African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
Sir Dawda K Jawara v The Gambia [2000] Communication Nos 147/95 and 149/96 (11 May 2000), 141
Arbitral Tribunals
Trail Smelter (US v Canada) (1938) 3 RIAA 1905, 200
European Court of Justice
25/62 Plaumann & Co v Commission of the European Economic Community [1963] ECR 95, 107, 112, 137
C-404/09 European Commission v Kingdom of Spain [2011] ECLI:EU:C:2011:768, 286
C-524/09 City of Lyon v French Deposits and Consignments Fund [2009] ECR-I 14115, 173
T-141/19 Sabo and Others v Parliament and Council [2020] (ECJ, 6 May 2020), 111
T-330/18 Carvalho and Others v Parliament and Council [2018] 2018/C 285/51 (ECJ, 8 May 2019), 111, 137
European Court of Human Rights
Al-Skeini and others v UK App no 55721/07, 210
Bankovic et al v Belgium et al App no 52207/99, 209
Duarte Agostinho v Portugal and 32 other States App no 39371/20, 2, 341, 346, 385, 443, 477
Greenpeace Nordic and others v Norway App no 34068/21, 385, 405, 496
Soubeste and Others v Austria and 11 other States App nos 3195/22, 31932/22, 31938/22, 31943/22, and 31947/22, 385, 496
Tatar v Romania App no 67021/01, 398
Uricchio v Italy and others App no 14165/21, 385
Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and others v Switzerland App no 53600/20, 2, 11, 126, 166, 385, 472, 498
European Committee of Social Rights
International Court of Justice/Permanent Court of International Justice
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v Myanmar) [2022] ICJ Rep 477, 373
Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua) (Compensation owed by the Republic of Nicaragua to the Republic of Costa Rica) [2018] ICJ Rep 15, 211
Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (US v Italy) [1989] ICJ Rep 1551, 371
Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia) (Judgment) [1997] ICJ Rep 7, 349
Kasikili/Sedudu Island (Botswana/Namibia) [1999] ICJ Rep 1045, 435
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (Advisory Opinion) [1971] ICJ Rep 16, 435
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) [2004] ICJ Rep 136, 379
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (Advisory Opinion) [1996] ICJ Rep 226, 211, 349, 375
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v Uruguay) (Merits) [2010] ICJ Rep 14, 210, 242, 349
Request for an Examination of the Situation in Accordance with Paragraph 63 of the Court’s Judgment of 20 December 1964 in the Nuclear Tests (Australia v France) (Judgment) [1974] ICJ Rep 253, 349
Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
Diaguita Agricultural Communities of the Huasco-Altinos and the members thereof v Chile, Admissibility [2009] Report No 141/09, Petition 415-07 (30 December 2009), 140
Kuna of Madungandí and Emberá of Bayano Indigenous Peoples and their Members v Panama, Admissibility [2009] Report No 58/09, Petition 12-354 (21 April 2009), 140
Opario Lemoth Morris et al (Miskitu Divers) v Honduras, Admissibility [2009] Report No 121/09, Petition 1186-04 (12 November 2009), 140
Petition Seeking Relief from Violations of the Rights of Arctic Athabaskan Peoples Resulting from Rapid Arctic Warming and Melting Caused by Emissions of Black Carbon by Canada [2013] Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, 385
Petition To the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting from Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States [2005] Petition 1413-05, 134, 135, 177, 385, 421
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Aloeboetoe et al v Suriname (Merits) Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 11 (4 December 1991), 450
Bámaca Velásquez v Guatemala (Reparations and Costs) Inter-American of Human Rights Series C No 70 (25 November 2000), 450
El Amparo v Venezuela (Reparations and Costs) Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 28 (14 September 1996), 450
Garrido and Baigorria v Argentina (Reparations and Costs) Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 39 (27 August 1998), 450
Julien Grisonas v Argentina (Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs) Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 437 (23 September 2021), 469
The Environment and Human Rights (State Obligations in Relation to the Environment in the Context of the Protection and Guarantee of the Rights to Life and to Personal Integrity – Interpretation and Scope of Articles 4(1) and 5(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights), Advisory Opinion OC-23, Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series A No 23 (15 November 2017), 174, 207, 280, 312, 350, 379
The Indigenous Communities of the Lhaka Honhat (Our Land) Association v Argentina Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 400 (6 February 2020), 285
The Saramaka People v Suriname Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 172 (28 November 2007), 285
Velásquez Rodríguez v Honduras Inter-American Court of Human Rights Series C No 4 (29 July 1998), 449
International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea
Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), ITLOS Case No 31 (Advisory Opinion of 21 May 2024), 2, 472, 498
Request for an Advisory Opinion submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (Request for Advisory Opinion submitted to the Tribunal), ITLOS Case No 31 (Order of 16 December 2022), 382
UN Committee on the Rights of the Child
UN Human Rights Committee
Views Adopted by the Committee under Article 5(4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning Communication No 2552/2015, 21 September 2022, UN Doc CCPR/C/132/D/2552/2015 (Benito Oliveira Pereira), 455
Views Adopted by the Committee under Article 5(4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning Communication No 3624/2019, 21 July 2022, UN Doc CCPR/C/135/D/3624/2019 (Billy), 174, 357, 382, 455, 498
Views Adopted by the Committee under Article 5(4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning Communication No 2751/2016, 20 September 2019, UN Doc CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 (Portillo Caceres), 455
Views Adopted by the Committee under Article 5(4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning Communication No 052/1979, 29 July 1981, UN Doc CCPR/C/13/D/52/1979 (Sergio Euben Lopez Burgos), 379
Views Adopted by the Committee under Article 5(4) of the Optional Protocol, concerning Communication No 2728/2016, 24 October 2019, UN Doc CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 (Teitiota), 139, 174, 382
Argentina
Austria
Australia
Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure and Warkworth Mining Limited [2013] NSWLEC 48, 282
Dual Gas Pty Ltd and Ors v Environment Protection Authority [2012] VCAT 308, 120
Gloucester Resources Limited v Minister for Planning [2019] NSWLEC 7, 179, 309, 332, 347, 401, 416, 438, 464, 499
Gray v The Minister for Planning, Director-General of the Department of Planning and Centennial Hunter Pty Ltd [2006] NSWLEC 720, 354, 355, 400, 431
Haughton v Minister for Planning and Macquarie Generation [2011] NSWLEC 217, 120, 355
Minister for the Environment v Sharma [2022] FCAFC 35, 179, 346, 402
North Coast Environment Council Inc v Minister for Resources [1994] 55 FCR 492, 127 ALR 617, 122
Onus v Alcoa of Australia Ltd [1981] 149 CLR 27, 122
Sharma and others v Minister for the Environment [2021] FCA 560, 150, 246, 307, 356, 402
Waratah Coal Pty Ltd v Youth Verdict Ltd [2022] QLC 21, 179, 340, 355, 399
Belgium
VZW Klimaatzaak v Kingdom of Belgium and Others [2023] 2022/AR/891(Cour d’appel de Bruxelles), 116, 138, 142, 152, 153, 175, 223, 328, 360, 390, 409, 461, 464, 495, 499
VZW Klimaatzaak v l’État Belge [2021] 2015/4585/A (Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles, Section Civile), 116, 138, 154, 189, 223, 306, 362, 390, 452, 488, 495
Brazil
PSB and others v Brazil [2022] ADPF 708 (Federal Supreme Court of Brazil), 146, 177, 224, 284, 285, 311, 443, 454
PSB and others v Brazil [2022] ADPF 760 (Federal Supreme Court of Brazil), 146, 285
PSB and others v Brazil [2022] ADO 59/DF (Federal Supreme Court of Brazil), 146, 285
Public Prosecutor’s Office v H Carlos Schneider S/A Comércio e Indústria and others [2007] 650.728 – SC 2003/0221786-0 (Superior Court of Justice), 166
Institute of Amazonian Studies (IEA) v Brazil No 5033746-81.2021.4.04.0000 (Federal District Court), 293
Canada
Clements v Clements [2012] 2 SCR 181, 428
Environnement Jeunesse v Procureur General du Canada [2018] 500-06-000955-183, 126, 151, 177, 356, 396
La Rose v Her Majesty the Queen [2020] T-1750-19, 177, 361, 453
La Rose v His Majesty the King [2023] A-289-20, A-308-20, 177
Lho’imggin et al v Her Majesty the Queen [2020] FC 1059, 361
Mathur et al v Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario [2020] ONSC 6918, 126, 150, 224, 347, 407, 440
Mathur v Ontario [2023] ONSC 2316, 150, 177, 340, 347, 408, 416
Saskatchewan et al v Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act (2021) SCC 11, 317
Colombia
Future Generations v Ministry of the Environment and Others (Demanda Generaciones Futuras v Minambiente) [2018] 11001 22 03 000 2018 00319 00 (Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia), 125, 139, 153, 177, 224, 258, 287, 307, 345, 454, 504
Germán Espinosa Mejía v Government of Colombia [2014] STP13863-2014 (Supreme Court of Justice of Colombia), 138
Josefina Huffington Archbold v Colombia [2022] T-8.298.253 (Constitutional Court of Colombia), 460
Salamanca Mancera and others v Presidencia de la República de Colombia and others, 29 January 2018 (Superior Tribunal of Bogotá), 387
Sentence C-123 (Constitutional Court of Colombia), 280
Sentence C-449 (Constitutional Court of Colombia), 279
The Atrato River Case, Sentence T-622 (Constitutional Court of Colombia), 279
Chile
Chauhuan Chauhuan v Empresa Nacional de Petroleos, ENAP SA Rol 5888-2019 (Excelentisima Corte Suprema, 2019), 355
Czechia
Ecuador
Appeals Judgement Herrera Carrión et al v Ecuador [2021] 21201202000170 (Provincial Court of Justice of Sucumbíos), 454
Reserva Los Cedros v Ecuador, Case No 1149-19-JP/20 (Constitutional Court of Ecuador), 290
Wheeler v Director de la Procuraduría General [2011] No 11121-2011-00010 (Provincial Criminal Court for Loja), 278
France
Germany
Family Farmers and Greenpeace v Germany [2018] 00271/17/R/SP (Administrative Court of Berlin), 164, 178, 229, 416
Lliuya v RWE [2017] I-5 U 15/17 (Higher Court of Appeal in Hamm), 416, 429, 437
Neubauer and Others v Germany [2021] 1 BvR 2656/18, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 78/20, 1 BvR 288/20, 1 BvR 96/20, 1 BvR 78/20 (German Federal Constitutional Court), 115, 146, 152, 175, 203, 224, 268, 314, 328, 345, 387, 395, 416, 453, 498
India
AP Pollution Control Board v Prof M V Nayudu (Retd) and Others 1994 (3) SCC 1, 348
Court on its own Motion v State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors Application No 237 (THC)/ 2013 (CWPIL No 15 of 2010), 119, 235, 261, 350
Fomento Resorts & Hotels and Anr v Minguel Martins and Ors [2009] Civil Appeal No 4154 OF 2000 with Civil Appeal Nos 4155 and 4156 of 2000, 345
Goa Foundation v Union of India and Ors Writ Petition (Civil) No 435 of 2012, 354
Intellectuals Forum, Tirupathi v State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors Appeal (Civil) 1251 of 2006, 354
M C Mehta v Kamal Nath (1996) 1 SCC 388, 255
Mohd Salim v State of Uttarakhand and others Writ Petition (PIL) No 126 of 2014, 279
Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra, Dehradun v State of Uttar Pradesh 1985 SCR (3) 169, 261
SP Gupta v Union of India AIR 1982 SC 149, 119
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v Union of India [1996] AIR SC 2715, 467
Virender Gaur v State of Haryana 1998 (1) CTC 143, 261
Indonesia
Italy
Ireland
Friends of the Irish Environment CLG v The Government of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General [2019] IEHC 747 (High Court), 158
Friends of the Irish Environment CLG v The Government of Ireland, Ireland and the Attorney General [2020] Appeal no 205/19 (Supreme Court of Ireland), 157, 177, 228, 434, 453, 499
Kenya
Nepal
Advocate Padam Bahadur Shrestha v Prime Minister and Office of Council of Ministers and Others [2018] Order No 074-WO-0283 (2075/09/10 BS) (Supreme Court of Nepal), 126, 138, 153, 177, 182, 282, 307, 345, 459
Pro Public and Others v Godavari Marble Industries Pvt Ltd and Others [2016] Order No 068–WO–0082 (Supreme Court of Nepal), 175, 182
Netherlands
Advisory Opinion on Cassation Appeal of the Procurator General in the Matter between the Netherlands v Urgenda ECLI:NL:PHR:2019:1026 No 19/00135 (Supreme Court of the Netherlands), 310
Milieudefensie v Royal Dutch Shell [2021] ECLR:NL: RBDHA:2021:5339 (District Court of the Hague), 106, 139, 154, 173, 176–178, 204, 226, 313, 397, 418, 432, 453, 496, 498
State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy) v Stichting Urgenda [2019] ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007 (Supreme Court of the Netherlands), 1, 106, 145, 175, 202, 226, 268, 305, 328, 353, 388, 398, 416, 452, 488, 498
State of the Netherlands v Stichting Urgenda [2018] ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2018:2591 (Court of Appeal), 114, 156, 353, 388, 402, 452
Urgenda Foundation v The State of The Netherlands [2015] ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2015:7196 (District Court of the Hague), 114, 143, 151, 223, 268, 293, 310, 328, 388, 397
New Zealand
Hauraki Coromandel Climate Action Inc v Thames-Coromandel District Council [2021] 3 NZLR 280, 440
In re: AD (Tuvalu) [2014] Cases 501370-371, 183
Ioane Teitiota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment [2015] NZSC 107, 183
Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited and Others CIV-2019-404-001730 [2020] NZHC 419, 110, 152, 231, 404
Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited and Others CA 128/2020 [2021] NZCA 552, 111, 152, 232, 307, 404, 430
Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited and Others [2022] NZSC 35, 150, 405
Michael John Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Limited and Others [2024] NZSC 5, 232, 405
Students for Climate Solutions Inc v Minister of Energy and Resources [2022] NZHC 2116 [40], 441
Thomson v Minister for Climate Change Issues [2017] NZHC 733, 150, 223, 308, 418, 499
Norway
Greenpeace Nordic Association v Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (2020) Case no 20-051052SIV-HRET (Norwegian Supreme Court), 499
Greenpeace Nordic Association v Ministry of Petroleum and Energy Case (2018) Case no 16-166674TVI-OTIR/06 (Oslo District Court), 206
Greenpeace Nordic Association v Ministry of Petroleum and Energy (2020) Case no 18-060499ASD-BORG/03 (Borgarting Court of Appeal), 206, 431
Greenpeace Nordic and Nature & Youth v Energy Ministry [2024] Case no 23-099330TVI-TOSL/05 (Oslo District Court), 244
Pakistan
Philippines
In re Greenpeace Southeast Asia and Others [2022] Case No CHR-NI-2016-0001, 173, 176, 178, 224, 313, 387, 471, 502
Minors Oposa v Factoran [1993] GR No 101083, 224 SCRA 792, 117, 253, 261, 345, 346, 350, 351, 358, 364, 365
MMDA et al v Concerned Residents of Manila Bay GR No 171947-48 (18 December 2008), 351
Resident Marine Mammals of the Protected Seascape Tanon Strait v Reyes [2015] GR No 180771, 359
Segovia v Climate Change Commission [2017] GR No 211020, 118
South Africa
Earthlife Africa Johannesburg v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others [2017] 65662/16, 179, 243, 316, 345, 417, 466
Groundwork Trust and Vukani Environmental Justice Alliance Movement in Action v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others (2022) 39724/2019, 224, 243, 398
Philippi Horticultural Area Food & Farming Campaign, et al v MEC for Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Western Cape, et al [2020] High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division) 39724/2019, 243, 398
Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC and Others v Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy and Others [2021] ZAECGHC 118, 180
Trustees for the time being of Groundwork Trust and Another v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Others [2019] SAFLII 208, 224, 345
Sri Lanka
Bulankulama and Others v Secretary, Ministry of Industrial Development and others [2000] LKSC 18 (Supreme Court of Sri Lanka), 354
Sweden
PUSH Sweden, Nature and Youth Sweden and Others v Government of Sweden (Stockholm District Court), 179
Switzerland
KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Ors v Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications [2020] 1C_37/2019 (Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland), 126
Uganda
Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment (ACODE) v Attorney General (2005) Miscellaneous Cause No 0100 of 2004 (High Court of Uganda), 258
United Kingdom
Baker v Willoughby [1970] AC 467, 428
Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22, 394, 421
Friends of the Earth Ltd and others v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWHC 1841, 418, 434
Greenpeace Ltd v the Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and the Oil and Gas Authority) [2021] CSIH 53 XA34/20, 431
March v Stramare E & MH Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506, 428
McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, 428
Plan B Earth and others v Prime Minister and others [2021] EWHC 3469 (Admin), 308
Plan B Earth and Others v The Secretary of State for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy [2019] C1/2018/1750, 453
R (on the application of Plan B Earth and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd (Heathrow Expansion) [2020] UKSC 52, 181, 308, 435
R (on the application of Plan B Earth Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2020] EWCA (Civ) 214, 435
Rabone v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2, 442
Richards v Environmental Agency [2022] EWCA (Civ) 26, 442
Richards, R (On the Application Of) v The Environment Agency [2021] EWHC 2501 (Admin), 442
United States of America
Aji Pexrel Piper v State 480 P.3d 438 (Court of Appeals for Washington), 264, 357
Bonser-Lain v Texas Commission on Environment Quality No D-1-GN-11-002194, 2012 (District Court of Texas), 264
Butler ex rel Peshlakai v Brewer No. 1 CA-CV 12-0347, 2013 WL 1091209 (Court of Appeals for Arizona), 253
Center for Biological Diversity v National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 508 F.3d 508 (9th Cir 2007), 406
Center for Biological Diversity v US Bureau of Land Management No 3:17-CV-553-LRH-WGC (District Court of Nevada), 401
Chernaik v Brown 475 P.3d 68 (Supreme Court of Oregon), 257
Citizens for a Healthy Community v US Bureau of Land Management No 1:2017cv02519 (District Court for the District of Columbia), 439
Clean Air Council v United States 362 F.Supp.3d 237 (District Court of Pennsylvania), 251, 292
Comer v Murphy Oil USA, Inc No 1:11-cv-00220 (Federal District Court of Mississippi), 417
Environmental Law Foundation v State Water Resources Control Board 237 Cal Rptr 3d 393, 402 (Court of Appeals for California), 267
Foster v Washington Department of Ecology No 14-2-25295-1 [2015] (Supreme Court of Washington), 256, 271, 353
Friends of Cedra Mesa v Department of the Interior No 1:21-cv-00971 (District Court of Utah), 433
Funk v Wolf 158 A.3d 642 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania), 260, 360, 395
Georgia v Tenn Copper Co 206 US 230, 237 (1907), 251
Held v Montana 2024 MT 312 (Supreme Court of Montana), 109
Held v Montana No CDV-2020-307 (District Court of Montana 2021), 265
Held v Montana No CDV-2020-307 (District Court of Montana 2023), 109, 265, 361, 459
Ill Cent RR Co v Illinois 146 US 387 (1892), 251
In re Downstream 147 Fed. Cl. at 570, 574 (Federal Claims Court), 436
In re Gas Co LLC 465 P.3d 633, 654 (Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi), 260
In re Hawai’i Electric Light Co No SCOT-22-0000418 (Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi), 175
In re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-control Reservoirs USA No 1:2017cv09001 (Federal Claims Court), 436
In re Water Use Permit Applications for Waiāhole Ditch, 9 P.3d 409, 447 (Supreme Court of Hawaiʻi), 253, 266
Juliana v United States 217 F.Supp.3d 1224, 1260 (District Court of Oregon 2016), 109, 236, 253
Juliana v United States 339 F. Supp. 3d 1062 (District Court of Oregon 2018), 236
Juliana v United States 947 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir 2020), 109, 150, 177, 221, 253, 309, 329, 346
Juliana v United States, No 6:15-cv-01517-AA (District Court of Oregon 2023), 221, 271, 396, 453
Kanuk Kanuk v State Department Natural Resources 335 P.3d 1088, 1095 (Supreme Court of Alaska), 254, 360
Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 (1992), 105, 127, 395
Massachusetts v EPA 549 US 497 (2007), 108, 230, 329, 395, 418
McDonald v Chicago, 561 US 742, 761, 767 (2010), 272
Milton v US Case: 21-1131 (Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit), 436
Mineral Cnty v Lyons Cnty 473 P.3d 418, 425 (Supreme Court of Nevada), 253
National Audubon Society v Superior Court, Alpine County 658 P.2d 709 (Supreme Court of California), 256
Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp 696 F.3d. 849, 868–69 (9th Cir 2012), 108, 396
Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp Kivalina 663 F.Supp.2d 863 (District Court of California), 420
Navahine F v Hawai’i Department of Transportation (First Circuit Court Hawaiʻi), 150
Parks v Cooper, 676 N.W.2d 823, 837 (Supreme Court of South Dakota), 253
Pennsylvania Environment Defense Foundation. v Commonwealth 108 A.3d 140, 167 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania), 260
Phillips Petroleum Co v Mississippi 484 US 469 (1988), 256
Robinson Township v Commonwealth, 83 A.3d 901, 950–51 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania), 260
Sanders-Reed ex rel Sanders-Reed v Martinez 350 P.3d 1221, 1225 (Court of Appeals for New Mexico), 260
Sierra Club v FERC, 867 F.3d 1357 (District Court for the District of Columbia), 439
Sindell v Abbott Laboratories 26 Cal 3d 588 (Supreme Court of California 1980), 428
Stone v Mississippi 101 US 814, 820 (1879), 253
Thomas v Mallett 701 N.W.2d 523 (Supreme Court of Wisconsin), 394
WildEarth Guardians v Zinke 368 F.Supp.3d 41 (District Court of Columbia), 243
Zero Zone Inc v United States Department of Energy 832 F3d 654 (7th Cir 2016), 401
Open access