Bilingual Sentence Processing

Part III - Bilingual Sentence Processing

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2019

Edited by

Roberto R. Heredia and

Anna B. Cieślicka

Show author details

Roberto R. Heredia: Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Anna B. Cieślicka: Affiliation:
Texas A & M University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution , pp. 157 - 228

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316535967 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Scholl, A., & Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-languages sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 477–492.Google Scholar

Balling, L. W. (2013). Reading authentic texts: What counts as cognate? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(3), 637–653.Google Scholar

Blumenfeld, H. K., & Marian, V. (2014). Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in Stimulus-Stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(3), 610–629.Google Scholar

Bultena, S., Dijkstra, T., & van Hell, J. G. (2014). Cognate effects in sentence context depend on word class, L2 proficiency, and task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1214–1241.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Charteris-Black, J. (2002). Second language figurative proficiency: A comparative study of Malay and English. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 104–133.Google Scholar

Cieślicka, A. B., & Heredia, R. R. (2017). How to “save your skin” when processing L2 idioms: An eye movement analysis of idiom transparency and cross-language similarity among bilinguals. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 81–107.Google Scholar

Cop, U., Dirix, N., van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Duyck, W. (2016). Reading a book in one or two languages? An eye movement study of cognate facilitation in L1 and L2 reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(4), 747–769.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (1999). Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: The neglected role of phonology. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 496–518. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2654.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, H. (2010). How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 284–301.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., & Rekké, S. (2010). Toward a localist-connectionist model of a word translation. The Mental Lexison, 5(3), 401–420.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Timmermans, M., & Schriefers, H. (2000). On being blinded by your other language: Effects of task demands on interlingual homograph recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(4), 445–464.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 175–197.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, R., van Jaarsveld, T., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of tasks demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., Wahl, A., Buythenhuijs, F., van Halem, N., Al-Jibouri, Z., De Korte, M., & Rekké, S. (2019). Multilink: A computational model for bilingual word recognition and word translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(4), 657–679.Google Scholar

Duyck, W., Vanderelst, D., Desmet, T., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2008). The frequency effect in second-language visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 850–855.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duyck, W., van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2007). Visual word recognition by bilinguals in a sentence context: Evidence for nonselective lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 663–679.Google Scholar

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1990). Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs. multiple senses. Journal of Memory and Language, 29(2), 181–200.Google Scholar

Gadsby, N., Arnott, W. L., & Copland, D. A. (2008). An investigation of working memory influences on lexical ambiguity resolution. Neuropsychology, 22(2), 209–216.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787–814.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gunter, T. C., Wagner, S., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPs: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(5), 643–657.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. M., Luke, S. G., Schmidt, J., & Richards, J. E. (2013). Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 7(28), 1–13.Google Scholar

Hoversten, L. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(2), 347–360.Google Scholar

Irujo, S. (1993). Steering clear: Avoidance in the production of idioms. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 205–219.Google Scholar

Jared, D., & Szucs, C. (2002). Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 225–239.Google Scholar

Kawamoto, A. H. (1988). Distributed representations of ambiguous words and their resolution in a connectionist network. In Small, S. I., Cottrell, G. W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (Eds.). Lexical ambiguity resolution (pp. 195–228). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.Google Scholar

Lemhöfer, K., Dijkstra, T., Schriefers, H., Baayen, R. H., Grainger, J., & Zwisterlood, P. (2008). Native language influences on word recognition in a second language: A megastudy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 12–31.Google Scholar

Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual Lexical Access in Context: Evidence from Eye Movements During Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390.Google Scholar

Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9, 225–236.Google Scholar

Palma, P., Whitford, V., & Titone, D. A. (in press). Cross-language activation and executive control modulate within-language ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.Google Scholar

Pivneva, I., Mercier, J., & Titone, D. A. (2014). Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 787–796.Google Scholar

Pivneva, I., Palmer, C., & Titone, D. A. (2012). Inhibitory control and L2 proficiency modulate bilingual language production: Evidence from spontaneous monologue and dialogue speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(57).Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., & Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4(3–4), SI21–SI49.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. I., & Arêas da Luz Fontes, A. B. (2015). Bilingual access of homonym meanings: Individual differences in bilingual access of homonym meanings. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(4), 639–656.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. I., Kroll, J. F., & Diaz, M. (2007). Reading words in Spanish and English: Mapping orthography to phonology in two languages. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(1), 106–129.Google Scholar

Seidenberg, M. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., & Bienkowski, M. (1982). Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 489–537.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sereno, S. C., Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1992). The effect of meaning frequency on processing lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Psychological Science, 3(5), 296–301.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. B., & Burgess, C. (1985). Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(1), 28–39.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. B., & Kreuger, M. (1991). Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 627–643.Google Scholar

Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: Reconsiderations of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645–659.Google Scholar

Tabossi, P., & Zardon, F. (1993). Processing ambiguous words in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 359–372.CrossRef Google Scholar

Titone, D. A., Columbus, G., Whitford, V., Mercier, J., & Libben, M. (2015). Contrasting bilingual and monolingual idiom processing. In Heredia, R. R., and Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp.171–207). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Titone, D. A., Libben, M. R., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1-L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431.Google Scholar

van Assche, E., Drieghe, D., Duyck, W., Welvaert, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). The influence of semantic constraints on bilingual word recognition during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 88–107.Google Scholar

van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Verb processing by bilinguals in sentence contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 237–259.Google Scholar

van Assche, E., Duyck, W., Hartsuiker, R. J., & Diependaele, K. (2009). Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context. Psychological Science, 20(8), 923–927.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, T. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(4), 780–789.Google Scholar

Whitford, V., & Joanisse, M. F. (2018). Do eye movements reveal differences between monolingual and bilingual children’s first-language and second-language reading? A focus on word frequency effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 173, 318–337.Google Scholar

Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2012). Second-language experience modulates first-and second-language word frequency effects: Evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(1), 73–80.Google Scholar

Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2015). Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first- and second-language sentence reading: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1118–1129.Google Scholar

Whitford, V., & Titone, D. (2019). Lexical entrenchment and cross-language activation: Two sides of the same coin for bilingual reading across the adult lifespan. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(1), 58–77.Google Scholar

References

Altarriba, J. (1992). The representation of translation equivalents in bilingual memory. In Harris, R. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 157–174). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRef Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2007). Methodological considerations in performing semantic- and translation-priming experiments across languages. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., & Basnight-Brown, D. M. (2009). An overview of semantic processing in bilinguals: Methods and findings. In Pavlenko, A. (Ed.), The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 79–98). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., & Gianico, J. (2003). Lexical ambiguity resolution across languages: A theoretical and empirical review. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 159–170.Google Scholar

Altarriba, J., Carlo, M. S., & Kroll, J. F. (1992). Language dominance and the processing of cross-language ambiguity. Poster presented at the fifth annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York.Google Scholar

Anderson, S. F., & Maxwell, S. E. (2016). There’s more than one way to conduct a replication study: Beyond statistical significance. Psychological Methods, 21(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., et al. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459.Google Scholar

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.Google Scholar

Basnight-Brown, D. M., & Altarriba, J. (2007). Differences in semantic and translation priming across languages: The role of language direction and language dominance. Memory and Cognition, 35(5), 953–965.Google Scholar

Baten, K., Hofman, F., & Loeys, T. (2011). Cross-linguistic activation in bilingual sentence processing: The role of word class meaning. Bilingualism, 14(3), 351–359.Google Scholar

Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48.Google Scholar

Brenders, P., van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, A. (2011). Word recognition in child second language learners: Evidence from cognates and false friends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 383–396.Google Scholar

Bueno, S., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (1998). L’effet de la fréquence lors du traitement des homographes interlexicaux. Psychologie Française, 43(4), 339–348.Google Scholar

Cieślicka, A. B. (2006). Literal salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 22, 115–144.Google Scholar

Cieślicka, A. B., & Heredia, R. R. (2016). Priming and online multiple language activation. In Heredia, R. R. & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Methods in bilingual reading comprehension Research (pp.123–156). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Cieślicka, A. B., Heredia, R. R., & García, T. (2017). Task effects in bilingual idiom comprehension. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 53(1), 95–117.Google Scholar

Cieślicka, A. B. Heredia, R. R., Olivares, M. (2014). It’s all in the eyes: How language dominance, salience, and context affect eye movements during idiomatic language processing. In Aronin, L., L & Pawlak, M. (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism: Studies in honor of David Singleton (pp. 21–42). Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar

Cohen, J., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphical system for designing and controlling experiments in the Psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavioral Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computation, 25(2), 257–271.Google Scholar

Conklin, K., & Mauner, G. (2005). Investigating bilingual lexical access: Processing French-English homographs in sentential contexts. Paper presented at the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism (ISB4), Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar

Costa, A., Caramazza, A., & Sebastián‐Gallés, N. (2000). The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1283–1296.Google Scholar

de Groot, A. M. B., Delmaar, P., & Lupker, S. J. (2000). The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: Support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 397–428.Google Scholar

Degani, T., & Tokowicz, N. (2010). Semantic ambiguity within and across languages: An integrative review. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(7), 1266–1303.Google Scholar

Degani, T., Prior, A., & Hajajra, W. (2018). Cross-language semantic influences in different script bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(4), 782–804.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T. (2005). Bilingual visual word recognition and lexical access. In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 179–201). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., van Jaarsveld, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (1998). Interlingual homograph recognition: Effects of task demands and language intermixing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 51–66.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T., de Bruijn, E. R. A., Schriefers, H., & Ten Brinke, S. (2000). More on interlingual homograph recognition: Language intermixing versus explicitness of instruction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(1), 69–78.Google Scholar

Dunn, A. L, & Fox Tree, J. E. (2014). More on language mode. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 605–613.Google Scholar

Durlik, J., Szewczyk, J., Muszyński, M., Wodniecka, Z., & Schiller, N. O. (2016). Interference and inhibition in bilingual language comprehension: Evidence from Polish-English interlingual homographs. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1–18.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Elston-Güttler, K. E. (2000). An enquiry into cross-language differences in lexical-conceptual relationships and their effect on L2 lexical processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elston-Güttler, K. E., & Williams, J. N. (2008). First language polysemy affects second language meaning interpretation: Evidence for activation of first language concepts during second language reading. Second Language Research, 24(2), 167–187.Google Scholar

Elston-Güttler, K. E., Gunter, T., & Kotz, S. (2005). Zooming into L2: Global language context and adjustment affect processing of interlingual homographs in sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 57–70.Google Scholar

Filippi, R., Karaminis, T., & Thomas, M. S. C. (2014). Language switching in bilingual production: Empirical data and computational modelling. Bilingualism, 17(2), 294–315.Google Scholar

Frazier, L. (1999). On sentence interpretation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Friesen, D. C., Jared, D., & Haigh, C. A. (2014). Phonological processing dynamics in bilingual word naming. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(3), 179–193.Google Scholar

García, O., Cieślicka, A. B., & Heredia, R. R. (2015). Nonliteral language processing and methodological considerations. In Heredia, R. R. & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 117–168). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Garro, L. C. (1992). Lexical access in bilinguals: The case of English-based Spanish calques. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, CUNY.Google Scholar

Gerard, L. D., & Scarborough, D. L. (1989). Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(2), 305–315.Google Scholar

Gernsbacher, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1998). Transfer and language mode. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(3), 175–176.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2001). The bilingual’s language lodes. In Nicol, J. (Ed.), One mind, two languages: Bilingual language processing (pp. 1–22). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R. (1997). Bilingual memory and hierarchical models: A case for language dominance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(2), 34–39.Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R., & Cieślicka, A. B. (2016). Metaphoric reference: An eye movement analysis of Spanish–English and English–Spanish bilingual readers. Frontiers in Psychology. 7, 439.Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R., & Muñoz, M. E. (2015). Metaphoric reference: A real-time analysis. In Heredia, R. R. & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing. (pp. 89–116). New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R., Cieślicka, A., & García, O. (2010a). Bilingual exhaustive language activation: Homograph and cognate processing. The 23rd Annual Meeting of the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, March.Google Scholar

Heredia, R. R., Cieślicka, A. B., & García, O. (2010b). Bilingual sentence processing: Multiple language activation. 51st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis, Missouri, November.Google Scholar

Hoshino, N., & Thierry, G. (2012). Do Spanish–English bilinguals have their fingers in two pies – or is it their toes? An electrophysiological investigation of semantic access in bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–6.Google Scholar

Hoversten, L. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2016). A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements. Bilingualism, 19(2), 347–360.Google Scholar

Hsieh, M. C., Jeong, H., Dos Santos, K. K. H., Sasaki, Y., Lee, H. C., Yokoyama, S., Sugiura, M., … Kawashima, R. (2017). Neural correlates of bilingual language control during interlingual homograph processing in a logogram writing system. Brain and Language, 174, 72–85.Google Scholar

Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2004). The on-line processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eyetracking. In Carrieras, M. & Clifton, C., Jr. (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond (pp. 187–207). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Huttenga, G. (2015). Cross-linguistic influence among Dutch-English bilinguals’ associations to false cognates. Student Undergraduate Research e-Journal, 1(1), 1–4.Google Scholar

Jared, D., & Szucs, C. (2002). Phonological activation in bilinguals: Evidence from interlingual homograph naming. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(3), 225–239.Google Scholar

Jared, D., Cormier, P., Levy, B. A., & Wade-Woolley, L. (2012). Cross-language activation of phonology in young bilingual readers. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1327–1343.Google Scholar

Jouravlev, O., & Jared, D. (2014). Reading Russian-English homographs in sentence contexts: Evidence from ERPs. Bilingualism, 17(1), 153–168.Google Scholar

Kennette, L. N., & van Havermaet, L. R. (2012). Interlingual homograph recognition by bilinguals: A new paradigm. The New School Psychology Bulletin, 9(2), 7–16.Google Scholar

Kreiner, H., & Degani, T. (2015). Tip-of-the-tongue in a second language: The effects of brief first-language exposure and long-term use. Cognition, 137, 106–114.Google Scholar

Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Hoshino, N. (2014). Two languages in mind: Bilingualism as a tool to investigate language, cognition, and the brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 159–163.Google Scholar

Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar

Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–208.Google Scholar

Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.Google Scholar

Lauro, J., & Schwartz, A. I. (2017). Bilingual non-selective lexical access in sentence contexts: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 217–233.Google Scholar

Libben, M. R., & Titone, D. A. (2009). Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(2), 381–390.Google Scholar

Love, T., Maas, E., & Swinney, D. (2003). The influence of language exposure on lexical and syntactic language processing. Experimental Psychology, 50(3), 204–16.Google Scholar

Lyddy, F. (2012). What can homograph interpretation tell us about language status in Irish/English bilinguals?: Language status and homograph recognition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 105–123.Google Scholar

Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Cruz, M. M. (2010). Inhibitory processes in bilingual language comprehension: Evidence from Spanish-English interlexical homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(2), 232–244.Google Scholar

Martín, M. C., Macizo, P., & Bajo, T. (2010). Time course of inhibitory processes in bilingual language processing. British Journal of Psychology, 101(4), 679–693.Google Scholar

Martin, C., Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Metcalf, K. (1999). Strength of discourse context as a determinant of the subordinate bias effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A(4), 813–839.Google Scholar

Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315.Google Scholar

Meuter, R. (2009). Neurolinguistic contributions to understanding the bilingual mental lexicon. In A. Pavlenko, The bilingual mental lexicon: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 1–25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. A. (2002). Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5(1), 39–68.Google Scholar

Montrul, S. A. (2013). Bilingualism and the heritage language speaker. In the handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed., pp. 168–189). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(6), 1003–1019.Google Scholar

Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1994). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Otwinowska, A., & Szewczyk, J. M. (2017). The more similar the better? Factors in learning cognates, false cognates and non-cognate words. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–18.Google Scholar

Parra, M. (2013). False recognition drive by meaning and form: The dynamics of bilingual memory representations. Unpublished master’s thesis, Florida Atlantic University.Google Scholar

Paul, S. T., Kellas, G., Martin, M., & Clark, M. B. (1992). Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(4), 703–717.Google Scholar

Pivneva, I., Mercier, J., & Titone, D. (2013). Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 787–796.Google Scholar

Poarch, G. J., & van Hell, J. G. (2012). Cross‐language activation in children’s speech production: Evidence from second language learners, bilinguals, and trilinguals. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111, 419–438.Google Scholar

Poort, E. D., & Rodd, J. M. (2017). The cognate facilitation effect in bilingual lexical decision is influenced by stimulus list composition. Acta Psychologica, 180, 52–63.Google Scholar

Poort, E. D., Rodd, J. M., & Warren, J. E. (2016). Recent experience with cognates and interlingual homographs in one language affects subsequent processing in another language. Bilingualism, 19(1), 206–212.Google Scholar

R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org/Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 14(3), 191–201.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 779–790.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Casas, R., & García-Albea, J. E. (2005). The representation of cognate and noncognate words in bilingual memory: Can cognate status be characterized as a special kind of morphological relation? In Kroll, J. F. & de Groot, A. M. B. (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 226–250). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schwartz, A. I., & Kroll, J. F. (2006). Bilingual lexical activation in sentence context. Journal of Memory and Language, 55 (2), 197–212.Google Scholar

Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 645–659.Google Scholar

Swinney, D. A., Onifer, W., Prather, P., & Hirshkowitz, M. (1979). Semantic facilitation across sensory modalities in the processing of individual words and sentences. Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 159–165.Google Scholar

Tabossi, P. (1996). Cross-modal semantic priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6), 569–576.Google Scholar

Titone, D., Libben, M., Mercier, J., Whitford, V., & Pivneva, I. (2011). Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1412–1431.Google Scholar

Vaid, J., López, B. G., & Martínez, F. E. (2015). Linking the figurative to the creative: Bilingual’s comprehension of metaphors, jokes, and remote associates. In Heredia, R. R. & Cieślicka, A. B. (Eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing (pp. 53–86). New York: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & Dijkstra, A. (2002). Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 780–789.Google Scholar

van Hell, J. G., & Tanner, D. (2012). Second language proficiency and cross-language lexical activation. Language Learning, 62, 148–171.Google Scholar

van Heuven, W., Schriefers, H., Dijkstra, T., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Language conflict in the bilingual brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(11), 2706–2716.Google Scholar

van Rinsveld, A., Schiltz, C., Brunner, M., Landerl, K., & Ugen, S. (2016). Solving arithmetic problems in first and second language: Does the language context matter?. Learning and Instruction, 42(3), 72–82.Google Scholar

Vu, H., & Kellas, G. (1999). Contextual strength and the subordinate bias effect: Reply to Rayner, Binder, and Duffy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52A(4), 853–855.Google Scholar

Vu, H., Kellas, G., & Paul, S. T. (1998). Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution. Memory and Cognition, 26(5), 979–1001.Google Scholar

Vu, H., Kellas, G., Petersen, E., & Metcalf, K. (2003). Situation-evoking stimuli, domain of reference, and the incremental interpretation of lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition, 31(8), 1302–1315.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wu, Y. J., & Thierry, G. (2013). Fast modulation of executive function by language context in bilinguals. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(33), 13533–13537.Google Scholar

Zhu, Y., & Mok, P. P. K. (2018). Visual recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs in two non-native languages: Evidence from Asian adult trilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1–30.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Bilingual Sentence Processing

Summary

Access options

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Book contents

Part III - Bilingual Sentence Processing

Summary

Access options

References

Further Reading

References

Further Reading

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive