Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-n5rmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T07:48:56.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chlorsulfuron Persistence and Response of Nine Rotational Crops in Alkaline Soils of Southern Alberta

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James R. Moyer ,
Rudy Esau  and
Gerald C. Kozub
James R. Moyer
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
Rudy Esau
Affiliation:
Agric. Canada Res. Stn., Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
Gerald C. Kozub
Affiliation:
Alta. Hortic. Res. Cent., Brooks, AB T0J 0J0, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chlorsulfuron was applied to wheat at rates of 0, 10, 20, and 40 g ai ha-1 in three locations at Lethbridge and Brooks between 1980 and 1984. The soil pH and organic matter contents at Lethbridge and Brooks were 8.0 and 2.1% and 7.4 and 3.0%, respectively. Rotational crops were seeded for up to 7 yr after chlorsulfuron application. The criteria used to indicate when susceptible crops will grow safely were no significant yield loss at the 40 g ha-1 rate and the magnitude of the upper confidence limit for this difference. The following times after application before crop yields were not affected were required at Lethbridge: barley, 2 yr; canola, 3 yr; peas, beans, 4 yr; flax and potatoes, 5 yr; alfalfa and sugarbeets, 6 yr; and lentils at least 7 yr. The effect of chlorsulfuron residues in the soil on rotational crops appeared to be similar at Brooks and at Lethbridge. Estimated chlorsulfuron concentrations were related to the tolerance of rotational crops.

Keywords

Chlorsulfuron, 2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]-carbonyl]benzenesulfonamidealfalfa, Medicago sativa L.barley, Hordeum vulgare L.bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.canola, Brassica napus L.flax, Linum usitatissimum L.lentil, Lens culinaris Medikpea, Pisum sativum L.potato, Solanum tuberosum L.sugarbeet, Beta vulgaris L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Replantresiduesoil pH

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 543 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Alberta Agriculture. 1989. Guide to crop protection in Alberta 1989. Part 1 chemical. Print Media Branch, Alberta Agric., Edmonton, Alta., p. 42.Google Scholar
2. Blair, A. M., and Martin, T. D. 1988. A review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 22:195–219.Google Scholar
3. Brewster, B. D., and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotational crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.Google Scholar
4. Cochran, W. G., and Cox, G. M. 1957. Experimental Designs, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, p. 545–565.Google Scholar
5. Dumanski, J., Newton, R., and Lindsay, J. D. 1970. Geographic zonation in selecting characteristics of surface mineral horizons in Alberta soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 50:131–139.Google Scholar
6. Fredrickson, D. R., and Shea, P. J. 1986. Effect of soil pH on degradation, movement, and plant uptake of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:328–332.Google Scholar
7. Grace, B., and Hobbs, E. H. 1988. The climate of the Lethbridge agricultural area: 1902–1985. LRS Mimeo Report 3, Agric. Can. Lethbridge, Alta., p. 7–12.Google Scholar
8. Hill, B. D., and Schaalje, G. B. 1985. A two-compartment model for the dissipation of deltramethrin on soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:1001–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Ivany, J. A. 1987. Chlorsulfuron use in barley and residual effect on potato and rutabaga grown in rotation. Can. J. Plant Sci. 67:337–341.Google Scholar
10. Joshi, M. M., Brown, H. M., and Romesser, J. A. 1985. Degradation of chlorsulfuron by soil microorganisms. Weed Sci. 33:888–893.Google Scholar
11. Mercie, W., and Foy, C. L. 1985. Phytotoxicity and adsorption of chlorsulfuron as affected by soil properties. Weed Sci. 33:564–568.Google Scholar
12. Moyer, J. R., Bergen, P., and Kozub, G. C. 1989. Chlorsulfuron persistence and response of legumes in an alkaline soil. J. Environ. Sci. Health B24:37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Moyer, J. R., Clayton, G. W., Darwent, A. L., and Esau, R. 1984. Persistence of chlorsulfuron in four Alberta soils. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:8.Google Scholar
14. Nicholls, P. H., Evans, A. A., and Walker, A. 1987. The behaviour of chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron in soils in relation to incidents of injury to sugarbeets. Br. Crop Prot. Weeds, Brighton, England, p. 549–556.Google Scholar
15. Peterson, M. A., and Arnold, W. E. 1985. Response of rotational crops to soil residues of chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 34:131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Ritter, R. L., Harris, T. C., and Kaufman, L. M. 1988. Chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron residues on double-cropped soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:49–52.Google Scholar
17. Steel, R.G.D., and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Toronto, p. 173, 235, and 463–466.Google Scholar
18. Thirunarayanan, K. R., Zimdahl, L., and Smika, D. E. 1985. Chlorsulfuron adsorption and degradation in soil. Weed Sci. 33:558–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Walker, A., and Brown, R. A. 1983. Measurement and prediction of chlorsulfuron persistence in soil. Bull. Environ. Contain. Toxicol. 30:365–372.Google Scholar