Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T03:59:57.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part VI - Discourses, Publics and Mediatization

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2020

Edited by
Anna De Fina  and
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Anna De Fina
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Alexandra Georgakopoulou
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies , pp. 593 - 731
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Agha, A. (2011). Meet Mediatization. Language & Communication 31: 163–70.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Engel, J. and Wodak, R. (2012). “Calculated Ambivalence” and Holocaust Denial in Austria. In Wodak, R. and Richardson, J. E. (eds.) Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text. New York: Routledge. 73–96.Google Scholar
Hepp, A. (2014). Mediatization: A Panorama of Media and Communication Research. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

In this book, Bhatia introduces, discusses and positions CGA (primarily in relation to CDA).

This edited volume contains a number of genre-oriented studies of political communication, including the analysis of meetings by Wodak (2013) and a chapter by Krzyżanowski (2013) on policy genres in the European Union.

This is one of the more accessible introductions to Fairclough’s uses of genre within his CDA framework.

The volume introduces the New Rhetoric and also contains Miller’s (1984) classic paper “Genre as Social Action.”

This book presents the foundations and a number of applications of Sydney school genre analysis.

The chapter describes how genre is perceived within the discourse-historical approach (DHA).

This chapter gives a good overview of the New Rhetoric, the Sydney school and genre analysis in ESP.

Swales’ book is a key reading regarding genre analysis in ESP.

This introduces van Leeuwen’s multimodal genre analysis.

Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cap, P. and Okulska, U. (eds.) (2013). Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freedman, A. and Medway, P. (eds.) (1994). Genre and the New Rhetoric. London/New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2016). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage. 87–121.Google Scholar
Solin, A. (2009). Genre. In Verschueren, J. and Östman, J.-O. (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–18.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005b). Multimodality, Genre and Design. In Norris, S. and Jones, R. H. (eds.) Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis. Milton Park/Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateman, J. A. 2008. Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2011). Discourse and Genre: Analysing Language in Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berge, K. L. and Ledin, P. (2001). Perspektiv på Genre [Perspectives on Genre]. Rhetorica Scandinavica 18: 4–16.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in Professional Communication. Discourse & Communication 4(1): 32–50.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2015). Critical Genre Analysis: Theoretical Preliminaries. Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication in Business. 54: 9–20.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cap, P. and Okulska, U. (eds.) (2013). Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (1997). Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassel.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society 4(2): 133–68.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2005). Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism. Organization Studies 26(6): 915–39.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Freedman, A. and Medway, P. (eds.) (1994). Genre and the New Rhetoric. London/New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, R. (1979). On the Notion of Text. In Petöfi, J. S. (ed.) Text vs Sentence: Basic Questions of Text Linguistics, Vol. II. Hamburg: Helmut Buske. 369–90.Google Scholar
Hiippala, T. (2016). The Structure of Multimodal Documents: An Empirical Approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hiippala, T. (2017). An Overview of Research within the Genre and Multimodality Framework. Discourse, Context & Media 20: 276–84.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (2010). Introducing Semiotic Landscapes. In Jaworski, A. and Thurlow, C. (eds.) Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum. 1–40.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and Threadgold, T. (1988). Towards a Social Theory of Genre. Southern Review 21(3): 215–43.Google Scholar
KrzyżanowskI, M. (2013). Policy, Policy Communication and Discursive Shifts: Analyzing EU Policy Discourses on Climate Change. In Cap, P. and Okulska, U. (eds.) Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 101–33.Google Scholar
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. (2016a). A Discourse-Design Approach to Multimodality: The Visual Communication of Neoliberal Management Discourse. Social Semiotics 26(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. (2016b). Performance Management Discourse and the Shift to an Administrative Logic of Operation: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analytical Approach. Text & Talk 36(4): 445–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machin, D. and van Leeuwen, T. (2007). Global Media Discourse: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1997). Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters. In Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (eds.) Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassel. 3–39.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2005). The Entrepreneurial University: A Discursive Profile of a Higher Education Buzzword. Critical Discourse Studies 2(2): 95–120.Google Scholar
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–67.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. ([1957]1975). The Language of Buying and Selling in Cyrenaica: A Situational Statement. In Mitchell, T. F. (ed.) Principles of Firthian Linguistics. London: Longman. 167–200.Google Scholar
Mulderrig, J. (2011). The Grammar of Governance. Critical Discourse Studies 8(1): 45–68.Google Scholar
Norris, S. and Jones, R. H. (eds.) (2005). Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis. Milton Park/Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nyström Höög, C. and Björkvall, A. (2018). Keeping the Discussion among Civil Servants Alive: “Platform of Values” as an Emerging Genre within the Public Sector in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 22(3): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M. I. (2011). The Post-Bureaucratic Organization and the Control Revolution. In Clegg, S., Harris, M. and Höpfl, H. (eds.) Managing Modernity: Beyond Bureaucracy? Oxford: Oxford University Press. 230–56.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2016). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.) Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage. 87–121.Google Scholar
Rothery, J. (1996). Making Changes: Developing an Educational Linguistics. In Hasan, R. and Williams, G. (eds.) Literacy in Society. London/New York: Longman. 86–123.Google Scholar
Solin, A. (2009). Genre. In Verschueren, J. and Östman, J.-O. (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–18.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1998). Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (1993). Genre and Field in Critical Discourse Analysis: A Synopsis. Discourse and Society 4(2): 192–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005a). Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005b). Multimodality, Genre and Design. In Norris, S. and Jones, R. H. (eds.) Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis. Milton Park/Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ventola, E. (1987). The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Weber, M. ([1922]1978). The Nature of Social Action. In Runciman, W. G. (ed.) Max Weber: Selections in Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2003). Populist Discourses: The Rhetoric of Exclusion in Written Genres. Document Design 4(2): 132–48.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2013). Analyzing Meetings in Political and Business Contexts: Different Genres – Similar Strategies? In Cap, P. and Okulska, U. (eds.) Analyzing Genres in Political Communication: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Further Reading

This edited volume’s insightful contributions on the forms and effects of populism across the globe remain relevant to this day.

Moffitt’s book makes a strong case for taking a close look at the performative dimension of populism, in particular the performances of its leaders in relation to crises and the media.

This aptly named introduction manages to give a comprehensive overview of populism across time and space in all its varied forms, providing a concise framework for comparative studies of populism.

This concise work, first published in 2016 and updated a year later, provides an accessible and passionate discussion of contemporary populism, focusing on its inner logic and threat to democracy.

This special issue covers right-wing populism in Europe and the United States and brings together varied approaches from applied linguistics and social sciences.

Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.) (2002). Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J. W. (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.) (2017a). Special Issue: Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics and Discourse beyond “Orbanism” and “Trumpism.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J. and de Vreese, C. (eds.) (2017). Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Angouri, J. and Wodak, R. (2014). They Became Big in the Shadow of the Crisis: The Greek Success Story and the Rise of the Far Right. Discourse & Society 25(4): 540–65.Google Scholar
Arditi, B. (2007). Politics on the Edges of Liberalism: Difference, Populism, Revolution, Agitation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Aslanidis, P. and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2016). Dealing with Populists in Government: The SYRIZA-ANEL Coalition in Greece. Democratization 23(6): 1077–91.Google Scholar
Barr, R. (2009). Populists, Outsiders and Anti-establishment Politics. Party Politics 15(1): 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, L., Sheets, P. and Boomgaarden, H. G. (2018). The Role of Implicit Attitudes in Populist Radical Right Support. Political Psychology 39(1): 69–87.Google Scholar
Bos, L., van der Brug, W. and de Vreese, C. H. (2013). An Experimental Test of the Impact of Style and Rhetoric on the Perception of Right-Wing Populist and Mainstream Party Leaders. Acta Politica 48(2): 192–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boukala, S. (2018). False Reasoning and Argumentation in the Twitter Discourse of the Prime Minister of Israel. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 6(1): 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boukala, S. and Dimitrakopoulou, D. (2015). The Politics of Fear vs. the Politics of Hope: Analysing the 2015 Greek Election and Referendum Campaigns. Critical Discourse Studies 14(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1997). Deliberation and Its Discontents: H. Ross Perot’s Antipolitical Populism. In Schedler, A. (ed.) The End of Politics? Explorations into Modern Antipolitics. 115–48.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. (2017). Why Populism? Theory and Society 46(5): 357–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, S., Eberhardt, L. and Merolla, J. L. (2013). What Is the Difference between a Hockey Mom and a Pit Bull? Presentations of Palin and Gender Stereotypes in the 2008 Presidential Election. Political Research Quarterly 66(3): 687–701.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies 4(1): 2–16.Google Scholar
Castanho, S. B., Vegetti, F. and Littvay, L. (2017). The Elite Is Up to Something: Exploring the Relation between Populism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Swiss Political Science Review 23(4): 423–43.Google Scholar
Chilton, P. (2017). “The People” in Populist Discourse: Using Neuro-cognitive Linguistics to Understand Political Meanings. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 582–94.Google Scholar
Christofferson, T. (2003). The French Elections of 2002: The Issue of Insecurity and the Le Pen Effect. Acta Politica 38(2): 109–23.Google Scholar
Colombo, M. (2012). Discourse and Politics of Migration in Italy: The Production and Reproduction of Ethnic Dominance and Exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics 12(2): 157–79.Google Scholar
Csigó, P. and Merkovity, N. (2017). Hungary: Home of Empty Populism. In Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J. and de Vreese, C. (eds.) Populist Political Communication in Europe. London: Routledge. 299–310.Google Scholar
Curato, N. (2016). Flirting with Authoritarian Fantasies? Rodrigo Duterte and the New Terms of Philippine Populism. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47(1): 142–53.Google Scholar
De la Torre, C. (2014). Populism in Latin American Politics. In Woods, D. and Wejnert, B. (eds.) The Many Faces of Populism: Current Perspectives. Bingley: Emerald. 79–100.Google Scholar
Dinçşahin, Ş. (2012). A Symptomatic Analysis of the Justice and Development Party’s Populism in Turkey, 2007–2010. Government and Opposition 47(4): 618–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dornbusch, R. and Edwards, S. (1992). The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ekström, M., Patrona, M. and Thornborrow, J. (2018). Right-Wing Populism and the Dynamics of Style: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective on Mediated Political Performances. Palgrave Communications 4(83). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0132-6.Google Scholar
Engel, J. and Wodak, R. (2013). “Calculated Ambivalence” and Holocaust Denial in Austria. In Wodak, R. and Richardson, J. E. (eds.) Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text. London: Routledge. 73–96.Google Scholar
Engesser, S., Fawzi, N. and Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue. Information, Communication & Society 20(9).Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2015). Language and Power, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Filc, D. (2010). The Political Right in Israel: Different Faces of Jewish Populism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Filc, D. (2015). Latin American Inclusive and European Exclusionary Populism: Colonialism as an Explanation. Journal of Political Ideologies 20(3): 263–83.Google Scholar
Gidron, N. and Bonikowski, B. (2013). Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda. Harvard, MA: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs.Google Scholar
Goodwyn, L. (1976). Democratic Promise: The Populist Moment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hafez, F. (2017). Debating the 2015 Islam law in Austrian Parliament: Between Legal Recognition and Islamophobic Populism. Discourse & Society 28(4): 392–412.Google Scholar
Hameleers, M., Bos, L. and de Vreese, C. H. (2017). The Appeal of Media Populism: The Media Preferences of Citizens with Populist Attitudes. Mass Communication & Society 20(4): 481–504.Google Scholar
Hatakka, N., Niemi, M. K. and Välimäki, M. (2017). Confrontational yet Submissive: Calculated Ambivalence and Populist Parties’ Strategies of Responding to Racism Accusations in the Media. Discourse & Society 28(3): 262–80.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R. ([1964]2008). The Paranoid Style in American Politics. In The Paranoid Style in American Politics, and Other Essays. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Ionescu, G. and Gellner, E. (eds.) (1969). Populism, Its Meaning and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Kavada, A. (2018). Editorial: Media and the “Populist Moment.” Media, Culture & Society. Published online: doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772144.Google Scholar
Keane, J. (2013). Democracy and Media Decadence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kellner, D. (2017). American Horror Show: Election 2016 and the Ascent of Donald J. Trump. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
Krämer, B. (2017). Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism. Information, Communication & Society 20(9).Google Scholar
Krastev, I. (2012). The Populist Moment. EUROZINE, September, 18. www.eurozine.com/the-populist-moment/.Google Scholar
Kress, G. R. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. (2012). Right-Wing Populism, Opportunism and Political Catholicism: On Recent Rhetorics and Political Communication of Polish PiS (Law and Justice) Party. In Pelinka, A. and Haller, B. (eds.) Populismus: Herausforderung oder Gefahr für die Demokratie? Vienna: New Academic Press. 111–26.Google Scholar
Krzyżanowski, M. and Ledin, P. (2017). Uncivility on the Web: Populism in/and the Borderline Discourses of Exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 566–81.Google Scholar
Kuzminski, A. (2008). Fixing the System: A History of Populism, Ancient and Modern. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. T. (2017). The Hollow Man: Donald Trump, Populism, and Post-Truth Politics. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 595–606.Google Scholar
Leach, M., Stokes, G. and Ward, I. (2000). The Rise and Fall of One Nation. Queensland: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Machin, D. and Richardson, J. E. (2012). Discourses of Unity and Purpose in the Sounds of Fascist Music: A Multimodal Approach. Critical Discourse Studies 9(4): 329–45.Google Scholar
Martinéz-Torres, M. E. and Rosset, P. M. (2010). La Vía Campesina: The Birth and Evolution of a Transnational Social Movement. Journal of Peasant Studies 37(1): 149–75.Google Scholar
Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Populism and the Media. In Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D. (eds.) Twenty-First Century Populism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 49–64.Google Scholar
McCabe, J. (2012). States of Confusion: Sarah Palin and the Politics of US Mothering. Feminist Media Studies 12(1): 149–53.Google Scholar
Milner, R. M. (2013). Pop Polyvocality: Internet Memes, Public Participation, and the Occupy Wall Street Movement. International Journal of Communication 7: 2357–90.Google Scholar
Moffitt, B. (2015). How to Perform Crisis: A Model for Understanding the Key Role of Crisis in Contemporary Populism. Government and Opposition 50(2): 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Moffitt, B. and Tormey, S. (2013). Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style. Political Studies 62(2): 381–97.Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. (2017). Post-Truth Politics? Authenticity, Populism and the Electoral Discourses of Donald Trump. Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 619–39.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39(4): 542–53.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. and Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, J. W. (2016). What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Musolff, A. (2018). Nations as Persons: Collective Identities in Conflict. In Bös, B., Kleinke, S., Mollin, S. and Hernández, N. (eds.) The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal, Group and Collective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 249–66.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. and Brooks, S. (2015). The Problems of Populism: Celebrity Politics and Citizenship. Communication Research and Practice 1(4): 349–61.Google Scholar
Ostiguy, P. (2009). The High–Low Political Divide: Rethinking Populism and Anti-Populism. Political Concepts: Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series 35.Google Scholar
Pappas, T. (2014). Populism and Crisis Politics in Greece. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pels, D. (2011). The New National Individualism: Populism Is Here to Stay. In Meijers, E. (ed.) Populism in Europe. Vienna/Brussels: PlanetVerlag/GEF.Google Scholar
Postill, J. (2018). Populism and Social Media: A Global Perspective. Media, Culture & Society. Published online: doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772186.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. (2005). Oppositioneller und regierender Rechtspopulismus: Rhetorische Strategien und diskursive Dynamiken in der Demokratie. In Fröhlich-Steffen, S. and Rensmann, L. (eds.) Populisten an der Macht. Populistische Regierungsparteien in West- und Osteuropa. Wien: Braumüller. 51–68.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. (2012). Rechtspopulistische und faschistische Rhetorik: ein Vergleich. Totalitarismus und Demokratie 9: 303–23.Google Scholar
Rheindorf, M. (2019). Disciplining the Unwilling. Normalisation of (Demands for) Punitive Measures against Immigrants in Austrian Populist Discourse. In Kranert, M. and Horan, G. (eds.) Doing Politics: Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 179–208.Google Scholar
Rheindorf, M. and Wodak, R. (2017). Borders, Fences, and Limits: Protecting Austria from Refugees. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 15–38.Google Scholar
Rheindorf, M. and Wodak, R. (2019). “Austria First” Revisited: A Diachronic Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Gender and Body Politics of the Extreme Right. Patterns of Prejudice 53(3): 302–20.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. E. (2013). Ploughing the Same Furrow? Continuity and Change on Britain’s Extreme-Right Fringe. In Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.) Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury. 105–20.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. E. and Colombo, M. (2013). Continuity and Change in Anti-immigrant Discourse in Italy: An Analysis of the Visual Propaganda of the Lega Nord. Journal of Language and Politics 12(2): 180–202.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M. (2007). Latin America’s Populist Revival. SAIS Review 28(1): 3–15.Google Scholar
Ruzza, C. and Balbo, L. (2013). Italian Populism and the Trajectories of Two Leaders: Silvio Berlusconi and Umberto Bossi. In Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.) Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury. 163–76.Google Scholar
Ruzza, C. and Pejovic, M. (2019). Populism at Work: The Language of the Brexiteers and the European Union. Critical Discourse Studies 16(4): 432–48.Google Scholar
Rydgren, J. (2017). Radical Right-Wing Parties in Europe: What’s Populism Got to Do with It? Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 485–96.Google Scholar
Sauer, B., Krasteva, A. and Saarinen, A. (2017). Post-Democracy, Party Politics and Right-Wing Populist Communication. In Pajnik, M. and Sauer, B. (eds.) Populism and the Web. London: Routledge. 14–35.Google Scholar
Savage, R. (2013). From McCarthyism to the Tea Party: Interpreting Anti-Leftist Forms of US Populism in Comparative Perspective. New Political Science 34(4): 564–84.Google Scholar
Schoor, C. (2017). In the Theater of Political Style: Touches of Populism, Pluralism and Elitism in Speeches of Politicians. Discourse & Society 28(6): 657–76.Google Scholar
Stanley, B. (2008). The Thin Ideology of Populism. Journal of Political Ideologies 13(1): 95–110.Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y. and Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies 19(2): 119–42.Google Scholar
Stavrakakis, Y., Katsambekis, G., Nikisianis, N., Kioupkiolis, A. and Siomos, T. (2017). Extreme Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Revisiting a Reified Association. Critical Discourse Studies 14(4): 420–39.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics. In Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmilla. 62–80.Google Scholar
Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.) (2009). The European Public Sphere and the Media: Europe in Crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vollmer, B. and Karakayali, S. (2017). The Volatility of the Discourse on Refugees in Germany. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 16(1–2): 118–39.Google Scholar
Ware, A. (2002). The United States: Populism as Political Strategy. In Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 101–19.Google Scholar
Weber, M. ([1924]1997). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Wiles, P. (1969). A Syndrome, Not a Doctrine: Some Elementary Theses on Populism. In Ionescu, G. and Gellner, E. (eds.) Populism: Its Meaning and National Characteristics. London: Weinfeld & Nicolson. 197–211.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2015). The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2017). The “Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People”: Who’s Who? Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 551–65.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., Liebhart, K., Hirsch, A., Mitten, R. and Unger, J. W. (2009). The Discursive Construction of National Identity, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Forchtner, B. (2014). Embattled Vienna 1683/2010: Right-Wing Populism, Collective Memory and the Fictionalisation of Politics. Visual Communication 13(2): 231–55.Google Scholar
Wodak, R., KhosraviNik, M. and Mral, B. (eds.) (2013). Right-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (2017). Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond “Orbanism” and “Trumpism.” Journal of Language and Politics 16(4): 471–84.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Pelinka, A. (eds.) (2009). The Haider Phenomenon in Austria. New Brunswick/London: Transaction.Google Scholar
Zappettini, F. and Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.) (2019). Special Issue: The Critical Juncture of Brexit in Media & Political Discourses: From National-Populist Imaginary to Cross-National Social and Political Crisis. Critical Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592767.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Working with audience responses to an artwork “Capitalism Works for Me!” (by Steve Lambert), Chun analyzes responses to and critiques of people’s understanding of capitalism in their lives.

This book offers an incisive account of neoliberal ideology and its effects on both language and practice in contemporary life. It examines the increasing reach of the “market” and the key figure of the “entrepreneur.” It provides a robust treatment of ideology and how this links to language specifically and linguistics more generally.

This landmark book documents and critically analyzes the effect of market thinking in domains like education, government, religion and self-promotion. The context of each domain is clearly provided while detailed analysis of texts ranges from the lexical through the multimodal to the linguistic landscape.

Chun, C. W. (2017). The Discourses of Capitalism: Everyday Economics and the Production of Common Sense. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Holborow, M. (2015). Language and Neoliberalism. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Albiston, C. R. and Nielsen, L. B. (1994). Welfare Queens and Other Fairy Tales: Welfare Reform and Unconstitutional Reproductive Controls. Howard Law Journal 38: 473–519.Google Scholar
Alejo, R. (2010). Where Does the Money Go? An Analysis of the Container Metaphor in Economics: The Market and the Economy. Journal of Pragmatics 42(4): 1137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (2015). Who Benefits When Discourse Gets Democratised? Analysing a Twitter Corpus around the British Benefits Street Debate. In Baker, P. and McEnery, T. (eds.) Corpora and Discourse Studies. Palgrave Advances in Language and Linguistics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 244–65. Bank Job. (2018). https://bankjob.pictures/bank/.Google Scholar
Bickes, H., Otten, T. and Weymann, L. C. (2014). The Financial Crisis in the German and English Press: Metaphorical Structures in the Media Coverage on Greece, Spain and Italy. Discourse and Society 25(4): 424–45.Google Scholar
Bjerg, O. (2014). Making Money: The Philosophy of Crisis Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blaazer, D. (1999). Reading the Notes: Thoughts on the Meanings of British Paper Money. Humanities Research 1: 39–53.Google Scholar
Boers, F. and Demecheleer, M. (1997). A Few Metaphorical Models in (Western) Economic Discourse. In Liebert, W. A., Redeker, G. and Waugh, L. R. (eds.) Discourse and Perspective in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 115–30.Google Scholar
Borriello, A. (2017). “There Is No Alternative”: How Italian and Spanish Leaders’ Discourse Obscured the Political Nature of Austerity. Discourse and Society 28(3): 241–61.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. and Harvey, K. (2017a). Just Pain Wronga? A Multimodal Critical Analysis of Online Payday Loan Discourse. Critical Discourse Studies 14(2): 167–87.Google Scholar
Brookes, G. and Harvey, K. (2017b). The Discourse of Alternative Credit: A Multimodal Critical Examination of the Cash Converters Mobile App. In Mooney, A. and Sifaki, E. (eds.) The Language of Money and Debt: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cham: Palgrave. 233–56.Google Scholar
Butters, R. R. (2004). How Not to Strike It Rich: Semantics, Pragmatics, and Semiotics of a Massachusetts Lottery Game Card. Applied Linguistics 25(4): 466–90.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. (2017) Neoliberal Ideology Only “Partially” to Blame in the Global Financial Crisis? A Critical Discourse Analysis of Alan Greenspan’s Public Discourses on the 2007/8 GFC. In Mickan, P. and Lopez, E. (eds.) Text-Based Research and Teaching. Cham: Palgrave. 55–74.Google Scholar
Catalano, T. and Waugh, L. R. (2013). The Language of Money: How Verbal and Visual Metonymy Shapes Public Opinion about Financial Events. International Journal of Language Studies 7(2): 31–60.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2000). Metaphor and Vocabulary Teaching in ESP Economics. English for Specific Purposes 19(2): 149–65.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. and Ennis, T. (2001). A Comparative Study of Metaphor in Spanish and English Financial Reporting. English for Specific Purposes 20: 249–66.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. and Musolff, A. (2003). “Battered Hero” or “Innocent Victim”? A Comparative Study of Metaphors for Euro Trading in British and German Financial Reporting. English for Specific Purposes 22: 153–76.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. (2006). Slang Terms for Money: A Historical Thesaurus. In Caie, G. (ed.) The Power of Words: Essays in Lexicology, Lexicography and Semantics in Honour of Christian Kay. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 23–34.Google Scholar
Custers, A. (2017). Falling Behind: Debtors’ Emotional Relationships to Creditors. In Mooney, A. and Sifaki, E. (eds.) The Language of Money and Debt: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cham: Palgrave. 163–85.Google Scholar
Davidko, N. (2011). The Concept of DEBT in Collective Consciousness (a Socio-historical Analysis of Institutional Discourse). Studies about Languages 19: 78–88.Google Scholar
De Landtsheer, C. (2015). Media Rhetoric Plays the Market: The Logic and Power of Metaphors behind the Financial Crisis since 2006. Metaphor and the Social World 5(2): 204–21.Google Scholar
Fairclough, I. (2016). Evaluating Policy as Argument: The Public Debate over the First UK Austerity Budget. Critical Discourse Studies 13(1): 57–77.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, 2nd ed. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Fine, B., Johnston, D., Santos, A. C. and Waeyenberge, E. (2016). Nudging or Fudging: The World Development Report 2015. Development and Change 47(4): 640–63.Google Scholar
Gil, M. M. (2016). A Cross-Linguistic Study of Conceptual Metaphors in Financial Discourse. In Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.) Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016. Cham: Springer. 107–26.Google Scholar
Graham, P. (2018). Ethics in Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 15(2): 186–203.Google Scholar
Gregoriou, C. and Paterson, L. L. (2017). “Reservoir of Rage Swamps Wall St”: The Linguistic Construction and Evaluation of Occupy in International Print Media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 5(1): 57–80.Google Scholar
Haakana, M. and Sorjonen, M.-L. (2011). Invoking Another Context: Playfulness in Buying Lottery Tickets at Convenience Stores. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1288–302.Google Scholar
Hartz, R. (2012). Reclaiming the Truth of the Market in Times of Crisis: Course, Transformation and Strategies of a Liberal Discourse in Germany. Culture and Organization 18(2): 139–54.Google Scholar
Herzog, B. (2018). Suffering as an Anchor of Critique: The Place of Critique in Critical Discourse Studies. Critical Discourse Studies 15(2): 111–22.Google Scholar
Ho, J. (2016). When Bank Stocks Are Hobbled by Worries: A Metaphor Study of Emotions in the Financial News Reports. Text & Talk 36(3): 295–317.Google Scholar
Horner, J. R. (2011). Clogged Systems and Toxic Assets: News Metaphors, Neoliberal Ideology, and the United States “Wall Street Bailout” of 2008. Journal of Language and Politics 10(1): 29–49.Google Scholar
Ingham, G. (1996). Money Is a Social Relation. Review of Social Economy LIV(4): 507–29.Google Scholar
Knezevic, I., Hunter, H., Watt, C., Williams, P. and Anderson, B. (2014). Food Insecurity and Participation. Critical Discourse Studies 11(2): 230–45.Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2007). “The World’s Local Bank”: Globalisation as a Strategy in Corporate Branding Discourse. Social Semiotics 17(1): 111–30.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. ([1980]2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lischinsky, A. (2011). In Times of Crisis: A Corpus Approach to the Construction of the Global Financial Crisis in Annual Reports. Critical Discourse Studies 8(3): 153–68.Google Scholar
Marten, L. and Kula, N. C. (2008). Meanings of Money: National Identity and the Semantics of Currency in Zambia and Tanzania. Journal of African Cultural Studies 20(2): 183–98.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2004). Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 49(1): 179–202.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mooney, A. (2017). Reading That which Should Not Be Signified: Community Currency in the UK. In Zhao, S., Djovnov, E., Björkvall, A. and Boeriis, M. (eds.) Advancing Multimodal and Critical Discourse Studies: Interdisciplinary Research Inspired by Theo van Leeuwen’s Social Semiotics. London/New York: Routledge. 95–114.Google Scholar
Mooney, A and Sifaki, E. (2017). The View from the Ground. In Mooney, A. and Sifaki, E. (eds.) The Language of Money and Debt: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cham: Palgrave. 1–30.Google Scholar
Mylonas, Y. (2014). Crisis, Austerity and Opposition in Mainstream Media Discourses of Greece. Critical Discourse Studies 11(3): 305–21.Google Scholar
Neon, NEF, FrameWorks Institute, and PIRC. (2018). Framing the Economy: How to Win the Case for a Better System. http://publicinterest.org.uk/framing-economy-report/.Google Scholar
Nerghes, A., Hellsten, I. and Groenewegen, P. (2015). A Toxic Crisis: Metaphorizing the Financial Crisis. International Journal of Communication 9: 106–32.Google Scholar
North, P. (2010). Local Money: How to Make It Happen in Your Community. Totnes: Green Books.Google Scholar
Oberlechner, T., Slunecko, T. and Kronberger, N. (2004). Surfing the Money Tides: Understanding the Foreign Exchange Market through Metaphors. British Journal of Social Psychology 43: 133–56.Google Scholar
Paterson, L., Coffey-Glover, L. and Peplow, D. (2016). Negotiating Stance within Discourses of Class: Reactions to Benefits Street. Discourse & Society 27(2): 195–214.Google Scholar
Paterson, L., Peplow, D. and Grainger, K. (2017). Does Money Talk Equate to Class Talk? Audience Responses to Poverty Porn in Relation to Money and Debt. In Mooney, A. and Sifaki, E. (eds.) The Language of Money and Debt: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Cham: Palgrave. 205–31.Google Scholar
Penrose, J. (2011). Designing the Nation: Banknotes, Banal Nationalism and Alternative Conceptions of the State. Political Geography 30(8): 429–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, J. and Cumming, C. (2011). Money Talks: Banknote Iconography and Symbolic Constructions of Scotland. Nations and Nationalism 17(4): 821–42.Google Scholar
Pessali, H. F. (2009). Metaphors of Transaction Cost Economics. Review of Social Economy 67(3): 313–28.Google Scholar
Reeves, A. et al. (2015). Economic Shocks, Resilience, and Male Suicides in the Great Recession: Cross-National Analysis of 20 EU Countries. European Journal of Public Health 15(3): 404–9.Google Scholar
Roderick, I. (2018). Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis as Ethical Praxis. Critical Discourse Studies 15(2): 154–68.Google Scholar
Semino, E. (2002). A Sturdy Baby or a Derailing Train? Metaphorical Representations of the Euro on British and Italian Newspapers. Text 22(1): 107–39.Google Scholar
Sørensen, A. R. (2014). “Too Weird for Banknotes”: Legitimacy and Identity in the Production of Danish Banknotes 1947–2007. Journal of Historical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12077.Google Scholar
Squires, P. and Lea, J. (2013). Introduction: Reading Loïc Wacquant – Opening Questions and Overview. In Squires, P. and Lea, J. (eds.) Criminalisation and Advanced Marginality: Critically Exploring the Work of Loïc Waquant. Bristol: Policy Press. 1–18.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Thunder, A. (2004). Living On … Counterfeit Money: J.S.G Boggs and the Borderlands of Economic Criticism. Textus XVII: 417–30.Google Scholar
Tomoni, B. (2012). Using Money Metaphors in Banking Discourse: Three Possible Scenarios. Metaphor and the Social World 2(2): 201–32.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T. (2018). Moral Evaluation in Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 15(2): 140–53.Google Scholar
Walsh, C. (2016). Protesting Too Much: Alastair Darling’s Constructions after the Financial Crash. Critical Discourse Studies 13(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
White, M. (1997). The Use of Metaphor in Reporting Financial Market Transactions. Cuadernos de Filología Inglesa 6(2): 233–45.Google Scholar
White, M. (2003). Metaphor and Economics: The Case of Growth. English for Specific Purposes 22(2): 131–51.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. and Mueller, F. (2016). Accounting for the Banking Crisis: Repertoires of Agency and Structure. Critical Discourse Studies 13(1): 20–40.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Using a combination of CDA and corpus linguistics, this volume offers comprehensive insights into the ways in which discourse constructs and maintains corporate identity and relationships with internal and external audiences. A wide range of written genres produced by corporations are explored in depth.

This book presents an excellent introduction to the role of language in many facets of business communication including stakeholder communication, brand narratives and management of conflict and self-branding. Each topic is discussed in an engaging way by drawing on a range of authentic examples.

Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Darics, E. and Koller, V. (2018). Language in Business, Language at Work. London: Palgrave Higher Education.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, R. J. (1999). Ecological Commitments in Business: A Computer-Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis. In Verschueren, J. (ed.) Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. 14–24.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. J. (2009). Framing Discourse on the Environment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis. Human Relations 53(9): 1125–49.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities, 2nd ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Austin, L. and Yin, J. (2018). Social Media and Crisis Communication. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C. and Planken, B. (2007). Business Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.Google Scholar
Baxter., J. (2010). The Language of Female Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting Narratives and the Narrative Turn in Accounting Research: Issues, Theory, Methodology, Methods and a Research Framework. British Accounting Review 46: 111–34.Google Scholar
Beattie, V., Dhanani, A. and Jones, M. J. (2008). Investigating Presentational Change in UK Annual Reports. Journal of Business Communication 45(2): 181–222.Google Scholar
Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication. Public Relations Review 23(2): 177–86.Google Scholar
Bhatia, A. (2012). The Corporate Social Responsibility Report: The Hybridization of a “Confused” Genre (2007–2011). IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 55(3): 221–38.Google Scholar
Boden, D. (1994). The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Breeze, R. (2012). Legitimation in Corporate Discourse: Oil Corporations after Deepwater Horizon. Discourse & Society 23(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Breeze, R. (2013). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Chaika, E. (1982). Language: The Social Mirror. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. T. (1998). An Analytic Framework for Crisis Situations: Better Responses from a Better Understanding of the Situation. Journal of Public Relations Research 10(3): 177–91.Google Scholar
Creelman, V. (2015). Sheer Outrage: Negotiating Customer Dissatisfaction and Interaction in the Blogosphere. In Darics, E. (ed.) Digital Business Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 160–85.Google Scholar
Darics, E. (2013). Non-verbal Signalling in Digital Discourse: The Case of Letter Repetition. Discourse, Context & Media 2(3): 141–8.Google Scholar
Darics, E. (2015). Digital Business Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Davis, C. B., Glantz, M. and Novak, D. R. (2016). You Can’t Run Your SUV on Cute. Let’s Go!: Internet Memes as Delegitimizing Discourse. Environmental Communication 10(1): 62–83.Google Scholar
Dennis, A. R., Rennecker, J. A. and Hansen, S. (2010). Invisible Whispering: Restructuring Collaborative Decision Making with Instant Messaging. Decision Sciences 41(4): 845–86.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, R. (2002). Leading with Purpose: The New Corporate Realities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Introduction. In Fairclough, N. (ed.) Critical Language Awareness. Harlow: Longman. 1–29.Google Scholar
Fromm., E. (1978). To Have or to Be? London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Fuoli, M. and Hart, C. (2018). Trust-Building Strategies in Corporate Discourse: An Experimental Study. Discourse & Society 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770264.Google Scholar
Fuoli, M. and Paradis, C. (2014). A Model of Trust-Repair Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 74: 52–69.Google Scholar
Garrett, R. K. and Danziger, J. N. (2007). IM = Interruption Management? Instant Messaging and Disruption in the Workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 23–42.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gimenez, J. (2000). Business E-mail Communication: Some Emerging Tendencies in Register. English for Specific Purposes 19(3): 237–51.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Handford, M. (2010). The Language of Business Meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2000). Doing Collegiality and Keeping Control at Work: Small Talk in Government Departments. In Coupland, J. (ed.) Small Talk. London: Longman. 32–61.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Marra, M. (2004). Relational Practice in the Workplace: Women’s Talk or Gendered Discourse? Language in Society 33: 377–98.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and Politeness in the Workplace. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring Corporate Rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s Letter. Journal of Business Communication 35(2): 224–45.Google Scholar
Incelli, E. (2013). Managing Discourse in Intercultural Business Email Interactions: A Case Study of a British and Italian Business Transaction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34(6): 515–32.Google Scholar
Jaworska, S. (2018). Change but No Climate Change: Discourses of Climate Change in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Oil Industry. International Journal of Business Communication 55(2): 194–219.Google Scholar
Jaworska., S. and Nanda, A. (2018). Doing Well by Talking Good? A Topic Modelling-Assisted Discourse Study of Corporate Social Responsibility. Applied Linguistics 39(3): 373–99.Google Scholar
Jay, T. (2000). Why We Curse: A Neuro-psycho-social Theory of Speech. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koester, A. (2006). Investigating Workplace Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2018). Language Awareness and Language Workers. Language Awareness 27(1–2): 4–20.Google Scholar
Lampi, M. (1986). Linguistic Components of Strategy in Business Negotiations, Studies B-85. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. (2015). The Semiotics of Modernist Space in the Branding of Corporations: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analytic Approach. International Journal of Marketing Semiotics 3: 19–38.Google Scholar
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. (2017). The Neoliberal Definition of “Elite Space” in IKEA Kitchens. Social Semiotics 27(3): 323–34.Google Scholar
Lischinsky, A. (2011). The Discursive Construction of a Responsible Corporate Self. In Sjölander, A. E. and Gunnarson Payne, J. (eds.) Tracking Discourses: Politics, Identity and Social Change. Lund: Nordic Academic Press. 257–85.Google Scholar
Lischinsky, A. (2018). Critical Discourse Studies and Branding. In Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 540–52.Google Scholar
Livesey, S. (2002). Global Warming Wars: Rhetorical and Discourse Analytic Approaches to Exxonmobil’s Corporate Public Discourse. Journal of Business Communication 39(1): 117–48.Google Scholar
Livesey, S. and Kearins, K. (2002). Transparent and Caring Corporations? A Study of Sustainability Reports by the Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organisation and Environment 15(3): 233–58.Google Scholar
Mak, B. C. N. and Lee, C. (2015). Swearing Is E-business: Expletives in Instant Messaging in Hong Kong Workplaces. In Darics, E. (ed.) Digital Business Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 122–41.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merkl-Davies, D. M. and Koller, V. (2012). “Metaphoring” People out of this World: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Chairman’s Statement of a Defence Firm. Accounting Forum 36(3): 178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullany, J. L. (2007). Gendered Discourse in Professional Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Neeley, T. (2012). Global Business Speaks English. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2012/05/global-business-speaks-english.Google Scholar
Nickerson, C. and de Groot, E. (2005). Dear Shareholder, Dear Stockholder, Dear Stakeholder: The Business Letter Genre in the Annual General Report. In Gillaerts, P. and Gotti, M. (eds.) Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang. 325–46.Google Scholar
Pollach, I. (2018). Issue Cycles in Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Longitudinal Study. Environmental Communication 12(2): 247–60.Google Scholar
Quan-Haase, A., Cothrel, J. and Wellman, B. (2005). Instant Messaging for Collaboration: A Case Study of a High-Tech Firm. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(4): JCMC10413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00277.x.Google Scholar
Rutherford, B. A. (2005). Genre Analysis of Corporate Annual Report Narratives: A Corpus Linguistics-Based Approach. Journal of Business Communication 42(4): 349–78.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., Scollon, S. and Jones, R. (2012). Intercultural Communication, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse Semantics as Ideology. Discourse & Society 6(2): 243–89.Google Scholar
Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M. and Moon, J. (2014). How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics 131(2): 469–86.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2013). “Toward a Global Knowledge Enterprise”: University Websites as Portals to the Ongoing Marketization of Higher Education. Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 468–85.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Agha’s linguistic-anthropological approach to mediatization emphasizes the importance of commoditized features of communication and their influence in the recontextualization of parts of discourse. It is recommended further reading, especially for a theory of how language/discourse travels across different communication media (cf. Briggs, 2011).

This revised account of the notion of “media logic” underpins (institutional) mediatization research and discusses the discourses of fear as developed and sustained by media logic.

The introduction to this edited volume offers a rich and comprehensive overview of mediatization research, its potential applications and its links with sociolinguistics. The volume overall is an indispensable tool for familiarizing oneself with mediatization research.

This social-constructionist account of mediatization in online discourses on economic affairs proposes the concept of “social mediatization” to account for the ever-growing importance of social media interactions in influencing and shifting modes of participation. It also illuminates the spread and recontextualization of elite terms/discourse in public settings.

The author provides a comprehensive overview of the ways in which technological change in communication has affected newspaper communication and how processes of communication may continue to be changed by technological developments.

Agha, A. (2011c). Meet Mediatization. Language & Communication 31: 163–70.Google Scholar
Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media Logic, Social Control, and Fear. Communication Theory 23: 223–38.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change: Key Concepts, Research Traditions, Open Issues. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 3–48.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. and Deschrijver, C. (2018). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Social Mediatization of the Economy: Texts, Discourses, and Participation. Language@Internet 16: article 1.Google Scholar
Schmitz, U. (2014). Semiotic Economy, Growth of Mass Media Discourse, and Change of Written Language through Multimodal Techniques: The Case of Newspapers (Printed and Online) and Web Services. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 279–304.Google Scholar

References

Adolf, M. (2011). Clarifying Mediatization: Sorting through a Current Debate. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3(2): 153–75.Google Scholar
Agha, A. (2011a). Commodity Registers. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21(1): 22–53.Google Scholar
Agha, A. (2011b). Large and Small Scale Forms of Personhood. Language & Communication 31: 171–80.Google Scholar
Agha, A. (2011c). Meet Mediatization. Language & Communication 31: 163–70.Google Scholar
Altheide, D. L. (2004). Media Logic and Political Communication. Political Communication 21: 293–6.Google Scholar
Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media Logic, Social Control, and Fear. Communication Theory 23: 223–38.Google Scholar
Altheide, D. L. and Snow, R. P. (1992). Media Logic and Culture: Reply to Oakes. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 5(3): 465–72.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. W. (2011). Deliberative, Agonistic, and Algorithmic Audiences: Journalism’s Vision of Its Public in an Age of Audience Transparency. International Journal of Communication 5: 529–47.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change: Key Concepts, Research Traditions, Open Issues. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 3–48.Google Scholar
Block, E. (2013). A Culturalist Approach to the Concept of the Mediatization of Politics: The Age of “Media Hegemony.” Communication Theory 23: 259–78.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. L. (2011). On Virtual Epidemics and the Mediatization of Public Health. Language & Communication 31: 217–28.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cole, D. and Pellicer, R. (2012). Uptake (Un)limited: The Mediatization of Register Shifting in US Public Discourse. Language in Society 41: 449–70.Google Scholar
Cotter, C. (2014). Revising the “Journalist’s Bible”: How News Practitioners Respond to Language and Social Change. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 371–94.Google Scholar
Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or Mediation? Alternative Understandings of the Emergent Space of Digital Storytelling. New Media & Society 10(3): 373–91.Google Scholar
Couldry, N. and Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Contexts, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory 23: 191–202.Google Scholar
Davies, N. (2009). Flat Earth News. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Deacon, D. and Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key Concept or Conceptual Bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society 36(7): 1032–44.Google Scholar
Deschrijver, C. (2020). Metalinguistic Density as an Indicator of Sharedness: Economic and Financial Terms in Online Interaction. Language & Communication 71: 123–35.Google Scholar
Ekström, M., Fornäs, J., Jansson, A. and Jerslev, A. (2016). Three Tasks for Mediatization Research: Contributions to an Open Agenda. Media, Culture & Society 38(7): 1090–108.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society 4(2): 133–68.Google Scholar
Falasca, K. (2014). Political News Journalism: Mediatization across Three News Reporting Contexts. European Journal of Communication 29(5): 583–97.Google Scholar
Gehl, R. W. (2014). Reverse Engineering Social Media: Software, Culture, and Political Economy in New Media Capitalism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (1997). Self-Presentation and Interactional Alliances in E-mail Discourse: The Style- and Code-Switches of Greek Messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7(2): 141–64.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. and Deschrijver, C. (2018). Introduction to the Special Issue: The Social Mediatization of the Economy: Texts, Discourses, and Participation. Language@Internet 16: article 1. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2018si/georgakopoulou.Google Scholar
Graber, K. (2012). Public Information: The Shifting Roles of Minority Language News Media in the Buryat Territories of Russia. Language & Communication 32: 124–36.Google Scholar
Hepp, A. (2013). The Communicative Figurations of Mediatized Worlds: Mediatization Research in Times of the “Mediation of Everything.” European Journal of Communication 28(6): 615–29.Google Scholar
Hepp, A. (2014). Mediatization: A Panorama of Media and Communication Research. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 49–66.Google Scholar
Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S. and Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: Theorizing the Interplay between Media, Culture and Society. Media, Culture & Society 37(2): 314–24.Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2008a). The Mediatization of Religion: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Religious Change. Northern Lights 6(1): 9–26.Google Scholar
Hjarvard, S. (2008b). The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review 29(2): 105–34.Google Scholar
Hou, M. (2018). Economic News Comments on a Mobile News App: An Emerging Genre of Bashing. Language@Internet 16: article 4. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2018si/hou.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2009). Entextualization, Mediatization and Authentication: Orthographic Choice in Media Transcripts. Text & Talk 29(5): 571–94.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A. (2011). Sociolinguistic Diversity in Mainstream Media: Authenticity, Authority and Processes of Mediation and Mediatization. Journal of Language and Politics 10(4): 562–86.Google Scholar
Jansson, A. (2002). The Mediatization of Consumption: Towards an Analytical Framework of Image Culture. Journal of Consumer Culture 2(1): 5–31.Google Scholar
Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and Sensitizing Conceptualizations of Mediatization. Communication Theory 23: 203–22.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. and Ensslin, A. (2007). Language in the Media: Theory and Practice. In Johnson, S. and Ensslin, A. (eds.) Language in the Media: Representation, Identities, Ideologies. London: Continuum. 3–24.Google Scholar
Kammer, A. (2013). The Mediatization of Journalism. MedieKultur 54: 141–58.Google Scholar
Knight Foundation. (2018). An Online Experimental Platform to Assess Trust in the Media. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KnightFoundation_NewsLens1_Client_Report_070918_ab.pdfGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, H. (2013). Communicative Constructivism and Mediatization. Communication Theory 23: 97–315.Google Scholar
Krotz, F. (2007). The Meta-process of “Mediatization” as a Conceptual Frame. Global Media and Communication 3(3): 256–60.Google Scholar
Krotz, F. (2009). Mediatization: A Concept with which to Grasp Media and Societal Change. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 21–40.Google Scholar
Krotz, F. and Hepp, A. (2013). A Concretization of Mediatization: How Mediatization Works and Why “Mediatized Worlds” Are a Helpful Concept for Empirical Mediatization Research. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3(2): 119–34.Google Scholar
Lampropoulou, S. (2018). Economy Talk as Blaming Strategy: Crisis Framings in The Guardian News Stories and Recontextualizations in User Comments during the Greek Bailout Referendum. Language@Internet 16: article 5. www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2018si/lampropoulou.Google Scholar
Landerer, N. (2013). Rethinking the Logics: A Conceptual Framework for the Mediatization of Politics. Communication Theory 23: 239–58.Google Scholar
Lelkes, Y., Sood, G. and Iyengar, S. (2017). The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect. American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 5–20.Google Scholar
Livingstone, S. (2009). Foreword: Coming to Terms with “Mediatization.” In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. ix–xi.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. A. (ed.) (1993). Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lundby, K. (2009). Media Logic: Looking for Social Interaction. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 101–119.Google Scholar
Maltby, S. (2012). The Mediatization of the Military. Media, War & Conflict 5(3): 255–68.Google Scholar
Marshall, P. D. (2015). Monitoring Persona: Mediatized Identity and the Edited Public Self. Frame: Journal of Literary Studies 28(1): 115–33.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, J. (2014). The Fourth Screen: Mediatization and the Smartphone. Mobile Media & Communication 2(2): 209–26.Google Scholar
Peleg, A. and Bogoch, B. (2012). Removing Justitia’s Blindfold: The Mediatization of Law in Israel. Media, Culture & Society 34(8): 961–78.Google Scholar
Peng, C.-Y. (2018). Mediatized Taiwan Mandarin: Social Perceptions and Language Ideologies. Chinese Language and Discourse 9(2): 162–83.Google Scholar
Rödder, S. and Schäfer, M. S. (2010). Repercussion and Resistance: An Empirical Study on the Interrelation between Science and Mass Media. Communications 35: 249–67. Schmitz, U. (2004). Sprache in modernen Medien. Berlin: E. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Rödder, S. and Schäfer, M. S. (2014). Semiotic Economy, Growth of Mass Media Discourse, and Change of Written Language through Multimodal Techniques: The Case of Newspapers (Printed and Online) and Web Services. In Androutsopoulous, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 279–304.Google Scholar
Schrott, A. (2009). Dimensions: Catch-All Label or Technical Term. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 41–61.Google Scholar
Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing Mediatisation as an Analytical Concept. European Journal of Communication 19(1): 87–101.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function. In Lucy, J. A. (ed.) Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 33–58.Google Scholar
Skjulstad, S. (2009). Dressing Up: The Mediatization of Fashion Online. In Lundby, K. (ed.) Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang. 179–202.Google Scholar
Squires, L. and Iorio, J. (2014). Tweets in the News: Legitimizing Medium, Standardizing Form. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.) Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 331–60.Google Scholar
Strömbäck, J. and Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). Mediatization and Media Interventionism: A Comparative Analysis of Sweden and the United States. International Journal of Press/Politics 16(1): 30–49.Google Scholar
Tewksbury, D. (2005). The Seeds of Audience Fragmentation: Specialization in the Use of Online News Sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49(3): 332–48.Google Scholar
Thurlow, C. and Poff, M. (2013). Text Messaging. In Herring, S. C., Stein, D. and Virtanen, T. (eds.) Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 163–89.Google Scholar
Toffler, A. and Toffler, H. (2006). Revolutionary Wealth. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Van Hout, T. (2015). Review of the book Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(5): 714–18.Google Scholar
Van Hout, T. and Burger, P. (2017). Text Bite News: The Metapragmatics of Feature News. Text & Talk 37(4): 461–84.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (2000). Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use. Pragmatics 10(4): 439–56.Google Scholar
Wallsten, K. (2010). “Yes We Can”: How Online Viewership, Blog Discussion, Campaign Statements, and Mainstream Media Coverage Produced a Viral Video Phenomenon. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 7(2–3): 163–81.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Enquiry. Pragmatics & Cognition 15(1): 203–25.Google Scholar
Zeh, R. and Hopmann, D. N. (2013). Indicating Mediatization? Two Decades of Election Campaign Television Coverage. European Journal of Communication 28(3): 225–40.Google Scholar

Further Reading

This is one of the few examples in surveillance studies to seriously engage with theories of discourse analysis, exploring how regimes of surveillance discursively construct social identities and relationships between citizens/customers and the state and corporations.

This chapter gives a comprehensive explanation of the impact of different kinds of media on the discursive processes involved in surveillance.

This article looks at digital surveillance from the point of view of users of digital media, reporting on a research project in which participants described their “folk theories” of how algorithms work and reflected on how these theories affect the way they communicate.

Barnard-Wills, D. (2012). Surveillance and Identity: Discourse, Subjectivity and the State. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2017). Surveillant Media: Technology, Language and Control. In Cotter, C. and Perrin, D. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Media. London: Routledge. 244–61.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (2019). The Text Is Reading You: Teaching Language in the Age of the Algorithm. Linguistics and Education. (available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100750)Google Scholar

References

Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective Economies. Social Text 22(2): 117–39.Google Scholar
Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance. First Monday 13(3).Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (2008). The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. Wired Magazine, June 23. www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory.Google Scholar
Andrejevic, M. (2015). Foreword. In Dubrofsky, R. E. and Magnet, S. A. (eds.) Feminist Surveillance Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. ix–xviii.Google Scholar
Anthamatten, E. (2015). Visibility Is a Trap: Body Cameras and the Panopticon of Police Power. The Mantle, March, 23. www.mantlethought.org/philosophy/visibility-trap.Google Scholar
Ayres, I. (2008). Super Crunchers: How Anything Can Be Predicted. London: Hachette. Barnard-Wills, D. (2012). Surveillance and Identity: Discourse, Subjectivity and the State. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Battelle, J. (2005). The Search: How Google and Its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed Our Culture. New York: Portfolio.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language Style as Audience Design. Language in Society 13: 145–204.Google Scholar
Berry, D. (2011). The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blaze, M. (2013). Phew, NSA Is Just Collecting Metadata (You Should Still Worry). Wired, June 19. www.wired.com/2013/06/phew-it-was-just-metadata-not-think-again.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Omoniyi, T. (2006). Email Fraud: Language, Technology, and the Indexicals of Globalisation. Social Semiotics 16(4): 573–605.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, D. (2012). Networked Privacy. Surveillance & Society 10(3/4): 348–50.Google Scholar
Bucher, T. (2017). The Algorithmic Imaginary: Exploring the Ordinary Affects of Facebook Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20(1): 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2016). Embodied Sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (ed.) Sociolinguistics.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 173–98.Google Scholar
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2017). We Are Data: Algorithms and the Making of Our Digital Selves. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R. (1988). Information Technology and Dataveillance. Communications of the ACM 31(5): 498–512.Google Scholar
Cole, D. (2014). “We Kill People Based on Metadata.” New York Review of Books, May 10. www.nybooks.com/daily/2014/05/10/we-kill-people-based-metadata.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F. and Massumi, B. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, M. and Kitchin, R. (2005). Codes of Life: Identification Codes and the Machine-Readable World. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 23(6): 851–81.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (2011). Linguistic Anthropology: The Study of Language as a Non-neutral Medium. In Mesthrie, R. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28–46.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2017). 2018 Reform of EU Data Protection Rules. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/justice-and-fundamental-rights/data-protection/2018-reform-eu-data-protection-rules_en.Google Scholar
Foth, M. and Hearn, G. (2007). Networked Individualism of Urban Residents: Discovering the Communicative Ecology in Inner-City Apartment Buildings. Information, Communication & Society 10(5): 749–72.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1986). Remarks on Ethnomethodology. In Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 301–45.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gitelman, L. (2014). Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1964). The Neglected Situation. American Anthropologist 66(6_PART2): 133–6.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1972). Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (1998). Spaces of Surveillant Simulation: New Technologies, Digital Representations, and Material Geographies. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16(4): 483–504.Google Scholar
Graham, S. and Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space, Inequality. Critical Social Policy 23(2): 227–48.Google Scholar
Grassenger, H. and Krogerus, M. (2017). The Data that Turned the World Upside Down. Vice, January 28. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/mg9vvn/how-our-likes-helped-trump-win.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hadnagy, C. (2010). Social Engineering: The Art of Human Hacking. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.Google Scholar
Haggerty, K. D. (2006). Tear Down the Walls: On Demolishing the Panopticon. In Lyon, D. (ed.) Theorizing Surveillance. London: Routledge. 23–45.Google Scholar
Haggerty, K. D. and Ericson, R. V. (2000). The Surveillant Assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605–22.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. (1993). The Materiality of Informatics. Configurations 1(1): 147–70.Google Scholar
Hess, A. (2014). You Are What You Compute (and What Is Computed for You): Considerations of Digital Rhetorical Identification. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric 4(1/2): 1–18.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
ieeessit. (2017). Ubiquitous Surveillance and Security. Technology and Society, June 29. http://technologyandsociety.org/ubiquitous-surveillance-and-security/.Google Scholar
Introna, L. D. (2011). The Enframing of Code Agency, Originality and the Plagiarist. Theory, Culture & Society 28(6): 113–41.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. G. and Regan, P. M. (2014). Transparency and Surveillance as Sociotechnical Accountability: A House of Mirrors. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2009). Inter-activity: How New Media Can Help Us Understand Old Media. In Rowe, C. and Wyss, E. (eds.) New Media and Linguistic Change. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press. 11–29.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2017a). Surveillant Media: Technology, Language and Control. In Colleen, C. and Perrin, D. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Language and Media. London: Routledge. 244–61.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2017b). “The Text Is Reading You”: Language Teaching in the Age of the Algorithm. Presented at the 18th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2018). GDPR and the Discursive Coercion of Consent. A plenary address presented at the “What’s Up, Switzerland?” Conference: Language, Individuals and Ideologies in Mobile Messaging, University of Zurich, October 18–20.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2020). The Rise of the Pragmatic Web: Implications for Rethinking Meaning and Interaction. In Tagg, C. and Evans, M. (eds.) Historicising the Digital. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter 17–37.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. and Hafner, C. A. (2012). Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kerr, I., Lucock, C. and Steeves, V. (2009). Lessons from the Identity Trail: Anonymity, Privacy and Identity in a Networked Society. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, K. (2019). Becoming a Citizen: Linguistic Trials and Negotiations in the UK. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Kim, N. S. (2013). Wrap Contracts: Foundations and Ramifications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. and Graepel, T. (2013). Private Traits and Attributes Are Predictable from Digital Records of Human Behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(15): 5802–5.Google Scholar
Lanier, J. (2018). Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Longford, G. (2005). Pedagogies of Digital Citizenship and the Politics of Code. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 9(1): 68–96.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Magnet, S. and Gates, K. (2009). Communicating Surveillance: Examining the Intersections. In Gates, K. and Magnet, S. (eds.) The New Media of Surveillance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marx, G. T. (2012). “Your Papers Please”: Personal and Professional Encounters with Surveillance. In Lyon, D., Ball, K. and Haggerty, K. D. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies. London: Routledge. xx–xxxi.Google Scholar
Marx, G. T. (2016). Windows into the Soul: Surveillance and Society in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maryns, K. and Blommaert, J. (2002). Pretextuality and Pretextual Gaps: On Re/defining Linguistic Inequality. Journal of Pragmatics 12(1): 11–30.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. (2004). Loving Big Brother: Surveillance Culture and Performance Space. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
MIT Media Lab. (n.d.). Project Overview: On the Re-identifiability of Credit Card Metadata. www.media.mit.edu/projects/on-the-reidentifiability-of-credit-card-metadata/overview.Google Scholar
Nguyen, D. H. and Mynatt, E. D. (2002). Privacy Mirrors: Understanding and Shaping Socio-technical Ubiquitous Computing Systems (Technical Report). Georgia Institute of Technology. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/3268.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Palen, L. and Dourish, P. (2003). Unpacking “Privacy” for a Networked World. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM. 129–36.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. and Gibson, P. L. (2011). Fifteen Minutes of Privacy: Privacy, Sociality, and Publicity on Social Network Sites. In Trepte, S. and Reinecke, L. (eds.) Privacy Online: Perspectives on Privacy and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. 75–89.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. J. (2002). Negotiating the Digital Closet: Online Pseudonymity and the Politics of Sexual Identity. Information, Communication & Society 5(3): 406–24.Google Scholar
Reilly, C. (2014). The Metadata Debate: What You Need to Know about Data Retention. CNet, August 13. www.cnet.com/news/what-you-need-to-know-about-data-retention.Google Scholar
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A. and Adleman, L. (1978). A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems. Communication of the ACM 21(2): 120–6.Google Scholar
Rock, F. (2016). Talking the Ethical Turn: Drawing on Tick-Box Consent in Policing. In Ehrlich, S., Eades, D. and Ainsworth, J. (eds.) Discursive Constructions of Consent in the Legal Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 93–117.Google Scholar
Ruesch, J. and Bateson, G. (1951). Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Scott, J. (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shohamy, E. (2014). The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Slade, S. and Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning Analytics: Ethical Issues and Dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 57(10): 1510–29.Google Scholar
Tagg, C., Seargeant, P. and Brown, A. A. (2017). Taking Offence on Social Media: Conviviality and Communication on Facebook. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tene, O. and Polonetsky, J. (2013). Big Data for All: Privacy and User Control in the Age of Analytics. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 11(5): 239.Google Scholar
Tiainen, M. (2017). (De)legitimating Electronic Surveillance: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Finnish News Coverage of the Edward Snowden Revelations. Critical Discourse Studies 14(4): 402–19.Google Scholar
Trottier, D. (2012). Social Media as Surveillance: Rethinking Visibility in a Converging World. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Van der Ploeg, I. (2003). Biometrics and Privacy: A Note on the Politics of Theorizing Technology. Information, Communication & Society 6(1): 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118032000068741.Google Scholar
Wee, L. (2015). Mobilizing Affect in the Linguistic Cyberlandscape: The R-Word Campaign. In Rudby, R. and Ben Said, S. (eds.) Conflict, Exclusion and Dissent in the Linguistic Landscape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 185–203.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (2004). Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×