Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-xnzsz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T14:57:05.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Construction and the Concept of Race

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Edouard Machery  and
Luc Faucher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has been little serious work to integrate the constructionist approach and the cognitive/evolutionary approach in the domain of race, although many researchers have paid lip service to this project. We believe that any satisfactory account of human beings’ racialist cognition has to integrate both approaches. In this paper, we propose to move toward this integration. We present an evolutionary hypothesis that rests on a distinction between three kinds of groups—kin-based groups, small scale coalitions, and ethnies. Following Gil-White (1999, 2001a, 2001b), we propose that ethnies have raised specific evolutionary challenges that were solved by an evolved cognitive system. We suggest that the concept of race is a byproduct of this mechanism. We argue that recent theories of cultural transmission are our best hope for integrating social constructionists’ and cognitive/evolutionary theorists’ insights.

Type
Race and Science
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 72 , Issue 5: Proceedings of the 2004 Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association. Part I: Contributed Papers , December 2005 , pp. 1208 - 1219
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atran, Scott (1990), Cognitive Foundations of Natural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banton, Michael (1970), “The Concept of Racism”, in Zubaida, Sami (ed.), Race and Racialism. London: Tavistock, 17–34.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L. (1991), Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal (2001), Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brown, Ryan A., and Armelagos, George J. (2001), “Apportionment of Racial Diversity: A Review”, Apportionment of Racial Diversity: A Review 10:34–40.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda, Tooby, John, and Kurzban, Robert (2003), “Perceptions of Race”, Perceptions of Race 7:173–179.Google ScholarPubMed
Faucher, Luc (1999), “Emotions fortes, constructionnisme faible et eliminativisme”, Emotions fortes, constructionnisme faible et eliminativisme 25:3–35.Google Scholar
Gil-White, Francisco (1999), “How Thick Is Blood? The Plot Thickens …: If Ethnic Actors Are Primordialists, What Remains of the Circumstantialists/Primordialists Controversy?”, How Thick Is Blood? The Plot Thickens …: If Ethnic Actors Are Primordialists, What Remains of the Circumstantialists/Primordialists Controversy? 22:789–820.Google Scholar
Gil-White, Francisco (2001a), “Are Ethnic Groups Biological ‘Species’ to the Human Brain?”, Are Ethnic Groups Biological ‘Species’ to the Human Brain? 42:515–554.Google Scholar
Gil-White, Francisco (2001b), “Sorting Is Not Categorization: A Critique of the Claim That Brazilians Have Fuzzy Racial Categories”, Sorting Is Not Categorization: A Critique of the Claim That Brazilians Have Fuzzy Racial Categories 1:219–249.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, and Boyd, Robert (1998), “The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences”, The Evolution of Conformist Transmission and the Emergence of Between-Group Differences 19:215–241.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, and Gil-White, Francisco (2001), “The Evolution of Prestige: Freely Conferred Deference as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Benefits of Cultural Transmission”, The Evolution of Prestige: Freely Conferred Deference as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Benefits of Cultural Transmission 22:165–196.Google ScholarPubMed
Henrich, Joseph, and McElreath, Richard (2003), “The Evolution of Cultural Evolution”, The Evolution of Cultural Evolution 12:123–135.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. (1995), “Do Children Have a Theory of Race?”, Do Children Have a Theory of Race? 54:209–252.Google ScholarPubMed
Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. (1996), Race in Making: Cognition, Culture, and the Child’s Construction of Human Kinds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. (1997), “The Conceptual Politics of Race”, The Conceptual Politics of Race 25:63–92.Google Scholar
Hirschfeld, Lawrence A. (2001), “On a Folk Theory of Society: Children, Evolution, and Mental Representations of Social Groups”, On a Folk Theory of Society: Children, Evolution, and Mental Representations of Social Groups 5:107–117.Google Scholar
Klein, Richard G. (1999), The Human Career: Human Biological and Cultural Origins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knauft, Bruce M. (1991), “Violence and Sociality in Human Evolution”, Violence and Sociality in Human Evolution 32:391–428.Google Scholar
Kurzban, Robert, Tooby, John, and Cosmides, Leda (2001), “Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization”, Can Race Be Erased? Coalitional Computation and Social Categorization 98:15387–15392.Google ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, Richard C. (1972), “The Apportionment of Human Diversity”, The Apportionment of Human Diversity 6:381–398.Google Scholar
Machery, Edouard, and Faucher, Luc (2005), “Why Do We Think Racially? Culture, Evolution and Cognition”, in Cohen, Henri and Lefebvre, Claire (eds.), Categorization in Cognitive Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1009–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, Ron, and Stich, Stephen P. (2000), “The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology”, The Odd Couple: The Compatibility of Social Construction and Evolutionary Psychology 67:133–154.Google Scholar
McElreath, Richard, Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J. (2001), “Shared Norms Can Lead to the Evolution of Ethnic Markers”, Shared Norms Can Lead to the Evolution of Ethnic Markers 44:122–130.Google Scholar
Medin, Douglas, and Atran, Scott, eds. (1999), Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omi, Michael, and Winant, Howard (2002), “Racial Formation”, in Essed, Philomena and Goldberg, David T. (eds.), Race Critical Theories. London: Blackwell, 123–145.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert (1998), “The Evolution of Human Ultra-Sociality”, in Eibl-Eibesfeldt, Irenaeus and Salter, Frank K. (eds.), Indoctrinability, Ideology and Warfare. New York: Berghahn, 71–96.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert (1999), “Complex Societies: The Evolution of a Crude Superorganism”, Complex Societies: The Evolution of a Crude Superorganism 10:253–289.Google ScholarPubMed
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert (2001), “The Evolution of Subjective Commitment to Groups: A Tribal Instincts Hypothesis”, in Nesse, Randolph M. (ed.), The Evolution of Subjective Commitment. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 186–220.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert (2004), Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, Peter J., Boyd, Robert, and Henrich, Joseph (2003), “Cultural Evolution of Human Cooperation”, in Hammerstein, Peter (ed.), Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 357–388.Google Scholar
Rodseth, Lars, Wrangham, Richard W., Harrigan, Alisa M., and Smuts, Barbara B. (1991), “The Human Community as a Primate Society”, The Human Community as a Primate Society 32:221–254.Google Scholar
Root, Michael (2000), “How We Divide the World”, How We Divide the World 67:S628–S639.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan (1996), Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar