No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2026
We examined whether point-of-sale warning posters, compared to control posters, reduced Guatemalan adolescents’ purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) at school stores.
We used a difference-in-differences approach (4 weeks baseline, 4 weeks treatment). Our primary analysis compared two schools assigned to an intervention warning poster to one school that displayed a control poster. Based on purchase transaction data, the outcomes were volume of sugar-sweetened beverages, beverage kcal, and sugar purchased per transaction.
Three private schools in Guatemala City, Guatemala
Students between 12 and 18 years of age
Our primary analysis found that the warning poster decreased the overall volume of sugar-sweetened beverages (in ounces) that adolescents purchased in the warning poster intervention schools (-2.27 oz. 95% CI=[-2.70, -1.85]) compared to the control school. This reduction was driven by a decrease in sugar-sweetened beverage purchases (OR= 0.64 95% CI=[0.49, 0.86]). The warning posters were associated with a significant reduction in likelihood of purchasing a beverage with kilocalories (calories) (OR= 0.68 95% CI=[0.49, 0.92]). These changes were associated with a significant overall decrease of sugar purchased (-5.54g 95% CI=[-6.69, -4.39]). The posters were associated with a significant increase of non-SSB purchases in the intervention schools compared to the control school (OR= 1.53 95% CI=[1.16, 2.02]).
Our results suggest that messages that warn adolescents about the high sugar content in SSBs may be an effective, low-cost way to modestly reduce purchases of these drinks. These findings provide evidence to support national front-of-package labeling, currently being considered in Guatemala.