Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-rx8cm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-06T20:39:52.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An evolving photoelectric efficiency at cosmic noon?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2020

Jed McKinney
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA01003, USA
Alexandra Pope
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA01003, USA
Lee Armus
Affiliation:
Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, MC 314-6, Caltech, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA91125, USA
Ranga Chary
Affiliation:
Division of Physics, Math & Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA91125
Mark Dickinson
Affiliation:
National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ85719, USA
Allison Kirkpatrick
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS66045, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To sustain star formation rates (SFRs) of hundreds to thousands of solar masses per year over millions of years, a galaxy must efficiently cool its gas. At z ∼ 2, the peak epoch for stellar mass assembly, tracers of gas heating and cooling remain largely unexplored. For one z ∼ 2 starburst galaxy GS IRS20, we present Spitzer IRS spectroscopy of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) emission, and ALMA observations of [C II] 158 μm fine-structure emission which we use to probe ISM heating/cooling. Coupled with an unusually warm dust component, the ratio of [C II] /PAH emission suggests a low photolelectric efficiency, and/or the importance of cooling from other far-IR lines in this galaxy. A low photoelectric efficiency at z ∼ 2 could be key for the peak in the SFR density of the universe by decoupling stellar radiation from ISM gas temperatures.

References

Helou, G., Malhotra, S., Hollenbach, D. J., Dale, D. A., & Contursi, A. 2001, ApJL, 548, L7310.1086/318916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. 1985, ApJ, 291, 72210.1086/163111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, A., Wagg, J., Frayer, D., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 9210.1088/0004-637X/772/2/92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanella, A., Daddi, E., Magdis, G., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisbin, D., Ferkinhoff, C., Nikola, T., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 1310.1088/0004-637X/799/1/13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkpatrick, A., Pope, A., Sajina, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 910.1088/0004-637X/814/1/9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Santos, T., Armus, L., Charmandaris, V., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 3210.3847/1538-4357/aa81d7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croxall, K. V, Smith, J. D., Wolfire, M. G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 81Google Scholar