Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T12:10:43.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of glyphosate resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) from California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Marulak Simarmata ,
Suleiman Bughrara  and
Donald Penner
Marulak Simarmata
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Suleiman Bughrara
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate resistance was found in a rigid ryegrass population in northern California. A sample of the resistant plants were collected and grown under greenhouse conditions. The objective of this study was to evaluate glyphosate resistance in the progeny of the collected plants by recurrent selection, obtain the homozygous resistant and sensitive lines to establish dose-response curves, and to determine the inheritance of glyphosate resistance in rigid ryegrass. Diverse levels of resistance were observed in the first generation with survival of 89, 59, 45, and 9% from glyphosate at 1x, 2x, 4x, and 8x respectively, where x = 1.12 kg ha−1 isopropylamine salt of glyphosate. Clones of plants that died from 1x were allowed to produce seed and were further subjected to recurrent selection to generate the most sensitive plants (S lines), which died from 0.125x glyphosate. The most resistant plants (R lines) were generated from the survivors receiving 8x glyphosate. The ratio between I50 rates for the glyphosate resistant and the glyphosate sensitive plants was > 100-fold. The R and S lines were crossed reciprocally and F1 progeny of both (R × S) and (S × R) showed intermediate resistance. These survived up to 2x glyphosate. The F2 progeny were generated by intercrossing of F1 plants. The ratio of sensitive, intermediate, and resistant plants in the F2 population before the treatment of glyphosate at 0.125x followed by 8x was 1 : 16, 14 : 16, and 1 : 16 respectively, which corresponded to the Mendelian segregation ratio of two genes. The results indicated that the inheritance of glyphosate resistance in rigid ryegrass from California appeared to be nuclear, incompletely dominant, multigenic, and pollen-transmitted with no indication of maternal inheritance.

Keywords

Glyphosaterigid ryegrass, Lolium rigidum Gaud. LOLRIGlyphosate resistanceinheritance

Information

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 615 - 619
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, J. and Sharp, W. C. 1995. Grass Varieties in the United States, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 296 p.Google Scholar
Chauvel, B. and Gasquez, J. 1994. Relationship between genetic polymorphism and herbicide resistance within Alopercurus myosuroides Huds. Heredity 72:336–344.Google Scholar
Clayton, W. D. and Revoize, S. A. 1986. Genera graminum: grasses of the world. Kew Bull. Addit. Ser. 13.Google Scholar
Corkill, L. 1956. The basis of synthetic strains of cross-pollinated grasses. Pages 427–438 in Proceedings of the 7th International Grassland Congress. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey Agricultural College.Google Scholar
Darmency, H. 1994. Genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. Pages 263–297 in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J. A. M. (eds.). Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewish.Google Scholar
Diggle, A. J. and Neve, P. 2001. The population dynamics and genetics of herbicide resistance—a modeling approach. Pages 61–99 in Powles, S. B. and Shaner, D. L. eds. Herbicide Resistance and World Grains. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Feng, P. C. C., Pratley, J. E., and Bohn, J. A. 1999. Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum, II: uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Sci 47:412–415.Google Scholar
Gasquez, J. 1997. Genetics of herbicide resistance within weeds: factor of evolution, inheritance, and fitness. Pages 181–189 in De Prado, J. J. R. and Garcia-Torres, L. eds. Weeds and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I. 2004. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.com.Google Scholar
Heap, I. and LeBaron, H. 2001. Introduction and overview of resistance. Pages 1–22 in Powles, S. B. and Shaner, D. L. (eds.). Herbicide Resistance and World Grains. New York: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hickman, J. C. ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1400 p.Google Scholar
Lee, L. J. and Ngim, J. 2000. A first report of glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) in Malaysia. Pest. Manage. Sci 56:336–339.3.0.CO;2-8>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Powles, S. B., Hawkes, T. R., and Preston, C. 2001. Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum Gaud. Theor. Appl. Genet 102:545–550.Google Scholar
Ng, C., Ratnam, W., Surif, S., and Ismail, B. S. 2004. Inheritance of glyphosate resistance in goosegrass (Eleusine indica). Weed Sci 52:564–570.Google Scholar
Perez, A. and Kogan, M. 2003. Glyphosate-resistant Lolium multiflorum in Chilean orchards. Weed Res 43:12–19.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Dellow, J. J., and Preston, C. 1998. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia. Weed Sci 46:604–607.Google Scholar
Pratley, J., Urwin, N., Stanton, R., Baines, P., Eberbach, P., Broster, J., Cullis, K., Schafer, D., Bohn, J., and Krueger, R. 1999. Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum., I: bioevaluation. Weed Sci 47:405–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, J. O. and Keeler-Wolf, T. 1997. A Manual of California Vegetation. Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society. 471 p.Google Scholar
Simarmata, M., Kaufmann, J. E., and Penner, D. 2001. Progress in determining the origin of the glyphosate-resistant ryegrass in California. Pages 95–96 in Wilcut, J. ed. Proceedings of the 2001 Meeting of the Weed Science Society of America. Greensboro, NC: WSSA Abstr. 41.Google Scholar
Skinner, M. W. and Pavlik, B. M. eds. 1994. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Sacramento, CA: California Native Plant Society Special Publication No. 1. 5th ed. 338 p.Google Scholar
Terrel, E. E. 1968. A taxonomic revision of genus Lolium . USDA ARS Tech. Bull 1392:1–65.Google Scholar
Thorogood, D. 2003. Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L). Pages 75–105 in Casler, M. D. and Duncan, R.R. eds. Turfgrass Biology, Genetics, and Breeding. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tran, M., Baerson, S., Brinker, R., Casagrande, L., Faletti, M., Feng, Y., Nemeth, M., Reynolds, T., Rodriquez, D., Schafer, D., Stalker, D., Taylor, N., Teng, Y., and Dill, G. 1999. Characterization of glyphosate resistant Eleusine indica biotypes from Malaysia. Pages 527–536 in Proceedings 1(B) of the 17th Asian-Pacific Weeds Science Society Conference. Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2000. Federal Noxious Weed List. Animal: and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). www.usda.gov.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703–705.Google Scholar
Zelaya, I. A., Owen, M. D. K., and VanGessel, M. J. 2004. Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in horseweed. Page 81 in Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the North Central Weed Science Society. Champaign, IL: NCWSS.Google Scholar