Hostname: page-component-74d7c59bfc-9jgps Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-10T06:22:49.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Monocrotaline toxicity in rats: decreased lung retinol and elevated alpha-tocopherol levels in lung and liver

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2026

Richard Carleton Baybutt*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA Department of Applied Health Science, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA Department of Nutrition Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
Vance La Baron Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA
Donovan Gabriel Kearns
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Health Science, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA
Samuel Bryce Stafford
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition Science, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
*
Corresponding author: Richard Carleton Baybutt; Email: baybuttr16@ecu.edu

Abstract

Monocrotaline (MCT) induces lung injury and pulmonary hypertension (PH) by a mechanism that is in part due to oxidative stress. The purpose of this study was to determine how MCT affected nutrient antioxidants retinol and alpha-tocopherol in a rat lung and liver. Rats were fed a purified diet (AIN-93G) one-week prior to a subcutaneous injection of MCT (60 mg/kg) and remained on the diet throughout the study. Three weeks after injection, the animals were euthanized, and the lungs and livers were analyzed for retinol, alpha-tocopherol, phospholipid (PL), and cholesterol content. Lung retinol concentrations were significantly lower in MCT-treated rats, 2.0 ± 1.2 (nmol/g lung) vs. vehicle control (VEH), 5.8 ± 1.4 (P < 0.01). However, liver retinol concentrations were not significantly different, 3.3 ± 1.3 vs. 2.5 ± 0.9 nmol/g liver. Alpha-tocopherol was significantly greater in MCT-treated rats in the lung, 145 ± 24 vs. 99 ± 13 nmol/g lung (P < 0.001), and liver, 107 ± 30 vs. 47.7 ± 4.8 nmol/g liver (P < 0.001). Phospholipid and cholesterol were significantly lower in the lung of the MCT-treated group, but not significantly different in the liver. In conclusion, retinol along with phospholipid, and cholesterol were decreased in the lungs whereas alpha-tocopherol was elevated in the lungs and liver in response to MCT. These findings along with others suggest a novel mechanistic link between MCT-induced oxidative stress, lung vitamin A depletion, inflammation and the impairment of alveolar cell proliferation and repair. Pulmonary retinol is important in the pathogenesis of MCT-induced lung injury.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Introduction

Monocrotaline (MCT) is a pyrrolizidine alkaloid found in the plant seeds of the species Crotalaria spectabilis (Reference Gomez-Arroyo, Farkas and Alhussaini1) and has been used to induce lung injury and pulmonary hypertension (PH) in rats. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, specifically the CYP3A subfamily, are responsible for the hepatic bioactivation of monocrotaline (MCT) into its reactive metabolite, dehydromonocrotaline (MCTP), which is the major pathway for activation(Reference He, Lian and Ding2Reference Lachant, Meoli, Haight, Lyons, Swarthout and White4). MCTP has been found to cause oxidative stress in both hepatic and pulmonary tissues(Reference Kamezaki, Tasaki and Yamashita5Reference Amin, Hassan, Awad and Hashem7). The oxidative metabolite MCTP is transported from the liver to the lungs, increasing lung oxidation as evidenced by marked increases of oxidative stress markers in lung tissues(Reference He, Lian and Ding2,Reference Al Tanoury, Piskunov and Rochette-Egly3) . The increased oxidative stress markers induced by MCT include elevated lipid peroxidation byproducts: malondialdehyde (MDA), 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE-4) and 8-isoprostane(Reference Kamezaki, Tasaki and Yamashita5,Reference Puukila, Fernandes and Türck8Reference Krzyżewska, Baranowska-Kuczko, Jastrząb, Kasacka and Kozłowska12) . Also, reactive oxygen species (ROS) byproduct nucleic acid 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) was found to be elevated(Reference Wang, Jing and Zhao9). All of the subsequent antioxidant enzyme activity are downregulated, which is indicated by lower levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, total sulfhydryl groups (SH), glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione (GSH)(Reference Wu, Hao and Yang10,Reference Krzyżewska, Baranowska-Kuczko, Jastrząb, Kasacka and Kozłowska12Reference Farahmand, Malik, Sharma, Bagchi and Singal15) . The oxidative stress exhibited in the lungs is linked with PH and then ultimately right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH)(Reference He, Lian and Ding2).

MCT-induced PH has provided scientists with an excellent animal model for the study of PH since 1967, which has given insights on PH progression and has been used for preclinical testing of new therapeutic strategies(Reference Gomez-Arroyo, Farkas and Alhussaini1Reference Al Tanoury, Piskunov and Rochette-Egly3,Reference Puukila, Fernandes and Türck8Reference Wu, Hao and Yang10,Reference Prescott, Zimmerman and McIntyre16Reference Singh and Bisserier18) . MCTP causes severe vascular remodeling after initial onset of injury(Reference He, Lian and Ding2). Pulmonary vascular endothelial cell injury is accompanied by progressive pulmonary vascular leakage as well as the inhibition of endothelial cell division(Reference Al Tanoury, Piskunov and Rochette-Egly3). Extensive endothelial cell injury results in the migration of inflammatory cells, such as neutrophils, to the area. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes release free radical components, which can damage alveolar cell membrane components, resulting in cell death(Reference Prescott, Zimmerman and McIntyre16). An effective means of combating MCT-induced oxidative stress involves the antioxidant system. Retinol is a well-known antioxidant(Reference Shastak, Gordillo and Pelletier19). However, the precise role of vitamin A in the pathology associated with monocrotaline is not thoroughly defined.

Vitamin A and its metabolites are necessary cofactors that regulate gene expression and cellular differentiation(Reference Al Tanoury, Piskunov and Rochette-Egly3). Within the liver, vitamin A mainly functions as a stored nutrient, although it has been shown to provide an anti-inflammatory role as well(Reference Reifen20). Vitamin A has also been shown to influence male albino rat sensitivity to hexacholorocyclohexane (HCH) toxicity by modulating the activity of hepatic xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, thus vitamin A may function to assist in the detoxification of hepatotoxins(Reference Joseph, Shivanandappa, Narasimhamurhty and Krishnakumari21). The pleotropic effects of vitamin A are well known, however vitamin A’s role as an anti-inflammatory and detoxifying agent in response to MCT is less well known.

There is evidence to suggest that oxidative injury is increased in liver disease. Isoprostanes, a family of prostaglandin isomers, are formed in a free radical catalyzed manner from arachidonic acid-containing phospholipid(Reference Practico, Iuliano and Basili22). Data from this study showed that isoprostane biosynthesis, and subsequent oxidative injury, increased in patients with hepatic cirrhosis(Reference Practico, Iuliano and Basili22). Diseases involving oxidative stress and inflammation, such as tumorigenesis and cancer development, have been shown to alter alpha-tocopherol content in tissue where damage occurs. Previous studies have shown that alpha-tocopherol content was depleted in the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma, but alpha-tocopherol concentration doubled in metastatic liver nodules in patients with liver cirrhosis(Reference Rocchi, Seium and Camellini23). The generation of free radicals due to hypoxic gas mixture resulted in depletion of glutathione and alpha-tocopherol concentrations in the liver(Reference El-Bassiouni, Abollo, Helmy, Isamil and Ramadan24). As an antioxidant, alpha-tocopherol protects the unsaturated fats from oxidation in low density lipoproteins (LDLs)(Reference Traber25).

The aim of this research was to determine how MCT toxicity alters lung and liver content of retinol and alpha-tocopherol content in rats. The effects of pyrrolizidine toxins on vitamin A and alpha-tocopherol concentrations are not known. MCT toxicity presents a model for systemic toxicity that can be used to determine how antioxidant and anti-inflammatory compounds are utilized, in particular retinol and alpha-tocopherol.

Materials and methods

Animals and treatment

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were housed in stainless steel cages at approximately 24°C with a 12-hour light: 12-hour dark cycle. Animal care and use were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Kansas State University. Rats were cared for in an animal facility approved by the American Association for the Advancement of Laboratory Animal Care.

Monocrotaline (Trans World Chemicals, Rockville, MD) was dissolved in 0.1 mol/L HCl and neutralized with 0.1 mol/L NaOH. Rats were fed their respective diets for 1 week and then injected subcutaneously with 60 mg monocrotaline/kg body weight or its vehicle (VEH).

Twelve rats weighing 150–170 g were distributed randomly into two groups, MCT and VEH, and were injected with monocrotaline or its vehicle. The sample size was chosen based on previous experiments. All rats were pair-fed the control AIN-93G growth purified diet (Dyets, Bethlehem, PA). AIN-93G includes 2.2 mg of vitamin A (as retinyl palmitate) and 75 mg of vitamin E (as alpha-tocopheryl acetate) per kilogram of diet. Food intake and body weights were measured.

Twenty-three days after injection of MCT or its VEH, both groups were anesthetized with halothane (U.S.P., Halocarbon Laboratories, River Edge, NJ), and heart, lung, and liver were collected and stored in a −70°C freezer until analysis. Prior to analysis, butylated-hydroxytoluene, BHT, (2,[6]-Di-tert-butyl-p-cresol, Sigma Chemical Co, St. Louis, MO) was added, and tissues were minced. Three aliquots of 500 mg of minced tissue were stored in amber-colored centrifuge tubes on ice and then analyzed.

Heart measurements

The hearts from each rat were analyzed to determine the severity of right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH). The right ventricle (RV) was separated from the left ventricle (LV) plus septal wall (S), and both parts were weighed to assess RVH.

Total lipid fraction

Total lipid fractions were separated by the Folch method(Reference Folch, Ascoli, Lees and Meath26). Isolated lipid extracts were sealed and stored in a dark −70°C freezer until lipid analysis.

Cholesterol determination

Three hundred microliters of 33% KOH (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ) in deionized water, 100 µL of total lipid extract and 3 mL 95% ethanol (HPLC grade, Fisher Scientific) were pipetted into tubes that were then capped and vortexed. Lipid extracts were saponified for 15 min in a 60°C water bath, removed, and allowed to cool. Five mL of hexane (HPLC grade, Fisher Scientific) and 1.5 mL of deionized water were added to the tubes, and the upper lipid extract layer was pipetted off and placed in a second set of tubes. The solvent was evaporated with nitrogen gas (Compressed, Salina, KS). Three mL of 50 mg/100 mL ortho-phthalaldehyde reagent (Sigma Chemical Co.) in glacial acetic acid (Fisher Scientific) was added to the tubes and vortexed immediately. Tubes were read by spectrophotometry (UV-1201, UV-VIS Spectrophotometer, Shimadzeu Corp), at an optical density of 550 nm. Absorbance was measured against the standard curve of cholesteryl palmitate (Sigma Chemical Co., in chloroform) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL as a reference standard.

Phospholipid determination

One hundred microliters of total sample was added to each test tube and evaporated with nitrogen gas. Four hundred microliters of chloroform (HPLC grade, Fisher Scientific), 100 µL of chromogenic solution was added to lipid extract and gently vortexed(Reference Raheja, Kaur, Singh and Bhatia27). Tubes were tightly capped and placed in a boiling water bath for 1–1.5 min. Samples were removed from the water bath, and after reaching room temperature, 4 mL of chloroform was added, tubes were vortexed, then allowed to sit for 30 min. The lower solution was recovered by pipetting, and the amount of phospholipid was measured spectrophotometrically at 710 nm. The concentration of phospholipid was determined by measuring absorbance against a standard curve of phosphatidylcholine (Sigma Chemical Co.).

Measurement of alpha-tocopherol concentration

Homogenizer tubes were pre-weighted, and approximately 100–200 mg of minced tissue sample was placed in the tube. Six hundred micromoles of internal standard and alpha-tocopherol acetate (Sigma Chemical Co.) dissolved in methanol (HPLC grad, Fisher Scientific) were added to the tubes. Two mL of acetone (HPLC grade, Fisher Scientific) was added, and the contents of the tube were homogenized. This step was repeated twice to ensure that the contents were thoroughly homogenized. Test tubes were centrifuged for 20 min, and using a 13 mm syringe and syringe filter (0.45 µm PTFE, Alltech) the supernatant was pipetted from the original tubes and filtered into another set. The original tubes were washed with acetone twice, and their contents were nitrogen evaporated. Six hundred microliters of methanol (Fisher Scientific) was added to the tubes to re-dissolve the alpha-tocopherol. Fifteen microliters of the methanol/alpha-tocopherol solution was injected into the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column with a retention time of 7 min.

Measurement of retinol concentration

Two hundred microliters of total sample and 10 mL of KOH solution (95.0% ethanol, HPLC grade, Fisher Scientific, 5.0% KOH, pelleted, Fisher Scientific, 1.0% pyrogallol, Sigma Chemical Co.) were added to each test tube and vortexed. The mixture was saponified for 20 min in a 60°C water bath and cooled to room temperature. Twenty mL of hexane and 10 mL of water were added and the tubes were vortexed again. The upper hexane layer was pipetted off and 100 µL of retinyl acetate (all trans-retinol acetate, Sigma Chemical Co.) was added as an internal standard. The solution was evaporated with nitrogen and brought to a final volume of 100 µL with methanol (HPLC grade, Fisher Scientific). Fifteen microliters of retinol extract were injected into HPLC with a retention time of 7 min.

The use of HPLC analysis of alpha-tocopherol and retinol

High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to analyze alpha-tocopherol and retinol. HPLC analysis used two necessary phases, the mobile and stationary phases. The mobile phase was a mixture of substances to be fractionated, which in the case of our research contained the sample and an internal standard, either retinyl acetate or alpha-tocopherol acetate. The stationary phase consisted of a porous solid matrix, in our case a C-18 column, which the aforementioned mobile phase was passed over. The HPLC was set for reverse phase chromatography, in which the stationary phase was less polar than the mobile phase. This resulted in a lower affinity of polar molecules in the mobile phase than the stationary phase. The HPLC was set to ensure a higher percent recovery (elution) of the internal standard, as well as the micronutrients under investigation, alpha-tocopherol and retinol.

Statistical analysis

When appropriate, data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical differences among means were considered significant when P < 0.05. Treatment-dependent changes for all reported values, including organ weights and the right ventricular hypertrophy data [RV/(LV + S)], were analyzed using T-tests to determine differences between the control (VEH) and monocrotaline (MCT) group means.

Results

Food intake between both groups was consistent and not significantly different for the first 21 days after injection of MCT or its vehicle, because both groups were pair-fed (Figure 1a). Two MCT-treated rats died on day 21 and a parallel experiment for the two MCT-treated replacement rats was carried out using the same breed, age, food and length of time after MCT injection before tissue collection. The results from the two replacement MCT-treated rats’ analysis showed that their food intakes were not significantly different from those of the 4 surviving MCT-treated rats, therefore their data was combined with the original MCT-treated rats.

Figure 1. Food consumption and rat weight. (a) Food consumption for pair-fed animals, VEH and MCT groups after injection of MCT or its vehicle. Animals were fed a standard AIN 93G diet. The pair feeding was done as follows: the average food intake for the MCT group was provided to the VEH group the following day. Data shown ranges from day 1 through day 23. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 6. (b) On day 1 of the study the animals in both groups were very similar in weight, VEH weighing 164.7 ± 6.3 and MCT weighing 165.3 ± 2.5 g. By day 23, the average weights of both groups were statistically significantly different, VEH weighing 300.5 ± 8.4 and MCT weight 236.2 ± 9.5 g (P < 0.00001).

On day 22 there was an abrupt change in food consumption; the MCT group consumed approximately half the food intake as the control group, VEH, 19.6 ± 0.3, vs. MCT, 10.8 ± 5.9 g. Decreased food consumption was accompanied by labored breathing and lengthened response time to external stimuli. Weight gain was also significantly affected by monocrotaline toxicity (Figure 1b). At the start of the study animals in both groups were very similar in weight, VEH weighing 164.7 ± 6.3 and MCT weighing 165.3 ± 2.5 g. By day 23, the average weights of both groups were significantly different, VEH weighing 300.5 ± 8.4 and MCT weight 236.2 ± 9.5 g (P < 0.00001).

There was no significant difference in organ weights except for lungs (P < 0.001) and hearts (P < 0.002). Because MCT-treated rats weighed significantly less than the VEH group, we expressed the organ weights relative to body weight. The organ to body weight ratio for the harvested organs was significantly heavier for the MCT group compared to VEH (Figure 2). The lung ratio for VEH was 0.0042 ± 0.0002 and for MCT was 0.0108 ± 0.0023 g (P < 0.00004), and the liver ratio for VEH was 0.026 ± 0.001 while for MCT it was 0.037 ± 0.0047 g (P < 0.0002). The kidney ratio for VEH was 0.0064 ± 0.0003 and for MCT it was 0.0077 ± 0.005 g (P < 0.0004). The heart VEH ratio was 0.0034 ± 0.0003 and MCT was 0.0051 ± 0.0004 g (P < 0.00001).

Figure 2. Comparison of various organs expressed as organ to body weight ratio 3 weeks after MCT/VEH injection. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Statistically significant differences in organ/body ratio are shown: *P < 0.0005, **P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.00005.

RVH was determined as an indirect measure of PH (Figure 3). RVH for VEH was 0.25 ± 0.041, and MCT was calculated to be 0.45 ± 0.038 (P < 0.001). A ratio of approximately 0.2 was considered normal and a ratio of 0.3 as hypertensive(Reference Bummer, Baughn and Sanders28).

Figure 3. Development of right ventricular hypertrophy in rats 3 weeks after subcutaneous injection of MCT or its Vehicle. Severity of disease assessed by RVH: (RV/[S + LV]). Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. MCT treatment group showed RVH greater than 0.3, **P < 0.001.

Note: This cardiac ratio has no units. RV: Right ventricle; S: Septum; LV: Left Ventricle.

Retinol concentrations in the lungs of MCT treated rats were significantly lower than VEH (Figure 4a), VEH lung concentration was 5.8 ± 1.4 vs. MCT, 2.0 ± 1.2 nmol/g lung tissue (P < 0.001). Liver concentrations did not differ significantly, VEH at 2.5 ± 0.9 vs. MCT at 3.3 ± nmol/g liver tissue. As retinol is a fat-soluble vitamin, we expressed it per 100 mg total lipid (Figure 4b). The data shows that there were significantly lower levels of retinol per lipid in the lungs of MCT-treated rats, MCT was 1.66 ± 0.63 and VEH 3.18 ± 0.67 nmol retinol/100 mg total lipid (P < 0.001).

Figure 4. Retinol. (a) Concentration of retinol per gram of tissue from MCT and VEH rats. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Lung concentrations of retinol were significantly different, *P < 0.001. Liver concentrations were not statistically significant between groups. (b) Retinol, expressed per 100 mg total lipid in MCT and VEH rats. Retinol content is significantly lower in the lungs of MCT treated rats, **P < 0.003. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6.

Although there was a decrease in retinol concentration in the lungs, there was a surprising increase in lung and liver concentrations of alpha-tocopherol (Figure 5a). Lung concentration of alpha-tocopherol in MCT treated rats (145 ± 24 nmol g/tissue) was approximately 30% higher than VEH, 99 ± 13 nmol g/tissue (P < 0.01). Liver content of alpha-tocopherol for MCT was 107 ± 30 nmol g/tissue vs. VEH was 47.7 ± 4.8 nmol g/tissue. Alpha-tocopherol, expressed per total lipid (Figure 5b), was found to be 65% higher in the lungs of MCT treated rats, 143 ± 93 vs. VEH at 55 ± 11 nmol vitamin E/100 mg total lipid (P < 0.05). In the liver MCT, 101 ± 37.7 vs. VEH, 40 ± 7.6 nmol vitamin E/100 mg total lipid (P < 0.01).

Figure 5. Alpha-tocopherol. (a) Alpha-tocopherol expressed nmol per gram of tissue. Alpha-tocopherol is significantly higher in both lung and liver of MCT treated rats, compared to VEH rats, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.005. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6. (b) Alpha-tocopherol expressed per 100 mg total lipid. Alpha-tocopherol/total lipid ratio is significantly higher in the lung and liver of MCT-treated rats compared to VEH, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6. (c) Alpha-tocopherol expressed nmol per µmol of phospholipid and cholesterol in MCT and VEH treated rats. Ratios of alpha-tocopherol to phospholipid and cholesterol are both significantly higher in the lung and liver of MCT-treated rats compared to VEH, *P < 0.01, ** P < 0.05. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6. (d) Alpha-tocopherol expressed as nmol/µmol of cholesterol in the liver of MCT and VEH treated rates. Alpha-tocopherol/cholesterol ratio is significantly higher in MCT treated rats, as compared to VEH, *P < 0.05. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6.

Alpha-tocopherol, expressed in nmol per µmol of phospholipid, was higher in MCT treated rats in the lung, with MCT was 3.6 ± 0.7 vs. VEH was 1.7 ± 0.2, as well as in the liver, with MCT value was 4 ± 1.7 vs. VEH was 2.34 ± 0.3 (P < 0.05). Alpha-tocopherol, expressed as nmol per µmol cholesterol, was also higher in the lung of MCT treated rats, with MCT was 82.7 ± 18 vs. VEH was 38 ± 56 (P < 0.0001) (Figure 5c). In the liver the MCT value was 7.3 ± 2.9 vs. VEH was 3.8 ± 1.6 (P < 0.05) (Figure 5d).

Although cell membrane concentrations of phospholipid and cholesterol were not measured directly, total lung and liver concentrations of these two important fats were determined (Figure 6). Despite higher concentrations of alpha-tocopherol in the lung and liver of MCT treated rats, total phospholipid and cholesterol in the lung (Figure 6) were significantly lower in MCT compared to VEH. Lung PL for MCT was 37.5 ± 8.6 and was 58 ± 4.4 µmol/g lung tissue for VEH. Cholesterol concentrations were also significantly lower in MCT rats, 1.6 ± 0.6 vs. VEH was 2.6 ± 0.4 µmol/g lung tissue (P < 0.01). Liver concentrations of phospholipid and cholesterol were not found to be significantly different.

Figure 6. Phospholipid and cholesterol in the lung, (µmol/g lung) of MCT and VEH treated rats. Phospholipid and cholesterol were both significantly lower in MCT treated rats, **P < 0.0005, *P < 0.007. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6.

Discussion

We investigated how the oxidative toxin, monocrotaline that is used to induce pulmonary hypertension in a rat model, changes retinol and alpha-tocopherol concentrations within the lung and liver of rats. Retinol plays an important role in the normal lung function. We also measured cholesterol and phospholipid concentrations in the lungs and liver of rats, due to their significance in the lung surfactant producing cell, the type II pneumocyte. The results of this study for the first time showed that MCT; 1) decreased retinol content in the lung but did not change liver retinol content; 2) increased alpha-tocopherol content in both the lung and liver; and 3) decreased phospholipid and cholesterol content of the lungs but did not significantly alter those lipid compounds in the liver.

This is the first time reported that vitamin A levels within the lungs were decreased in response to MCT toxicity. Decreasing concentrations of lung retinol may be in response to oxidative stress in the lung(Reference Shastak, Gordillo and Pelletier19,Reference Li, Molteni, Latkovich, Castellani and Baybutt29) . We have previously shown that in a pro-oxidative and pro-inflammatory smoking model, vitamin A levels were depleted in lung and liver(Reference Li, Molteni, Latkovich, Castellani and Baybutt29). Further, several studies have shown that retinol concentration decreases the presence of lipid peroxidation that was induced by tissue inflammation(Reference Chapman, Prabhudesai and Erdman30,Reference Kanda, Yamamoto and Yoshino31) . Vitamin A depletion induced by MCT could be mediated in part through oxidation and/or inflammation.

In MCT-treated rats there is increased lung inflammation(Reference Krzyżewska, Baranowska-Kuczko, Jastrząb, Kasacka and Kozłowska12,Reference Swamidas, Basaraba and Baybutt32) . We have previously shown that vitamin A deficiency increases lung inflammation(Reference Baybutt, Hu and Molteni33). Furthermore, in another study we have shown that in MCT-treated rats that are supplemented with additional vitamin A, inflammation is significantly reduced(Reference Swamidas, Basaraba and Baybutt32). In this current study, we have shown that MCT significantly reduces vitamin A in the lung. Therefore, the reason that there is an increase in lung inflammation in MCT-treated rats may in part be attributed to depleted vitamin A. It is important to note that vitamin A supplementation did not prevent right ventricular hypertrophy in our pulmonary hypertension model, but effective decreased lung inflammation(Reference Swamidas, Basaraba and Baybutt32).

As we have previously noted, MCT increases inflammation and oxidation, depleting retinol. The increased inflammation may also decrease retinol transport due to the adverse effect on the transport protein for vitamin A, retinol binding protein (RBP). Monocrotaline has been shown to cause acute inflammation in liver tissues(Reference Copple, Banes, Ganey and Roth34). Other studies have shown that acute systemic inflammation significantly reduces serum RBP and retinol, and both hepatic RBP’s mRNA and protein concentrations(Reference Rosales, Ritter, Zolfaghari, Smith and Ross35,Reference Gieng, Raila and Rosales36) . Likewise, it has been shown that there is an inverse relationship between plasma inflammatory markers such as CRP and serum RBP(Reference Rubin, Ross, Stephensen, Bohn and Tanumihardjo37). The decrease in RBP was paralleled with a decrease in plasma retinol levels(Reference Gieng, Raila and Rosales36,Reference Rubin, Ross, Stephensen, Bohn and Tanumihardjo37) . Retinol binding protein is the major transport protein for retinol from the liver, and it is responsible for the transport of retinol throughout the blood(Reference Rosales, Ritter, Zolfaghari, Smith and Ross35Reference Rubin, Ross, Stephensen, Bohn and Tanumihardjo37). Decreased concentrations of RBP will decrease the release of hepatic retinol, potentially elevating hepatic retinol, which has been previously reported(Reference Gieng, Raila and Rosales36). However, for our pro-oxidative induced MCT model, we observe no change in hepatic retinol, which may be explained by oxidative destruction of the retinol. This warrants future research.

This is the first time it has been reported that concentrations of alpha-tocopherol were elevated in the liver and lung in rats treated with MCT. Elevated lung and liver alpha-tocopherol levels have been reported in other pro-oxidation models(Reference Elsayed38Reference Seven, Guzel and Seymen40). It is well known that alpha-tocopherol is utilized by the body for its antioxidant capabilities and studies have shown a positive correlation between oxidative stress within the lung and elevation of alpha-tocopherol(Reference Elsayed38,Reference Elsayed, Mustafa and Mead39,Reference Kolleck, Sinha and Rüstow41,Reference Ryan, Hashim, Cernansky, Barrett, Bell and Liau42) . Oxidative stress appears to be one of the key mechanisms by which MCT exerts its toxic effects(Reference He, Lian and Ding2,Reference Al Tanoury, Piskunov and Rochette-Egly3,Reference Kamezaki, Tasaki and Yamashita5Reference Krzyżewska, Baranowska-Kuczko, Jastrząb, Kasacka and Kozłowska12,Reference Farahmand, Malik, Sharma, Bagchi and Singal15) . With regard to MCT toxicity, it seems that the increase in tissue alpha-tocopherol is in response to oxidative metabolites.

Total lung phospholipid and cholesterol were found to be significantly lower within the MCT treated group (Figure 6). Eighty-six percent of lung phospholipid is made up of cellular phospholipid(Reference Kolleck, Guthmann, Ladhoff, Tandon, Schlame and Rüstow43). Type II pneumocytes are the most numerous alveolar cells and are markedly decrease in response to MCT administration(Reference Crapo, Barry, Gehr, Bachofen and Weibel44, Reference Wilson and Segall45). Both phospholipid and cholesterol are critical components of the type II pneumocyte(Reference Wilson and Segall45,Reference King and Clements46) . Previously, it has been shown that retinoic acid promotes cell proliferation of type II pneumocytes in the cell repair process(Reference Nabeyrat, Corroyer, Epaud, Besnard, Cazals and Clement47,Reference Nabeyrat, Besnard, Corroyer, Cazals and Clement48) . MCT-induced decrease in the lung cell number would also decrease total lung phospholipid and cholesterol, which may be attributed to depleted Vitamin A.

Conclusion

In summary, this study provides the first direct evidence that MCT-induced pulmonary toxicity is characterized by a significant and organ-specific dysregulation of key lipophilic micronutrients, retinol and alpha-tocopherol. We demonstrate that MCT administration selectively depletes pulmonary retinol while concurrently elevating alpha-tocopherol concentrations in both the lung and liver.

Our data supports a pathogenic model wherein MCT-induced oxidative and inflammatory insults within the lung trigger a localized depletion of retinol. Consequently, this micronutrient deficiency likely impairs the reparative and proliferative capacity of type II pneumocytes and may, in part, explain the observed reductions in total lung phospholipid and cholesterol (Figure 7). The systemic elevation of alpha-tocopherol appears to be a compensatory antioxidant response to this oxidative challenge. The hepatic retinol was unchanged, despite MCT’s known hepatotoxicity.

Figure 7. Schematic figure to summarize proposed mechanism of injury.

These findings suggest a novel mechanistic link between MCT-induced oxidative stress, lung vitamin A depletion, inflammation, and the impairment of alveolar cell proliferation and repair. This work identifies pulmonary retinol status as an important contributing factor in the pathogenesis of this model of lung injury.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2026.10077

Acknowledgements

Supported by the American Heart Association, Kansas Affiliate, INC., and Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. The authors thank Dr. Sung I. Koo for his comments regarding the manuscript, as well as Wei Zou and Ling Hu for their laboratory assistance, and Emily Belfi for her technical assistance. We thank the Lord for His guidance and grace. We are grateful for the resources made available by Dean Barbara S. Stowe and acting Department Head Judith L. Miller.

Author contribution

Richard Carleton Baybutt was the senior investigator responsible for all aspects of the experiments and writing of the manuscript. Vance La Baron Smith was responsible for sample collection, data analysis, and assisting in the initial writing of the manuscript. Donovan Kearns and Samuel B. Stafford were responsible for assisting with the writing of the manuscript. The authors have read and agreed to the publishing of the manuscript.

Financial support

This work was supported by American Heart Association, Kansas Affiliate, INC., and Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Gomez-Arroyo, JG, Farkas, L, Alhussaini, AA, et al. The monocrotaline model of pulmonary hypertension in perspective. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302(4):L363L369.10.1152/ajplung.00212.2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Y, Lian, W, Ding, L, et al. Lung injury induced by pyrrolizidine alkaloids depends on metabolism by hepatic cytochrome P450s and blood transport of reactive metabolites. Arch Toxicol. 2021;95(1):103116.10.1007/s00204-020-02921-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al Tanoury, Z, Piskunov, A, Rochette-Egly, C. Vitamin A and retinoid signaling: genomic and nongenomic effects. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(7):17611775.10.1194/jlr.R030833CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachant, DJ, Meoli, DF, Haight, D, Lyons, JA, Swarthout, RF, White, RJ. Low dose monocrotaline causes a selective pulmonary vascular lesion in male and female pneumonectomized rats. Exp Lung Res. 2018;44(1):5161.10.1080/01902148.2017.1422157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamezaki, F, Tasaki, H, Yamashita, K, et al. Gene transfer of extracellular superoxide dismutase ameliorates pulmonary hypertension in rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(2):219226.10.1164/rccm.200702-264OCCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pichardo, J, Palace, V, Farahmand, F, Singal, PK. Myocardial oxidative stress changes during compensated right heart failure in rats. Mol Cell Biochem. 1999;196(1–2):5157.10.1023/A:1006914111957CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amin, KA, Hassan, MS, Awad, EST, Hashem, KS. The protective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles against hepatic oxidative damage induced by monocrotaline. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:143149.10.2147/IJN.S15308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puukila, S, Fernandes, RO, Türck, P, et al. Secoisolariciresinol diglucoside attenuates cardiac hypertrophy and oxidative stress in monocrotaline-induced right heart dysfunction. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;432(1–2):3339.10.1007/s11010-017-2995-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y, Jing, L, Zhao, XM, et al. Protective effects of hydrogen-rich saline on monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in a rat model. Respir Res. 2011;12(1):26.10.1186/1465-9921-12-26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, F, Hao, Y, Yang, J, et al. Protective effects of aloperine on monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;89:632641.10.1016/j.biopha.2017.02.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, T, Liu, S, Ma, T, Jia, Z, Zhang, Z, Wang, A. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 protects against oxidative stress associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Redox Biol. 2017;11:286296.10.1016/j.redox.2016.12.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krzyżewska, A, Baranowska-Kuczko, M, Jastrząb, A, Kasacka, I, Kozłowska, H. Cannabidiol improves antioxidant capacity and reduces inflammation in the lungs of rats with monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension. Molecules. 2022;27(10):3327.10.3390/molecules27103327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carraro, CC, Turck, P, Bahr, A, et al. Effect of free and nanoemulsified β-caryophyllene on monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2024;1871(4):119704.10.1016/j.bbamcr.2024.119704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soltani Hekmat, A, Amini, F, Javanmardi, K. Effects of alamandine on monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2024;27(4):500508.Google ScholarPubMed
Farahmand, F, Malik, A, Sharma, A, Bagchi, AK, Singal, PK. Role of oxidative stress versus lipids in monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure. Physiol Rep. 2021;9(22):e15090.10.14814/phy2.15090CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prescott, S, Zimmerman, G, McIntyre, T. Platelet activation factor. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:1738117384.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)38167-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, JM, Harris, P, Heath, D. Pulmonary hypertension produced in rats by ingestion of Crotalaria spectabilis seeds. Thorax. 1967;22(2):176179.10.1136/thx.22.2.176CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, E, Bisserier, M. Experimental animal models and patient-derived platforms to bridge preclinical discovery and translational therapeutics in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Transl Med. 2025;23(1):665.10.1186/s12967-025-06709-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shastak, Y, Gordillo, A, Pelletier, W. The relationship between vitamin A status and oxidative stress in animal production. Indian J Anim Nutr. 2023;40(3):546553.Google Scholar
Reifen, R. Vitamin A as an anti-inflammatory agent. Proc Nutr Soc. 2002;61(3):397400.10.1079/PNS2002172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, P, Shivanandappa, T, Narasimhamurhty, K, Krishnakumari, M. Effect of vitamin A on hexachlorocyclohexan (HCH) toxicity in the rat. Gen Pharmacol. 1992;23(6):11591164.10.1016/0306-3623(92)90305-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Practico, D, Iuliano, L, Basili, S, et al. Enhanced lipid peroxidation in hepatic cirrhosis. J Investig Med. 1998;46:5157.Google Scholar
Rocchi, E, Seium, Y, Camellini, L, et al. Hepatic tocopherol content in primary heptocellular carcinoma and liver metastases. Hepatology. 1997;26:6772.10.1002/hep.510260109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Bassiouni, E, Abollo, M, Helmy, M, Isamil, S, Ramadan, M. Changes in the defense against free radicals in the liver and plasma of the dog during hypoxia and/or halothane anaesthesia. Toxicology. 1998;128:2534.10.1016/S0300-483X(98)00045-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traber, M. Utilization of vitamin E. Biofactors. 1999;10(2–3):115120.10.1002/biof.5520100205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, J, Ascoli, I, Lees, M, Meath, J, LeBARON N. Preparation of lipide extracts from brain tissue. J Biol Chem. 1951;191(2):833841.10.1016/S0021-9258(18)55987-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raheja, R, Kaur, C, Singh, A, Bhatia, S. New colorimetric method for the quantitative estimation of phospholipids without acid digestion. J Lipid Res. 1973;14(6):695697.10.1016/S0022-2275(20)36853-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bummer, PM, Baughn, JA, Sanders, LP, et al. Surfactant disposition in rats with monocrotaline-induced pneumotoxicity. Toxicology. 1994;90(1–2):5362.10.1016/0300-483X(94)90204-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, T, Molteni, A, Latkovich, P, Castellani, W, Baybutt, RC. Vitamin A depletion induced by cigarette smoke is associated with the development of emphysema in rats. J Nutr. 2003;133(8):26292634.10.1093/jn/133.8.2629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, K, Prabhudesai, M, Erdman, J. Effects of acute ethanol doses or dietary phenobarbitol with carbon tetrachloride exposure on Vitamin A status of rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992;17(3):637642.10.1111/j.1530-0277.1993.tb00811.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanda, Y, Yamamoto, N, Yoshino, Y. Utilization of vitamin A in rats with inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1034:337341.10.1016/0304-4165(90)90061-ZCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swamidas, GP, Basaraba, RJ, Baybutt, RC. Dietary retinol inhibits inflammatory responses of rats treated with monocrotaline. J Nutr. 1999;129(7):12851290.10.1093/jn/129.7.1285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baybutt, R, Hu, L, Molteni, A. Vitamin A deficiency injures lung and liver parenchyma and impairs function of rat type II pneumocytes. J Nutr. 2000;130(5):11591165.Google ScholarPubMed
Copple, B, Banes, A, Ganey, P, Roth, R. Endothelial cell injury and fibrin deposition in rat liver after monocrotaline exposure. Toxicol Sci. 2002;65(2):309318.10.1093/toxsci/65.2.309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosales, F, Ritter, S, Zolfaghari, R, Smith, J, Ross, A. Effects of acute inflammation on plasma retinol, retinol-binding protein, and its mRNA in the liver and kidneys of vitamin A-sufficient rats. J Lipid Res. 1996;37(5):962971.10.1016/S0022-2275(20)42007-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gieng, SH, Raila, J, Rosales, FJ. Accumulation of retinol in the liver after prolonged hyporetinolemia in the vitamin A-sufficient rat. J Lipid Res. 2005;46(4):641649.10.1194/jlr.M400415-JLR200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, LP, Ross, AC, Stephensen, CB, Bohn, T, Tanumihardjo, SA. Metabolic effects of inflammation on vitamin A and carotenoids in humans and animal models. Adv Nutr. 2017;8(2):197212.10.3945/an.116.014167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsayed, NM. Antioxidant mobilization in response to oxidative stress: a dynamic environmental-nutritional interaction. Nutrition. 2001;17(10):828834.10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00646-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elsayed, NM, Mustafa, MG, Mead, JF. Increased vitamin E content in the lung after ozone exposure: a possible mobilization in response to oxidative stress. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1990;282(2):263269.10.1016/0003-9861(90)90115-FCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seven, A, Guzel, S, Seymen, O, et al. Effects of vitamin E supplementation on oxidative stress in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats: investigation of liver and plasma. Yonsei Med J. 2004;45(4):703710.10.3349/ymj.2004.45.4.703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolleck, I, Sinha, P, Rüstow, B. Vitamin E as an antioxidant of the lung: mechanisms of vitamin E delivery to alveolar type II cells. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(12 Pt 2):S62S66.10.1164/rccm.2206019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, SF, Hashim, SA, Cernansky, G, Barrett, CR Jr, Bell, AL Jr, Liau, DF. Quantification of surfactant phospholipids in the dog lung. J Lipid Res. 1980;21(8):10041014.10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34760-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolleck, I, Guthmann, F, Ladhoff, AM, Tandon, NN, Schlame, M, Rüstow, B. Cellular cholesterol stimulates acute uptake of palmitate by redistribution of fatty acid translocase in type II pneumocytes. Biochemistry. 2002;41(20):63696375.10.1021/bi015980uCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crapo, JD, Barry, BE, Gehr, P, Bachofen, M, Weibel, ER. Cell number and cell characteristics of the normal human lung. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982;126(2):332337.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, DW, Segall, HJ. Changes in type II cell populations in monocrotaline pneumotoxicity. Am J Pathol. 1990;136(6):12931299.Google ScholarPubMed
King, RJ, Clements, JA. Surface active materials from dog lung. II. Composition and physiological correlations. Am J Physiol. 1972;223(3):715726.10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.223.3.715CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabeyrat, E, Corroyer, S, Epaud, R, Besnard, V, Cazals, V, Clement, A. Retinoic acid-induced proliferation of lung alveolar epithelial cells is linked to p21(CIP1) downregulation. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;278(1):L42L50.10.1152/ajplung.2000.278.1.L42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nabeyrat, E, Besnard, V, Corroyer, S, Cazals, V, Clement, A. Retinoic acid-induced proliferation of lung alveolar epithelial cells: relation with the IGF system. Am J Physiol. 1998;275(1):L71L79.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Food consumption and rat weight. (a) Food consumption for pair-fed animals, VEH and MCT groups after injection of MCT or its vehicle. Animals were fed a standard AIN 93G diet. The pair feeding was done as follows: the average food intake for the MCT group was provided to the VEH group the following day. Data shown ranges from day 1 through day 23. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. n = 6. (b) On day 1 of the study the animals in both groups were very similar in weight, VEH weighing 164.7 ± 6.3 and MCT weighing 165.3 ± 2.5 g. By day 23, the average weights of both groups were statistically significantly different, VEH weighing 300.5 ± 8.4 and MCT weight 236.2 ± 9.5 g (P < 0.00001).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Comparison of various organs expressed as organ to body weight ratio 3 weeks after MCT/VEH injection. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Statistically significant differences in organ/body ratio are shown: *P < 0.0005, **P < 0.0001, ***P < 0.00005.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Development of right ventricular hypertrophy in rats 3 weeks after subcutaneous injection of MCT or its Vehicle. Severity of disease assessed by RVH: (RV/[S + LV]). Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. MCT treatment group showed RVH greater than 0.3, **P < 0.001.Note: This cardiac ratio has no units. RV: Right ventricle; S: Septum; LV: Left Ventricle.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Retinol. (a) Concentration of retinol per gram of tissue from MCT and VEH rats. Values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 6. Lung concentrations of retinol were significantly different, *P < 0.001. Liver concentrations were not statistically significant between groups. (b) Retinol, expressed per 100 mg total lipid in MCT and VEH rats. Retinol content is significantly lower in the lungs of MCT treated rats, **P < 0.003. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Alpha-tocopherol. (a) Alpha-tocopherol expressed nmol per gram of tissue. Alpha-tocopherol is significantly higher in both lung and liver of MCT treated rats, compared to VEH rats, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.005. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6. (b) Alpha-tocopherol expressed per 100 mg total lipid. Alpha-tocopherol/total lipid ratio is significantly higher in the lung and liver of MCT-treated rats compared to VEH, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6. (c) Alpha-tocopherol expressed nmol per µmol of phospholipid and cholesterol in MCT and VEH treated rats. Ratios of alpha-tocopherol to phospholipid and cholesterol are both significantly higher in the lung and liver of MCT-treated rats compared to VEH, *P < 0.01, ** P < 0.05. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6. (d) Alpha-tocopherol expressed as nmol/µmol of cholesterol in the liver of MCT and VEH treated rates. Alpha-tocopherol/cholesterol ratio is significantly higher in MCT treated rats, as compared to VEH, *P < 0.05. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Phospholipid and cholesterol in the lung, (µmol/g lung) of MCT and VEH treated rats. Phospholipid and cholesterol were both significantly lower in MCT treated rats, **P < 0.0005, *P < 0.007. All values expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 5 or 6.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Schematic figure to summarize proposed mechanism of injury.

Supplementary material: File

Baybutt et al. supplementary material

Baybutt et al. supplementary material
Download Baybutt et al. supplementary material(File)
File 50.6 KB