Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-4n89n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T14:54:32.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yale Natural Radiocarbon Measurements V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Minze Stuiver ,
Edward S. Deevey  and
L. J. Gralenski
Minze Stuiver
Affiliation:
Geochronometric Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Edward S. Deevey
Affiliation:
Geochronometric Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
L. J. Gralenski
Affiliation:
Geochronometric Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following list of dates, measured since the publication of Yale IV, includes a few repetitions of published dates, noted as such by the addition of bis to their number. One of these (Y-140 bis) was a new preparation of CO2 from a sample previously measured as acetylene; the others are rechecks of repurified CO2, repeated because instrumental difficulties plagued our laboratory throughout the year beginning in September 1958 and might have affected some dates published in Yale IV. No important differences were found, however. Several measurements of geochemical interest, on lake water and other lacustrine materials for which C13 analyses have been reported (Oana and Deevey, 1960), are not included here but will form the subject of a separate paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 2 , 1960 , pp. 49 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Chicago I. Arnold, and Libby, , 1951 Google Scholar
Chicago III. Libby, , 1952 Google Scholar
La Jolla I. Hubbs, , Suess, , and Bien, , 1960 Google Scholar
Lamont IV. Broecker, and Kulp, , 1957 Google Scholar
Lamont V. Olson, and Broecker, , 1959 Google Scholar
Michigan III. Crane, and Griffin, , 1958 Google Scholar
Stockholm I. Östlund, , 1957 Google Scholar
Uppsala II. Olsson, , 1960 Google Scholar
USGS V. Rubin, and Alexander, , 1960 Google Scholar
Yale II. Preston, , Person, , and Deevey, , 1955 Google Scholar
Yale IV. Deevey, , Gralenski, , and Hoffren, , 1959 Google Scholar
Arnold, J. R., and Libby, W. F., 1951, Radiocarbon dates: Science, v. 113, p. 111–120.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. W., 1956, The limestones of the Lake George depression: Geol. Survey Uganda Rec., 1954, p. 55–59.Google Scholar
Bishop, W. W., 1960, A review of the Pleistocene stratigraphy of the Uganda Protectorate: C.C.T.A., Proc. Meeting C.C.T.A. Regional Committees, Geology, Leopoldville, 1958, p. 91–105. London, C.C.T.A. Google Scholar
Brachi, R. M., 1960, Uganda Jour., March 1960.Google Scholar
Broecker, W. S., and Kulp, J. L., 1957, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Science, v. 126, p. 1324–1334.Google Scholar
Caldwell, D. W., 1959, Glacial lake and glacial marine clays of the Farmington area, Maine: Maine Geol. Survey, Spec. Geol. Stud. Ser. 3, 48 p., 3 folded pls. Google Scholar
Campbell, J. M., 1959, The Kayuk complex of Arctic Alaska: Am. Antiquity, v. 25, p. 94–105.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B., 1958, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 128, p. 1117–1123.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S., 1958, Radiocarbon-dated pollen sequences in eastern North America: Geobot. Inst. Rübel, Zürich, Veröffentl., no. 34, p. 30–37.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S., Gralenski, L. J., and Hoffren, Väinö, 1959, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements IV: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 1, p. 144–172.Google Scholar
Flint, R. F., 1956, New radiocarbon dates and late-Pleistocene stratigraphy: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 254, p. 265–287.Google Scholar
González, A. R., 1955, Contextos culturales y cronología relativa en el área central del N. O. Argentino (Nota preliminar): Anal. Arqueol. y Etnol., v. 11, p. 1–32, 10 pls. Google Scholar
González, A. R. 1956, La cultura Condorhuasi del Noroeste Argentino (apuntes preliminares para su estudio): Runa, v. 7, pt. I, p. 37–86.Google Scholar
González, A. R. 1957, Dos fechas de la cronología arqueológica Argentina obtenidas por el método de radiocarbón: Univ. Nac. del Litoral [Rosario, Argentina], Inst. de Antropologia, 19 p.Google Scholar
Goodall, E., in press, Report on an ancient burial ground, Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia: Pan-African Cong, on Pre-History, 4th, Leopoldville, Proc. Google Scholar
Heintz, Anatol, 1958, Om pollenanalyse av mageinnholdet fra Beresovka-mammuten; On the pollen analysis of the stomach contents of the Beresovka mammoth: Blyttia, v. 16, p. 122–142.Google Scholar
Heinzelin, J. de, 1957, Les Fouilles d'Ishango: Exploration du Parc Nat. Albert, Mission J. de Heinzelin, 1950, fasc. 2. Brussels, Inst. des Parcs Nat. du Congo Belge.Google Scholar
Heusser, C. J., 1959, Research on late-Pleistocene environments of southern Chile: Am. Geog. Sac., Semi-Annual Status Rept., Contract Nonr-641(04) [processed].Google Scholar
Howard, Hildegarde, 1960, Significance of Carbon-14 dates for Rancho La Brea: Science, v. 131, p. 712–714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbs, C. L., Suess, H. E., and Bien, H. E., 1960, Scripps Institution of Oceanography radiocarbon measurements I: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 2, p. 197–223.Google Scholar
Kanto Loam Research Group, 1956, Problems on the Kanto loam: Geol. Soc. Japan Jour., v. 62, p. 302–316 [Japanese, with English summary].Google Scholar
Kanto Loam Research Group 1957, On the relation between Ekoda conifer-bed and Kanto loam: Geol. Soc. Japan Jour., v. 63, p. 725–727 [Japanese].Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Kunio, 1958, Quaternary glaciation of the Japan Alps: Shinshu Univ., Fac. Liberal Arts & Sci., Jour., no. 8, pt. II, p. 13–67, 12 pls. Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. B., and Lawrence, E. G., 1959, Recent glacier variations in southern South America: Am. Geog. Soc. Southern Chile Exped., Tech. Rept. [to Office of Naval Research], Contract Nonr-641 (04) [processed].Google Scholar
Leakey, M. D., 1945, Report on the excavation at Hyrax Hill, Nakuru, Kenya Colony, 1937–8: Royal Soc. South Africa Trans., v. 30, pt. IV, p. 271–409.Google Scholar
Leopold, E. B., 1956, Two late-glacial deposits in southern Connecticut: Nat. Acad. Sci. Proc., v. 52, p. 863–867.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1952, Chicago radiocarbon dates, III: Science, v. 116, p. 673–681.Google Scholar
Mathews, W. H., 1951, Historic and prehistoric fluctuations of alpine glaciers in the Mount Garibaldi map-area, southwestern British Columbia: Jour. Geology, v. 59, p. 357–380, 7 figs.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S., 1958, Geoecological observations in New Quebec, in Drummond, R. N., ed., Scientific studies in the Labrador peninsula: McGill Sub-Arctic Research Papers, no. 4, p. 93–97.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, H., and Mori, H., 1956, On the mammals of the very Late-Pliocene fossiliferous zone at Kanamori, Hanaizumi, Nishi-iwai District, Province of Rikichu: Zool. Mag. [Japan], v. 65, p. 239–249 [English summary].Google Scholar
Miki, Shigeru, 1938, On the change of flora of Japan since the Upper Pliocene and the floral composition at the present: Jap. Jour. Botany, v. 9, p. 213–251, pl. 3, 4.Google Scholar
Muller, E. H., 1959, Glacial geology of the Laguna San Rafael area: Am. Geog. Soc. Southern Chile Exped., Tech. Rept. [to Office of Naval Research], Contract Nonr-641 (04) [processed].Google Scholar
Oana, Shinya, and Deevey, E. S., 1960, Carbon 13 in lake waters, and its possible bearing on paleolimnology: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 258A, (Bradley volume), p. 253–272.Google Scholar
Ogden, J. G. III, 1959, A late-glacial pollen sequence from Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 257, p. 366–381.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A., and Broecker, W. S., 1959, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements V: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 1, p. 1–28.Google Scholar
Olsson, Ingrid, 1960, Uppsala natural radiocarbon measurements II: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 2, p. 112428.Google Scholar
Östlund, H. G., 1957, Stockholm natural radiocarbon measurements I: Science, v. 126, p. 493–497.Google Scholar
Overbeck, F., Münnich, K. O., Aletsee, L., and Averdieck, F. R., 1957, Das Alter des “Grenzhorizonts” norddeutsche Hochmoore nach Radiocarbon-Datierungen: Flora, v. 145, p. 37–71.Google Scholar
Pavlovskij, E. N., 1956, Quelques considérations sur les conditions écologiques de l'existence du mammouth: Internat. Cong. Zool., 14th, Copenhagen 1953, Proc., p. 61–63.Google Scholar
Posnansky, Merrick, in press, The neolithic cultures of East Africa: Pan-African Cong. on Prehistory, 4th, Leopoldville, Proc. Google Scholar
Preston, R. R., Person, Elaine, and Deevey, E. S., 1955, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements II: Science, v. 122, p. 954–960.Google Scholar
Rubin, Meyer, and Alexander, Corrinne, 1960, U. S. Geological Survey radiocarbon dates V: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 2, p. 129–185.Google Scholar
Terasmae, Jaan, 1959, Notes on the Champlain Sea episode in the St. Lawrence lowlands, Quebec: Science, v. 130, p. 334–336.Google Scholar
Tobias, P. V., Some developments in South African physical anthropology 1938–1958, in Galloway, Alexander, The skeletal remains of Bambandyanalo: Johannesburg, Witwatersrand Univ. Press, p. 127454.Google Scholar
Tolmachoff, I. P., 1929, The carcasses of the mammoth and rhinoceros found in the frozen ground of Siberia: Am. Philos. Soc. Trans., n. s., v. 23, pt. 1, x, 74 p.Google Scholar
Trevor Jones, R., in press, Skeletal remains from Salisbury, Southern Rhodesia: Pan-African Cong. on Pre-History, 4th, Leopoldville Proc. Google Scholar