Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T11:48:33.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing Weed Seed Rain with Late-Season Glyphosate Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Chad E. Brewer  and
Lawrence R. Oliver
Chad E. Brewer*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 115 Plant Science Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 115 Plant Science Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: cbrewer@uark.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were established in Fayetteville, AR, to determine the effects of glyphosate on biomass and seed production of spurred anoda, entireleaf morningglory, hemp sesbania, and Florida pusley. Inconsistent control of these species by glyphosate allows them to enrich the soil seedbank. Glyphosate rates of 0.42, 0.84, and 1.68 kg ae/ha were applied at 3, 6, and 9 wk after emergence (WAE) and were compared with a nonsprayed control. Spurred anoda seed production was reduced 99.9% by glyphosate at 1.68 kg/ha averaged over application timings and 99.7% by glyphosate applied at 6 WAE averaged over rates. Entireleaf morningglory seed production was reduced 100% by glyphosate at 1.68 kg/ha at 3 WAE and > 93% by the same rate applied at 6 or 9 WAE. Hemp sesbania seed production was reduced 100% by glyphosate at 1.68 kg/ha at 3 WAE and > 96% by glyphosate at 0.42, 0.84, and 1.68 kg/ha applied at 6 or 9 WAE. Florida pusley seed production was reduced 99.9% by glyphosate at 1.68 kg/ha averaged over application timings and 99.4% by application at 3 or 6 WAE averaged over rates. Biomass accumulation for all species was reduced most by early applications, particularly at 1.68 kg/ha.

Keywords

Glyphosateentireleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula (L.) Jacq. A. Gray IPOHGFlorida pusley, Richardia scabra L. RCHSChemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Cory SEBEXspurred anoda, Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht ANVCRSeed productionseedbankspecies shift

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 753 - 758
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Abu-Irmaileh, B. E., Jordan, L. S., and Kumamoto, J. 1979. Enhancement of CO2 and ethylene production and cellulase activity by glyphosate in Phaseolus vulgaris . Weed Sci. 27:103–106.Google Scholar
Banga, S. S. and Labana, K. S. 1983. Production of F1 hybrids of using ethrel-induced male sterility in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Coss.]. J. Agric. Sci. 101:453–455.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. W. and Oliver, L. R. 2003. Control practices and glyphosate applications for sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:429–440.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. C. and Shaw, D. R. 2000. Effect of preharvest desiccants on weed seed production and viability. Weed Technol. 14:530–538.Google Scholar
Carmer, S. G., Nyquist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analyses of experiments with two- or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665–672.Google Scholar
Cavers, P. B. and Benoit, D. L. 1989. Seed banks of arable land. Pages 309–328. in Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T., Simpson, R.L. eds. Ecology of Seed Banks. San Diego Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chailakhyan, M. K. and Khrianin, V. N. 1978. Effect of growth regulators and role of roots in sex expression in spinach. Planta. 142:207–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clay, P. A. and Griffin, J. L. 2000. Weed seed production and seedling emergence responses to late-season glyphosate applications. Weed Sci. 48:481–486.Google Scholar
Coble, H. D. and Mortensen, D. A. 1992. The threshold concept and its application to weed science. Weed Technol. 6:191–195.Google Scholar
Espinoza, L. and Ross, J. 2003. Fertilization and liming. Pages 23–27. in Espinoza, L., Ross, J. eds. Corn Production Handbook MP437. Little Rock Cooperative Extension Service, University of Arkansas.Google Scholar
Fawcett, R. S. and Slife, F. W. 1978. Effects of 2,4-D and dalapon on weed seed production and dormancy. Weed Sci. 26:543–547.Google Scholar
Goughler, J. A. and Geiger, D. R. 1981. Uptake and translocation of N-phosphonomethylglycine in sugarbeet. Plant Physiol. 68:668–672.Google Scholar
Haar, M. J. and Fennimore, S. A. 2003. Evaluation of integrated practices for common purslane (Portulaca oleracea) management in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Weed Technol. 17:229–233.Google Scholar
Hamdi, S., Teller, G., and Louis, J. P. 1987. Master regulatory genes, auxin level, and sexual organogenesis in the dioecious plant Mercurialis annua . Plant Physiol. 85:393–399.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. 1996. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) population dynamics following a single year's seed rain. Weed Technol. 10:581–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, W. G. 1999. Introduction to Plant Physiology. New York J. Wiley. 215–233.Google Scholar
Isaacs, M. A., Murdock, E. C., Taylor, J. E., and Wallace, S. U. 1989. Effects of late-season herbicide application on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed production and viability. Weed Sci. 37:761–765.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2002. Weed management in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) transplanted on polyethylene-covered seed beds. Weed Technol. 16:860–866.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. and Medd, R. W. 2005. A methodology for evaluating risk and efficacy of weed management technologies. Weed Sci. 53:505–514.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.Google Scholar
Lee, T. T. 1984. Release of lateral buds from apical dominance by glyphosate in soybean and pea seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 3:227–235.Google Scholar
Menges, R. M. 1987. Weed seed population dynamics during six years of weed management systems in crop rotations on irrigated soil. Weed Sci. 35:328–332.Google Scholar
Norris, R. F. 1985. Weed population dynamics and the concept of zero thresholds. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 160.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2002a. Hemp sesbania interference in drill-seeded glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Sci. 50:34–41.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. and Oliver, L. R. 2002b. Pitted morningglory interference in drill-seeded glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Sci. 50:26–33.Google Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 2000. Weed control programs in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 14:413–422.Google Scholar
Pline, W. A., Edmisten, K. L., Wilcut, J. W., Wells, R., and Thomas, J. 2003. Glyphosate-induced reductions in pollen viability in glyphosate-resistant cotton and attempted remediation by gibberellic acid (GA3). Weed Sci. 51:19–27.Google Scholar
Puricelli, E., Faccini, D., Orioli, G., and Sabbatini, M. R. 2004. Anoda cristata control with glyphosate in narrow- and wide-row soybean. Weed Res. 44:150–156.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology 2nd ed. New York J. Wiley. 130–162.Google Scholar
Richardson, R. J., Wilson, H. P., Armiel, G. R., and Hines, T. E. 2004. Mixtures of glyphosate with CGA 362622 for weed control in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 18:16–22.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res. 20:195–200.Google Scholar
Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after six years if continuous corn (Zea mays) production and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:76–83.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. L., Leck, M. A., and Parker, V. T. 1989. Seed banks: general concepts and methodological issues. Pages 3–8. in Leck, M.A., Parker, V.T., Simpson, R.L. eds. Ecology of Seed Banks. San Diego Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46:652–660.Google Scholar
Swahney, V. K. and Shukla, A. 1994. Male sterility in flowering plants: are plant growth substances involved? Am. J. Bot. 81:1640–1647.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M., Cardina, J., and White, A. D. 2003. Weed seed rain, soil seedbanks, and seedling recruitment in no-tillage crop rotations. Weed Sci. 51:569–575.Google Scholar