Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-gtgcz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-20T18:09:25.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theorizing Public Digital Humanities: A Model for Collaborative Knowledge Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2025

Allen Brizee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Theories and Methodologies
Information
PMLA , Volume 140 , Issue 1 , January 2025 , pp. 126 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Modern Language Association of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Asen, Robert. “Critical Engagement through Public Sphere Scholarship.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 101, no. 1, 2015, pp. 132–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asen, Robert. “A Discourse Theory of Citizenship.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 90, no. 2, 2004, pp. 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asen, Robert. “Neoliberalism, the Public Sphere, and a Public Good.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 103, no. 4, 2017, pp. 329–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazaluk, Oleg. “Plato's and Isocrates’ Traditions in the Development of Educational Theories in the History of Culture.” Annals of the University of Craiova—Philosophy Series, vol. 40, no. 2, 2017, pp. 5–18.Google Scholar
Benis, Toby, and Lewis, Michal. “Joint Faculty Senate/Provost Committee on Mid-Career Faculty Development.” COACHE Survey Town Hall Meetings, 12 and 25 Oct. 2017, Saint Louis University.Google Scholar
Bizzell, Patricia, and Herzberg, Bruce, editors. The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present. Bedford / St. Martin's, 2001.Google Scholar
Blythe, Stuart, et al. “Action Research and Wicked Environmental Problems: Exploring Appropriate Roles for Researchers in Professional Communication.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 22, no. 3, 2008, pp. 272–98.Google Scholar
“BMore Me.” Baltimore City Public Schools, www.baltimorecityschools.org/page/bmore-me. Accessed 2019.Google Scholar
Booth, Alison, and Posner, Miriam. “The Materials at Hand.” Varieties of Digital Humanities, special issue of PMLA, edited by Booth and Posner, vol. 135, no. 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, Marcus. The Heart of Christianity: Rediscovering a Life of Faith. HarperOne, 2015.Google Scholar
Boyer, Ernest L. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Jossey-Bass, 1997.Google Scholar
Bringle, Robert. “High-Impact Pedagogies: Integrating Service-Learning with Three Other High-Impact Pedagogies.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, vol. 24, no. 1, 2017, pp. 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringle, Robert, et al. “Civic-Minded Graduate: Additional Evidence II.” International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, vol. 7, no. 1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.37333/001c.11481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringle, Robert, et al. “Partnerships in Service Learning and Civic Engagement.” Partnerships: A Journal of Service Learning and Civic Engagement, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Brizee, Allen. “Reimagining the Humanistic Tradition: Using Isocratic Philosophy, Ignatian Pedagogy, and Civic Engagement to Journey with Youth and Walk with the Excluded.” Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, 2022, pp. 2–25.Google Scholar
Brizee, Allen. “Toward Participatory Civic Engagement: Findings and Implications of a Three-Year Community-Based Research Study.” Computers and Composition: An International Journal, vol. 32, 2014, pp. 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brizee, Allen. “What Happens When We Fail? Developing Resilient Community-Based Research.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 50, no. 4, 2020, pp. 339–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brizee, Allen, and Wells, Jaclyn M.. Partners in Literacy: A Writing Center Model for Civic Engagement. Rowman and Littlefield, 2016.Google Scholar
Brizee, Allen, et al. “High-Impact Civic Engagement: Outcomes of Community-Based Research in Technical Writing Courses.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 50, no. 3, 2019, pp. 224–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brizee, Allen, et al. “John W. O'Malley as a Guide for Eloquentia Perfecta, Community-Engaged Work, and Graduate Education.” Jesuit Higher Education: A Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, 2022, article 12, pp. 76–82, https://doi.org/10.53309/2164-7666.1422.Google Scholar
Cella, Laurie JC. “Taking Stock of Our Past and Assessing the Future of Community Writing Work.” Introduction. Unsustainable: Re-imagining Community Literacy, Public Writing, Service-Learning, and the University, edited by Jessica Restaino and Cella, Lexington Books, 2013, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, 2006.Google Scholar
Christian, Barbara. “The Race for Theory.” New Black Feminist Criticism, 1985–2000, by Christian, edited by Bowles, Gloria et al., U of Illinois P, 2007, pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
Coe, Marlana. Human Factors for the Technical Communicator. Wiley and Sons, 1996.Google Scholar
“College 2030, Emerging from the Pandemic: Reimagining Higher Education.” Barnes and Noble College, 2022, www.bncollege.com/insight/report/college2030/.Google Scholar
Corbin, Juliette, and Strauss, Anselm. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology, vol. 13, no. 1990, pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, Ellen. “The Rhetorician as an Agent of Social Change.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 47, no. 1, 1996, pp. 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deans, Thomas. “English Studies and Public Service.” Writing and Community Engagement: A Critical Sourcebook, edited by Deans et al., Bedford / St. Martin's, pp. 97–116.Google Scholar
Depew, David. “The Inscription of Isocrates into Aristotle's Practical Philosophy.” Poulakos and Depew, Isocrates, pp. 157–85.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Signature Event Context.” Margins of Philosophy, translated by Alan Bass, U of Chicago P, 1982, pp. 307–30.Google Scholar
Dumas, Joseph S., and Redish, Janice C.. A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Cromwell Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ehn, Pelle. “Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill.” Usability: Turning Technologies into Tools, edited by Adler, P. S. and Winograd, T. A., Oxford UP, 1992, pp. 96–132.Google Scholar
Enos, Sandra, and Morton, Keith. “Developing a Theory and Practice of Campus-Community Partnerships.” Building Partnerships for Service-Learning, edited by Jacoby, Barbara et al., Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 20–41.Google Scholar
Eyler, Janet, et al. At a Glance: What We Know about the Effects of Service-Learning on College Students, Faculty, Institutions, and Communities, 1993–2000. 3rd ed., Vanderbilt University, 2001.Google Scholar
Fleischauer, Janet Patterson, and Fleischauer, John F.. “College Credit for Community Service: A ‘Win-Win’ Situation.” Journal of Experiential Education, vol. 17, no. 3, 1994, pp. 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garver, Eugene. “Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Civic Education in Aristotle.” Poulakos and Depew, Isocrates, pp. 186–213.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Strauss, Anselm L.. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction, 1967.Google Scholar
Haskins, Ekaterina V. Logos and Power in Isocrates and Aristotle. U of South Carolina P, 2004.Google Scholar
Hauser, Gerard A. “Philosophy and Rhetoric—Rethinking Their Intersections.” Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 50, no. 4, 2017, pp. 371–89.Google Scholar
“High-Impact Practices.” American Association of Colleges and Universities, www.aacu.org/trending-topics/high-impact. Accessed 25 July 2023.Google Scholar
Hwang, Wonil, and Salvendy, Gavriel. “Number of People Required for Usability Evaluation: The 10± Rule.” Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 5, 2010, pp. 130–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isocrates. Antidosis. Translated by Norlin, George, G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1929.Google Scholar
Kendi, Ibram X. How to Be an Antiracist. One World, 2019.Google Scholar
Ledesma, Janet. “Conceptual Frameworks and Research Models on Resilience in Leadership.” Sage Open, vol. 4, no. 3, 2014, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Leff, Michael. “Isocrates, Tradition, and the Rhetorical Version of Civic Education.” Poulakos and Depew, Isocrates, pp. 235–65.Google Scholar
Manning-Ouellette, Amber, and Hemer, Kevin M.. “Service-Learning and Civic Attitudes: A Mixed Methods Approach to Civic Engagement in the First Year of College.” Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, vol. 11, no. 3, 2019, pp. 5–18.Google Scholar
Marrou, Henri. Histoire de l’éducation dans l’ Antiquité. 6th ed., Éditions du Seuil, 1948.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Tania D. “Traditional vs. Critical Service-Learning: Engaging the Literature to Differentiate Two Models.” Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, vol. 14, no. 2, 2008, pp. 50–65.Google Scholar
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Valuing the Public Humanities. Guidelines for Evaluating Publicly Engaged Humanities Scholarship in Language and Literature Programs. Modern Language Association of America, Aug. 2022, www.mla.org/Guidelines-Public-Humanities. PDF file.Google Scholar
O'Malley, John. “Jesuit Schools and the Humanities Yesterday and Today.” Studies in the Spirituality of Jesuits, vol. 47, no. 1, 2015, pp. 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulakos, Takis. “Isocrates’ Civic Education and the Question of Doxa.” Poulakos and Depew, Isocrates, pp. 44–65.Google Scholar
Poulakos, Takis, and Depew, David. Introduction. Poulakos and Depew, Isocrates, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Poulakos, Takis, and Depew, David, editors. Isocrates and Civic Education. U of Texas P, 2004.Google Scholar
A Primer on the Benefits and Value of Civic and Community Engagement in Higher Education. North Carolina Campus Engagement, 2023, nccampusengagement.org/wp-content/uploads/HECE-Primer_2nd-Edition.pdf.Google Scholar
Rumsey, Suzanne Kelser, and Nihiser, Tanja. “Expectation, Reality, and Rectification: The Merits of Failed Service Learning.” Community Literacy Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, 2012, pp. 135–51.Google Scholar
“Saint Louis University 2023 Profile.” Saint Louis University, www.slu.edu/about/key-facts/slu-profile.pdf. Accessed 2023.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Kelly L. “‘Regulations for Our Black People’: Reconstructing the Experiences of Enslaved People in the United States through Jesuit Records.” Portal to Jesuit Studies, 2021, jesuitportal.bc.edu/publications/symposia/2019symposium/symposia-schmidt/.Google Scholar
Simmons, Michele W., and Grabill, Jeffrey T.. “Toward a Civic Rhetoric for Technologically and Scientifically Complex Places: Invention, Performance, and Participation.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 58, no. 3, 2007, pp. 419–48.Google Scholar
Soria, Krista M., and Weiner, Brad. “A ‘Virtual Fieldtrip’: Service Learning in Distance Education Technical Writing Courses.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, vol. 43, no. 2, 2013, pp. 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenberg, Shari J., and Minter, Deborah. “‘Always Up Against’: A Study of Veteran WPAs and Social Resilience.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 69, no. 4, 2018, pp. 642–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theofanos, Mary F., and Redish, Janice. “Helping Low-Vision and Other Users with Websites That Meet Their Needs: Is One Site for All Feasible?” Technical Communication, vol. 52, no. 1, 2005, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
USC Race and Equity Center. National Assessment of Collegiate Campus Climates, Saint Louis University. Saint Louis University, 2020, www.slu.edu/diversity/-pdf/slu-naccc-results-fall2020.pdf.Google Scholar
“What We Have Learned.” Jesuits, www.jesuits.org/our-work/shmr/what-we-have-learned/. Accessed 7 Dec. 2023.Google Scholar
Yep, Kathleen S., and Mitchell, Tania D.. “Decolonizing Community Engagement: Reimagining Service Learning through an Ethnic Studies Lens.” The Cambridge Handbook of Service Learning and Community Engagement, edited by Dolgon, Cory et al., Cambridge UP, 2017, pp. 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, Mark A. “Resilience Theory: A Strengths-Based Approach to Research and Practice for Adolescent Health.” Health Education and Behavior, vol. 40, no. 4, 2013, pp. 381–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed