Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T10:46:00.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mixed-methods research: What’s in it for economists?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

Therese Jefferson ,
Siobhan Austen ,
Rhonda Sharp ,
Rachel Ong ,
Gill Lewin  and
Valerie Adams
Therese Jefferson*
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Australia
Siobhan Austen
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Australia
Rhonda Sharp
Affiliation:
University of South Australia, Australia
Rachel Ong
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Australia
Gill Lewin
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Australia
Valerie Adams
Affiliation:
University of South Australia, Australia
*
Therese Jefferson, Curtin Graduate School of Business, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. Email: Therese.Jefferson@gsb.curtin.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Empirical studies in economics traditionally use a limited range of methods, usually based on particular types of regression analysis. Increasingly, sophisticated regression techniques require the availability of appropriate data sets, often longitudinal and typically collected at a national level. This raises challenges for researchers seeking to investigate issues requiring data that are not typically included in regular large-scale data. It also raises questions of the adequacy of relying mainly or solely on regression analysis for investigating key issues of economic theory and policy. One way of addressing these issues is to employ a mixed-methods research framework to investigate important research questions. In this article, we provide an example of applying a mixed-methods design to investigate the employment decisions of mature age women working in the aged care sector. We outline the use of a coherent and robust framework to allow the integrated collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. Drawing on particular examples from our analysis, we show how a mixed-methods approach facilitates richer insights, more finely grained understandings of causal relationships and identification of emergent issues. We conclude that mixed-methods research has the capacity to provide surprises and generate new insights through detailed exploratory data analysis.

Keywords

J21J24Employment conditionsgenderlow-paid workersmixed methodsresearch methodology
Type
Non-Symposium Articles
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 25 , Issue 2: Symposium - Some Impacts of Neoliberalism , June 2014 , pp. 290 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austen, S, Ong, R (2013) The effects of ill-health and informal care roles on the employment retention of mid-life women: does the workplace matter? Journal of Industrial Relations. Epub ahead of print 21 August. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022185613494648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, D (2003) Emancipatory for whom? A comment on critical realism. Feminist Economics 9(1): 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berik, G (1997) The need for crossing the method boundaries in economics research. Feminist Economics 3(2): 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, N (1993) Approaches to Social Enquiry. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cortis, N (2007) Using community services: a case study in the politics of recognition. In: Connelly, J, Leach, M, Walsh, L (eds) Recognition in Politics: Theory Policy and Practice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 253–269.Google Scholar
Creswell, J (2009a) Editorial: mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 3(2): 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J (2009b) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Creswell, J, Plano Clark, V (2011) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, CA/London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Delbridge, R, Edwards, T (2013) Inhabiting institutions: critical realist refinements to understanding institutional complexity and change. Organization Studies 34(7): 927–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downward, P, Mearman, A (2007) Retroduction as mixed-methods triangulation in economic research: reorienting economics into social science. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31(1): 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J, McMaster, R (2002) On categorical variables and non-parametric statistical inference in the pursuit of causal explanations. Cambridge Journal of Economics 26(6): 753–772.Google Scholar
Fraser, N (2000) Rethinking recognition. New Left Review 3: 107–120.Google Scholar
Harding, S (1987) Introduction: is there a feminist method? In: Harding, S (ed.) Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Harding, S (2003) Representing reality: the critical realism project. Feminist Economics 9(1): 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse-Biber, S (2008) Part 2: innovation in research methods design and analysis. In: Hesse-Biber, S, Patricia Leavy, P (eds) Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 359–362.Google Scholar
Honneth, A (2003) Contributions to Nancy Fraser and Axel Honneth. In: Fraser, N, Honneth, A (eds) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political–Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Irwin, S (2008) Data analysis and interpretation: emerging issues in linking qualitative and quantitative evidence. In: Hesse-Biber, SN, Leavy, P (eds) Handbook of Emergent Methods. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 415–435.Google Scholar
King, D, Mavromaras, K, Wei, Z, et al . (2012) The aged care workforce, 2012. Final Report. National Aged Care Workforce Census and Survey. Adelaide, SA, Australia: National Institute for Labour Studies, for Australian Government Department of Health Care and Ageing.Google Scholar
Lawson, T (1997) Economics and Reality. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, G, Cortis, N (2009) The political economy of for-profit paid care: theory and evidence. In: King, D, Meagher, G (eds) Paid Care in Australia: Politics, Profits, Practices. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of Sydney Press, pp. 13–42.Google Scholar
Nelson, J (2003a) Confronting the science/value split: notes on feminist economics, institutionalism, pragmatism and process thought. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27(1): 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J (2003b) Once more, with feeling: feminist economics and the ontological question. Feminist Economics 9(1): 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Productivity Commission (2011) Caring for older Australians. Available at: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/aged-care/report (accessed 12 August 2011).Google Scholar
Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C (2003) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Treasury Commonwealth of Australia (2010) Australia to 2050: Future Challenges: The 2010 Intergenerational Report Overview. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Australian Government.Google Scholar
Ziliak, S, McCloskey, D (2004) Significance redux. The Journal of Socio-Economics 33(5): 665–675.Google Scholar