Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Maps Volume II
- Figures Volume II
- Tables Volume II
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part One Multilingualism
- Part Two Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification
- Part Three Lingua Francas
- Part Four Language Vitality
- Part Five Contact and Language Structures
- 22 Structural Outcomes of Language Contact
- 23 The Emergence of Andean Spanish: Against the Odds
- 24 Contact between English and Norman in the Channel Islands
- Author Index
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
22 - Structural Outcomes of Language Contact
from Part Five - Contact and Language Structures
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 June 2022
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language Contact
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Maps Volume II
- Figures Volume II
- Tables Volume II
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part One Multilingualism
- Part Two Contact, Emergence, and Language Classification
- Part Three Lingua Francas
- Part Four Language Vitality
- Part Five Contact and Language Structures
- 22 Structural Outcomes of Language Contact
- 23 The Emergence of Andean Spanish: Against the Odds
- 24 Contact between English and Norman in the Channel Islands
- Author Index
- Language Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
The chapter re-positions the study of contact-induced language change in the context of the individual user’s management of a complex repertoire of linguistic structures. Taking as a point of departure the assumption that for multilinguals, boundaries among “languages” are permeable and subject to users’ creativity, I draw links between structural outcomes of contact and the inherent functions that structural categories have in information processing in communication. Topics covered include code-switching, lexical borrowing, functional and grammatical borrowing, and convergence and contact-induced grammaticalization. I examine proposed hierarchies of borrowability in lexicon and grammar, and revisit the notion of “constraints” on borrowing. I argue in favour of an epistemology that identifies trends as worthy of attention even if isolated exceptions exist; and which seeks to derive explanatory models from such cross-linguistic trends. I conclude that the study of structural outcomes of language contact can contribute to a better understanding of the language faculty itself, and possibly even of key aspects of the evolution of human language.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language ContactVolume 2: Multilingualism in Population Structure, pp. 593 - 617Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Auer, Peter. 1995. The pragmatics of code-switching: A sequential approach. In One speaker, two languages. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on code-switching, ed. by Milroy, L. & Muysken, P., 115–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Backus, Ad. 1996. Two in one. Bilingual speech of Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 1997. A language of our own. The genesis of Michif – the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2003. Mixed languages as autonomous systems. In Bakker & Matras 2003, 107–50.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter & Matras, Yaron (eds.). 2003. The mixed language debate. Theoretical and empirical advances. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1986. Linguistic constraints on intra-sentential code-switching: A study of Spanish/Hebrew bilingualism. Language in Society 15.313–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, Ellen, Craik, F.I.M., & Luk, G.. 2008. Lexical access in bilinguals: Effects of vocabulary size and executive control. Journal of Neurolinguistics 21.6.522–38.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Backus, Ad. 2013. Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. In Multilingualism and multimodality. The future of education research, ed. by Saint-Georges, I. & Weber, J.J., 11–32. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. 1993. On proposed universals of grammatical borrowing. In Historical linguistics 1989, ed. by Aertsen, H. & Jeffers, R.J., 91–109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 2000. Language contact, lexical borrowing, and semantic fields. In Languages in contact, ed. by Gilbers, D.G., Nerbonne, J., & Schaeken, J., 73–86. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Elšík, Viktor & Matras, Yaron. 2006. Markedness and language change: The Romani sample. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Field, Frederic W. 2002. Linguistic borrowing in bilingual contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gardner-Chloros, Penelope. 1991. Language selection and switching in Strasbourg. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, David. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1.67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, François. 1989. Neurolinguists beware! The bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain and Language 36.3–15.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Tadmor, Uri (eds.). 2009. Loanwords in the world’s languages. A comparative handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1950. The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language 26.210–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1969 [1953]. The Norwegian language in the Americas: A study in bilingual behavior. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1984. Language contact and language change. Annual Review of Anthropology 13.367–84.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tanya. 2005. Language contact and grammatical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars. 2002. Structural factors in Turkic language contacts. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Li, Wei. 2005. How can you tell? Towards a commonsense explanation of conversational code-switching. Journal of Pragmatics 37.375–89.Google Scholar
Li, Wei. 2018. Translanguaging as a practical theory of languages. Applied Linguistics 39.1.9–30.Google Scholar
Mahsain, Fatemah. 2014. Motivations behind code-switching among Kuwaiti bilingual schools students. Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 1994. Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society 23.325–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 1998. Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics 36.281–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2007. The borrowability of grammatical categories. In Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Matras, Yaron & Sakel, Jeanette, 31–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2010. Romani Britain. The afterlife of a language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2011. Explaining convergence and the formation of linguistic areas. In Geographical typology and linguistic areas, ed. by Hieda, Osamu, König, Christa, & Nakagawa, Hirosi, 143–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Sakel, Jeanette (eds.). 2007. Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Meeuwis, Michael & Blommaert, Jan. 1998. A monolectal view of code-switching: Layered code-switching among Zairians in Belgium. In Code-switching in conversation, ed. by Auer, Peter, 76–98. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. Universals of language contact. In Universals of human language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., 94–122. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 2000. Bilingual speech. A typology of code-mixing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993a. Social motivations for code-switching. Evidence from Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 1993b. Duelling languages. Grammatical structure in code-switching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol. 2002. Contact linguistics. Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol & Bolonyai, Agnes. 2001. Calculating speakers: Code-switching in a rational choice model. Language in Society 30.1–28.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol & Jake, Janice. 2000. Four types of morpheme: Evidence from aphasia, code-switching, and second language acquisition. Linguistics 38.1053–100.Google Scholar
Nortier, Jacomine. 1990. Dutch/Moroccan Arabic code-switching among young Moroccans in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alistair & Otsuji, Emi. 2015. Metrolingualism: Language in the city. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, Carol. 1979. Constraints on language mixing: Intrasentential code-switching and borrowing in Spanish/English. Language 55.291–318.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana. 1980. Sometimes I’ll start a sentence in Spanish y termino en español. Linguistics 18.581–618.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, Trask, R.L., & McMahon, April (eds.). 2000. Time depth in historical linguistics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 1996. Contact-induced change and the comparative method. In The comparative method reviewed, ed. by Durie, Mark & Ross, Malcolm, 180–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2001. Contact-induced change in Oceanic languages in north-west Melanesia. In Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics, ed. by Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R.M.W., 134–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David. 1998. A formal production-based explanation of the facts of code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1.39–50.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David & Poplack, Shana. 1981. A formal grammar of code-switching. Papers in Linguistics 14.3–46.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank. 2017. Patterns of affix borrowing in a sample of 100 languages. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7.3.389–431.Google Scholar
Stolz, Christel & Stolz, Thomas. 1997. Universelle Hispanismen? Von Manila über Lima bis Mexiko und zurück: Muster bei der Entlehnung spanischer Funktionswörter in die indigenen Sprachen Amerikas und Austronesiens. Orbis 39.1–77.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris. 1952. Lexicostatistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96.452–63.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Everett, Dan L.. 2001. Pronoun borrowing. In Proceedings of the twenty seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, ed. by Chang, Ch., 301–15. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Kaufman, T.. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, S. 1983. Pronouns in contact. In Essays in honor of Charles F. Hockett, ed. by Agard, B., Kelley, G., Makkai, A., & Becker Makkai, V., 573–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren & Wohlgemuth, Jan. 2007. Loan verbs in a typological perspective. In Aspects of language contact. New theoretical, methodological and empirical findings with special focus on Romanisation processes, ed. by Stolz, Thomas, Palomo, R., & Bakker, Dik, 89–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn, Wälchli, Bernard, & Hansen, Björn (eds.). 2012. Grammatical replication and borrowability in language contact. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar