Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:17:49.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Corpus Pragmatics

from Part III - Pragmatic Approaches to Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2023

By
Karin Aijmer
Edited by
Jesús Romero-Trillo
Jesús Romero-Trillo
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Get access

Summary

The chapter gives a state-of- the-art overview of the themes and issues in corpus pragmatics and describes new directions in the field represented by empirical corpus studies where synchronic pragmatic variation and change are analyzed in a broader social and cultural perspective. The interaction between corpora and pragmatics implies both challenges and possibilities. Corpora are ideal for studying the relationship between form and function.This is illustrated by studies using corpora for the purpose of investigating the functions of pragmatic markers, interjections, address forms, and pauses. Nowadays there is also a great deal of interest in finding strategies, making it possible to study the linguistic realisations of functions such as speech acts, hedging, and politeness. Pragmatic annotation systems are expected to be interesting from this perspective. New developments in corpus pragmatics are characterized by alliances between corpus pragmatics and other fields such as variational pragmatics and sociopragmatics with a shared interest in the influence of context on language. Pragmatic markers are, for example, now studied on the basis of corpora with respect to macro-sociolinguistic variables such as region, genre, and the age, gender, and social class of the speakers. Attention is also given to a new discipline of historical corpus pragmatics emerging at the intersection between historical linguistics, pragmatics, and corpus linguistics.

Keywords

corporapragmaticspragmatic annotationpragmatic markersociolingustic variablevariational pragmatics,sociopragmaticshistorical corpus pragmaticsinterlanguage corpus pragmaticsmultimodal corpora
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context , pp. 289 - 313
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2002). English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K., ed. (2009). Special issue on contrastive pragmatics. Languages in Contrast, 9(1), 1–181.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2011). Well, I’m not sure I think … The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2013). Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2021). “That’s well good”: A re-emergent intensifier in current British English. Journal of English Linguistics, 49(1), 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K. (2022). “Well he’s sick anyway like”: Anyway in Irish English. Corpus Pragmatics: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 6(2), 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K., and Lewis, D., eds. (2017). Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-Pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres. Cham: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K., and Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2006). Pragmatic Markers in Contrast. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, K., and Rühlemann, C. (2015). Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Andersen, G. (2001). Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, G. (2018). Corpus construction. In Jucker, A. H., Schneider, K., and Bublitz, W. (eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 467–494). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, D., Culpeper, J., and Davies, M. (2008). Pragmatic annotation. In Kytö, M. and Lüdeling, A. (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (pp. 613–642). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Archer, D. and Culpeper, J. (2018). Corpus annotation. In Jucker, A. H., Schneider, K., and Bublitz, W. (eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 495–525). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M. (2012). Research paradigms in pragmatics. In Allan, K. and Jaszczolt, J. M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 23–45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Barron, A. (2017a). The speech act of “offers” in Irish English. World Englishes, 36(2), 224–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. (2017b). Variational pragmatics. In Barron, A., Yueuo, G., and Steen, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 91–104). London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, K. (2016). Pragmatic Markers in British English: Meaning in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beeching, K., and Detges, U. (2014). Introduction. In Beeching, K. and Detges, U. (eds.), Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change (pp. 1–23). Brill: Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., and Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. Google Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (2008). The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origin and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J. (2017). The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction (pp. 56–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Butler, C. S. (2008). The subjectivity of basically in British English: A corpus-based study. In Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.), Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente (pp. 37–63). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, L. (2017). The pragmatic marker “you know” in learner Englishes. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 40–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J. (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalization and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11, 155–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P., Fox, S., and Torgersen, E. (2011). Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 151–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, B. (2011). Complementary perspectives on hedging behaviour in family discourse: The analytical synergy of variational pragmatics and corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 371–390. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, B. (2015). “Hurry up baby son all the boys is finished their breakfast”: Examining the use of vocatives as pragmatic markers in Traveller, Irish and settled family discourse. In Amador-Moreno, C., McCafferty, K., and Vaughan, E. (eds.), Pragmatic Markers in Irish English (pp. 229–247). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, B., and McCarthy, M. (2015). Co-constructed turn-taking. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 430–453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Clift, R. (2001). Meaning in interaction. Language, 77, 246–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., and Gillings, M. (2018). Politeness variation in England: A north–south divide? In Brezina, V., Love, R., and Aijmer, K. (eds.), Corpus Approaches to Contemporary British Speech: Sociolinguistic Studies of the Spoken BNC2014 (pp. 33–59). New York/London: Routledge. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, A. (2017). Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context: Eight Hundred Years of LIKE. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. 2009. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–present). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2): 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2010). The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/.Google Scholar
Degand, L., and Fagard, B. (2011). Alors between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language, 18(1), 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, D., and Tagliamonte, S. A. (2016). Innovation, right? Change, you know? Utterance-final tags in English, Canadian. In H. Pichler, (ed.), Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights (pp. 86–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutschmann, M. (2003). Apologising in British English. Institutionen för moderna språk. Umeå: Umeå universitet.Google Scholar
Diani, G. (2015). Politeness. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 169–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., and Hasler-Barker, M. (2017). Elicited data. In Barron, A., G. Yueuo, and G. Steen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 27–40). London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia McAllister, P. (2015). Speech acts: A synchronic perspective. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 29–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., and Colston, H. L. (2020). Pragmatics always matters: An expanded vision of experimental pragmatics. Front. Psychol., July 24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, S., and Hunston, S. (2016). Corpora and beyond: Investigating evaluation in discourse. Introduction to the special issue on corpus approaches to evaluation Corpora, 11(2), 131–141.Google Scholar
Gray, D., and Biber, D. (2015). Stance markers. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 219–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and Morton, J. M. (eds.), Syntax and emantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1996). The linguistic and cultural relativity of inference. In Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 374–406). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Huang, L. (2021). Toward multi-modal corpus pragmatics: Rationale, case, and agenda. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(1). DOI:10.1093/llc/fqz080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulleberg Johansen, S. (2020). “I just need to like see what I can do”: A contrastive study of hedging strategies in English and Norwegian informal spoken conversations. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Jautz, S. (2013). Thanking Formulae in English: Explorations across Varieties and Genres. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H., and Taavitsainen, I. (2000). Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67–95. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H., and Taavitsainen, I. (2014). Diachronic corpus pragmatics: Intersections and interactions. In Jucker, A. H., Taavitsainen, I., and Tuominen, J. (eds.), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics (pp. 3–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jucker, A. H. (2018). Introduction to part 5: Corpus pragmatics. In Jucker, A. H., Schneider, K., and Bublitz, W. (eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 455–466). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallen, J. L. (2015). “Actually, it’s unfair to say that I was throwing stones”: Comparative perspectives on uses of actually in ICE-Ireland. In Amador-Moreno, C., McCafferty, K., and Vaughan, E. (eds.), Pragmatic Markers in Irish English (pp. 135–155). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kallen, J. L., and Kirk, J. (2012). SPICE-Ireland: A User’s Guide. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar
Knight, D., and Adolphs, S. (2008). Multi-modal corpus pragmatics: The case of active listenership. In Romero-Trillo, J. (ed.), Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente (pp. 175–190). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., and Smith, N.. (2009). Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17, 365–379. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., and Yang, Y. (2018). Pragmatic functions of emoji in internet-based communication: A corpus-based study. Asian Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0057-zGoogle Scholar
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching Dialogue Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogic Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, R., Dembry., C., Hardie., A., Brezina, V., and McEnery, T. (2017). The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. Google Scholar
Lutzky, U. (2012). Discourse Markers in Early Modern English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutzky, U., and Kehoe, A. (2017). “Oops, I didn’t mean to be so flippant.” A corpus pragmatic analysis of apologies in blog data. Journal of Pragmatics, 116: 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mey, J. L. (2017). Interdisciplinarity in pragmatics and linguistics. In Barron, A., Gu, Y., and Steen, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 4–18). London/New York: Routledge. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, S. (2005). Discourse Markers in Native and Non-native English Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. N. (2009). Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 866–891. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. N. (2015). Interjections. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 249–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 407–437). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A. (2018). Corpus-based function-to-form approaches. In Jucker, A. H., Schneider, K., and Bublitz, W. (eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 587–618). Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios-Martínez, I. (2018). ‘Help me move that, blood’ A corpus-based study of the syntax and pragmatics of vocatives in the language of British teenagers. Journal of Pragmatics, 130, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, H. (2016). Introduction: Discourse-pragmatic variation and change. In H. Pichler, (ed.), Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöldvere, N., Paradis, C., and Johansson, V. (2017). The London-Lund Corpus 2: A New Corpus of Spoken British English in the Making (LLC 2). Lund University. https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/the-london-lund-corpus-2-a-new-corpus-of-spoken-british-english-i.Google Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J., ed. (2008). Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics: A Mutualistic Entente. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero-Trillo, J. (2018). Corpus pragmatics and second language pragmatics: A mutualistic entente in theory and practice. Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 113–127. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronan, P. (2019). Silly much? Tracing the spread of a new expressive marker in recent corpora. Corpus Approaches into World Englishes and Language Contrasts (Studies in Variation, Contacts, and Change in English, Vol. 20), ed. Parviainen, H., Kaunisto, M., and Pahta, P.. Helsinki: VARIENG.Google Scholar
Rühlemann., C., and Aijmer, K. (2015). Introduction. Corpus pragmatics: Laying the foundations. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 1–26). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rühlemann, C., and O’Donnell, M. B. (2012). Introducing a corpus of conversational narratives: Construction and annotation of the Narrative Corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(2), 313–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Staley, L., and Jucker, A. H. (2021). The uh-deconstructed pumpkin pie: The use of uh and um in Los Angeles restaurant server talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 172, 21–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stange, U. (2019). The social life of emotive interjections in spoken British English. Scandinavian Studies in Linguistics, 10(1), 174–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenström, A.-B. (2011). Pauses and hesitation. In Andersen, G. and Aijmer, K. (eds.), Pragmatics of Society (pp. 537–567). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svartvik, J. (1990). The London–Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press/Bromley: Chartwell-Brat. Google Scholar
Timmis, I. (2015). Tails. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 304–327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tottie, G. (2011). Uh and um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. The International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., and Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Van Olmen, D., and Šinkūnienė, J., eds. (2021). Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold. Google Scholar
Wagner, S. E., Hesson, A., and Little, H. M. (2016). The use of referential general extenders across registers. In H. Pichler, (ed.), Discourse Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights (pp. 211–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, C. (2016). Practical strategies for elucidating discourse-pragmatic variation. In Pichler, H. (ed.), Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights (pp. 41–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisser, M. (2015). Speech act annotation. In Aijmer, K. and Rühlemann, C. (eds.), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook (pp. 84–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Weisser, M. (2017). Corpora. In Barron, A., Yueuo, G., and Steen, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 41–52). London/New York: Routledge. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×