We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Electronic health records (EHRs), increasingly available in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), provide an opportunity to study transdiagnostic features of serious mental illness (SMI) and its trajectories.
Aims
Characterise transdiagnostic features and diagnostic trajectories of SMI using an EHR database in an LMIC institution.
Method
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using EHRs from 2005–2022 at Clínica San Juan de Dios Manizales, a specialised mental health facility in Colombia, including 22 447 patients with schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BPD) or severe/recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD). Using diagnostic codes and clinical notes, we analysed the frequency of suicidality and psychosis across diagnoses, patterns of diagnostic switching and the accumulation of comorbidities. Mixed-effect logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing diagnostic stability.
Results
High frequencies of suicidality and psychosis were observed across diagnoses of SCZ, BPD and MDD. Most patients (64%) received multiple diagnoses over time, including switches between primary SMI diagnoses (19%), diagnostic comorbidities (30%) or both (15%). Predictors of diagnostic switching included mentions of delusions (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% CI 1.34–1.61), prior diagnostic switching (odds ratio = 4.01, 95% CI 3.7–4.34) and time in treatment, independent of age (log of visit number; odds ratio = 0.57, 95% CI 0.54–0.61). Over 80% of patients reached diagnostic stability within 6 years of their first record.
Conclusions
Integrating structured and unstructured EHR data reveals transdiagnostic patterns in SMI and predictors of disease trajectories, highlighting the potential of EHR-based tools for research and precision psychiatry in LMICs.
Many institutions are attempting to implement patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Because PROs often change clinical workflows significantly for patients and providers, implementation choices can have major impact. While various implementation guides exist, a stepwise list of decision points covering the full implementation process and drawing explicitly on a sociotechnical conceptual framework does not exist.
Methods:
To facilitate real-world implementation of PROs in electronic health records (EHRs) for use in clinical practice, members of the EHR Access to Seamless Integration of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Consortium developed structured PRO implementation planning tools. Each institution pilot tested the tools. Joint meetings led to the identification of critical sociotechnical success factors.
Results:
Three tools were developed and tested: (1) a PRO Planning Guide summarizes the empirical knowledge and guidance about PRO implementation in routine clinical care; (2) a Decision Log allows decision tracking; and (3) an Implementation Plan Template simplifies creation of a sharable implementation plan. Seven lessons learned during implementation underscore the iterative nature of planning and the importance of the clinician champion, as well as the need to understand aims, manage implementation barriers, minimize disruption, provide ample discussion time, and continuously engage key stakeholders.
Conclusions:
Highly structured planning tools, informed by a sociotechnical perspective, enabled the construction of clear, clinic-specific plans. By developing and testing three reusable tools (freely available for immediate use), our project addressed the need for consolidated guidance and created new materials for PRO implementation planning. We identified seven important lessons that, while common to technology implementation, are especially critical in PRO implementation.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.