
Redhead, Michael L.G. (1987), Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism. Oxford, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rössler, Otto E. (1990), “Einstein Completion of Quantum Mechanics Made Falsifiable”, in Zurek, W.H. (ed.), Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Reading, MA.: Addison-Wesley, 367–373.Google Scholar
Shimony, Abner (1986), “Events and Processes in the Quantum World”, in Penrose, Roger and Isham, Chris (eds.), Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 182–203.Google Scholar
Smith, Gerrit J. and Weingard, Robert (1987), “A Relativistic Formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox”, Foundations of Physics 17: 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar