Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-j7khd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T15:15:04.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorsulfuron and Metsulfuron Residues on Double-Cropped Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ronald L. Ritter ,
Thomas C. Harris  and
Lisa M. Kaufman
Ronald L. Ritter
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Thomas C. Harris
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Lisa M. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., Univ. Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field experiments in 1981, 36 g ai/ha of chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} applied to winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Arthur’) in early spring reduced seed yield in conventional and no-till plantings of double-cropped soybeans [Glycine max (L.) ‘Essex’]. From 1982 to 1984, three rates of chlorsulfuron (9, 18, and 36 g/ha) were applied at three different times (preemergence, early winter, and early spring) to study their residual effects on double-cropped soybeans. Chlorsulfuron at 36 g/ha applied preemergence or early spring reduced soybean seed yields when averaged over the 3-yr period. Metsulfuron {2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2-yl)amino] carbonyl] amino] sulfonyl] benzoic acid} was tested at three rates (4.5, 9, and 18 g/ha) applied at three times (same as chlorsulfuron) in field studies in 1983 and 1984. Metsulfuron did not injure subsequently planted no-till soybeans.

Keywords

Triticum aestivumherbicide carryovercrop rotation

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1988 , pp. 49 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Brewster, B. D., and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotational crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chaleff, R. S., and Mauvais, C. J. 1984. Acetolactase synthase is the site of action of two sulfonylurea herbicides in higher plants. Science 224:1443–1445.Google Scholar
3. Christie, M. S., and Cornwell, M. J. 1984. DPX-T6376 – A new herbicide for broadleaf weed control in cereals. Proc. New Zealand Weed Pest Control Conf. 37:272–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cook, G. E., and McKinley, N. D. 1980. A new herbicide for cereals in the western United States. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 33:72.Google Scholar
5. Crane, S., Sollazzo, P. J., and Ilnicki, R. D. 1981. Weed control in double crop no-till soybeans. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 35:48–50.Google Scholar
6. Doig, R. I., Carraro, G. A., and McKinley, N. D. 1983. DPX-T6376 – A new broad spectrum cereal herbicide. 10th Int. Congr. Plant Prot., Brighton, England.Google Scholar
7. Hageman, L. H., and Behrens, R. 1981. Response of small grain cultivars to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 29:414–420.Google Scholar
8. Hageman, L. H., and Behrens, R. 1984. Basis for response differences of two broadleaf weeds to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 32:162–167.Google Scholar
9. Henson, M. A., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1982. The effect of chlorsulfuron on winter wheat yield and Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] control. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 35:118.Google Scholar
10. Hutchison, J. M., Shapiro, R., and Sweetser, P. B. 1984. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by tolerant broadleaves. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 22:243–247.Google Scholar
11. Khodayari, K., Frans, R. E., and Akkari, K. H. 1985. Evaluation of chlorsulfuron in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and in a wheat-soybean (Glycine max) double-cropping system. Weed Sci. 33:746–749.Google Scholar
12. Levitt, G., Bingeman, C. W., and Barrier, G. E. 1980. A new herbicide for cereals. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., p. 26.Google Scholar
13. Levitt, G., Ploeg, H. L., Weigel, R. C. Jr., and Fritzgerald, D. J. 1981. 2-chloro-N-[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,4-triazin-2-yl) aminocarbonyl]benzene-sulfonamide, a new herbicide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 29:416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mersie, W., and Foy, C. L. 1985. Phytotoxicity and absorption of chlorsulfuron as affected by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:564–568.Google Scholar
15. Morishita, D. W., Lee, G. A., and Belles, W. S. 1980. Field evaluation of DPX-4189 in winter wheat under two tillage systems. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 33:72–76.Google Scholar
16. Norris, R. F., Lardelli, R. A., and Ayres, D. 1981. Efficacy and carryover of herbicides for winter annual weed control in wheat. West. Soc. Weed Sci Res. Prog. Rep. p. 287–288.Google Scholar
17. O'Sullivan, P. A. 1982. Response of various broadleaved weeds, and tolerance of cereals to soil and foliar applications of DPX-4189. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:715–724.Google Scholar
18. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:10–17.Google Scholar
19. Ritter, R. L., and Harris, T. C. 1983. Residual effects of chlorsulfuron on double cropped soybeans. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., p. 20.Google Scholar
20. Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:18–23.Google Scholar
21. Thill, D. C., Zamora, D. L., and Salhoff, C. R. 1982. The persistence of several soil residual herbicides under irrigated conditions. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep., p. 232–234.Google Scholar
22. Thirunarayanan, K., Zimdahl, R. L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558–563.Google Scholar