Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:17:35.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Assessing Multilinguals

from Part Four - Language(s) and Literacy of Multilingual Children through Schooling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2022

By
Becky H. Huang  and
Alison L. Bailey
Edited by
Anat Stavans  and
Ulrike Jessner
Anat Stavans
Affiliation:
Beit Berl College, Israel
Ulrike Jessner
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Austria
Get access

Summary

As the number of young multilinguals continues to grow globally, there is a parallel need for fair and effective assessment of multilingual development. This chapter aims to provide a state-of-the art picture of the critical and unique needs of assessing multilingual children from ages 3 to 11. We first define the “multilingual” population and survey two domains of assessment: language proficiency and content area knowledge. We then address the challenges of assessing multilinguals in three key areas: (1) the heterogeneity in the young multilingual population, (2) the articulation of connections between language and content, and (3) the difficulties in differentiating between typically developing multilingual development and language learning difficulties (also known as developmental language disorders) or learning difficulties. We conclude the chapter with a discussion of the future of multilingual assessment practices, considering the roles of technology in multilingual assessments, dynamic assessment, and the application of translanguaging in assessing multilinguals.

Keywords

multilingualsyoung learnerslanguage proficiency assessmentcontent area assessmentsassessment validity
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Childhood Multilingualism , pp. 441 - 471
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abedi, J. (2011). Assessing English language learners: Critical issues. In Basterra, M. R., Trumbull, E., E., & Solano-Flores, G., eds., Cultural Validity in Assessment: Addressing Linguistic and Cultural Ddiversity. New York: Routledge, pp. 49–71.Google Scholar
Aguado, G. (1988). Valoración de la competencia morfosintáctica en el niño de dos años y medio. Infancia y aprendizaje, 11(43), 73–95.Google Scholar
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Ascenzi-Moreno, L. (2016). An exploration of elementary teachers’ views of informal reading inventories in dual language bilingual programs. Literacy Research and Instruction, 55(4), 285–308, https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2016.1165318.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (2013). Ongoing challenges in language assessment. In Kunnan, A. J. et al., eds., The Companion to Language Assessment, pp. 1586–604.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L. (2017). Theoretical and developmental issues to consider in the assessment of young learners’ English language proficiency. In Wolf, M. K. & Butler, Y. G., eds., English Language Proficiency Assessments for Young Learners. ETS Language Assessment Series. New York: Routledge, pp. 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, A. L., Butler, F. A., Stevens, R., & Lord, C. (2007). Further specifying the language demands of school. In Bailey, A. L., ed., Language Demands of School: Putting Academic Language to the Test. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 103–56.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., Blackstock-Bernstein, A., Ryan, E., & Pitsoulakis, D. (2016). Data mining with natural language processing and corpus linguistics: Unlocking access to school-children’s language in diverse contexts to improve instructional and assessment practices. In El Atia, S., Zaiane, O., & Ipperciel, D., eds., Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Educational Research. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 255–75.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., & Carroll, P. (2015). Assessment of English language learners in the era of new academic content standards. Review of Research in Education, 39, 253–94, https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X14556074.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., & Durán, R. (2020). Language in practice: A mediator of valid interpretations of information generated by classroom assessments among linguistically and culturally diverse students. In Brookhart, S. M. & McMillan, J. H., eds., Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement. New York: Routledge/NCME Book Series, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2008). Formative Assessment for Literacy, Grades K-6: Building Reading and Academic Language Skills across the Curriculum. Thousand Oaks: Corwin/Sage Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., Heritage, M., & Butler, F. A. (2014). Developmental considerations and curricular contexts in the assessment of young language learners. In Kunnan, A., ed., Companion to Language Assessment. New York: Wiley-Blackwell Press, pp. 421–39.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., & Huang, B. H. (2011). Do current English language development/proficiency standards reflect the English needed for success in school? Language Testing, 28(3), 343–65, https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211404187.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., Maher, C., & Wilkinson, L. (2018). Introduction: Language, literacy and learning in the STEM disciplines. In Bailey, A. L., Maher, C., & Wilkinson, L., eds., Language, Literacy and Learning in the STEM Disciplines: How Language Counts for English Learners. New York: Routledge Publishers, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., Martin, A., Pogossian, A., Quintero Pérez, M., Yeung, G. J., Alwan, A., & Afshan, A. (2020). Early literacy and oral language ties: Extending the range of human–computer interface for early assessment. Poster Session, AERA Annual Meeting, San Francisco. http://tinyurl.com/u75tuhx (conference canceled).Google Scholar
Bailey, A. L., Osipova, A., & Kelly, K. R., (2015). Language development. In Anderman, E. & Corno, L., eds., Handbook of Educational Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 199–222.Google Scholar
Baker, C., & Wright, W. (2017). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Baker, D. L., Cummings, K. D., Good, R. H., & Smolkowski, K. (2007). Indicadores dinámicos del éxito en la lectura (IDEL): Summary of Decision Rules for Intensive, Strategic, and Benchmark Instructional Recommendations in Kindergarten through Third Grade (Technical Report No. 1) Eugene: Dynamic Measurement Group.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, K. G. (2013) Disproportional representation of English learners among students identified with disabilities; equity and the federal accountability system. In Tsagari, D. & Spanoudis, G., eds., Assessing L2 Students with Learning and Other Disabilities. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Bang, M., (2019). Making assessment responsive to culturally and linguistically diverse identities. Paper presented at 3rd NCME Classroom Assessment Conference, Boulder.Google Scholar
Barrueco, S., Lopez, M., Ong, C., & Lozano, P. (2012). Assessing Spanish-English Bilingual Preschoolers: A Guide to Best Approaches and Measures. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Gillam, R. B., & Ho, T. H. (2010). Language sample measures and language ability in Spanish-English bilingual kindergarteners. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43(6), 498–510, http://doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.05.002.Google Scholar
Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Griffin, Z. M., & Hixon, J. G. (2016). Effects of age of English exposure, current input/output, and grade on bilingual language performance. Journal of Child Language, 43(3), 687–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Summers, C. L., Boerger, K. M., Reséndiz, M. D., Greene, K., … & Gillam, R. B. (2012). The measure matters: Language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 616–29.Google Scholar
Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., & King, M. (2017). Dynamic assessment for 3- and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication: Evaluating expressive syntax. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(7), 1946–58.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2003). The Children’s Communication Checklist, Second Edition. London: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Brownell, R. (2001). Expressive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test – Spanish-English Bilingual Edition. Novato: Academic Therapy Publications.Google Scholar
Burt, M. K., Dulay, H. C., & Hernandez-Chavez, E. (1978). Bilingual Syntax Measure: Technical Handbook. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2019). Assessment of young English learners in instructional settings. In Gao, X., ed., Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G., Sayer, P., & Huang, B. (2018). Introduction: Social class/socioeconomic status and young learners of English as a global language. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 73, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Department of Education (2018). California Global 2030, www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/documents/globalca2030report.pdf.Google Scholar
Camilleri, B., & Botting, N. (2013). Beyond static assessment of children’s receptive vocabulary: The Dynamic Assessment of Word Learning (DAWL). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(5), 565–81.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Cisero, C. A., & Royer, J. M. (1995). The development and cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 275–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, C. A., Dershimer, E. L., & Tichenor, M. S. (2004). A teacher’s guide to alternative assessment: Taking the first steps. The Clearing House, 77(5), 213–16.Google Scholar
Council of Chief State School Officers (2012). Framework for English Language Proficiency Development Standards Corresponding to the Common Core State Standards and the Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., Mirza, R., & Stille, S. (2012). English language learners in Canadian schools: Emerging directions for school-based policies. TESL Canada Journal, 29(6), 25–48, http://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v29i0.1121.Google Scholar
DeAnda, S., Poulin-Dubois, D., Zesiger, P., & Friend, M. (2016). Lexical processing and organization in bilingual first language acquisition: Guiding future research. Psychological Bulletin, 142(6), 655–67, https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000042.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. (2009). Bilingual First Language Acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. (2017). Bilingual language acquisition. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B., eds., The Handbook of Child Language. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 219–50.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2018). The critical period hypothesis: A diamond in the rough. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(5), 915–16.Google Scholar
Delgado, C. E., & Scott, K. G. (2006). Comparison of referral rates for preschool children at risk for disabilities using information obtained from birth certificate records. The Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 28–35.Google Scholar
De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020). Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 171–85.Google Scholar
Dunn, L., Padilla, E., Lugo, D., & Dunn, L. (1986). Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes Peabody: Adaptación Hispanoamericana. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Enever, J., & Lindgren, E., eds. (2017). Early Language Learning: Complexity and Mixed Methods. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Ercikan, K., & Por, H-H. (2020). Comparability in multilingual and multicultural assessment contexts. In Berman, A. I., Haertel, E. H., & Pellegrino, J. W., eds., Comparability of Large-Scale Educational Assessments: Issues and Recommendations. Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, pp. 205–25.Google Scholar
Escamilla, K., Butvilofsky, S., & Hopewell, S. (2018). What gets lost when English-only writing assessment is used to assess writing proficiency in Spanish- English emerging bilingual learners? International Multilingual Research Journal, 12(4), 221–36.Google Scholar
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015. Public Law 114–95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015–2016).Google Scholar
Fitton, L., Hoge, R., Petscher, Y., & Wood, C. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Bilingual English Spanish Assessment sentence repetition task for clinical decision making. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(6), 1906–22.Google Scholar
García, O. (2009). Bilingual Education in the 21st Century: A Global Perspective. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism, and Education. New York: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
García, O., Johnson, S., & Seltzer, K (2017). The Translanguaging Classroom: Leveraging Student Bilingualism for Learning. Philadelphia: Caslon.Google Scholar
Genesee, F. (2001). Bilingual first language acquisition: Exploring the limits of the language faculty. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 153–68.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., Paradis, J., & Crago, M. B. (2004). Dual Language Development & Disorders: A Handbook on Bilingualism & Second Language Learning, Vol. 11. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, H. P., & Opper, S. (1988). Piaget’s Theory of Intellectual Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Glasgow, C., & Cowley, J. (1994). Renfrew Bus Story Test - North American Edition. Centreville: Centreville School.Google Scholar
Goldstein, B. A. (2004). Bilingual Language Development and Disorders in Spanish- English Speakers. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language, 36(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J. (2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(2), 267–88.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Restrepo, M. A., Bedore, L., Peña, E., & Anderson, R. (2000). Language sample analysis in Spanish-speaking children: Methodological considerations. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(1), 88–98.Google Scholar
Hager, M., & Müller, N. (2015). Ultimate attainment in bilingual first language acquisition. Lingua, 164, 289–308.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Introduction to Functional Grammar, Second Edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hasson, N., Dodd, B., & Botting, N. (2012). Dynamic Assessment of Sentence Structure (DASS): Design and evaluation of a novel procedure for the assessment of syntax in children with language impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(3), 285–99.Google Scholar
Hasson, N., Camilleri, B., Jones, C., Smith, J., & Dodd, B. (2013). Discriminating disorder from difference using dynamic assessment with bilingual children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(1), 57–75.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
Hoff, E. (2003). The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development, 74(5), 1368–78.Google Scholar
Hos, R. (2016). The lives, aspirations, and needs of refugee and immigrant students with interrupted formal education (SIFE) in a secondary newcomer program. Urban Education, http://doi: 10.1177/0042085916666932.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H. (2014). The effects of age on second language grammar and speech production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43(4), 397–420.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H. (2016). A synthesis of empirical research on the linguistic outcomes of early foreign language instruction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(3), 257–73.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H., Bailey, A. L., Sass, D. A., & Chang, Y. H. S. (2020). An investigation of the validity of a speaking assessment for adolescent English language learners. Language Testing, http://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220925731.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H., Bedore, L. M., Niu, L., Wang, Y., & Wicha, N. Y. (2020). The contributions of oral language to English reading outcomes among young bilingual students in the United States. International Journal of Bilingualism, http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920938136.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H., Chang, Y. H. S., Zhi, M., & Niu, L. (2018). The effect of input on bilingual adolescents’ long-term language outcomes in a foreign language instruction context. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 8–25, http://doi.org/10.1177/1367006918768311.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H., & Flores, B. B. (2018). The English Language Proficiency Assessment for the 21st Century (ELPA21). Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 433–42.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H., & Kuo, L. J. (2018). The role of input in bilingual children’s language and literacy development: Introduction to the Special Issue. International Journal of Bilingualism, 24(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
Huang, B. H., & Ramirez, R. (2021). Second language speech production methods. In Butler, Y. G. and Huang, B. H., eds., Research Methods for Understanding Child Second Language Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 [IDEA] (2004). Public Law 108-446, 108th Congress.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 131–61.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. K., Curby, T. W., & Winsler, A. (2014). Child, family, and school characteristics related to English proficiency development among low-income, dual language learners. Developmental Psychology, 50(12), 2600–13.Google Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2002). A longitudinal evaluative study on child JFL learners’ oral performances. Japanese Language and Literature, 36(2), 171–99.Google Scholar
Li, W. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1222–35.Google Scholar
Lopez, A. A., Turkan, S., & Guzman‐Orth, D. (2017). Conceptualizing the use of translanguaging in initial content assessments for newly arrived emergent bilingual students. ETS Research Report Series, 2017(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Maragkaki, I., & Hessels, M. G. (2017). A pilot study of dynamic assessment of vocabulary in German for bilingual preschoolers in Switzerland. Journal of Studies in Education, 7(1), 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, A. K., Bailey, A. L., & Melzi, G. (2008). Spanish-Language Narration and Literacy: Culture, Cognition, and Emotion. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, A., & Peterson, C. (1991). Getting the story: A longitudinal study of parental styles in eliciting narratives and developing narrative skill. In McCabe, A. & Peterson, C., eds., Developing Narrative Structure. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, pp. 217–53.Google Scholar
McKay, P. (2006). Assessing Young Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2017). Bilingual acquisition: A morphosyntactic perspective on simultaneous and early successive language development. In Fernandez, E. M. & Cairns, H. S., eds., The Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Hoboken: Wiley, 635–52.Google Scholar
Menken, K. (2008). English Learners Left Behind: Standardized Testing as Language Policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Miller, L., Gillam, R. B., & Peña, E. (2001). Dynamic Assessment and Intervention: Improving Children’s Narrative Abilities. Austin: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
Montrul, S. (2018). Heritage language development: Connecting the dots. International Journal of Bilingualism, 22(5), 530–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., Mattison, R., Maczuga, S., Li, H., & Cook, M. (2015). Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: Longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 278–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, C. (2014). Complexities and interactions of age effects in L2 learning: Broadening the research agenda. Applied Linguistics, 35(4), 369–73.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C., Cadierno, T., & Casas, I. (2018). Different starting points for English language learning: A comparative study of Danish and Spanish young learners. Language Learning, 68(4), 1076–109.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F., Cummins, J., Alvarado, C. G., & Ruef, M. L. (1998). Bilingual Verbal Ability Tests: Comprehensive manual. Itasca: Riverside.Google Scholar
Nalls, I. B. (2019). BFLA Spanish-English Mexican American bilinguals. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 16(1), 30–49.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). English Learners in STEM Subjects: Transforming Classrooms, Schools, and Lives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, https://doi.org/10.17226/25182.Google Scholar
Noguerón-Liu, S., Shimek, C. H., & Bahlmann Bollinger, C. (2020). “Dime de que se trató/Tell me what it was about”: Exploring emergent bilinguals’ linguistic resources in reading assessments with parent participation. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(2), 411–33.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2016). The development of English as a second language with and without specific language impairment: Clinical implications. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(1), 171–82.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1997). On continuity and the emergence of functional categories in bilingual first-language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 6(2), 91–124.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., & Jia, R. (2017). Bilingual children’s long‐term outcomes in English as a second language: Language environment factors shape individual differences in catching up with monolinguals. Developmental Science, 20, 1–15.Google Scholar
Peña, E. D., Gillam, R. B., & Bedore, L. M. (2014). Dynamic assessment of narrative ability in English accurately identifies language impairment in English language learners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2208–20.Google Scholar
Peña, E. D., & Quinn, R. (1997). Task familiarity: Effects on the test performance of Puerto Rican and African American children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28(4), 323–32.Google Scholar
Peña, E., Gillam, R., Malek, M., Ruiz-Felter, R., Resendiz, M., Fiestas, C., & Sabel, T. (2006). Dynamic assessment of children from culturally diverse backgrounds: Applications to narrative assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1–21.Google Scholar
Peña, E. D., Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., Iglesias, A., Goldstein, B., & Bedore, L. M. (2018). Bilingual English Spanish Assessment (BESA). Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
Peña, E., Iglesias, A., & Lidz, C. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children’s word learning ability. American Journal of Speech- Language Pathology, 10, 138–54.Google Scholar
Peña, E. D., Reséndiz, M., & Gillam, R. B. (2007). The role of clinical judgements of modifiability in the diagnosis of language impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 9(4), 332–45.Google Scholar
Petersen, D. B., Chanthongthip, H., Ukrainetz, T. A., Spencer, T. D., & Steeve, R. W. (2017). Dynamic assessment of narratives: Efficient, accurate identification of language impairment in bilingual students. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(4), 983–98.Google Scholar
Petersen, D. B., Gragg, S. L., & Spencer, T. D. (2018). Predicting reading problems 6 years into the future: Dynamic assessment reduces bias and increases classification accuracy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49(4), 875–88.Google Scholar
Petersen, D. B., & Spencer, T. D. (2014). The Predictive Early Assessment of Reading and Language (PEARL). Laramie: Language Dynamics Group.Google Scholar
Polinsky, M., & Scontras, G. (2019). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1–17.Google Scholar
Ribot, K. M., Hoff, E., & Burridge, A. (2018). Language use contributes to expressive language growth: Evidence from bilingual children. Child Development, 89(3), 929–40.Google Scholar
Riccio, C. A., Imhoff, B., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Davis, G. (2004). Test of Phonological Awareness in Spanish. Austin: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Ruiz‐Felter, R., Cooperson, S. J., Bedore, L. M., & Peña, E. D. (2016). Influence of current input–output and age of first exposure on phonological acquisition in early bilingual Spanish-English‐speaking kindergarteners. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 51(4), 368–83.Google Scholar
Russell, M. (2020). Supporting and advancing assessment practices in the classroom. In Brookhart, S. M. & McMillan, J. H., eds., Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement. New York: Routledge/NCME Book Series, pp. 224–42.Google Scholar
Sandlund, E., Sundqvist, P., & Nyroos, L. (2016). Testing L2 talk: A review of empirical studies on second‐language oral proficiency testing. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(1), 14–29.Google Scholar
Sayer, P. (2013). Translanguaging, TexMex, and bilingual pedagogy: Emergent bilinguals learning through the vernacular. TESOL Quarterly, 47 (1), 63–88.Google Scholar
Schissel, J. L., De Korne, H., & López-Gopar, M. (2018). Grappling with translanguaging for Teaching and assessment in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts: teacher perspectives from Oaxaca, Mexico. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–17.Google Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 4th Ed. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Seymour, H. N., Roeper, T. W., & de Villiers, J. (2003). Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation. San Antonio: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Sheng, L., Wang, D., Yang, A., & Hsu, N. (2019). MECO-LAB: A Mandarin-English child online language assessment tool for researchers, clinicians, and parents. Poster presentation at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Sheng, L., Yang, M., Peña, E., Bedore, L., Li, F., & Du, Y. (2016). Profiles of language impairment in Mandarin-English bilingual children: A pilot study. Poster presented at the 37th annual Symposium on Research in Child Language Disorders, Madison.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2011). Assessing multilingual competencies: Adopting construct valid assessment policies. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 418–29.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, C. (2014). Bilingual Language Acquisition: Spanish and English in the First Six Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. R., McCauley, R., & Guitar, B. (2000). Development of the Teacher Assessment of Student Communicative Competence (TASCC) for grades 1 through 5. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 22(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
Stow, C., & Pert, S. (1998). The development of a bilingual phonology assessment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33(S1), 338–42.Google Scholar
Sullivan, A. L., & Bal, A. (2013). Disproportionality in special education: Effects of individual and school variables on disability risk. Exceptional Children, 79(4), 475–94.Google Scholar
Suskind, D. L., Leffel, K. R., Graf, E., Hernandez, M. W., Gunderson, E. A., Sapolich, S. G., & Levine, S. C. (2016). A parent-directed language intervention for children of low socioeconomic status: A randomized controlled pilot study. Journal of Child Language, 43(2), 366–406.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M., & Chen, L. M. (2015). The acquisition of Japanese stops by Japanese-Mandarin bilingual children. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 41(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Tragant, E., Muñoz, C., & Spada, N. (2016). Maximizing young learners’ input: An intervention program. Canadian Modern Language Review, 72(2), 234–57.Google Scholar
United States Census Bureau (2015). Detailed Languages Spoken at Home and Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over for United States: 2009–2013, www.census.gov/data/tables/2013/demo/2009-2013-lang-tables.html.Google Scholar
University of Oregon, Center on Teaching and Learning (2018). Understanding the Research behind DIBELS 8th Edition (Technical Report 1801). Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×