This study provides the large-scale bibliometric assessment of the Journal of Management & Organization (JMO), offering insights into its intellectual trajectory and positioning within the management field. Covering 1,083 documents published between 1995 and 2024, indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, the analysis applies performance metrics, citation structures, and science mapping using VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. The study is further grounded in institutional and field-theoretic perspectives, interpreting JMO’s evolution as a process of legitimacy-building and scientific capital accumulation within a global knowledge field. The results show that JMO’s growth has been marked by cyclical expansion, with a sharp increase in productivity since the mid-2000s but uneven citation impact, heavily reliant on a small set of landmark articles. Co-citation and bibliographic coupling analyses reveal intellectual roots in organizational behavior, psychology, and strategy, while keyword and thematic mapping highlight enduring strengths in leadership, human resource management, and job satisfaction. At the same time, new research frontiers have emerged in governance, innovation, sustainability, and work-life balance, reflecting JMO’s responsiveness to global challenges such as COVID-19 and digital transformation. Collaboration networks confirm the journal’s Australasian anchoring, yet also demonstrate growing integration into international research systems, particularly through linkages with the United States, China, and Europe. This study contributes to understanding JMO’s evolving role within management and organizational scholarship, identifying both its achievements and challenges. The findings offer insights for scholars, institutions, and editors on how JMO can consolidate high-impact niches, diversify its author base, and strengthen its influence in shaping global management debates.

Regional warming rates experienced in the Antarctic Peninsula since the mid-twentieth century, linked to global climate change, have been amongst the world's fastest. The majority of studies of change in this region have focused on temperature, and while precipitation is also predicted to change (both in form and quantity) in the models, fewer studies have set out to document and test this prediction. In this study, we examined trends in research publications on precipitation variability over the Antarctic Peninsula from 1990 to 2023 using the Web of Science Core Collection database. A total of 86 relevant papers were retained and used to identify patterns in scientific outputs. VOSviewer and Bibliometrix software packages were used to illustrate the subject content of and trends in publications retrieved by key word analysis. Our findings revealed a positive trend in the number of papers published by year. Within the analysed period, research on precipitation variability in the Antarctic Peninsula region was initiated by a study of Turner and colleagues from 1997. The UK and US research communities were the two largest contributors to this field of Antarctic research globally, with their researchers also holding strong positions within international collaborative networks.