Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-rbv74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T15:05:40.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantification of excess carbon-14 specific activity in soil and sediments in the vicinity of a nuclear power plant by batch combustion and liquid scintillation counting method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2025

Arya Krishnan K
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity, Mangalore University, Mangalore, Karnataka 574 199, India
Bharath S
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity, Mangalore University, Mangalore, Karnataka 574 199, India
Rajveer Sharma
Affiliation:
Inter-University Accelerator Centre, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, Near Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 067, India
Pankaj Kumar
Affiliation:
Inter-University Accelerator Centre, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, Near Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 067, India
Sundeep Chopra
Affiliation:
Inter-University Accelerator Centre, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, Near Vasant Kunj, New Delhi 110 067, India
Reshmi T R
Affiliation:
Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode, Kerala 673 571, India
Sudheesh M
Affiliation:
Centre for Water Resources Development and Management, Kozhikode, Kerala 673 571, India
Karunakara N*
Affiliation:
Centre for Advanced Research in Environmental Radioactivity, Mangalore University, Mangalore, Karnataka 574 199, India
*
Corresponding author: Karunakara N; Email: drkarunakara@gmail.com

Abstract

The application of a tube combustion system (pyrolyzer) for the batch combustion of low carbon content environmental matrices, such as soil and sediment, for determining 14C specific activity is examined. The samples were combusted at 600°C, and the CO2 species produced were trapped in 3N NaOH, precipitated as BaCO3 by adding BaCl2, and subjected to acid-hydrolysis to transfer the CO2 species to the absorber-scintillator mixture for liquid scintillation counting (LSC). The method was validated by analyzing the samples by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) method. The minimum detectable activity (MDA) for the method, at 2σ confidence level, was 10 Bq kg–1C (4 pMC) for a counting time of 500 min and 7 Bq kg–1C (3 pMC) for 1000 min. The capability of the method to quantify a small excess of 14C specific activity (a few Bq kg–1C or pMC) in the environment of a nuclear facility, when compared to the ambient natural background level, was demonstrated by analyzing a total of 23 soil and 7 sediment samples from the vicinity of a pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) nuclear power plant (NPP) at Kaiga, India. The maximum excess 14C specific activity values recorded for soil and sediment matrices were 37 ± 7 Bq kg–1C and 11 ± 7 Bq kg–1C, respectively, confirming minimal radioecological impact of the operation of the NPP on the environment. The 14C specific activity ratio for the recently fallen leaf litter and the soil underneath at most of the sampling points in the vicinity of the NPP had a mean value of 1.03 with an associated standard deviation of 0.07. Statistical tests confirm that the mean values of the data set of 14C specific activity of leaf litter and underlying soil are not significantly different.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM D6866-22) (2022) Standard Test Methods for Determining the Biobased Content of Solid, Liquid, and Gaseous Samples Using Radiocarbon Analysis.Google Scholar
Aravind, A, Srinivas, CV, Shrivastava, R, Hegde, MN, Seshadri, H and Mohapatra, DK (2022) Simulation of atmospheric flow field over the complex terrain of Kaiga using WRF, sensitivity to model resolution and PBL physics. Meteorog. Atmos. Phys. 134, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atarashi-Andoh, M, Amano, H, Guo, J and Arakhatoon, J (2003) Measurement of C-14 distribution in forest around nuclear facilities (No. JAERI-CONF--2003-010).Google Scholar
Baburajan, A, Dalvi, SS, Sudheendran, V, Varakhedkar, VK, Saradhi, IV, Ravi, PM and Karunakara, N (2020) Validation of a method for measurement of 14C in air and its application for estimation of 14C levels around Tarapur nuclear site. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 324, 551559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajaj, SS and Gore, AR (2006) The Indian PHWR. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236(7–8), 701722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barisevičiūtė, R, Maceika, E, Ežerinskis, Ž, Šapolaitė, J, Butkus, L, Mažeika, J, Rakauskas, V, Juodis, L, Steponėnas, A, Druteikienė, R and Remeikis, V (2020) Distribution of radiocarbon in sediments of the cooling pond of RBMK type Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant in Lithuania. PloS One 15(8).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baydoun, R, El Samad, O, Nsouli, B and Younes, G (2015) Measurement of 14C content in leaves near a cement factory in Mount Lebanon. Radiocarbon 57(1), 153159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bharath, S, Krishnan, KA, D’Souza, RS, Nayak, SR, Dileep, BN, Ravi, PM, Managavi, SS, Salunke, GS, Veerendra, D and Karunakara, N (2022) Carbon-14 emission from the pressurised heavy water reactor nuclear power plant at Kaiga, India. J. Environ. Radioact. 255, 107006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bharath, S, Krishnan, KA, D’Souza, RS, Nayak, SR, Ravi, PM, Sharma, R, Kumar, P, Chopra, S and Karunakara, N (2021) Optimisation of CO2 absorption and liquid scintillation counting method for carbon-14 specific activity measurement in atmospheric air. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 172, 109685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blowers, P, Caborn, J, Dell, T, Gingell, T, Harms, A, Long, S, Sleep, D, Stewart, C, Walker, J and Warwick, PE (2011) Determination of carbon-14 in environmental level, solid reference materials. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 69, 13231329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolin, B and Bischof, W (1970) Variations of the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere in the northern hemisphere. Tellus. 22(4), 431442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzinny, M (2006) Radioactive graphite dispersion in the environment in the vicinity of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. Radiocarbon 48(3), 451458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chuang, TH, Tsai, TL, Guo, GL and Chang, RS (2015) A simple sample preparation system for determination of 14C in environmental samples and radwastes using liquid scintillation counting. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 303, 12391243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culp, R, Cherkinsky, A and Prasad, GR (2014) Comparison of radiocarbon techniques for the assessment of biobase content in fuels. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 93, 106109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D’Souza, RS, Nayak, SR, Mohan, MP, Bharath, S, Krishnan, KA, Kamath, S, Diéguez, A, Agulló, L, Gómez-Martínez, I, Santos-Arévalo, FJ, García-Tenorio, R and Karunakara, N (2021) Optimisation of a batch thermal combustion method using a tube furnace oxidation system (pyrolyser) and LSC for carbon-14 determination in environmental matrices. J. Environ. Radioact. 226, 106345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dias, CM, Telles, EC, Santos, RV, Stenström, K, Nícoli, IG, Correa, RS and Skog, G (2009) 14C, δ13C and total C content in soil around a Brazilian PWR power plant. J. Environ. Radioact. 100, 348353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Efremenkov, VM (1989) Radioactive waste management at nuclear power plants. IAEA Bulletin 31(4), 3742.Google Scholar
Eyrolle, F, Lepage, H, Copard, Y, Ducros, L, Claval, D, Saey, L, Cossonnet, C, Giner, F and Mourier, D (2018) A brief history of origins and contents of Organically Bound Tritium (OBT) and 14C in the sediments of the Rhône watershed. Sci. Total Environ. 643, 4051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gifford, FA (1968) An outline of theories of diffusion in the lower layers of the atmosphere. Meteorol. Appl. At. Energy. 1968, 66116.Google Scholar
Godwin, H (1962) Half-life of radiocarbon. Nature 195, 984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajdas, I (2008) Radiocarbon dating and its applications in quaternary studies. Quat. Sci. J. 57, 224.Google Scholar
Hammer, S, Friedrich, R, Kromer, B, Cherkinsky, A, Lehman, SJ, Meijer, HA, Nakamura, T, Palonen, V, Reimer, RW and Smith, AM (2017) Compatibility of atmospheric 14CO2 measurements: comparing the Heidelberg Low-Level Counting Facility to international accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) laboratories. Radiocarbon 59(3), 875883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvatinčić, N, Barešić, J, Krajcar Bronić, I and Obelić, B (2004) Measurement of low 14C activities in a liquid scintillation counter in the Zagreb radiocarbon laboratory. Radiocarbon 46(1), 105116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q, Turnbull, JC, Santos, GM, Rakowski, AZ, Ancapichún, S, De Pol-Holz, R, Hammer, S, Lehman, SJ, Levin, I, Miller, JB and Palmer, JG (2022) Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950–2019. Radiocarbon 64(4), 723745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2004) Management of Waste Containing Tritium and Carbon-14. Report IAEA 421, Vienna.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2009) Mediterranean Region Proficiency Test on the Determination of Radionuclides in Air Filters. Report IAEA AQ 2, Vienna.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (1989) Measurement of Radionuclides in Food and Environment. Technical Report Series 295. IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2017) Determination and interpretation of characteristic limits for radioactivity measurements decision threshold, detection limit and limits of the confidence interval. In IAEA/AQ/48 IAEA Analytical Quality in Nuclear Applications Series No., vol. 48. IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
Joshi, ML, Ramamirtham, B and Soman, SD (1987) Measurement of 14C emission rates from a pressurised heavy water reactor. Health Phys. 52, 787791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karunakara, N, D’Souza, RS, Nayak, SR, Bharath, S, Krishnan, KA, Dileep, BN and Ravi, PM (2023) Quantification of excess Carbon-14 specific activity in terrestrial biota in the off-site locations of the PHWR nuclear power plant at Kaiga, India. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karunakara, N, Ujwal, P, Yashodhara, I, Chetan, R, Kumara, KS and Ravi, PM (2013) Studies on the soil-to-grass transfer factor (Fv) and grass-to-milk transfer coefficient (Fm) for cesium in Kaiga region. J. Environ. Radioact. 124, 101112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koarashi, J, Fujita, H, Watanabe, H and Sumiya, S (2011) Diverse monitoring approaches reveal 14C dispersion pattern and its impact on the environment around the Tokai reprocessing plant. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48(1), 120129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajcar Bronić, I, Barešić, J, Sironić, A and Borković, D (2020) Properties, behaviour and potential health effects of 14C. Radionuclides. Nova Science Publishers, Inc ISBN: 978-153617-379-6.Google Scholar
Krajcar Bronić, I, Horvatinčić, N, Barešić, J and Obelić, B (2009) Measurement of 14C activity by liquid scintillation counting. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 67(5), 800804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krajcar Bronić, I, Todorović, N, Nikolov, J and Barešić, J (2012) Intercomparison of low-level tritium and radiocarbon measurements in environmental samples. In The first international conference on radiation and dosimetry in various fields of research. Niš, Serbia: RAD; 2012.Google Scholar
Krishnan, KA, Bharath, S, Sharma, R, Kumar, P, Chopra, S, Reshmi, TR, Sudheesh, M and Karunakara, N (2023) Development of a secondary reference material for application in carbon-14 specific activity determination by thermal oxidation and liquid scintillation counting method. Radiat Prot. Environ. 46(3), 9397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I and Hessheimer, V (2000) Radiocarbon–a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42, 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I and Kromer, B (2004) The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the northern hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46, 12611272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Schoch-Fischer, H, Bruns, M, Münnich, M, Berdau, D, Vogel, JC and Münnich, KO (1985) 25 years of tropospheric 14C observations in Central Europe. Radiocarbon 27(1), 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libby, WF (1946) Atmospheric helium three and radiocarbon from cosmic radiation. Phys. Rev. 69, 671672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Å, Stenström, K, Adliene, D, Adlys, G, Dias, C, Rääf, C, Skog, G, Zakaria, M and Mattsson, S (2007) Carbon-14 levels in the vicinity of the Lithuanian nuclear power plant Ignalina. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B. 259(1), 530535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Å, Stenström, K, Skog, G, Adliene, D, Adlys, G, Hellborg, R, Olariu, A, Zakaria, M, Rääf, C and Mattsson, S (2004) Levels of 14C in the terrestrial environment in the vicinity of two European nuclear power plants. Radiocarbon 46(2), 863868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazeika, J, Petrosius, R and Pukiene, R (2007) Carbon-14 in tree rings in the vicinity of Ignalina nuclear power plant, Lithuania. Geochronometria. 28, 3137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazeika, J, Petrosius, R and Pukiene, R (2008) Carbon-14 in tree rings and other terrestrial samples in the vicinity of Ignalina nuclear power plant, Lithuania. J. Environ. Radioact. 99, 238247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milton, GM, Kramer, SJ, Brown, RM, Repta, CJW, King, KJ and Rao, RR (1995) Radiocarbon dispersion around Canadian nuclear facilities. Radiocarbon 37(2), 485496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mook, WG and van der Plicht, J (1999) Reporting 14C activities and concentrations. Radiocarbon 41, 227239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, RS, D’Souza, RS, Kamath, SS, Mohan, MP, Bharath, S, Ravi, PM and Karunakara, N (2020) Experimental database on water equivalent factor (WEQp) and organically bound tritium activity for tropical monsoonal climate region of south west coast of India. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 166, 109390.Google Scholar
Nayak, RS, D’Souza, RS, Kamath, SS, Mohan, MP, Bharath, Dileep, BN, Ravi, PM and Karunakara, N (2021) NE-OBT and TFWT activity concentrations in wild plants in the vicinity of the PHWR nuclear power plant and control regions of the tropical monsoonal climatic region of the Indian subcontinent. J. Environ. Radioact. 240, 106740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Němec, M, Wacker, L, Hajdas, I and Gäggeler, H (2010) Alternative methods for cellulose preparation for AMS measurement. Radiocarbon 52, 13581370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noakes, J, Norton, G, Culp, R, Nigam, M and Dvoracek, D (2006) A comparison of analytical methods for the certification of biobased products. In Chałupnik, S, Schönhofer, F and Noakes, JE, editors. LSC 2005: Advances in Liquid Scintillation Spectrometry. Tucson: Radiocarbon, 259271.Google Scholar
Nydal, R and Lövseth, K (1996) Carbon-14 measurements in atmospheric CO2 from northern and southern hemisphere sites, 1962–1993 (No. ORNL/CDIAC-93; NDP-057). Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); Oak Ridge Inst. for Science and Education, TN (United States).Google Scholar
Otlet, RL, Fulker, MJ and Walker, AJ (1992) Environmental impact of atmospheric Carbon-14 emissions resulting from the nuclear energy cycle. Radiocarbon after four decades: An interdisciplinary perspective, New York, NY: Springer New York. 519534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popoaca, S, Bucur, C and Simionov, V (2014) Determination of 3H and 14C in organic sample after separation through combustion method. J. Energy Eng. 8, 16871694.Google Scholar
Povinec, P, Šáro, Š, Chudý, M and Šeliga, M (1968) The rapid method of carbon-14 counting in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 19(12), 877881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Povinec, PP, Šivo, A, Ješkovský, M, Svetlik, I, Richtáriková, M and Kaizer, J (2015) Radiocarbon in the atmosphere of the Žlkovce monitoring station of the bohunice NPP: 25 years of continuous monthly measurement. Radiocarbon 57(3), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roussel-Debet, S, Gontier, G, Siclet, F and Fournier, M (2006) Distribution of carbon 14 in the terrestrial environment close to French nuclear power plant. J. Environ. Radioact. 87, 246259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, RK, Fitzjarrald, DR, Walcek, C, Czikowsky, MJ and Freedman, JM (2006) Wind Channeling in the Hudson Valley, NY. In Proceedings of the American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA 21–25 May 2006.Google Scholar
Sharma, R, Umapathy, GR, Kumar, P, Ojha, S, Gargari, S, Joshi, R, Chopra, S and Kanjilal, D (2019) AMS and upcoming geochronology facility at Inter-University Accelerator Centre (IUAC), New Delhi, India. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B. 438, 124130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, SC, Amiro, BD, Sheppard, MI, Stephenson, M, Zach, R and Bird, GA (1994) Carbon-14 in the biosphere: modelling and supporting research for the Canadian nuclear fuel waste management program. Waste Manage. 14(5), 445456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, DL, Sanchez, AL and Woods, C (2002) A comparison of two techniques to determine carbon-14 in environmental samples. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 251(3), 353357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, K (1995) New Applications of 14C Measurements at the Lund AMS Facility. Doctoral Dissertation, Lund University, ISBN 91-628-1816-3, 167 p.Google Scholar
Stenström, K, Erlandsson, B, Mattsson, S, Thornberg, C, Hellborg, R, Kiisk, M, Persson, P and Skog, G (2000) 14C emission from Swedish nuclear power plants and its effect on the 14C levels in the environment (Report 06/00 LUNDFD6/(NFFR3079)/1–44/(2000) Lund2000).Google Scholar
Stenström, K, Skog, G, Adliene, D, Adlys, G, Hellborg, R, Olariu, A, Zakaria, M, Rääf, C and Mattsson, S (2004) Levels of 14C in the terrestrial environment in the vicinity of two European nuclear power plants. Radiocarbon 46(2), 863868.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Quay, PD (1981) Atmospheric 14C changes resulting from fossil fuel CO2 release and cosmic ray flux variability. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 53(3), 349362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (1993) Sources and Effects of Ionising Radiation, Report to the General Assembly With Scientific Annexes. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2000) Sources (Volume 1), Effects (Volume II). United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (2017) Sources, effects and risks of ionising radiation: Report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes. United Nations.Google Scholar
Vagner, I, Varlam, C, Faurescu, D, Bogdan, D and Faurescu, I (2019) Reproducibility of CO2 absorption method for measurement of radiocarbon using a PARR bomb and LSC. Radiocarbon 61, 18351842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Plicht, J and Hogg, A (2006) A note on reporting radiocarbon Quat. Geochronol. 1, 237240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G, Feng, X, Han, J, Zhou, L, Tan, W and Su, F (2008) Paleovegetation reconstruction using δ13C of soil organic matter. Biogeosciences. 5(5), 13251337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z, Xiang, Y and Guo, Q (2012) 14C levels in tree rings located near Quinshan nuclear power plant, China. Radiocarbon 54(2), 195202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, JL, Snow, MS, Olson, JE, Ball, D and Adamic, ML (2018) Carbon-14 content in tree and soil samples at the Idaho National Laboratory nuclear site. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 437, 103109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, PE, Kim, D, Croudace, IW and Oh, J (2010) Effective desorption of tritium from diverse solid matrices and its application to routine analysis of decommissioning materials. Anal. Chim. Acta. 676, 93102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, HJ, Cho, SY, Chun, SK, Kim, NB, Kang, DW and Kim, EH (1999) Optimisation of liquid scintillation counting techniques for the determination of carbon-14 in environmental samples. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 239(3), 649655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar