Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T09:19:38.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

3D Manipulation of an Active Steerable Needle via Actuation of Multiple SMA Wires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2019

Bardia Konh Open the ORCID record for Bardia Konh [Opens in a new window] ,
Dayne Sasaki ,
Tarun K. Podder  and
Hashem Ashrafiuon
Bardia Konh*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
Dayne Sasaki
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
Tarun K. Podder
Affiliation:
Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Hashem Ashrafiuon
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: konh@hawaii.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Many medical procedures such as brachytherapy, thermal ablations, and biopsies are performed using needle-based procedures. In this work, 3D manipulation of an active needle realized by multiple Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) actuators was first predicted by Finite Element Analyses (FEA), and then demonstrated by a fabricate prototype. The FEA results were validated by planar deflection of an active needle. A similar FEA was developed to predict 3D manipulation of the active needle. For 17-gage needle, a maximum of 26° reversible deflection was achieved in 3D space via actuation forces of a 0.127 mm SMA wire. A scaled prototype was also developed and tested to show the feasibility of developing a 3D steering active needle with multiple actuators.

Keywords

SMA-actuated surgical needle3D steerable active needleBrachytherapy

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Robotica , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , March 2020 , pp. 410 - 426
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Phelan, S., O’Doherty, A., Hill, A. and Quinn, C. M., “Epithelial displacement during breast needle core biopsy causes diagnostic difficulties in subsequent surgical excision specimens,” J. Clin. Pathol. 60(4), 373–376 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nag, S., Beyer, D., Friedland, J., Grimm, P. and Nath, R., “American brachytherapy society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer,” Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 44(4), 789–799 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyano, T., Tobinaga, Y., Kanno, T., Matsuzaki, Y., Takeda, H., Wakui, M. and Hanada, K., “Sugar micro needles as transdermic drug delivery system,” Biomed. Microdevices 7(3), 185–188 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youk, J. H., Kim, E. K., Kim, M. J., Kwak, J. Y. and Son, E. J., “Analysis of false-negative results after US-guided 14-gauge core needle breast biopsy,” Eur. Radiol. 20(4), 782–789 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volpe, A., Kachura, J. R., Geddie, W. R., Evans, A. J., Gharajeh, A., Saravanan, A. and Jewett, M. A., “Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy,” J. Urol. 178(2), 379–386 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrick, G. S., Butler, W. M., Dorsey, A. T. and Walbert, H. L., “Influence of timing on the dosimetric analysis of transperineal ultrasound-guided, prostatic conformal brachytherapy,” Radiat. Oncol. Investig. 6(4), 182–190 (1998).3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, S., Reed, K. B., Schafer, B. W., Ramesh, K. T. and Okamura, A. M., “Mechanics of flexible needles robotically steered through soft tissue,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 29(13), 1640–1660 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Berg, N. J., van Gerwen, D. J., Dankelman, J. and van den Dobbelsteen, J. J., “Design choices in needle steering – a review,” Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Trans. 20(5), 2172–2183 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datla, N. V., Kohn, B., Honarvar, M., Podder, T. K., Dicker, A. P., Yu, Y. and Hutapea, P., “A model to predict deflection of bevel-tipped active needle advancing in soft tissue,” Med. Eng. Phys. 36(3), 258–293 (2013).Google Scholar
Datla, N. V., Konh, B., Koo, J. J., Choi, D. J., Yu, Y., Dicker, A. P., Podder, T. K., Darvish, K. and Hutapea, P., “Polyacrylamide phantom for self-actuating needle-tissue interaction studies,” Med. Eng. Phys. 36(1), 140–145 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roesthuis, R. J., Abayazid, M. and Misra, S., “Mechanics-Based Model for Predicting In-Plane Needle Deflection with Multiple Bends,” 2012 4th IEEE RAS EMBS International Conference on Biomed. Robot. Biomechatronics (2012) pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
Konh, B., Honarvar, M., Darvish, K. and Hutapea, P., “Simulation and experimental studies in needle–tissue interactions,” J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 31(4), 861–872 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swensen, J. P., Lin, M., Okamura, A. M. and Cowan, N. J., “Torsional dynamics of steerable needles: Modeling and fluoroscopic guidance,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61(11), 2707–2717 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, K. B., Okamura, A. M. and Cowan, N. J., “Modeling and control of needles with torsional friction,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 56(12), 2905–2916 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podder, T. K., Dicker, A. P., Hutapea, P. and Yu, Y., “A novel curvilinear approach for prostate seed implantation,” J. Med. Phys. 39, 1887–1892 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayvali, E., Liang, C. P., Ho, M., Chen, Y. and Desai, J. P., “Towards a discretely actuated steerable cannula for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures,” Int. J. Rob. Res. 31(5), 588–603 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, R. J., Ryu, S., Moslehi, B. and Costa, J. M., “Characterization of optically actuated MRI-compatible active needles for medical interventions,” SPIE Smart Struct. Mater. + Nondestruct. Eval. Heal. Monit. 9058, 90580J (2014).Google Scholar
Konh, B. and Podder, T. K., “Design and Fabrication of a Robust Active Needle using SMA Wires,” Design of Medical Devices Conference (2017) pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Konh, B. and Motalleb, M., “Evaluating the performance of an advanced smart needle prototype inside tissue,” In: SPIE 10164, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, 101640G (2017).Google Scholar
Konh, B., Honarvar, M. and Hutapea, P., “Design optimization study of a shape memory alloy active needle for biomedical applications,” J. Med. Eng. Phys. 37(5), 469–477 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, N. B., “Medical shape memory alloy applications—the market and its products,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A378(1–2), 16–23 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagoudas, D. C., Shape Memory Alloys: Modeling and Engineering Applications, vol. 1 (Springer, New York, 2008).Google Scholar
Honarvar, M., Datla, N. V., Bardia, K., Podder, T. K., Dicker, A. P., Yu, Y. and Hutapea, P., “Study of unrecovered strain and critical stresses in one-way shape memory Nitinol,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 23(8), 2885–2893 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elahinia, M. H. and Ashrafioun, H., “Control of Shape Memory Alloy Actuators” In:Shape Memory Alloy Actuators: Design, Fabrication and Experimental Evaluation (John Wiley and Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK, 2016).Google Scholar
Datla, N. V and Hutapea, P., “Flexure-based active needle for enhanced steering within soft tissue,” J. Med. Device. 9, 1–27 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinson, L. C., “One-dimensional constitutive behavior of shape memory alloys: thermomechanical derivation with non-constant material functions and redefined martensite internal variable,” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 229–242 (1993).Google Scholar
Konh, B. and Podder, T. K., “Finite Element Analyses of a Dual Actuated Prototype of a Smart Needle,” In: SPIE 10164, Active and Passive Smart Structures and Integrated Systems (2017) p. 101640X–1–7.Google Scholar
Konh, B., “Steerable surgical devices with shape memory alloy wires,” WO2018183832A1 (2018).Google Scholar
Lagoudas, D. C., Shape Memory Alloys: Modeling and Engineering Applications (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY, 2008).Google Scholar
Konh, B., Datla, N. V. and Hutapea, P., “Feasibility of SMA wire actuation for an active steerable cannula,” J. Med. Device, 9(2) 021002. (2014). doi: 10.1115/1.4029557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podder, T. K., Beaulieu, L., Caldwell, B., Cormack, R. A., Crass, J. B., Dicker, A. P., Fenster, A., Fichtinger, G., Meltsner, M. A., Moerland, M. A., Nath, R., Rivard, M., Salcudian, T., Song, D. Y., Thomadsen, B. R. and Yu, Y., “AAPM and GEC-ESTRO guidelines for image-guided robotic brachytherapy: Report of Task Group 192,” Med. Phys. 41(10), 101501 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konh, B., Datla, N. V and Hutapea, P., “Feasibility of SMA wire actuation for an active steerable cannula,” J. Med. Device. 9, 021002 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarmolenko, P. S., Moon, E. J., Landon, C., Manzoor, A., Hochman, D. W., Viglianti, B. and Dewhirst, M. W., “Thresholds for thermal damage to normal tissues: An update,” Int. J. Hyperth. 27(4), 320–343 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viglianti, B. L., Dewhirst, M. W., Hanson, M., Hoopes, P. J. and Lora-Michiels, M., “Basic principles of thermal dosimetry and thermal thresholds for tissue damage from hyperthermia,” Int. J. Hyperth. 19(3), 267–294 (2003).Google Scholar