Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-ks5gx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-22T20:51:20.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cyclic vs. non-cyclic constraint evaluation*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2009

Michael Kenstowicz
Michael Kenstowicz
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Information
Phonology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 1995 , pp. 397 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank (1993). Optimality, grounding theory, and rule parameters. Paper presented at Rutgers Optimality Workshop 1, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Louis Goldstein (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology 6. 201–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buller, Barbara, Ernest Buller & Daniel Everett (1993). Stress placement, syllable structure, and minimality in Banawa. IJAL 59. 280–293.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail (1989). Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. NLLT 7. 167–216.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail (1993). The initial dactyl effect in Indonesian. LI 24. 372–381.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail & John McCarthy (1993). Foot alignment and apparent cyclicity in Indonesian. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail & John McCarthy (1994). Alignment and parallelism in Indonesian phonology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
San, Duanmu (1992). End-based theory, cyclic stress, and tonal domains. CLS 28: 2. 65–76.Google Scholar
San, Duanmu (1993). Metrical and tonal phonology of compounds in two Chinese dialects. Ms, University of Michigan. To appear in Lg 71.Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward (1993). The role of metrical structures in segmental rules. Ms, UCLA.Google Scholar
Furby, Christine (1974). Garawa phonology. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John (1992). Local modelling in phonology. In S. Davis (ed.) Connectionism: theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John (ed.) (1995). The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, Mass. & Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Green, Thomas (1993). Configurational constraints in a generalized theory of phonological representation. PhD dissertation, MITGoogle Scholar
Green, Thomas (1995). The stress window in Piraha: a reanalysis of rhythm in Optimality Theory. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & William Idsardi (1994). A reanalysis of Indonesian stress. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21. 1–9.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & William Idsardi (1995). General properties of stress and metrical structure. In Goldsmith (1995). 403–443.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Michael Kenstowicz (1991). The The free element condition and cyclic versus noncyclic stress. LI 22. 457–502.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud (1978). Metrical structures in phonology. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Jean-Roger Vergnaud (1987). An essay on stress. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, Michael (1984). Constraining metrical theory: a modular theory of rhythm and destressing. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Hansen, Kenneth C. & L. E. Hansen (1969). Pintupi phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 8. 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James (1995). Projection and edge marking in the computation of stress in Spanish. In Goldsmith (1995). 867–887.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1985). Iambic and trochaic rhythm in stress rules. BLS 13. 429–446.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1987). A revised parametric metrical theory. NELS 17. 274–289.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1994). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, B. (1968). The Carib language. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der & Ellis Visch (1992). Iambic lengthening in Carib. In R. Bok-Bennema & R. van Hout (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1992. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 113–124.Google Scholar
Hung, Henrietta (1993). Iambicity, rhythm, and non-parsing. Ms, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Hung, Henrietta (1994). Rhythmic and prosodic organization of edge constituents. PhD dissertation, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William (1992). The computation of prosody. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Idsardi, William (1994). Optimality, alignment and Polish stress. Paper presented at the 68th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Boston.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon (1989). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kager, René (1989). A metrical theory of stress and destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kager, Rene (1993). Blocking effects in lexical stress rules. Ms, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Kager, Rene (1994). Ternary rhythm in alignment theory. Ms, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1981). Functional explanations in generative phonology. In D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyvaerts, (ed.) Phonology in the 1980's. Ghent: E. Storia-Scientia. 431–443.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1993). Evidence for metrical constituency. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds.) The view from building 20: essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 257–273.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael (1994). Sonority–based stress. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Kraska, Iwona (1995). The phonology of stress in Polish. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince (1986). Prosodic morphology. Ms, Brandeis UniversiGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince (1993a). Prosodic morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Massachusetts, Amherst. To appear, MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince (1993b). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993. 79–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince (1994). Reduplicative identity. Handout from Harvard University lecture.Google Scholar
Mester, Armin (1994). The quantitative trochee in Latin. NLLT 12. 1–62.Google Scholar
Onn, Farid (1976). Aspects of the phonology and morphology of Malay. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Osborn, Henry (1966). Warao I: phonology and morphophonemics. IjfAL 32. 108–123.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan (1983). Relating to the grid. LI 14. 19–100.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms, Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. To appear, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy & Geert Booij (1985). A grid theory of stress in Polish. Lingua 66. 281–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 371–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth (1993). The prosodic structure of function words. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Teoh, BoonSeong (1987). Geminates and inalterability in Malay. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 17. 125–136.Google Scholar
Tryon, Darrell (1970). An introduction to Maranungku. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie (1973). The phonology of reduplication. IULC.Google Scholar
Zee, Draga (1993). Rule domains and phonological change. In Sharon Hargus & Ellen Kaisse (eds.) Studies in Lexical Phonology. Orlando: Academic Press. 365–405Google Scholar