Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-rcs6z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T08:21:37.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contribution of Nitrogen Fertilizer Placement to Weed Management in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kenneth J. Kirkland  and
Hugh J. Beckie
Kenneth J. Kirkland
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Farm, P.O. Box 10, Scott, SK, Canada S0K 4A0
Hugh J. Beckie
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0X2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The contribution of nitrogen (N) fertilizer placement to management of annual weeds in spring wheat grown under two tillage systems was examined at sites located in three ecoregions of the northern Great Plains from 1994 to 1996. The effect of three different fertilizer placements on narrowleaf and broadleaf weed emergence, growth, and N uptake were determined in a no-till and a conventional tillage system. Fertilizer was broadcast, subsurface-banded in the spring prior to seeding, or side-banded at the time of seeding. Tillage system generally did not influence weed and crop response to fertilizer placement. Broadcast-applied fertilizer was more effective than banded fertilizer in promoting wild oat and broadleaf weed emergence and growth over the growing season. Weed densities, biomass, and N uptake measured early in the growing season averaged 20 to 40% less, and grain yield of wheat at maturity averaged 12% higher where fertilizer was side-banded compared to broadcast. In contrast, the addition of fertilizer, regardless of placement, was detrimental to green foxtail because of enhanced crop competitiveness. Banding fertilizer at recommended rates can be an effective cultural practice for managing weeds in no-till and conventional tillage wheat-cropping systems in semiarid to subhumid regions of the northern Great Plains, but it is not reliable when used as the sole method of weed management.

Keywords

Green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVIwild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAspring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Makwa'Broadleaf weedsnitrogen uptaketillageAVEFASETVICT, conventional tillageIPM, integrated pest managementIPM, integrated weed managementK, potassiumN, nitrogenNT, no tillageP, phosphorusS, sulfur

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1998 , pp. 507 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC. 1141 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1993. Canadian Climate Normals 1961–90: Prairie Provinces. Ottawa, ON: Atmospheric Environment Service, Environment Canada Catalog En56-61/2-1993. 266 p.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Semach, G., Harker, K. N., and O'Donovan, J. T. 1996. Hordeum jubatum management in conservation cropping systems. In Proc. Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark. Flakkebjerg, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology. pp. 993–996.Google Scholar
Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: effects of nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 34:29–33.Google Scholar
Cochran, V. L., Morrow, L. A., and Schirman, R. D. 1990. The effect of N placement on grass weeds and winter wheat responses in three tillage systems. Soil Tillage Res. 18:347–355.Google Scholar
Di Tomaso, J. M. 1995. Approaches for improving crop competitiveness through manipulation of fertilization strategies. Weed Sci. 43:491–497.Google Scholar
Everaarts, A. P. 1992. Response of weeds to the method of fertilizer application on low-fertility acid soils in Suriname. Weed Res. 32:391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, L. 1982. The long-term effects of fertilizer application and three rotations on weed communities in wheat (after 21–22 years at Indian Head, Saskatchewan). Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:741–750.Google Scholar
Milbury, W. F., Stack, V. T., and Doll, F. L. 1970. Simultaneous determination of total phosphorus and total Kjeldahl nitrogen in activated sludge with the Technicon continuous digestor system. In Whitehead, E. C., ed. Technicon International Congress, Advances in Automatic Analysis, Industrial Analysis. Volume 2. Mount Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing Co. pp. 299–304.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., McAndrew, D. A., and Thomas, A. G. 1997. Tillage and nitrogen influence weed population dynamics in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Technol. 11:502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. E. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1992. Environment influences green foxtail (Setaria viridis) competition with wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 6:606–610.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, P. E. 1995. Effects of fertilizer and stubble burning on downy brome competition in winter wheat. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 26:951–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinertsen, M. R., Cochran, V. L., and Morrow, L. A. 1984. Response of spring wheat to N fertilizer placement, row spacing, and wild oat herbicides in a no-till system. Agron. J. 76:753–756.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1990. SAS User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1686 p.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C., O'Donovan, J. T., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1994. Integrated weed management strategies for delaying herbicide resistance in wild oats. Phytoprotection 75(Suppl.): 61–70.Google Scholar
Winkleman, G. E. 1994. Methods Manual Support Services Laboratory. Swift Current, SK: Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 222 p.Google Scholar