Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-trf7k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-16T07:26:56.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficient aerodynamic modeling and load analysis for large flapping-wing flying robot considering structural flexibility and inertial forces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2025

Hui Xu Open the ORCID record for Hui Xu [Opens in a new window] ,
Erzhen Pan  and
Wenfu Xu
Hui Xu
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
Erzhen Pan
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China
Wenfu Xu*
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Morphing Mechanisms and Adaptive Robotics, Shenzhen, China
*
Corresponding author: Wenfu Xu; Email: wfxu@hit.edu.cn.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The enhanced computing power of the onboard flight control system and the low flapping frequency have made real-time position and attitude control possible for large flapping-wing flying robots (LFWFRs). Therefore, it is necessary to design an efficient flapping load calculation method to provide the load situation of the flapping wings. To address this problem, we establish a three-dimensional aeroelastic model by coupling the finite element method and state-space airloads theory. This model considers the interaction between aerodynamic loads, inertial loads, and flapping-wing structural elasticity during the flapping motion, which could quickly calculate the instantaneous aerodynamic loads and inertial loads of flapping wings under different flight conditions. The accuracy of the model was verified through vacuum and wind tunnel experiments. Experiments under various flight conditions demonstrate the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed method, and the method could be used to guide the rapid iterative upgrade and control law design of LFWFRs.

Keywords

flapping-wingbionicaerodynamic loadinertial loadflying robot

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Robotica , First View , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Tedeschi, P., Nuaimi, F. A. A., Awad, A. I. and Natalizio, E., “Privacy-aware remote identification for unmanned aerial vehicles: Current solutions, potential threats, and future directions,” IEEE. Trans. Ind. Inform. 20(2), 1069–1080 (2023).10.1109/TII.2023.3280325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahzad, A., Tian, F. B., Young, J. and Lai, J. C. S., “Effects of hawkmoth-like flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios,” Phys. Fluids 30 (2018).10.1063/1.5044635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phan, H. V., Park, H. C. and Floreano, D., “Passive wing deployment and retraction in beetles and flapping microrobots,” Nature 632, 1067–1072 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07755-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, B., Guo, C. and Liu, H., “Aerodynamic analysis for a bat-like robot with a deformable flexible wing,” Robotica 41, 306–325 (2023).10.1017/S0263574722001308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S., Zuber, M., Hamidon, M. N., Mazlan, N., Basri, A. A. and Ahmad, K. A., “Classification of actuation mechanism designs with structural block diagrams for flapping-wing drones: A comprehensive review,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 132 (2022).10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, E. J. and Perez, R. E., “Neuroevolutionary control for autonomous soaring,” Aerospace 8(9), 267 (2021).10.3390/aerospace8090267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, G., J.W., N., Celani, A., Sejnowski, T. J. and Vergassola, M., “Glider soaring via reinforcement learning in the field,” Nature 562, 236–239 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0533-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abujabal, N., Fareh, R., Sinan, S., Baziyad, M. and Bettayeb, M., “A comprehensive review of the latest path planning developments for multi-robot formation systems,” Robotica 41(7), 2079–2104 (2023).10.1017/S0263574723000322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, D. N. and Phung, M. D., “Radial basis function neural networks for formation control of unmanned aerial vehicles,” Robotica 42(6), 1842–1860 (2024).10.1017/S0263574724000559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, W. D., Phan, H. V., Daley, M. A., Ijspeert, A. J. and Floreano, D., “Fast ground-to-air transition with avian-inspired multifunctional legs,” Nature 1, 86–91 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-08228-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zufferey, R., Barbero, J. T., Talegón, D. F., Nekoo, S. R., Acosta, J. N. and Ollero, A., “How ornithopters can perch autonomously on a branch,” Nat. Commun. 13, 7713 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-35356-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Q., Wang, S., Wang, C. and Zhu, J., “Editorial for the special issue on bio-inspired robotic dexterity intelligence,” Biomim. Intell. Robot. 4(4), 100186 (2024).Google Scholar
Wu, X., Bai, S. and O’Sullivan, L., “Editorial for the special issue on wearable robots and intelligent device,” Biomimetic Biomim. Intell. Robot. 3(2), 100102 (2023).Google Scholar
Taha, H., Hajj, M. and Nayfeh, A., “Flight dynamics and control of flapping-wing MAVs: A review,” Nonlinear. Dynam. 70(2), 907–939 (2012).10.1007/s11071-012-0529-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathcote, S. and Gursul, L., “Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low reynolds numbers,” AIAA. J. 45(5), (2007).10.2514/1.25431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathcote, S., Wang, Z. and Gursul, I., “Effect of spanwise flexibility on flapping wing propulsion,” J. Fluid. Struct. 24, 183–199 (2008).10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2007.08.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tay, W. B., de Baar, J. H. S., Percin, M., Deng, S. and Oudheusden, B. W., “Numerical simulation of a flapping micro aerial vehicle through wing deformation capture,” AIAA. J. 56 (2018).10.2514/1.J056482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X., Song, B., Yang, W., Xue, D., Pei, Y. and Lang, X., “Study of aerodynamic and inertial forces of a dovelike flapping-wing MAV by combining experimental and numerical methods,” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 35, 63–76 (2022).10.1016/j.cja.2021.09.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Usherwood, J. R., “Inertia may limit efficiency of slow flapping flight, but mayflies show a strategy for reducing the power requirements of loiter,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 4, 1748–3182 (2009).10.1088/1748-3182/4/1/015003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, H. V., Truong, Q. T. and Park, H. C., “An experimental comparative study of the efficiency of twisted and flat flapping wings during hovering flight,” Bioinspir. Biomim. 12, 1748–3190 (2017).10.1088/1748-3190/aa65e6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phan, H. V. and Park, H. C., “Wing inertia as a cause of aerodynamically uneconomical flight with high angles of attack in hovering insects,” J. Exp. Biol. 221, 187369 (2018).10.1242/jeb.187369CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, W., Wang, L. and Song, B., “Dove: A biomimetic flapping-wing micro air vehicle,” Int. J. Micro. Air. Veh. 10, 70–84 (2018).10.1177/1756829317734837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibilski, K., Loroch, L., Buler, W. and Zyluk, A.. Modeling and Simulation of the Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of a Flapping Wings Micro-Aerial-Vehicle. In: AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit (ASME) (2004) pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Zhong, S. and Xu, W., “Power modeling and experiment study of large flapping-wing flying robot during forward flight,” Appl. Sci. 12(6), 3176 (2022).10.3390/app12063176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, D. A., Hsieh, M. C. A. and Torrero, A., “A state-space airloads theory for flexible airfoils,” J. Am. Helicopter. Soc. 52(4), 329–342 (2007).10.4050/JAHS.52.329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, B., Beran, P. and Kobayashi, M., “Aeroelastic optimization of flapping wing venation: A cellular division approach,” AIAA. J. 50, 938–951 (2012).10.2514/1.J051443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, D. A., Arunamoorthyt, S. K. and Cao, W. M., “Finite state induced flow models part i: Two-dimensional thin airfoil introduction background,” J. Aircraft 32(2), 313–322 (2012).10.2514/3.46718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., Yu, J., Lin, Z. and Li, M., “Theoretical and experimental study of the spanwise effect of turbulence on the aerodynamic lift on a wing with different aspect ratios,” Phys. Fluids 36(4), 045104 (2024).10.1063/5.0190734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Si, C., Hao, L., Guo, S., Tong, M. and Bing, J., “Unsteady aerodynamic model of flexible flapping wing,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 80, 354–367 (2018).Google Scholar
Xue, D., Song, B., Song, W., Yang, W., Xu, W. and Wu, T., “Computational simulation and free flight validation of body vibration of flapping-wing MAV in forward flight,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 95, 1270–9638 (2019).10.1016/j.ast.2019.105491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Liu, J. and Ding, Y., “A three-dimensional elastic-plastic damage model for predicting the impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced polymer-matrix composites,” Compos. Part. B-Eng. 201 (2020).10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108389CrossRefGoogle Scholar