Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:12:15.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Decolonizing Gender and Intercultural Communication in Transnational Contexts

from Part III - Methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2020

By
Lara Lengel ,
Ahmet Atay  and
Yannick Kluch
Edited by
Guido Rings  and
Sebastian Rasinger
Guido Rings
Affiliation:
Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge
Sebastian Rasinger
Affiliation:
Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Lara Martin Lengel, Ahmet Atay and Yannick Kluch propose in their chapter to theorize decolonization as a framework that emphasizes empowerment through the potential to reframe and re/envision history. The aim is to break away from dominant Western and US-centric ways of studying culture, communication and identity and the relationships among them, including especially the construction and performance of gender. This chapter also presents methodological strategies for critical intercultural communication research, particularly with focus on the intersectional nature of gender, identity, culture and power.

Keywords

intercultural communicationcritical intercultural communicationhistorygenderpostcolonialismdecolonialism
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication , pp. 205 - 226
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, L. (2006). Writing against culture. In Lewin, E., ed., Feminist Anthropology: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 153–66.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J. and Sztompka, P. (2004). Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. and McCormack, M. (2010). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and American sporting oppression: examining black and gay male athletes. Journal of Homosexuality, 57(8), 949–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asselin, H. and Basile, S. (2012). Éthique de la recherche avec les peuples autochtones: Qu’en pensent les principaux intéressés? Éthique Publique, 14(1), 333–45.Google Scholar
Atay, A. (2015). Globalization’s Impact on Cultural Identity Formations: Queer Diasporic Males in Cyberspace. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Atay, A. (2018). Mediated intercultural communication. In Atay, A. and Toyosaki, S., eds., Critical Intercultural Communication Pedagogy. Lanham, MA: Lexington, pp. 179–94.Google Scholar
Austin, W., Goble, E., and Kelecevic, J. (2009). The ethics of forensic psychiatry: moving beyond principles to a relational ethics approach. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20(6), 835–50.Google Scholar
Barlow, M. R. and Hetzel-Riggin, M. D. (2018). Predicting posttraumatic growth in survivors of interpersonal trauma: gender role adherence is more important than gender. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(3), 446–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmayor, R. (1991). Testimony, action research, and empowerment: Puerto Rican women and popular education. In Gluck, S. B. and Patai, D., eds., Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge, pp. 159–74.Google Scholar
Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59(5–6), 312–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, K. L., Browne, C. V., Ka’Opua, L. S., Kim, B. J. and Mokuau, N. (2014). Research on indigenous elders: from positivistic to decolonizing methodologies. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 117–26.Google Scholar
Carspecken, P. F. (1996). Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chávez, K. R. (2009). Embodied translation: dominant discourse and communication with migrant bodies-as-text. Howard Journal of Communications, 20(1), 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chávez, K. R. (2013). Pushing boundaries: queer intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 6(2), 83–95.Google Scholar
Chawla, D. and Atay, A. (2017). Decolonizing autoethnography. Cultural Studies <=> Critical Methodologies, 18(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous Research Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chuang, R. (2003). A postmodern critique of cross-cultural and intercultural communication research: contesting essentialism, positivist dualism, and Eurocentricity. In Starosta, W. J. and Chen, G. M., eds., Ferment in the Intercultural Field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 34–35.Google Scholar
Coburn, E., Moreton-Robinson, A., Sefa Dei, G. and Stewart-Harawira, M. (2013). Unspeakable things: indigenous research and social science. Socio: Révolutions, Contestations, Indignations, 2, 121–34.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (1989). The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(4), 745–73.Google Scholar
Coombes, B., Johnson, J. T. and Howitt, R. (2014). Indigenous geographies III: methodological innovation and the unsettling of participatory research. Progress in Human Geography, 38(6), 845–54.Google Scholar
Corus, C. and Saatcioglu, B. (2015). An intersectionality framework for transformative services research. Service Industries Journal, 35(7/8), 415–29.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Designing a qualitative study. In Creswell, J. W., ed., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Cruz, M. R. (2008). What if I just cite Graciela? Working toward decolonizing knowledge through a critical ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(4), 651–8.Google Scholar
Cuadraz, G. H. and Uttal, L. (1999). Intersectionality and in-depth interviews: methodological strategies for analyzing race, class, and gender. Race, Gender & Class, 6, 156–86.Google Scholar
Custer, D. (2014). Autoethnography as a transformative research method. The Qualitative Report, 19(37), 1–13.Google Scholar
Cutcliffe, J. (2003). Reconsidering reflexivity: introducing the case for intellectual entrepreneurship. Qualitative Health Research, 13(1), 136–48.Google Scholar
Davis, D.-A. and Craven, C., eds. (2016). Feminist Ethnography: Thinking through Methodologies, Challenges, and Possibilities. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Davis, L. and Shpuniarsky, H. Y. (2010). The spirit of relationships: what we have learned about indigenous/non-indigenous alliances and coalitions. In Davis, L., ed., Alliances: Re/Envisioning Indigenous-non-Indigenous Relationships. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 334–48.Google Scholar
Desjarlait, R. (2011). Decolonization and ‘Occupy Wall Street’. Indian Country Today Media, 24 October. https://unsettlingamerica.wordpress.com/2011/10 (last accessed 4 March 2019).Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 695–727.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S. and Tuhiwai Smith, L., eds. (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrowolsky, A., MacDonald, F., Raney, T., Collier, C. N. and Dufour, P. (2017). Gender versus culture debates and débâcles: feminisms, interculturalism and the Quebec Charter of Values. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 515–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, A. and Mauthner, N. S. (2006). Feminist methodologies and epistemologies. In Bryant, C. D. and Peck, D. L., eds., Handbook of 21st Century Sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 36–42.Google Scholar
Downing, J. and Husband, C. (2005). Representing Race: Racisms, Ethnicities and Media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Drzewiecka, J. A. and Steyn, M. (2009). Discourses of exoneration in intercultural translation: Polish immigrants in South Africa. Communication Theory, 19(2), 188–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drzewiecka, J. A., Ehrenhaus, P. and Owen, A. S. (2016). Memory, culture, and difference: critical reflections. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 9(3), 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutta, M. (2015). Decolonizing communication for social change: a culture-centered approach. Communication Theory, 25(2), 123–43.Google Scholar
Eguchi, S. (2015). Queer intercultural relationality: an autoethnography of Asian-Black (dis)connections in white gay America. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
Ehlers, N. (2012). Racial Imperatives: Discipline, Performativity, and Struggles against Subjection. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, M., Hole, R., Berg, L. D., Hutchinson, P. and Sookraj, D. (2009). Common insights, differing methodologies: toward a fusion of indigenous methodologies, participatory action research, and white studies in an urban aboriginal research agenda. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 893–910.Google Scholar
Fanow, M. M. and Cook, J. (2005). Feminist methodology: new applications in the academic and public policy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), 2211–36.Google Scholar
Fontana, A. and Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: from neutral stance to political involvement. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., eds., The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 695–727.Google Scholar
Gandy, O. H. (2003). The political economy approach: a critical challenge. In Miller, T., ed., Television: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies, vol. 3, London: Routledge, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Gentelet, K. (2009). Les conditions d’une collaboration éthique entre chercheurs autochtones et non autochtones. Cahiers de Recherche Sociologique, 48, 143–53.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goltz, D. B., Zingsheim, J., Mastin, T. and Murphy, A. G. (2016). Discursive negotiations of Kenyan LGBTI identities: cautions in cultural humility. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 9(2), 104–21.Google Scholar
Guillemin, M. and Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and ethically important moments in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–80.Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T. and Nakayama, T. K. (2013). Critical intercultural communication studies: at a crossroads. In Nakayama, T. K. and Halualani, R. T., eds., The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: the development of an indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Hashemi, M. R. and Ghanizadeh, A. (2012). Critical discourse analysis and critical thinking: an experiential study in an EFL context. System, 40(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, R. (1997). Reflexivity & Voice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. (2014). Ontologies of indigeneity: the politics of embodying a concept. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 27–32.Google Scholar
Hurtig, J. J. (2017). Feminist ethnography: thinking through methodologies, challenges, and possibilities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 48(4), 432–4.Google Scholar
Isasi-Diaz, A. M., and Mendieta, E. (2011). Decolonizing Epistemologies: Latina/o Theology and Philosophy. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. and Dangerfield, C. (2002). Defining black masculinity as cultural property: an identity negotiation paradigm. In Samovar, L. and Porter, R., eds., Intercultural Communication: A Reader. Belmont, WA: Wadsworth, pp. 120–30.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. R. (2013). Cisgender privilege, intersectionality, and the criminalization of CeCe McDonald: why intercultural communication needs transgender studies. Journal of International & Intercultural Communication, 6(2), 135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalscheuer, B. (2009). Encounters in the third space: links between intercultural communication theories and postcolonial approaches. In Ikas, K. and Wagner, G., eds., Communicating in the Third Space. London: Routledge, pp. 26–46.Google Scholar
Killian, K. D. and Agathangelou, A. M. (2018). The wake of war: relationships among gender, trauma, resources, and traumatic stress in refugee families. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 30(3), 129–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluch, Y. (2018). More than an Athlete: A Qualitative Examination of Activist Identities among NCAA Division I Student-Athletes. Doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University.Google Scholar
Kovach, M. E. (2010). Conversational method in indigenous research. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 5(1), 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucharska, J. (2018). Cumulative trauma, gender discrimination and mental health in women: mediating role of self-esteem. Journal of Mental Health, 27(5), 416–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lavallée, L. F. (2009). Practical application of an indigenous research framework and two qualitative indigenous research methods: sharing circles and Anishinaabe symbol-based reflection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(8), 21–40. https://homelesshub.ca/sites/default/files/i2lyr5dn.pdf (last accessed 1 October 2018).Google Scholar
Leeds-Hurwitz, W. (2013). Writing the intercultural history of intercultural communication. In Nakayama, T. K. and Halualani, R. T., eds., The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 21–33.Google Scholar
Lengel, L. (1998). Researching the ‘Other’, transforming ourselves: Methodological considerations of feminist ethnography, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 22(3), 229–250.Google Scholar
Lengel, L. (2018). A critical feminist study of sex trafficking and sex tourism in Costa Rica: how civil society organisations amplify or misrepresent voices of sex workers. Paper presented at the 68th annual conference of the International Communication Association, 28 May, Prague.Google Scholar
Lengel, L. and Holdsworth, H. (2015). Enacting social change along the cultural identity spectrum: intercultural identity construction in faith-based community organizations. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(3), 249–67.Google Scholar
Lengel, L. and Martin, S. C. (2013). Situating gender in critical intercultural communication. In Nakayama, T. and Halualani, R., eds., Blackwell Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 335–47.Google Scholar
Lengel, L. and Warren, J. T., eds. (2005). Casting Gender: Women and Performance in Intercultural Contexts. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S. and González y González, E. M. (2008). The search for emerging decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: further strategies for liberatory and democratic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(5), 784–805.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1047–65.Google Scholar
Lindlof, T. R. and Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Louie, D. W., Pratt, Y. P., Hanson, A. J. and Ottmann, J. (2017). Applying indigenizing principles of decolonizing methodologies in university classrooms. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(3), 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical Ethnography Method, Ethics, and Performance, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Mahon, P. and McPherson, G. (2014). Explaining why nurses remain in or leave bedside nursing: a critical ethnography. Nurse Researcher, 22(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
Marecek, J. (2003). Dancing through minefields: toward a qualitative stance in psychology. In Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E. and Yardley, L., eds., Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 49–69.Google Scholar
Markula, P. and Silk, M. (2011). Qualitative Research for Physical Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. N. and Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Intercultural Communication in Contexts, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mendoza, L. (2018). Engaging historical trauma in the classroom: ethnoautobiography as decolonizing practice. In Atay, A. and Toyosaki, S., eds., Critical Intercultural Communication Pedagogy. Lanham, MD: Lexington, pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
Mendoza, S. L. Halualani, R., and Drzewiecka, J. A. (2002). Moving the discourse on identities in intercultural communication: structure, culture, and significations. Communication Quarterly, 50(3–4), 312–27.Google Scholar
Miike, Y. (2003). Beyond eurocentrism in the intercultural field. In Starosta, W. J. and Chen, G. M., eds., Ferment in the Intercultural Field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 243–70.Google Scholar
Patai, D. (1991). U.S. academics and third world women: ‘is ethical research possible?’ In Gluck, S. B. and Patai, D., eds., Women’s Words: The Practice of Feminist Oral History. New York: Routledge, pp. 137–54.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pihama, L, Cram, F. and Walker, S. (2002). Creating methodological space: a literature review of Kaupapa Māori research. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 26(1), 30–43.Google Scholar
Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J. (2002). Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. E. (2004). Mis(representing) Islam: The Racism and Rhetoric of British Broadsheet Newspapers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ruitenberg, C. W., Knowlton, A. and Li, G. (2016). The productive difficulty of untranslatables in qualitative research. Language and Intercultural Communication, 16(4), 610–26.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Sandelowski, M. (2006). ‘Meta-jeopardy’: the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Nursing Outlook, 54(1), 10–16.Google Scholar
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as Qualitative Research. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Shah, P. P. and Khurshid, A. (2018). Writing against culture: unveiling education and modernity for Hindu Indian and Muslim Pakistani women through an ‘ethnography of the particular’. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 31(4), 257–71.Google Scholar
Shome, R. (2009). Postcolonial reflections on ‘internationalization’ of cultural studies. Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 694–719.Google Scholar
Shome, R. and Hegde, R. S. (2002). Postcolonial approaches to communication: charting the terrain, engaging the intersections. Communication Theory, 12(3), 249–70.Google Scholar
Sikes, P. (2006). Decolonizing research and methodologies: indigenous peoples and cross-cultural contexts. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 14(3), 349–58.Google Scholar
Simpson, M. and Ake, T. (2010). Whitiwhiti korero: exploring the researchers’ relationship in cross-cultural research. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 39(3), 185–205.Google Scholar
Skeggs, B. (1994). Situating the production of feminist ethnography. In Maynard, M. and Purvis, J., eds., Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 72–92.Google Scholar
Stanton, C. R. (2014). Crossing methodological borders: decolonizing community-based participatory research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(5), 573–83.Google Scholar
Sutanuka, B. (2012). Probing the problematics of gender and sexuality: an intercultural approach to critical discourses on body in the colonial Bengali magazine Nara-Naree. Global Media Journal: Indian Edition, 3(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Sylvestre, P., Castleden, H., Martin, D. and McNally, M. (2018). ‘Thank you very much… You can leave our community now.’: geographies of responsibility, relational ethics, acts of refusal, and the conflicting requirements of academic localities in indigenous research. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 17(3), 750–79.Google Scholar
Thayer, J. (1983). On ‘doing’ research and ‘explaining’ things. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2005). On tricky ground: researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 85–107.Google Scholar
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2012 [1999]). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, H. and Hall, W. (2011). Critical ethnography: extending attention to bias and reinforcement of dominant power relations. Nurse Researcher, 18(3), 25–30.Google Scholar
Vasquez-Fernandez, A., Hajjar, R., Shuñaqui Sangama, M., Sebastián Lizardo, R., Pérez Pinedo, M., Innes, J. and Kozak, R. (2018). Co-creating and decolonizing a methodology using Indigenist approaches: alliance with the Asheninka and Yine-Yami peoples of the Peruvian Amazon. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 17(3), 720–49.Google Scholar
Willink, K., Gutierrez-Perez, R., Shukri, S. and Stein, L. (2014). Navigating with the stars: critical qualitative methodological constellations for critical intercultural communication research. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(4), 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. (2008). Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
Yep, G. A. (2010). Toward the de-subjugation of racially marked knowledges in communication. Southern Communication Journal, 75(2), 171–5.Google Scholar
Yep, . (2013). Queering/quaring/kauering/crippin’/transing ‘other bodies’ in intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 6(2), 118–26.Google Scholar
Yep, G. A., Lovaas, K. E. and Elia, J. P., eds. (2003). Queer Theory and Communication: From Disciplining Queers to Queering the Discipline(s). Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×