We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Altschuler, Sari, and Weimer, David. “Texturing the Digital Humanities: A Manifesto.” PMLA, vol. 135, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 74–91.Google Scholar
Boyer, Ernest L.Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1990.Google Scholar
Burton, Antoinette, et al. “Reciprocity and Redistribution.” Fisher-Livne and May-Curry, Routledge Companion, pp. 66–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Jordana, and Tilton, Lauren. “The Digital Public Humanities: Giving New Arguments and New Ways to Argue.” Review of Communication, vol. 19, no. 2, 2019, pp. 127–46.Google Scholar
Dimock, Wai Chee. “Editor's Column: Experimental Humanities.” PMLA, vol. 132, no. 2, Mar. 2017, pp. 241–49.Google Scholar
Ellison, Julie. “Guest Column: The New Public Humanists.” PMLA, vol. 128, no. 2, Mar. 2013, pp. 289–98.Google Scholar
Fisher-Livne, Daniel, and May-Curry, Michelle. “Public Humanities in Practice and Theory.” Introduction. Fisher-Livne and May-Curry, Routledge Companion, pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Fisher-Livne, Daniel, and May-Curry, Michelle., editors. The Routledge Companion to Public Humanities Scholarship. Taylor and Francis, 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Gerard A.The Public Work of Rhetoric: Citizen-Scholars and Civic Engagement. U of South Carolina P, 2013.Google Scholar
Heiland, Donna, and Huber, Mary Taylor. “The Role of the Arts and Humanities in Civic Learning and Engagement: The US Debate.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, vol. 14, no. 3, 2015, pp. 231–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández-Laroche, Araceli. “The Urgency of Making Public Work Count.” ADE Bulletin, vol. 159 / ADFL Bulletin, vol. 47, no. 2, 2022, pp. 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Ashley J. “Transformative Learning, Affect, and Reciprocal Care in Community Engagement.” Community Literacy Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, 2015, pp. 48–67.Google Scholar
Johnsen, Rosemary Erickson. “Literary Study Writ Large.” Conclusion. Public Scholarship in Literary Studies, edited by Arteaga, Rachel and Johnsen, , Amherst College Press, 2021, pp. 145–52.Google Scholar
Kirby, Brian, et al. “Community College and University Partnerships in the Public Humanities: Creating a Partnership between El Paso Community College and the University of Texas, El Paso.” ADE Bulletin, vol. 159 / ADFL Bulletin, vol. 47, no. 2, 2022, pp. 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornstein, Harris, and Barrios, Jacqueline Jean. “Querying Public Scholarship: An Unfinished List of Questions toward More Meaningful University-Community Partnerships.” Public Humanities, vol. 1, 2025, article e18, https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2024.22.Google Scholar
Lemenager, Stephanie, and Foote, Stephanie. “The Sustainable Humanities.” PMLA, vol. 127, no. 3, May 2012, pp. 572–78.Google Scholar
Marullo, Sam, et al. “C. Wright Mills's Friendly Critique of Service Learning and an Innovative Response: Cross-Institutional Collaborations for Community-Based Research.” Teaching Sociology, vol. 37, no. 1, 2009, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Carol, and Humphries, Hilton. “From Notions of Charity to Social Justice in Service-Learning: The Complex Experience of Communities.” Education as Change, vol. 11, no. 3, 2007, pp. 47–58.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Tania D. “Critical Service Learning.” Anti-Oppressive Education in “Elite” Schools: Promising Practices and Cautionary Tales from the Field, edited by Swalwell, Katy M. and Spikes, Daniel, Teachers College Press, 2021, pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Valuing the Public Humanities. Guidelines for Evaluating Publicly Engaged Humanities Scholarship in Language and Literature Programs. Modern Language Association of America, Aug. 2022, www.mla.org/Guidelines-Public-Humanities. PDF file.Google Scholar
Renwick, Kerry, et al. “Community Engagement Is . . . : Revisiting Boyer's Model of Scholarship.” Higher Education Research and Development, vol. 39, no. 6, 2020, pp. 1232–46.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Pamela. “Community Engagement: What's the Difference between Service Learning, Community Service, and Community-Based Research?” Journal of Physical Therapy Education, vol. 23, no. 2, 2009, pp. 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risam, Roopika. “Public Humanities before Public Humanities.” Public Humanities, vol. 1, 2025, article e34, https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2024.45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Jamie. “The Reparative Work of Radical Collaboration: Project Planning to Enhance Outcomes and Long-Term Sustainability of Community Partnerships.” IDEAH, vol. 3, no. 3, 2023, https://doi.org/10.21428/f1f23564.b3dabf1e.Google Scholar
Santana, Christina, et al., editors. Anti-racist Community Engagement: Principles and Practices. Campus Compact / Stylus, 2023.Google Scholar
Vincent, Cindy S., et al. “Critically Engaged Civic Learning: A Comprehensive Restructuring of Service-Learning Approaches.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, vol. 27, no. 2, 2021, pp. 107–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. Zone Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Wickman, Matthew. “What Are the Public Humanities? No, Really, What Are They?” University of Toronto Quarterly, vol. 85, no. 4, 2016, pp. 6–11.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jeffrey R., and Bulaitis, Zoe Hope. “What Is Public Humanities?” Public Humanities, vol. 1, 2025, article e17, https://doi.org/10.1017/pub.2024.25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingo, Rebecca S., et al., editors. Digital Community Engagement: Partnering Communities with the Academy. U of Cincinnati P, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Kathleen. “The Future of the Humanities—in the Present and in Public.” Daedalus, vol. 138, no. 1, 2009, pp. 110–23.Google Scholar