The objective is to determine if a practical face-to-face emergency disaster incident response training program delivered in the clinical setting will improve self-reported confidence and assessed knowledge of emergency department (ED) nurses to respond to disasters.

A single site prospective pre-test and post-test randomized controlled trial was adopted for this study. The intervention was a practical face-to-face training program, while the control group completed the required annual mandatory hospital online training.

There was a large difference in post-test median self-reported confidence between groups. There was also a large difference in the proportion of subjects who reached satisfactory levels of self-reported confidence post-test. Regarding assessed knowledge, there was a moderate difference in post-test median knowledge between groups. There was also a moderate difference in the proportion who reached satisfactory levels of knowledge post-test.

This study has shown that ED nurses who undertake a practical face-to-face disaster preparedness education program in the clinical setting, are better prepared to respond to emergency disaster incidents. Organizations should consider the use of a practical structured face-to-face emergency disaster incident response education program to complement and enhance any online emergency and disaster training.

Nurses, as the largest group of frontline responders, play a crucial role in managing catastrophic incidents and addressing the health needs of affected populations. This study aims to identify and analyze the challenges faced by emergency nurses in Palestine who work in active conflict zones.

A quantitative, descriptive study design was employed. The research was conducted across emergency departments in 7 hospitals located in the West Bank. Data were collected from 171 nurses using a sociodemographic questionnaire and a challenge-specific questionnaire, developed and validated through literature review and expert consultations.

The study revealed that 70% of the nurses were aged between 25-29 years, with 51% being male and 60% married. Most respondents (95%) held a bachelor’s degree, 72% had received advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training, and 68% had advanced trauma life support (ATLS) training. Additionally, 76% of the nurses were informed about critical cases before the patients arrived at the hospital. The main challenge during emergencies, as the results mention, are inadequate numbers of nurses and physicians (60%). There was a significant concern regarding whether the number of nurses was sufficient to manage the demands and pressures specific to active conflict environments, with 62% of those in nursing feeling unsafe.

The scope of emergency nurses’ challenges in managing several hospitals in areas of armed conflict was examined in this study. The resulting overview of their duties, difficulties, and experiences serves as a useful tool and presents crucial details for future emergency nursing workforce readiness. To perform effectively in armed conflict situations, emergency nurses complete a variety of preparatory courses; however, the necessary education and training should be carefully designed in accordance with their actual roles and responsibilities in these circumstances.

Emergency nurses play a major role in disaster relief in mainland China, but there is no valid instrument to measure the extent of their disaster preparedness. The Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool© is a reliable instrument to assess the disaster preparedness of nurse practitioners. The tool has been translated and validated in Saudi Arabia, Taiwan, China and the United States of America.

This study aimed at translating and adapting the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool© (DPET) for emergency nurses in mainland China and determining its psychometric properties.

A total of 2 cross-sectional online surveys were conducted in the emergency departments of 26 public grade III-A hospitals in Guangdong, mainland China. In the first study, 633 emergency nurses were recruited from May to August, 2018. In the second study, 205 were recruited in April 2019.

The instrument was adapted through rigorous forward-backward translation, face validity, and pre-test processes. Exploratory factor and parallel analyses were used in the first study. Confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency and split-half reliability were used in the second study.

Exploratory factor and parallel analyses extracted a 5-factor solution comprising of 34 items that accounted for 64.06% of the total variance. The fit indices indicated a good model fit. The reliability was good, as indicated by a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97 and a split-half reliability coefficient of 0.97.

The mainland China version of the DPET (DPET-MC) was a reliable and valid instrument and can be used in practice.