Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:21:59.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2023

Edited by
Jonathan Fuqua ,
John Greco  and
Tyler McNabb
Jonathan Fuqua
Affiliation:
Conception Seminary College, Missouri
John Greco
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Tyler McNabb
Affiliation:
Saint Francis University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology , pp. 305 - 334
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, R. & Kanouse, D. E. 1966. “Subjective Acceptance of Verbal Generalizations,” in Feldman, S. (ed.), Cognitive Consistency: Motivational Antecedents and Behavioral Consequents. New York: Academic Press, pp. 171–197.Google Scholar
Abraham, W. J. 1987. “Cumulative Case Arguments for Christian Theism,” in Abraham, W. J. and Holtzer, S. W. (eds.), The Rationality of Religious Belief: Essays in Honour of Basil Mitchell. Oxford University Press, pp. 17–37.Google Scholar
Abrahamov, B. 1993. “Necessary Knowledge in Islamic Theology,” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 20: 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamov, B. 2016. “Scripturalist and Traditionalist Theology,” in Schmidtke, S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology. Oxford University Press, pp. 263–279.Google Scholar
‘Abd al-Jabbār, Q. 1965a. Kitāb al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawḥīd wa’l-‘adl. Cairo: Dār al-Miṣriyya li’l-Ta’līf wa’l-Tarjama.Google Scholar
‘Abd al-Jabbār, Q. 1965b. Sharḥ Uṣūl al-Khamsa. Cairo: Maktaba Whaba.Google Scholar
‘Abd al-Jabbār, Q. 1988. Rasā’il al-‘adl wa’l-tawḥīd. London: Dār al-Shurūq.Google Scholar
Adams, R. M. 1987. The Virtue of Faith and Other Essays in Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, R. M. 2002. Finite and Infinite Goods: A Framework for Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adamson, P. 2022. Don’t Think for Yourself: Authority and Belief in Medieval Philosophy. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Adler, J. 2002. Belief’s Own Ethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ahlstrom-Vij, K. & Dunn, J. (eds.). 2018. Epistemic Consequentialism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, A. 2015. “Hume and the Independent Witnesses,” Mind 124: 1013–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aijaz, I. 2018. Islam: A Contemporary Philosophical Investigation. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Azmeh, A. 1988. “Orthodoxy and Ḥanbalite Fideism,” Arabica 35: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al-Baghdādī, A. Q. 2002. Uṣūl al-Dīn. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya.Google Scholar
al-Bāqillāni, A. B. 2000. al-Inṣāf fīmā yajib ‘itiqāduhu wa lā yajūz jahl bi. Cairo: al-Maktaba al-Azhariyya li’l-turāth.Google Scholar
Al-Ghazālī, A. H. M. 12th century/1991. The Alchemy of Happiness, trans. C. Field. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
al-Juwaynī, A. Y. 1950. Kitāb al-Irshād ilā Qawāṭi’ al-Adilla fī Uṣūl al-I’tiqād. Baghdād: Maktaba al-Khānjī.Google Scholar
al-Māturīdī, A. M. 2020. Kitāb al-Tawḥīd. Istanbul: ISAM.Google Scholar
al-Nasafī, A. M. 2001. Tabṣirāt al-Adilla fī Uṣūl al-Dīn. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı.Google Scholar
al-Nasafī, A. M. 2004. Tebṣıratü’l-edille. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı.Google Scholar
al-Rāzī, F. D. 1991. Kitāb al-muḥaṣṣal. Cairo: Maktaba Dār al-Turāth.Google Scholar
al-Ṣābūnī, N. D. 2020. al-Bidāya fī uṣūl al-dīn, trans. F. A. Khan. Berkeley: Zaytuna College.Google Scholar
Alston, A. J. 1990. The Thousand Teachings of Shankara. London: Shanti Sadan.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. 1982. “Religious Experience and Religious Belief,” Noûs 16: 3–12.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. 1986a. “Internalism and Externalism in Epistemology,” in Epistemic Justification: Essays in the Theory of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 185–226.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. 1986b. “Is Religious Belief Rational?” in Harrison, S. M. & Tayler, R. C. (eds.), The Life of Religion, Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. 1991. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. 1996. “Belief, Acceptance, and Religious Faith,” in Jordan, J. & Howard-Snyder, D. (eds.), Faith, Freedom, and Rationality: Philosophy of Religion Today. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Altmann, A. 1946. “Translator’s Introduction,” in Saadya Gaon: The Book of Doctrines and Beliefs. Oxford: East and West Library, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1999. Contours of Old Testament Theology. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Fortress.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. 2018. “Hume, Defeat, and Miracle Reports,” in Benton, M., Hawthorne, J., and Rabinowitz, D. (eds.), Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford University Press, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. & Pruss, A. 2020. “The Case for Miracles,” in Peterson, M. and VanArragon, R. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 113–123.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 1995. “Knowledge, Human Interests, and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology,” Philosophical Topics 23: 27–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, T. 2022. Kommentar till Sanusi: En systematisk studie i islamisk teologi. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2012. “Ancient Scepticism and Ancient Religion,” in Morison, B. & Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes. Oxford University Press, pp. 74–89.Google Scholar
Annas, J. & Barnes, J. (trans.) 2000. Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Skepticism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Annet, P. 1744. “The Resurrection of Jesus Considered: In Answer to the Tryal of the Witnesses,” in Earman, J., 2000. Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles. Oxford University Press, pp. 113–140.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2008. “What Is It to Believe Someone?” in Geach, M. & Gormally, L. (eds.), Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G. E. M. Anscombe. Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Anselm of Canterbury, . 1979 [1078]. St Anselm’s Proslogion, trans. M. J. Charlesworth. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1256–59/1951–54. Truth (Quaestiones Disputatae De Veritate), trans. Robert W. Mulligan, J. V. McGlynn, and R. W. Schmidt, 3 vols., Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1975a. Summa Contra Gentiles: Book One, trans. A. Pegis. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1975b. Summa Contra Gentiles: Book Three, trans. V. J. Bourke. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. 1265–74/1981. Summa Theologiae, Part II–II (Secunda Secundae), trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. London: Burns, Oates, and Washbourne. Reprinted by New York: Benziger 1947–48 and Westminster, MD: Christian Classics. www.newadvent.org/summa.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 2005. Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief Epistemology in South Asian Philosophy of Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Askell, A. 2012. “Common Objections to Pascal’s Wager.” https://askell.io/posts/2012/08/pascal.Google Scholar
Askew, R. 1988. “On Fideism and Alvin Plantinga,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 23: 3–16.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 1991. “Faith, Belief, Rationality,” Philosophical Perspectives 5: 213–39.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 1997. “The Place of Testimony in the Fabric of Knowledge and Justification,” American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 405–422.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 2011. Rationality and Religious Commitment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 2020. Seeing, Knowing, and Doing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1991 [400]. Confessions, trans. Henry Chadwick. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Babbage, C. 2009. [1838]. Ninth Bridgewater Treatise. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baggett, D. & Walls, J. L. 2016. God and Cosmos: Moral Truth and Human Meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, A. 1986. “Trust and Antitrust,” Ethics 96: 231–260. https://doi:10.1086/292745.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. 2002. Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, R. 1990. “Advaita Vedanta: Its Unity with Other Systems and Its Contemporary Relevance,” in Indian Philosophical Systems. Calcutta: Ramakrishna Mission Institute of Culture, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Baldwin, E. & McNabb, T. 2018. Plantingian Religious Epistemology and World Religions: Prospects and Problems. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1980. “Socrates and the Jury: Paradoxes in Plato’s Distinction between Knowledge and True Belief,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 54: 193–206.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1997. “The Beliefs of a Pyrrhonist,” in Burnyeat, M. & Frede, M. (eds.), The Original Sceptics: A Controversy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, pp. 58–91.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. 1997. “Newman and Wittgenstein on the Rationality of Religious Belief,” in Ker, I. (ed.), Newman and Conversion. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 89–99.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. L. 2004. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. L. 2012. Born Believers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bartha, P. 2007. “Taking Stock of Infinite Value: Pascal’s Wager and Relative Utilities,” Synthese 154: 5–52.Google Scholar
Bartha, P. 2012. “Many Gods, Many Wagers: Pascal’s Wager Meets the Replicator Dynamics,” in Chandler, J. & Harrison, V. S. (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Barton, J. Unpublished. “Faith in the Hebrew Bible.” Content incorporated into Barton, J. (2022), Translating the Bible, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Basinger, D. 2002. Religious Diversity: A Philosophical Assessment. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Becker, B. & Black, B. (eds.). 2012. The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Behe, M. 2003. “The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis: Breaking Rules,” in Manson, N. A. (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science. London: Routledge, pp. 276–290.Google Scholar
Beilby, J. (ed.) 2002. Naturalism Defeated? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, R. H. 1995. “Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy: Beyond Fideism and Language Games,” in Tessin, T. & von der Ruhr, M. (eds.), Philosophy and the Grammar of Religious Belief. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 215–248.Google Scholar
Bengson, J. 2020. “Practical Understanding: Skill as Grasp of Method,” in Demmerling, C. and Schröder, D. (eds.), Concepts in Thought, Action and Emotion. New York: Routledge, pp. 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett-Hunter, G. 2019. “Wittgensteinian Quasi-Fideism and Interreligious Communication,” in Andrejč, G. & Weiss, D. H. (eds.), Interpreting Interreligious Relations with Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies. Leiden: Brill, pp. 157–173.Google Scholar
Benton, M. A. 2017. “Epistemology Personalized,” The Philosophical Quarterly 67: 813–834.Google Scholar
Benton, M. A. 2018. “God and Interpersonal Knowledge,” Res Philosophica 95: 421–447.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 2006. Justification without Awareness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 2008. “Externalist Responses to Skepticism,” in Greco, John (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press, pp. 504–532.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 2015. “Religious Disagreement and Rational Demotion,” in Kvanvig, J. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, vol. 6. Oxford University Press, pp. 21–57.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 2017. “Religious Disagreement and Epistemic Intuitions,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 81: 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, M. 2018. “Externalist versions of Evidentialism,” in McCain, K. (ed.), Believing in Accordance with the Evidence: New Essays on Evidentialism. Cham: Springer, pp. 109–123.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. 2021. Radical Skepticism and Epistemic Intuition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bering, J. M. 2011. The God Instinct. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google Scholar
Bernstein, C. 2018. “Is God’s Existence Possible?” The Heythrop Journal 59: 424–432.Google Scholar
Bhatt, S. R. & Mehrotra, A. 2000. Buddhist Epistemology. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bird, A. 2010. “Social Knowing: The Social Sense of ‘Scientific Knowledge,’” Philosophical Perspectives 24: 23–56.Google Scholar
Bird, A. 2014. “When Is There a Group That Knows? Scientific Knowledge as Social Knowledge,” in Lackey, J. (ed.), Essays in Collective Epistemology. Oxford University Press, pp. 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, C. C. 2011. Mark. New York: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. 2005. Descartes’ Baby. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bodhi, B. (ed. & trans.) 2012. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of Aṅguttara Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publication.Google Scholar
Boespflug, M. 2019. “Locke’s Principle of Proportionality,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 101: 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogardus, T. 2016. “Only All Naturalists Should Worry About Only One Evolutionary Debunking Argument,” Ethics 126: 636–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BonJour, L. 1992. “Externalism/Internalism” in Dancy, J. & Sosa, E. (eds.), A Companion to Epistemology. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 132–136.Google Scholar
Bostrom, N. 2002. Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. 2009. “Pascal’s Mugging,” Analysis 69: 443–445.Google Scholar
Boyer, P. 2001. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origin of Religious Thought. London: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
Braddock, M. 2016. “Debunking Arguments and the Cognitive Science of Religion,” Theology and Science 14: 268–287.Google Scholar
Brown, F., Brown, S. R. D. & Briggs, C. A. 1977. “אָמַן (āman),” “אֱמוּנָה (ʾĕmûnāh),” in Brown, F., Driver, S. R., & Briggs, C. (eds.), Enhanced Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brueggemann, W. 1986a. Genesis. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Brueggemann, W. 1986b. “The Costly Loss of Lament,” Journal for the Study of the Old Testament 36: 57–71.Google Scholar
Buchak, L. 2012. “Can It Be Rational to Have Faith?” in Probability in the Philosophy of Religion, Chandler, J. & Harrison, V. S. (eds.), Oxford University Press, pp. 225–247.Google Scholar
Burge, T. 1993. “Content preservation,” Philosophical Review 102: 457–488.Google Scholar
Byerly, T. R. 2019. “From a Necessary Being to a Perfect Being,” Analysis 79: 10–17.Google Scholar
Camp, E. 2007. “Thinking with Maps,” Philosophical Perspectives 21: 145-182.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. 2011. “Why Do Language Use and Tool Use both Count as Manifestations of Intelligence?” in McCormack, T., Hoerl, C., & Butterfill, S. (eds.), Tool Use and Causal Cognition. Oxford University Press, pp. 169–182.Google Scholar
Canfield, J. 1986. The Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Volume 9: The Private Language Argument. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Cardoso, S. 2010. “On Skeptical Fideism in Montaigne’s Apology for Raymond Sebond,” in Neto, J. M., Paganini, G. & Laursen, J. C. (eds.), Skepticism in the Modern Age: Building on the Work of Richard Popkin. Leiden: Brill, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
Carroll, T. D. 2008. “The Traditions of Fideism,” Religious Studies 44: 1–22.Google Scholar
Carter, J. A. & McKenna, R. 2020. “Skepticism Motivated: On the Skeptical Import of Motivated Reasoning,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50: 702–718.Google Scholar
Cerić, M. 1995. Roots of Synthetic Theology in Islam: A Study of the Theology of Abu Mansur al-Maturidi. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.Google Scholar
Chen, E. & Rubio, D. 2020. “Surreal Decisions,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100: 54–74.Google Scholar
Chesterton, G. K. 2011. In Defense of Sanity. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Chignell, A. & Pereboom, D. 2015. “Natural Theology and Natural Religion,” in Zalta, E (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/natural-theology/.Google Scholar
Chisholm, R. 1982. “The Problem of the Criterion,” in The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
Chouhoud, Y. 2018. What Causes Muslims to Doubt Islam? A Quantitative Analysis. Dallas, TX: Yaqueen Institute for Islamic Research.Google Scholar
Christensen, D. 2007. “Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News,” Philosophical Review, 116: 187–217. https://doi:10.1215/00318108-2006-035.Google Scholar
Christensen, D. 2010. “Higher-Order Evidence,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81: 185–215.Google Scholar
Chudnoff, E. 2013. Intuition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, K. J. (ed.) 1993. Philosophers Who Believe. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Clark, K. J. & Barrett, J. 2010. “Reformed Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion,” Faith and Philosophy 27: 174–189.Google Scholar
Clark, K. J., & Barrett, J. 2011. “Reidian Religious Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 79: 1–37.Google Scholar
Clark, S. R. L. 2013. “The Classical Origins of Natural Theology,” in Manning, R., Brooke, J. H., & Watts, F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford University Press, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Clarke, S. 1998 [1705]. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clément, O. (ed.) 1993. The Roots of Christian Mysticism, 2nd ed. New York: New City Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. 1877. “The Ethics of Belief,” Contemporary Review 29: 289–309.Google Scholar
Clines, D. J. A. 1993. “אָמַן (āman),” “אֱמוּנָה (ʾĕmûnāh),” in Clines, D. J. A. (ed.), The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew, vol. 1. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, pp. 312–316.Google Scholar
Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. 1984. “Justification and Truth,” Philosophical Studies 46: 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, R. 2009. “The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Universe,” in Craig, & Moreland, (eds.), pp. 202–281.Google Scholar
Conee, E. B. & Feldman, R. 2004. Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conee, E. 2010. “Rational Disagreement Defended,” in Feldman, R. and Warfield, T. (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar
Coliva, A. 2015. Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. 2005. The Spiritual Dimension. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cowell, E. B. & Gough, A. E. 1989. Sarva-darsana-sangraha of Madhavacarya. Delhi: Parimal Publications.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. 1979. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. 1989. Assessing the New Testament Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. 2001a. The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. (ed.) 2001b. Philosophy of Religion: A Reader and Guide. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. 2008. Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. Wheaton, IL: Crossway.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. & Moreland, J. P. 2009. “Introduction,” in Craig, & Moreland, (eds.), pp. ix–xiii.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. & Moreland, J. P. (eds.). 2012. The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crummett, D. 2015. “We Are Here to Help Each Other,” Faith and Philosophy 32: 45–62. https://doi:10.5840/faithphil20153428.Google Scholar
Cuneo, T. 2016. Ritualized Faith: Essays on the Philosophy of Liturgy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, T. 2020. “Dual-Inheritance, Common Sense, and the Justification of Religious Belief,” in Peels, R., de Ridder, J., & van Woudenberg, R. (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 191–214.Google Scholar
De Cruz, H. 2015. “The Relevance of Hume’s Natural History of Religion for the Cognitive Science of Religion,” Res Philosophica 92: 653–74.Google Scholar
De Cruz, H. & De Smedt, J. 2013. “Reformed and Evolutionary Epistemology and the Noetic Effects of Sin,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74: 49–66.Google Scholar
De Cruz, H. & De Smedt, J. 2015. A Natural History of Natural Theology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1988 [1641]. “Meditations on First Philosophy,” in Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings, trans. J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch. Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–122.Google Scholar
DePoe, J. 2020. “A Classical Evidentialist Response to PC,” in Depoe, & McNabb, (eds.), pp. 82–85.Google Scholar
Depoe, J. & McNabb, T. D. (eds.) 2020. Debating Christian Religious Epistemology: An Introduction to Five Views on the Knowledge of God. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
de Ridder, J. 2014. “Epistemic Dependence and Collective Scientific Knowledge,” Synthese 19: 1–17.Google Scholar
de Ridder, J. 2019. “Against Quasi-Fideism,” Faith and Philosophy 36: 223–43.Google Scholar
Deutsch, E. 1969. Advaita Vedanta: A Philosophical Reconstruction. Honolulu: East-West Center Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
di Ceglie, R. 2017. “Faith and Reason: A Response to Duncan Pritchard,” Philosophy 92: 231–47.Google Scholar
di Ceglie, R. 2022. God, the Good, and the Spiritual Turn in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, C. 2018. “Reasons and Factive Emotions,” Philosophical Studies 175: 1681–1691.Google Scholar
Dormandy, K. 2018a. “Disagreement from the Religious Margins,” Res Philosophica 95: 371–395.Google Scholar
Dormandy, K. 2018b. “Resolving Religious Disagreements,” Faith and Philosophy 35: 56–83. https://doi:10.5840/faithphil201812697.Google Scholar
Dormandy, K. 2020. “The Epistemic Benefits of Religious Disagreement,” Religious Studies 56: 390–408. https://doi:10.1017/s0034412518000847.Google Scholar
Dormandy, K. 2021. “The Loyalty of Religious Disagreement,” in Benton, M. & Kvanvig, J. (eds.), Religious Disagreement and Pluralism. Oxford University Press, pp. 238–270.Google Scholar
Dougherty, T. (ed.). 2011. Evidentialism and Its Discontents. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dougherty, T. 2020. “Religious Beliefs Require Evidence,” in Cowan, S. (ed.) Problems in Epistemology and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Contemporary Debates. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 127–139.Google Scholar
Dougherty, T. & Tweedt, C. 2015. “Religious Epistemology,” Philosophy Compass 10: 547–559.Google Scholar
Doyle, C., Milburn, M., & Pritchard, D. (eds.) 2019. New Issues in Epistemological Disjunctivism, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Draper, P. 2010. “Cumulative Cases,” in Taliaferro, C., Draper, P., & Quinn, P. (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 414–424.Google Scholar
Dretske, F. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, G. B. J. 1997. Recognizing Reality – Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy and Its Tibetan Interpretations. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, C. 2013. “Religion and Secular Utility: Happiness, Truth, and Pragmatic Arguments for Theistic Belief,” Philosophy Compass 8: 381–399.Google Scholar
Duncan, M. 2020. “Knowledge of Things,” Synthese 197: 3559–3592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, A. 1986. “Pascal’s Wager and Infinite Utilities,” Analysis 46:107–09.Google Scholar
Dunne, J. D. 2004. Foundations of Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy. Boston: Wisdom Publication.Google Scholar
Earman, J. D. 2000. Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Efird, D. & Worsley, D. 2017. “What an Apophaticist Can Know: Divine Ineffability and the Beatific Vision,” Philosophy & Theology 29: 205–219.Google Scholar
Elga, A. 2007. “Reflection and Disagreement,” Noûs 41: 478–502.Google Scholar
El-Tobgui, C. S. 2020. Ibn Taymiyya on Reason and Revelation. Leiden/Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, D. 2017. “Political Philosophy and Epistemology,” in Sobel, D., Vallentyne, P., & Wall, S. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, vol. 3. Oxford University Press, pp. 132–65.Google Scholar
Evans, C. S. 1998. Faith Beyond Reason. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Evans, C. S. 2010. Natural Signs and Knowledge of God. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, C. S. 2013. God and Moral Obligation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fagan, M. B. 2012. “Collective Scientific Knowledge,” Philosophy Compass 7: 821–831.Google Scholar
Fales, E. 2003. “Alvin Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Belief,” Noûs 37: 353–70.Google Scholar
Farkas, K. 2019. “Objectual Knowledge,” Knowles, J. & Raleigh, T. (eds.), New Essays on Acquaintance. Oxford University Press, pp. 260–276.Google Scholar
Faulkner, P. 2007. “A Genealogy of Trust,” Episteme 4: 305–321. https://doi:10.3366/E174236000700010X.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. 2007. “Reasonable Religious Disagreements,” in Antony, L. (ed.) Philosophers without Gods: Meditations on Atheism and the Secular. Oxford University Press, pp. 194–214.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. & Warfield, T. (ed.) 2010. Disagreement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2017. Five Proofs of the Existence of God. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B. 2001. “A Bayesian Account of Independent Evidence with Applications,” Philosophy of Science 68: S123–S140.Google Scholar
Flew, A. 1976. The Presumption of Atheism and Other Philosophical Essays on God, Freedom, and Immortality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Flew, A. 1985. “Introduction to Hume,” in Hume, D., Of Miracles. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Classics.Google Scholar
Fogelin, R. 2003. A Defense of Hume on Miracles. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, R. 2001. Intellectual Trust in Oneself and Others. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forsthoefel, T. 2002. Knowing Beyond Knowledge: Epistemologies of Religious Experience in Classical Advaita. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. 1981. Stages of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and the Quest for Meaning. New York: Harper-Collins.Google Scholar
Frank, R. M. 1989. “Knowledge and Taqlîd: The Foundations of Religious Belief in Classical Ash’arism,” Journal of American Oriental Society 109: 37–62.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. 1998. Necessity, Volition, and Love. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. 1994. “Against Gullibility,” in Chakrabarti, A. & Matilal, B. K. (eds.), Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 125–162.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. 2017. “Why Suspend Judging?” Noûs 51: 302–326.Google Scholar
Gage, L. P. & McAllister, B. 2020. “Phenomenal Conservatism/Response to Critics,” in Depoe, & McNabb, (eds.), pp. 61–81/98–106.Google Scholar
Gambhirananda, S. 1993. Brahma Sutra Bhasya of Shankaracarya. Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama.Google Scholar
Ganeri, J. 2018. “Epistemology from a Sanskritic Point of View,” in Stich, S., Mizumoto, M., & McCready, E. (eds.), Epistemology for the Rest of the World. Oxford University Press, pp. 12–21.Google Scholar
Garfield, J. L. 2015. Engaging Buddhism: Why It Matters to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, N. 2019. Rorty, Liberal Democracy, and Religious Certainty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. F. 2015. “Public Reason Liberalism,” in Wall, S. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–140.Google Scholar
Geivett, R. D. 1995. Evil and the Evidence for God: The Challenge of John Hick’s Theodicy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gellman, J. 1993. “Religious Diversity and the Epistemic Justification of Religious Belief’, Faith and Philosophy 10: 345–364.Google Scholar
Gettier, E. 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23: 121–123.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. C. 2007. Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2014. “Does Externalist Epistemology Rationalize Religious Commitment?” in Callahan, L. & O’Connor, T. (eds.), Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford University Press, pp. 279–98.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. 2021. “How Confident Should the Religious Believer Be in the Face of Religious Pluralism?” in Benton, & Kvanvig, (eds.), pp. 65–90.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1979. “What Is Justified Belief?” in Pappas, G. (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. 1999. Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. 2001. Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63: 85–110. https://doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, T. 2018. “The Argument from (Natural) Numbers,” in Walls, J. and Dougherty, T. (eds.), Two Dozen (or So) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford University Press, pp. 59–75.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, T., 2019. “A Proof of Exodus: Yehuda HaLevy and Jonathan Edwards Walk into a Bar,” in Lebens, S., Rabinowitz, D., & Segal, A. (eds.), Jewish Philosophy in an Analytic Age. Oxford University Press, pp. 222–242.Google Scholar
Gomez-Alonso, M. 2021. “Wittgenstein, Religious Belief, and Hinge Epistemology,” Skepsis 12: 18–34.Google Scholar
Goodman, J. & Salow, B. 2018. “Taking a Chance on KK,” Philosophical Studies 75: 175–186.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, D. 2017. Reason to Believe. Bet Shemesh: Mosaica Press.Google Scholar
Gowans, C. W. 2003. Philosophy of the Buddha. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graham, P. J. 1997. “What Is Testimony?” Philosophical Quarterly 47: 227–232. https://doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00057.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2009. “Religious Knowledge in the Context of Conflicting Testimony,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 82: 61–76.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2010 Achieving Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, J. 2021. The Transmission of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, P. 2001. Aspects of Reason. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. 2013. Truth for the Rest of Us: Dharmakīrti’s Philosophy of Language. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Gutschmidt, R. 2021. “The Religious Dimension of Skepticism,” International Philosophical Quarterly 61: 77–99.Google Scholar
Gutting, G. 1982. Religious Belief and Religious Skepticism. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, G. 1996. The Historical Jesus. Joplin, MO: College Press.Google Scholar
Habgood-Coote, J. 2020. “Group Knowledge, Questions, and the Division of Epistemic Labour,” Ergo 6: 925–966.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. 2003. “Waging War on Pascal’s Wager,” The Philosophical Review 112: 27–56.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. 2007. “The Reference Class Problem Is Your Problem Too,” Synthese 156: 563–585.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. 2008. “Are Miracles Chimerical?” Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 1: 82–103.Google Scholar
Hájek, A. 2018. “Pascal’s Wager,” in Zalta, E (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pascal-wager/.Google Scholar
Halbfass, W. 1990. India and Europe: An Essay in Philosophical Understanding. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hallaq, W. 1991. “Ibn Taymiyya on the Existence of God,” Acta Orientalia 52: 49–69.Google Scholar
Halvorsson, H. 2018. “A Theological Critique of the Fine-Tuning Arguments,” in Benton, M., Hawthorne, J., & Rabinowitz, D. (eds.), Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford University Press, pp. 122–135.Google Scholar
Hardwig, J. 1985. “Epistemic Dependence,” Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–349.Google Scholar
Hardwig, J. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge,” Journal of Philosophy 88: 693–708.Google Scholar
Harrison, V. S. 2006. “Internal Realism and the Problem of Religious Diversity,” Philosophia 34: 287–301.Google Scholar
Harrison, V. S. 2019. Eastern Philosophy. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harrison, V. S. 2022. Eastern Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, C. 1962. The Logic of Perfection. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. 1996. An Introduction to Buddhism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. 2009. “The Approach to Knowledge and Truth in the Theravāda Record of the Discourses of the Buddha,” in Edelglass, W. & Garfield, J. (eds.), Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press, pp. 175–85.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. 2021. Transcendent God, Rational World: A Māturīdī Theology. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, K. 2014. Trust, Distrust and Commitment. Noûs 48(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. & Dunaway, B. 2017. “Skepticism,” in Abraham, W. & Aquino, F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. Oxford University Press, pp. 290–308.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. & Isaacs, Y. 2018. “Fine-Tuning Fine-Tuning,” in Benton, M., Hawthorne, J., & Rabinowitz, D. (eds.), Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology. Oxford University Press, pp. 136–168.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J., Isaacs, Y., & Lasonen-Aarnio, M. 2021. “The Rationality of Epistemic Akrasia,” Philosophical Perspectives 35: 206–228.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. & Magidor, O. 2018. “Reflections on the Ideology of Reasons,” in Star, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press, pp. 113–142.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. P. 1988. Dignāga on the Interpretation of Signs. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Healey, J. P. 1992. “Faith: Old Testament,” in Freedman, D. (ed.) The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, D–G: Volume 2. New York: Doubleday, pp. 744–749.Google Scholar
Heer, N. 1993. “The Priority of Reason in the Interpretation of Scripture: Ibn Taymīya and the Mutakallimūn,” In Mir, M. & Fossum, J. E. (eds.), Literary Heritage of Classical Islam. Arabic and Islamic Studies in Honor of James A. Bellamy. Princeton: Darwin Press, pp. 181–195.Google Scholar
Helm, P. (ed.) 1999. Faith and Reason (Oxford Readers). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. (ed.) 2019. Epistemology: The Key Thinkers. 2nd ed. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Hick, J. 1966. Faith and Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hick, J. 1989. An Interpretation of Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hieronymi, P. 2008. “The Reasons of Trust,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86: 213–236. https://doi:10.1080/00048400801886496.Google Scholar
Hinchman, E. S. 2005. “Telling as Inviting to Trust,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70: 562–587. https://doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2005.tb00415.x.Google Scholar
Hoitenga, D. 1991. Faith and Reason from Plato to Plantinga: An Introduction to Reformed Epistemology. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Holder, J. 2013. “A Survey of Early Buddhist Epistemology,” in Emmanuel, S. (ed.) A Companion to Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 223–240.Google Scholar
Holton, R. 1994. “Deciding to Trust, Coming to Believe,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 63–76. https://doi:10.1080/00048409412345881.Google Scholar
Hoover, J. 2007. Ibn Taymiyya’s Theodicy of Perpetual Optimism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hoover, J. 2019; Ibn Taymiyya. London: Oneworld Academic.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. 2013. “Propositional Faith: What It Is and What It Is Not,” American Philosophical Quarterly 50: 357–372.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. 2016. “Does Faith Entail Belief?” Faith and Philosophy 33: 142–162.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. 2017a. “Markan faith,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81: 31–60.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. 2017b. “The Skeptical Christian,” Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8: 142–167.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. 2019. “Can Fictionalists Have Faith? It All Depends,” Religious Studies 55: 447–468.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. & McKaughan, D. J. 2020. “Faith and Humility: Conflict or Concord?” in Alfano, M., Lynch, M., & Tanesini, A. (eds.), Handbook on the Philosophy of Humility. New York: Routledge, pp. 212–224.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D. & McKaughan, D. J. 2022. “Faith and Resilience,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 91: 205–241.Google Scholar
Hricko, J. & Leben, D. 2018. “In Defense of Best-Explanation Debunking Arguments in Moral Philosophy,” Review of Philosophical Psychology 9: 143–160.Google Scholar
Huemer, M. 2007. “Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 30–55.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1975 [1748]. Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A., 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 1990 [1779]. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 2000 [1777]. “Of Miracles,” in Davies, B. (ed.) Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology. Oxford University Press, pp. 430–436.Google Scholar
Hyman, J. 1999. “How Knowledge Works,” Philosophical Quarterly 49: 433–451.Google Scholar
Ibn Qudāma, M. D. 1962. Taḥrīm al-Naẓar fī Kutub ahl al-Kalām, trans. George Makdisi as The Censure of Speculative Theology of Ibn Qudama. Cambridge: Gibb Memorial Trust.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. 1972. Majmū’āt al-Rasā’il al-Kubrā, vol 2. Beirut: Dār iḥyā’ al-turāth al-’arabī.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. 1979. Dar’ ta‘āruḍ al-‘aql wa-l-naql. Riyadh: Jāmi‘at al-Imām Muḥammad b. Sa‘ūd al-Islāmiyya.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. 1995. Majmū’ Fatāwā Shaykh al-Islām Aḥmad b. Taymiyya. Mujamma’ al-Malik Fahd.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. 2005. al-Radd’ ‘ala al-Manṭiqiyyīn. Beirut: Mu’assasa al-Rayyān.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. 2014. al-Intiṣār li-ahl al-athar (naqḍ al-mantiq). Mecca: Dār ‘ālam al-Fawā’id.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymiyya, Taqī al-Dīn. 2018. Amrāḍ al-qulūb wa-shifā’uhā. Cairo: al-Maṭba‘a al-Salafiyya.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, M. D. 2013. “Immediate Knowledge according to al-Qāḍī ‘Abd al-Jabbār,” Sciences and Philosophy 23: 101–115.Google Scholar
Jackson, E. In press a. “A Permissivist Defense of Pascal’s Wager,” Erkenntnis.Google Scholar
Jackson, E. In press b. “An Epistemic Version of Pascal’s Wager.” Journal of the American Philosophical Association.Google Scholar
Jackson, E. 2023. “Faithfully Taking Pascal’s Wager,” The Monist 106: 35–45.Google Scholar
Jackson, E. & Rogers, A. 2019. “Salvaging Pascal’s Wager,” Philosophia Christi 21: 59–84.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1982. “Epiphenomenal Qualia,” Philosophical Quarterly 32: 127–136.Google Scholar
Jackson, S. 2009. Islam and the Problem of Black Suffering. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. 1896 (1979). “The Will to Believe,” in Burkhardt, F. et al. (eds.), The Will to Believe and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 2–32.Google Scholar
Jayatilleke, K. N. 1963. Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Jepsen, A. 1977. “אָמַן (āman),” in Botterweck, G. J., Ringgren, H., & Fabry, Heinz-Josef (eds.), Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, revised ed., vol. 1, trans. D. Green & J. T. Willis. Grand Rapids, MI. Eerdmans, pp. 292–323.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. 1999. Hume, Holism, and Miracles, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. & Bering, J. 2009. “Hand of God, Mind of Man: Punishment and Cognition in the Evolution of Cooperation,” in Schloss, J. & Murray, M. (eds.), The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 26–43.Google Scholar
Jones, K. 2012. “Trustworthiness,” Ethics 123 : 61–85. https://doi:10.1086/667838.Google Scholar
Jones, W. 1998. “Religious Conversion, Self-Deception, and Pascal’s Wager,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 36: 167–188.Google Scholar
Jong, J. & Visala, A. 2014. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments against Theism, Reconsidered,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76: 243–258.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. 1991. “The Many-Gods Objection and Pascal’s Wager,” The International Philosophical Quarterly 31: 309–17.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. 1998. “Pascal’s Wager Revisited,” Religious Studies 34: 419–431.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. 2006. Pascal’s Wager: Pragmatic Arguments and Belief in God. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. 2007. “Pascal’s Wagers and James’s Will to Believe,” in Wainwright, W. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 168–187.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2007. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahan, D. 2016. “The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part I,” in Scott, R., Buchmann, M., & Kosslyn, S. (eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0417.Google Scholar
Kahn, Y. 2017. Va-etchanan: Remembering Sinai. [Online] Available at: https://etzion.org.il/en/tanakh/torah/sefer-devarim/parashat-vaetchanan/va-etchanan-remembering-sinai [Accessed 08 12 2021].Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kail, P. 2007. “Understanding Hume’s Natural History of Religion,” The Philosophical Quarterly 57: 190–211.Google Scholar
Kalupahana, D. J. 1992. A History of Buddhist Philosophy: Continuities and Discontinuities. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1998 [1781]. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2018 [1793] Religion within the Bounds of Mere Reason, revised ed., trans. & ed. Wood, A. and Di Giovanni, G.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karunadasa, Y. 2017. Early Buddhist Teachings: The Middle Position in Theory and Practice. Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
Keith, A. B. 1989, The Religion and Philosophy of the Upanishads, vol. 2, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. First published 1925, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelemen, D. 2004. “Are Children ‘Intuitive Theists’?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature,” Psychological Science 15: 295–301.Google Scholar
Keller, L. J. 2018a. “Divine Ineffability and Franciscan Knowledge,” Res Philosophica 95: 347–370.Google Scholar
Keller, L. J. 2018b. “The Argument from Intentionality (or Aboutness): Propositions Supernaturalized,” in Walls, J. & Dougherty, T. (eds.), Two Dozen (or So) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford University Press, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2005. “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement,” Oxford Studies in Epistemology 1: 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119420828.ch17.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2010. “Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence,” in Feldman, R. & Warfield, T. (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press, pp. 111–174.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2014a. “Evidence,” in Zalta, E (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence/.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. 2014b. “Evidence Can Be Persmissive,” in Steup, M., Turri, J., & Sosa, E. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 298–311.Google Scholar
Kienzler, W. 2006. “Wittgenstein and John Henry Newman on Certainty,” Grazer Philosophische Studien 71: 117–138.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. 1983 [1843]. Fear and Trembling, trans. H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1994. “Explanatory Knowledge and Metaphysical Dependence,” Philosophical Issues 5: 51–69.Google Scholar
King, N. L. 2012. “Disagreement: What’s the Problem? Or a Good Peer Is Hard to Find,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85: 249–272. https://doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00441.x.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1991. “Socializing Knowledge,” Journal of Philosophy 88: 675–676.Google Scholar
Koons, R. C. 2018. “The General Argument from Intuition,” Walls, J. & Dougherty, T. (eds.), Two Dozen (or So) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford University Press, pp. 238–260.Google Scholar
Korcz, K. A. 2021. “The Epistemic Basing Relation,” in Zalta, E (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/basing-epistemic/.Google Scholar
Korman, D. 2019. “Debunking Arguments,” Philosophy Compass 14: e12638.Google Scholar
Korman, D. & Locke, D. 2020. “Against Minimalist Responses to Moral Debunking Arguments,” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 15: 309–332.Google Scholar
Kundert, C. & Edman, R. O. 2017. “Promiscuous Teleology: From Childhood Through Adulthood and from West to East,” in Hornbeck, R. et al. (eds.), Religious Cognition in China. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J. 2018. Faith and Humility. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2008. Learning From Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2014. “Taking Religious Disagreement Seriously,” in Callahan, L. & O’Connor, T. (eds.), Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford University Press, pp. 300–317.Google Scholar
Lackey, J. 2017. “The Epistemology of Testimony and Religious Belief,” in Abraham, W. & Aquino, F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. Oxford University Press, pp. 203–220.Google Scholar
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. 2010. “Unreasonable Knowledge,” Philosophical Perspectives 24: 1–21.Google Scholar
Leben, D. 2014. “When Psychology Undermines Belief,” Philosophical Psychology 27: 328–350.Google Scholar
Lebens, S. 2020a. “Pascal, Pascalberg, and Friends,” International Journal of Philosophy of Religion 87: 109–130.Google Scholar
Lebens, S. 2020b. The Principles of Judaism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lebens, S. 2021. “Proselytism as Epistemic Violence: A Jewish Approach to the Ethics of Religious Persuasion,” The Monist 104: 376–392.Google Scholar
Lebens, S. In press. “Amen to Da’at: On the Foundations of Jewish Epistemology,” Religious Studies.Google Scholar
Leftow, B. 2007. “Ontological Arguments,” in Wainwright, W. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press, pp. 80–111.Google Scholar
Leftow, B. 2012. God and Necessity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leftow, B. 2022. Anselm’s Argument: Divine Necessity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. 1991 [1714]. The Monadology. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, N. 2021. “Epistemological Problems of Testimony,” in Zalta, E (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/testimony-episprob/.Google Scholar
Levin, J. 2021. “Functionalism,” in Zalta, E (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/functionalism/.Google Scholar
Licona, M. R. 2010. The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Ljiljanaa, R. & Slavišab, K. 2017. “Religious Hinge Commitments: Developing Wittgensteinian Quasi-Fideism,” Belgrade Philosophical Annual 30: 235–256.Google Scholar
List, C. 2005. “Group Knowledge and Group Rationality: A Judgment Aggregation Perspective,” Episteme 2: 25–38.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1979 [1689]. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P., Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Long, T. 2010. “De jure Objection to Religious Belief,” Religious Studies 46: 375–394.Google Scholar
Longino, H. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lopes, D. M. 2005. Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lougheed, K. 2018. “Recognition and Epistemic Injustice in the Epistemology of Disagreement,” Philosophical Forum 49: 363–377. https://doi:10.1111/phil.12197.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 2002. A Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowe, E. J. 2010. “John Locke,” in Bernecker, S. & Pritchard, D. (eds.), Routledge Companion to Epistemology. London: Routledge, pp. 687–696.Google Scholar
Luhrmann, T. M. 2020. How God Becomes Real. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lycan, W. & Schlesinger, G. 1989. “You Bet Your Life: Pascal’s Wager Defended,” in Feinberg, J. (ed.) Reason & Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, pp. 80–90.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1982. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maharshi, R. 1995. Who Am I? trans. T. M. P. Mahadevan. Tiruvannamalai: Sri Ramanasramam.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. 1960. “Anselm’s Ontological Arguments,” Philosophical Review 69: 41–62.Google Scholar
Marsh, J. 2013. “Darwin and the Problem of Natural Nonbelief,” Monist 96: 349–376.Google Scholar
Martin, M. 1975. “On Four Critiques of Pascal’s Wager,” Sophia 14: 1–11.Google Scholar
Martin, M. 1990. Atheism: A Philosophical Justification. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Matilal, B. K. 1986. Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mavrodes, G. I. 1989. “Enthusiasm,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 25: 171–86.Google Scholar
Mawson, T. J. 2005. Belief in God: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayeda, S. 1992. A Thousand Teachings: The Upadesasahasri of Shankara. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
McAllister, B. 2020. “Evidence Is Required for Religious Belief,” in Peterson, M. & VanArragon, R. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd edn. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 269–278.Google Scholar
McBrayer, J. 2014. “The Wager Renewed: Believing in God Is Good for You,” Science, Religion & Culture 1: 130–140.Google Scholar
McBrayer, J. 2018. “The Epistemology of Genealogies,” in Van Eyghen, H. et al. (eds.), New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Belief. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 157–169.Google Scholar
McCain, K. 2012. “The Interventionist Account of Causation and the Basing Relation,” Philosophical Studies 159: 357–382.Google Scholar
McCain, K. 2014. Evidentialism and Epistemic Justification. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCain, K. 2015. “Explanationism: Defended on All Sides,” Logos & Episteme 6: 333–349.Google Scholar
McCain, K. 2018. “Explanationist Aid for Phenomenal Conservatism,” Synthese 195: 3035–3050.Google Scholar
McCain, K. 2022. Understanding How Science Explains the World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCain, K. & Moretti, L. 2021. Appearance and Explanation: Phenomenal Explanationism in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. 2011. Why Religion Is Natural and Science is Not. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1982. “Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge,” Proceedings of the British Academy 68: 173–192.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. “Knowledge by Hearsay,” in Matilal, B. & Chakrabarti, A. (eds.), Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding Testimony. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 195–224.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1995. “Knowledge and the Internal,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55: 877–893.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. 1984. Wittgenstein on Meaning: An Interpretation and Evaluation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McGinn, M. 1989. Sense and Certainty: A Dissolution of Skepticism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McGrew, T. & McGrew, L. 2009. “The Argument from Miracles: A Cumulative Case for the Resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth,” in Craig, & Moreland, (eds.), pp. 593–662.Google Scholar
McGuckin, J. 2011. Prayer Book of the Early Christians. Brewster, MA: Paraclete Press.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. 2013. “Authentic Faith and Acknowledged Risk: Dissolving the Problem of Faith and Reason,” Religious Studies 49: 101–124.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. 2016. “Action-Centered Faith, Doubt, and Rationality,” Journal of Philosophical Research 41: 71–90.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. 2017. “On the Value of Faith and Faithfulness,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81: 7–29.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. 2018. “Faith Through the Dark of Night: What Perseverance Amidst Doubt Can Teach Us About the Nature and Value of Religious Faith,” Faith and Philosophy 35: 195–218.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. & Howard-Snyder, D. 2022. “Theorizing about Faith and Faithfulness with Jonathan Kvanvig,” Religious Studies 58: 628–648. https://doi:10.1017/S0034412521000202.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. & Howard-Snyder, D. In press a. “Faith and Faithfulness,” Faith and Philosophy.Google Scholar
McKaughan, D. J. & Howard-Snyder, D. In press b. “Perseverance in the Religious Life,” in King, N. (ed.), Endurance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKim, R. 2001. Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMyler, B. 2011. Testimony, Trust, and Authority. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McMyler, B. & Ogungbure, A. 2018. “Recent Work on Trust and Testimony,” American Philosophical Quarterly 55: 217–230.Google Scholar
McNabb, T. D. 2019. Religious Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, D. 2020. Virtue and Meaning: A Neo-Aristotelian Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Medina, J. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and the Social Imagination. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, J. P. 1991. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Menssen, S. & Sullivan, T. D. 2007. The Agnostic Inquirer. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Menssen, S. & Sullivan, T. D. 2021. “The Argument from Ramified Natural Theology,” in Ruloff, C. & Horban, P. (eds.), Contemporary Arguments in Natural Theology: God and Rational Belief. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 311–325.Google Scholar
Menssen, S. & Sullivan, T. D. 2022. “Can I Be Obliged to Believe?” Religions 13: 1159.Google Scholar
Menzel, C. 2018. “The Argument from Collections.” in Walls, J. & Dougherty, T. (eds.), Two Dozen (or So) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford University Press, pp. 29–58.Google Scholar
Mihirig, A. A. 2022a. “Typologies of Scepticism in the Philosophical Tradition of Kalām,” Theoria 88: 13–48.Google Scholar
Mihirig, A. A. 2022b. “Analogical Arguments in the Kalām Tradition: Abū’l-Ma‘ālī al-Juwaynī and Beyond,” Methodos: Savoirs Et Textes 22.Google Scholar
Miller, B. 2015. “Why Knowledge Is the Property of a Community and Possibly None of Its Members,” Philosophical Quarterly 65: 417–441.Google Scholar
Miller, C. 2016. “Is Theism a Simple Hypothesis? The Simplicity of Omni-Properties,” Religious Studies 52: 45–61.Google Scholar
Millican, P. 2011. “Twenty Questions about Hume’s ‘Of Miracles’,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 68: 151–92.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1973. The Justification of Religious Belief. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moberly, R. W. L. 1997. “אמן (ʾāman),” in VanGemeren, W.A. (ed.) New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis, vol. 1. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, pp. 427–433.Google Scholar
de Montaigne, M. 2003 [1576]. Apology for Raymond Sebond, trans. R. Ariew & M. Grene. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Moon, A. 2012. “Warrant Does Entail Truth,” Synthese 184: 287–297.Google Scholar
Moon, A. 2017. “Plantinga’s Religious Epistemology, Skeptical Theism, and Debunking Arguments,” Faith and Philosophy 34: 449–470.Google Scholar
Moon, A. 2021. “Circular and Question-Begging Responses to Religious Disagreement and Debunking Arguments,” Philosophical Studies 178: 785–809.Google Scholar
Mooney, J. 2019. “From a Cosmic Fine-Tuner to a Perfect Being,” Analysis 79: 449–452.Google Scholar
Moran, R. A. 2005. “Getting Told and Being Believed,” Philosophers’ Imprint 5: 1–29.Google Scholar
Moreland, J. P. 2008. Consciousness and the Existence of God: A Theistic Argument. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 2015. Roman Faith and Christian Faith: Pistis and Fides in the Early Roman Empire. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, P. K. 2008a. “Religious Scepticism,” in Greco, J. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press, pp. 200–224.Google Scholar
Moser, P. K. 2008b. The Elusive God: Reorienting Religious Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, P. K. 2010. The Evidence for God: Religious Knowledge Reexamined. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mougin, G. & Sober, E. 1994. “Betting against Pascal’s Wager,” Noûs 28: 382–95.Google Scholar
Teresa, Mother. 2007. Come Be My Light: The Private Writings of the “Saint of Calcutta.” New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. 2007. Wittgenstein’s Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, §§ 243–315. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. & Swift, A. 1996. Liberals & Communitarians. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Murray, M. 2009. “Scientific Explanation of Religion and the Justification of Religious Belief,” in Schloss, & Murray, (eds.), pp. 168–178.Google Scholar
Murray, M. & Goldberg, A. 2009. “Evolutionary Accounts of Religion: Explaining and Explaining Away,” in Schloss, and Murray, (eds.), pp. 179–199.Google Scholar
Murray, M. J. & Schloss, J. 2013. “Evolutionary Accounts of Religion and the Justification of Religious Belief,” in Moreland, J. P. et al. (eds.), Debating Christian Theism. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–260.Google Scholar
Mustafa, A. R. 2013. On Taqlīd: Ibn al-Qayyim’s Critique of Authority in Islamic Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagasawa, Y. 2017. Maximal God: A New Defence of Perfect Being Theism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ñāṇamoli, B. & Bodhi, B. (eds. and trans.) 1995. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikaya. Boston: Wisdom Publication.Google Scholar
Nelson, L. H. 1993. “Epistemological Communities,” in Feminist Epistemology. New York: Routledge, pp. 121–160.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, R. J. 2000. Death on a Friday Afternoon: Meditations on the Last Words of Jesus from the Cross. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. 1979 [1870]. An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C. T. 2018. “Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles,” Episteme 17: 141–161. https://doi:10.1017/epi.2018.32.Google Scholar
Nguyen, C. T. 2023. “Trust as an Unquestioning Attitude,” Oxford Studies in Epistemology.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. 1967. “Wittgensteinian Fideism,” Philosophy 42: 191–209Google Scholar
Norenzayan, A. 2013. Big Gods. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, D. S. 2021. “O Woman, Great Is Your Faith!”: Faith in the Gospel of Matthew. Eugene, OR: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham. 1991. “On Rescher on Pascal’s Wager,” The International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30: 159–68.Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham. 2006. Arguing about Gods. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oppy, Graham. 2007. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pace, M. & McKaughan, D. J. 2022. “Judaeo-Christian Faith as Trust and Loyalty,” Religious Studies 58: 30–60.Google Scholar
Page, B. 2020. “Arguing to Theism from Consciousness,” Faith and Philosophy 37: 336–362.Google Scholar
Paley, W. 1802. Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. London: R. Faulder.Google Scholar
Pandeya, R. C. 1989. The Pramāṇavārttikam of Ācārya Dharmakīrti with the Commentaries Svopajñavtti of the Author and Pramāṇavārttikavrtti of Manorathanandin. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Pargament, K. I. & Exline, J. J. 2022. Working with Spiritual Struggles in Psychotherapy: From Research to Practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, K. M. 2013. “Perspectives on Natural Theology from Analytic Philosophy,” in Manning, R., Brooke, J., & Watts, F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford University Press, pp. 248–261.Google Scholar
Pascal, B. 1662/1958. Pensees, trans. W. Trotter. New York: J. M. Dent Co., fragments 233–241.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1965 [1908]. “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God,” in Hartshorne, C. & Weiss, P. (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 6. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 452–85.Google Scholar
Penelhum, T. 1983a. God and Scepticism: A Study in Scepticism and Fideism. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Penelhum, T. 1983b. “Scepticism and Fideism,” in Burnyeat, M. (ed.) The Skeptical Tradition. University of California Press, pp. 287–318.Google Scholar
Penelhum, T. 2010. “Fideism,” in Taliaferro, C., Draper, P., & Quinn, P. (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 441–448.Google Scholar
Pessagno, M. J. 1979. “Intellect and Religious Assent,” The Muslim World 69:18–27.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. Z. 1976. Religion Without Explanation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philipse, H. 2012. God in the Age of Science? Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pittard, J. 2019. Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1980. “The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 15: 49–62.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1983. “Reason and Belief in God,” in Plantinga, A & Wolterstorff, N (eds.), pp. 16–93.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1985. “Self-Profile,” in Tomberlin, J. & van Iwagen, P. (eds.), Alvin Plantinga. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, pp. 3–97.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1991. “Theism, Atheism and Rationality,” Truth: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Christian Thought 3.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993a. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1993b. Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1998. “Religion and Epistemology,” in Craig, E. (ed.) Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge. https://doi:10.4324/9780415249126-K080-1.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 2000a. “Pluralism: A Defense of Exclusivism,” in Meeker, K. & Quinn, P. L. (eds.), The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press, pp. 172–192.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 2000b. Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 2011. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 2015. Knowledge and Christian Belief. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 2018 [1986]. “Two Dozen (or so) Theistic Arguments,” in Walls, J. & Doughterty, T. (eds.), Two Dozen (or so) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford University Press, pp. 461–479.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. & Wolterstorff, N. (eds.) 1983. Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Pojman, L. 1986. “Faith Without Belief?” Faith and Philosophy 3: 157–176.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. 1992. “Fideism, Quietism, and Unbelief: Skepticism for and against Religion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries,” in Hester, M. (ed.) Faith, Reason, and Skepticism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 121–154.Google Scholar
Popkin, R. 2003. The History of Scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poston, T. 2014. Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.Google Scholar
Poston, T. 2018. “The Argument from (A) to (Y): The Argument from So Many Arguments,” in Walls, J. & Dougherty, T. (eds.), Two Dozen (or So) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford University Press, pp. 372–388.Google Scholar
Potter, K. 1981. Advaita Vedanta up to Shankara and His pupils. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Preus, J. 1987. Explaining Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2011. “Wittgensteinian Quasi-Fideism,” Oxford Studies in the Philosophy of Religion 4: 145–159.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2012. Epistemological Disjunctivism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2015a. Epistemic Angst: Radical Skepticism and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2015b. “Wittgenstein on Faith and Reason: The Influence of Newman,” in Szatkowski, M. (ed.) God, Truth and Other Enigmas. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 141–164.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2016. Epistemology, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2017a. “Faith and Reason,” Philosophy 81: 101–118.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2017b. “Wittgenstein on Hinge Commitments and Radical Scepticism in On Certainty,” in Glock, H.-J. & Hyman, J. (eds.), Blackwell Companion to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 563–575.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2018. “Quasi-Fideism and Religious Conviction,” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 10: 51–66.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2019a. “Wittgensteinian Epistemology, Epistemic Vertigo, and Pyrrhonian Scepticism,” in Vlasits, J. & Vogt, K. M. (eds.), Epistemology After Sextus Empiricus. Oxford University Press, pp. 172–192.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2019b. “Wittgenstein’s On Certainty as Pyrrhonism in Action,” in de Costa, N. & Wuppuluri, S. (eds.), Wittgensteinian (adj.): Looking at Things from the Viewpoint of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 91–106.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2021. “Sceptical Fideism and Quasi-Fideism,” Manuscrito 44: 3–30.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2022a. “Exploring Quasi-Fideism,” in Moyal-Sharrock, D. & Sandis, C. (eds.), Extending Hinge Epistemology. London: Anthem, ch. 2.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. 2022b. “Quasi-Fideism and Epistemic Relativism,” Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2135820.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. In press a. “Honest Doubt: Quasi-Fideism and Wittgensteinian Epistemology,”in Pritchard, D. H. & Venturinha, N. (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Epistemology of Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. In press b. “Pyrrhonism and Wittgensteinian Quietism,” in Perissinotto, L. & Cámara, B. R. (eds.), Ancient Scepticism and Contemporary Philosophy. Milan, Italy: Mimesis International.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. H. & Richmond, A. 2012. “Hume on Miracles,” in Bailey, A. & O’Brien, D. (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Hume. London: Continuum, pp. 227–245.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. R. 2001. “Śaṃkara’s Principle and Two Ontomystical Arguments,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49: 111–120.Google Scholar
Pruss, A. R. 2010. “The Ontological Argument and the Motivational Centres of Lives,” Religious Studies 46: 233–249.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. 2001. “Highlights of Recent Epistemology,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52: 95–124.Google Scholar
Pryor, J. 2004. “What’s Wrong with Moore’s Argument?” Philosophical Issues 14: 349–378.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. L. 2000. “Toward Thinner Theologies: Hick and Alston on Religious Diversity,” in Meeker, K. & Quinn, P. L. (eds.), The Philosophical Challenge of Religious Diversity. Oxford University Press, pp. 226–243.Google Scholar
Quong, J. 2011. Liberalism without Perfection. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan, S. 1992. The Principal Upanishads. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, J. 2009. “From a Necessary Being to God,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66: 1–13.Google Scholar
Rath, B. 2017. “Christ’s Faith, Doubt, and the Cry of Dereliction,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81: 161–169.Google Scholar
Ratzsch, D. 2003. “Perceiving Design,” in Manson, N. (ed.) God and Design. New York: Routledge. pp. 124–144.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rea, M. (ed.) 2009. Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology: Trinity, Incarnation, Atonement, vol. 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rea, M. 2018. The Hiddenness of God. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rea, M. C. 2021. “Protest, Worship, and the Deformation of Prayer,” in Essays in Analytic Theology: Volume 2. Oxford University Press, pp. 193–210.Google Scholar
Reppert, V. 2009. “The Argument from Reason,” in Craig, & Moreland, (eds.), pp. 344–390.Google Scholar
Rhoads, D. M. 2004. Reading Mark: Engaging the Gospel. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, B. 2009. “Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Exercises in Skeptical Cartography,” The Modern Schoolman 87: 7–34.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, B. 2021. Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rini, R. 2017. “Fake News and Partisan Epistemology,” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27: E-43–E-64. https://doi:10.1177/1326365X17702268.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A. 2012. From Morality to Metaphysics: The Theistic Implications of Our Ethical Commitments. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rockwood, N. 2020. “Locke on Reason, Revelation, and Miracles,” in Gordon-Roth, J. & Weinberg, S. (eds.), The Lockean Mind. London: Routledge, pp. 545–553.Google Scholar
Rogers, K. A. 2021. “The Argument from Certainty,” in Ruloff, C. & Horban, P. (eds.), Contemporary Arguments in Natural Theology: God and Rational Belief. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 179–194.Google Scholar
Rolin, K. 2007. “Science as Collective Knowledge,” Cognitive Systems Research 9: 115–124.Google Scholar
Rota, M. 2016a. “A Better Version of Pascal’s Wager,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90: 415–439.Google Scholar
Rota, M. 2016b. Taking Pascal’s Wager: Faith, Evidence, and the Abundant Life. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.Google Scholar
Rota, M. 2017. “Pascal’s Wager,” Philosophy Compass 12: 1–11.Google Scholar
Rowe, W. 1979 “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism,” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 335–341.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1912. The Problems of Philosophy. London: Williams and Norgate; New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, J. 2020. Morality: Restoring the Common Good in Divided Times. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sauer, H. 2018. Debunking Arguments in Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saul, J. 2013. “Scepticism and Implicit Bias,” Disputatio 37: 243–263.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. 2005. Prolegomena to a Philosophy of Religion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. 2007. The Wisdom to Doubt. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schliesser, B. 2022. “Shades of Faith: The Phenomenon of Doubt in Early Christianity,” Religious Studies First View. https://doi:10.1017/S0034412522000105.Google Scholar
Schloss, J. & Murray, M. (eds.). 2009. The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmemann, A. 1973. For the Life of the World. Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Schroeder, M. 2012. “Stakes, Withholding, and Pragmatic Encroachment on Knowledge,” Philosophical Studies 160: 265–285.Google Scholar
Schönbaumsfeld, G. 2016. The Illusion of Doubt. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seel, N. M. 2012. “Fowler Faith Stages,” in Seel, N. M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. New York: Springer, pp. 1323–1324.Google Scholar
Senor, T. 2020. “Religious Beliefs Do Not Require Evidence/Response to Dougherty,” in Cowan, S. (ed.) Problems in Epistemology and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Contemporary Debates. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar
Shanahan, M. 2015. The Technological Singularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, A. 1909. “Doubt,” in The Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. 5. New York: Robert Appleton Company. www.newadvent.org/cathen/05141a.htm.Google Scholar
Shaw, K. 2016. “Religious Epistemological Disjunctivism,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79: 261–279.Google Scholar
Shaw, K. 2019. “A Plea for the Theist in the Street: A Defense of Liberalism in the Epistemology of Religious Experience,” Faith and Philosophy 36: 102–128.Google Scholar
Siderits, M. 1980. “The Madhyamaka Critique of Epistemology I,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 8: 307–335.Google Scholar
Siderits, M. 1981. “The Madhyamaka Critique of Epistemology II,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 9: 121–160.Google Scholar
Siderits, M. 2007. Buddhism as Philosophy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Siderits, M., Tillemans, T., & Chakrabarti, A. (eds.) 2011. Apoha: Buddhist Nominalism and Human Cognition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sluga, H. 2004. “Wittgenstein and Pyrrhonism,” in Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford University Press, pp. 99-117.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 2017. Religion: What It Is, How It Works, and Why It Matters. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. 2021. “How to Hang a Door: Picking Hinges for Quasi-Fideism,” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13: 51–82.Google Scholar
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. 1991. “A Terror Management Theory of Social Behavior: The Psychological Functions of Self-Esteem and Cultural Worldviews,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 93–157.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. 1983. “Hume’s Scepticism Concerning Reports of Miracles,” Analysis 43: 60.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 1997. “Reflective Knowledge in the Best Circles,” The Journal of Philosophy 94: 410–430.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2017. Epistemology. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spevack, A. 2020. “Continuing Conversations: Later Sunni Kalām-Theology’s Ongoing Engagement with Philosophy,” in Shihadeh, A. and Thiele, J. (eds.), Philosophical Theology in Islam: Later Ash’arism East and West. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Staal, F. 1979. “The Meaninglessness of Ritual,” Numen 26: 2–22.Google Scholar
Stausberg, M. (ed.) 2009. Contemporary Theories of Religion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stcherbatsky, T. 1930, 1932. Buddhist Logic, 2 vols. Leningrad: Bibliotheca Buddhica 26. Reprinted The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1958.Google Scholar
Stoltz, J. 2009. “Buddhist Epistemology: The Study of Pramāṇa,” Religion Compass 3/4: 537–548.Google Scholar
Stoltz, J. 2021. Illuminating the Mind: An Introduction to Buddhist Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1974. Freedom and Resentment, and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1985. Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1994. “Knowing from Words,” in Matilal, B. K. & Chakrabarti, A. (eds.), Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
Stroud, S. 2006. “Epistemic Partiality in Friendship,” Ethics 116: 498–524.Google Scholar
Street, S. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value,” Philosophical Studies 127: 109–166.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2000. “Francis and Dominic: Persons, Patterns, and the Trinity,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74: 1–25.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2010. Wandering in Darkness: Narrative and the Problem of Suffering. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2012. “Wandering in Darkness: Further Reflections,” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4: 197–219.Google Scholar
Sudduth, M. n.d. “Defeaters in Epistemology,” in Feiser, J & Dowden, B (eds.), The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/defeaters-in-epistemology/.Google Scholar
Swain, M. 1988. “Alston’s Internalistic Externalism,” Philosophical Perspectives 2: 461–473.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 2003. The Resurrection of God Incarnate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 2004. The Existence of God, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 2005. Faith and Reason, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 2018. “The Argument from Colors and Flavors,” in Walls, & Dougherty, (eds.), pp. 293–302.Google Scholar
Tennant, F. R. 1930. Philosophical Theology, Volume II, the World, the Soul, and God. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thakchöe, S. 2007. The Two Truth Debate: Tsongkhapa and Gorampa on the Middle Way. Boston: Wisdom Publication.Google Scholar
Thakchöe, S. 2011. “Prāsaṅgika Epistemology in Context,” in The Cowherds: Moonshadows: Conventional Truth in Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford University Press, pp. 39–55.Google Scholar
Thakchöe, S. 2012. “Candrakīrti’s Theory of Perception: A Case for Non-Foundationalist Epistemology in Madhyamaka,” Acta Orientalia Vilnensia 11: 93–125.Google Scholar
Thakchöe, S. 2013. “Prāsaṅgika Epistemology: A Reply to sTag tsang’s Charge against Tsongkhapa’s Use of Pramāṇa in Candrakīrti’s Philosophy,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 41: 1–27.Google Scholar
Thagard, P. 1997. “Collaborative Knowledge,” Noûs 31: 242–261.Google Scholar
The Qur’an (Oxford World Classics), trans. M. A. S. Abdel Haleem. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Theokritoff, E. 2009. Living in God’s Creation. Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Thurow, J. C. 2013. “Does Cognitive Science Show Belief in God to Be Irrational? The Epistemic Consequences of the Cognitive Science of Religion,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74: 77–98.Google Scholar
Thurow, J. C. 2014a. “Does the Scientific Study of Religion Cast Doubt on Theistic Beliefs?” in Bergmann, M. & Kain, P. (eds.), Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford University Press, pp. 277–294.Google Scholar
Thurow, J. C. 2014b. “Some Reflections on Cognitive Science, Doubt, and Religious Belief,” in Trigg, R., & Barrett, J. L. (eds.), The Roots of Religion: Exploring the Cognitive Science of Religion. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Press, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
Thurow, J. C. 2016. “Book Review of De Cruz & De Smedt, A Natural History of Natural Theology,” Faith and Philosophy 33: 370–374.Google Scholar
Thurow, J. C. 2018. “Debunking and Fully Apt Belief,” Filosofia Unisinos 19: 294–301.Google Scholar
Thurow, J. C. 2022. “Rationalization, Reasons, and Religion,” in Machuca, D. (ed.), Evolutionary Debunking Arguments. London: Routledge, pp. 129–159.Google Scholar
Tillemans, T. J. F. 1999. Logic, Language, Scripture. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
Tillemans, T. J. F. 2011. “Buddhist Epistemology (pramāṇavāda),” in Edelglass, W. & Garfield, Jay L. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of World Philosophy. Oxford University Press, pp. 233–244.Google Scholar
Tillemans, T. J. F. 2021. “Dharmakīrti,” in E. Zalta, (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/dharmakiirti/.Google Scholar
Timpe, K. 2022. “Toward an Account of Lamenting Well,” in Crisp, O., Arcadi, J., & Wessling, J. (eds.), Analyzing Prayer: Theological and Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
Tolhurst, W. 1998. “Seemings,” American Philosophical Quarterly 35: 293–302.Google Scholar
Tucker, C. 2011. “Phenomenal Conservatism and Evidentialism in Religious Epistemology,” in Clark, K. J. & VanArragon, R. (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press, pp. 52–73.Google Scholar
Tucker, C., ed. 2013. Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuggy, D. 2017. “Jesus as an Exemplar of Faith in the New Testament,” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 81: 171–191.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. 2004. “Group Knowledge Analyzed,” Episteme 1: 109–127.Google Scholar
Turner, J. B. 2021. “An Islamic Account of Reformed Epistemology,” Philosophy East and West 71: 767–792.Google Scholar
Urban, H. B. 2015. New Age, Neopagan, & New Religious Movements. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Uslu, F. 2007. “Knowledge and Volition in Early Ash’arī Doctrine of Faith,” Journal of Islamic Studies 18: 163–182.Google Scholar
VanArragon, R. 2020. “Evidence Is Not Required for Religious Belief,” in Peterson, M. & VanArragon, R. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion, 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 279–287.Google Scholar
Van Eyghen, H. 2020. Arguing from Cognitive Science of Religion. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 1994. “Quam Dilecta,” in Morris, T. V. (ed.) God and the Philosophers: The Reconciliation of Faith and Reason. Oxford University Press, pp. 31–60.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, P. 2009. “Listening to Clifford’s Ghost,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 65: 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246109990038.Google Scholar
Vidyabhusana, M. S. C. (trans.). 1975. The Nyaya Sutras of Gotama, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporation.Google Scholar
Visala, A. 2020. “Cultural Evolution and Debunking Arguments: A Response to Davis,” in Peels, R., de Ridder, J., & van Woudenberg, R. (eds.), Scientific Challenges to Common Sense Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 215–222.Google Scholar
Wainwright, W. J. 1994. “Skepticism, Romanticism, and Faith,” in Morris, T. V. (ed.), God and the Philosophers. Oxford University Press, pp. 77–87.Google Scholar
Walls, J. & Dougherty, T. (eds.). 2018. Two Dozen (or so) Arguments for God: The Plantinga Project. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walshe, M. (ed. and trans.) 1995. The Long Discourse of the Buddha: A Translation of Digha Nikāya. Boston: Wisdom Publication.Google Scholar
Ware, K. (Metropolitan Kallistos of Diokelia). 2013. “Through Creation to the Creator,” in Chryssavgis, J. & Foltz, B. (eds.), Toward an Ecology of Transfiguration: Orthodox Christian Perspectives on Environment, Nature, and Creation. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 86–105.Google Scholar
Weger, U. & Wagemann, J. 2021. “Towards a Conceptual Clarification of Awe and Wonder a First Person Phenomenological Enquiry,” Current Directions in Psychology 40: 1386–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0057-7.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, J. 2009. Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, J. 2010. The Dispeller of Disputes: Nāgārjuna’s Vigrahavyāvartanī. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westerhoff, J. 2018. The Golden Age of Indian Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, D., Battaly, H., Baehr, J., & Howard-Snyder, D. 2017. “Intellectual Humility: Owning Our Limitations,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94: 509–539.Google Scholar
White, R. 2010. “You Just Believe That Because …” Philosophical Perspectives 24: 573–615.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. H. 2010. “Wittgensteinian Philosophy of Religion,” in Taliaferro, C., Draper, P. & Quinn, P. (eds.), A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 659–666.Google Scholar
Wielenberg, E. 2010. “On the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality,” Ethics 120: 441–464.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. & Griffiths, P. 2012. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Three Domains: Fact, Value, and Religion,” in Dawes, G. & Maclaurin, J. (eds.), A New Science of Religion. New York: Routledge, pp. 133–146.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 1991. Unnatural Doubts: Epistemological Realism and the Basis of Skepticism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, M. In press. “Fideism, Skepticism and ‘Hinge’ Epistemology,” in Pritchard, D. H. & Venturinha, N. (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Epistemology of Religion. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1997. “Knowledge as Evidence,” Mind 106: 1–25.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2017. “Ambiguous Rationality,” Episteme 14: 263–274.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. In press. “Justification, Excuses and Sceptical Scenarios,” in Dorsch, F. and Dutant, J. (eds.), The New Evil Demon. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1966. Wittgenstein’s Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief, ed. Barrett, C.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1969. On Certainty, eds. Anscombe, G. E. M. & von Wright, G. H., trans. D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1980. Culture and Value, trans. P. Winch, ed. von Wright, G. H.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 1976. Reason within the Bounds of Religion, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 1983a. “Can Belief in God Be Rational if It Has No Foundations?” in Plantinga, & Wolterstorff, (eds.), pp. 135–186.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 1983b. “Introduction,” in Plantinga, & Wolterstorff, (eds.), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 1995a. Divine Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 1995b. “On Being Entitled to Beliefs about God,” revised and reprinted in Wolterstorff, 2010, pp. 313–333.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 1996. John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 1999. “Epistemology of Religion,” revised and reprinted in Wolterstoff, 2010, pp. 144–172.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 2001a. “Reformed Epistemology,” revised and reprinted in Wolterstoff, 2010, pp. 334–349.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 2001b. Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 2010. Practices of Belief, Cuneo, Terence (ed). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 2015. The God We Worship. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N. 2016. “Knowing God Liturgically,” Journal of Analytic Theology 4: 1–16.Google Scholar
Wray, K. B. 2007. “Who Has Scientific Knowledge?” Social Epistemology 21: 337–347.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2002. “(Anti-)Sceptics Simple and Subtle: G. E. Moore and John McDowell,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65: 330–348.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2004. “Warrant for Nothing (and Foundations for Free)?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary 78: 167–212.Google Scholar
Wright, L. 2013. Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wykstra, S. J. 1989. “Towards a Sensible Evidentialism: On the Notion of ‘Needing Evidence,’” in Rowe, W. & Wainwright, W. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings. Oxford University Press, pp. 481–491.Google Scholar
Wykstra, S. J. 2001. “On behalf of the Evidentialist,” in Phillips, D. Z. & Tessin, T. (eds.), Philosophy of Religion in the 21st Century. New York: Palgrave, 64–84.Google Scholar
Wykstra, S. J. 2002. “Not Done in a Corner: How to Be a Sensible Evidentialist About Jesus,” Philosophical Books 43: 81–135.Google Scholar
Wynn, M. 1997. “Beauty, Providence, and the Biophilia Hypothesis,” Heythrop Journal 38: 283–299.Google Scholar
Yandell, K. 1990. Hume’s “Inexplicable Mystery”: His Views on Religion. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Yao, Z. 2004. “Dignāga and Four Types of Perception,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 32: 57–79.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 1993. “Religious Knowledge and the Virtues of the Mind,” in Zagzebski, L. (ed.) Rational Faith: Catholic Responses to Reformed Epistemology. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 199–225.Google Scholar
Zagzebski, L. 2012. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by Jonathan Fuqua, Conception Seminary College, Missouri, John Greco, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Tyler McNabb, Saint Francis University, Pennsylvania
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047180.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by Jonathan Fuqua, Conception Seminary College, Missouri, John Greco, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Tyler McNabb, Saint Francis University, Pennsylvania
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047180.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by Jonathan Fuqua, Conception Seminary College, Missouri, John Greco, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Tyler McNabb, Saint Francis University, Pennsylvania
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology
  • Online publication: 24 August 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009047180.024
Available formats
×