Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:42:10.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Tasks and Needs Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

Edited by
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian  and
Michael H. Long
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Michael H. Long
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching , pp. 53 - 202
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. (2018). TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

References

Annenberg Learner. (n.d.). Teaching foreign languages K-12: A library if classroom practices. Retrieved from: https://www.learner.org/series/teaching-foreign-languages-k-12-a-library-of-classroom-practices/creating-travel-advice/view-analyze-video/.Google Scholar
Benevides, M. and Valvona, C. (2018). Widgets Inc: A task-based course in workplace English. 2nd ed. Tokyo: Atama-ii Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2016). Communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. In Van Deusen-Scholl, N. and May, S., eds. Second and foreign language education, encyclopedia of language and education. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 327–38.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J. M., and Van den Branden, K. (2015). Task-based language teaching. In Chapelle, C. A., ed. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. and Samuda, V. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595–608.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1968). Social processes and social simulation games. In Boocock, S. S. and Schild, E. O., eds. Simulation games in learning. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross disciplinary review (Technical Report No. 4). Honolulu: Center for Second Language Classroom Research, Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. and Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortune, A. E., Lee, M., and Cavazos, A. (2005). Achievement motivation and outcome in social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 115–30.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T. and Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D. and Barr, R., eds. Reading research handbook. Vol. III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 403–24.Google Scholar
Hu, G. W. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15, 93–105.Google Scholar
Hu, G. W. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 635–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In Reigelruth, C. M., ed. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 383–434.Google Scholar
Klein, J. D. and Freitag, E. (1991). Effects of using an instructional game on motivation and performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(5), 303–8.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, M., Toprac, P., and Yuen, T. T. (2009). What factors make a multimedia learning environment engaging: A case study. In Zheng, R. Z., ed. Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 173–92.Google Scholar
Long, K. J. (2004). Unit of analysis. In Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., and Futing Liao, T., eds. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1157–58.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–78.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M., eds. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bahtia, T. K., eds. Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press, pp. 413–68.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015a). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015b). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In Crookes, G. and Gass, S., eds. Tasks in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 9–54.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–27.Google Scholar
Luo, S. and Xing, J. (2015). Teachers’ perceived difficulty in implementing TBLT in China. In Thomas, M. and Reinders, H., eds. Contemporary Task-based language teaching in Asia: Contemporary studies in linguistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 139–55.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. and Doughty, C., eds. Handbook of language teaching. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2018). Task-based language assessment: Aligning designs with intended uses and consequences. Japan Language Testing Association (JLTA) Journal, 21, 3–20.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. and Rogers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. (2018). TBLT as a research pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sasayama, S. (2018). An evidence-based approach to L2 task design. Taking it to Task, 3(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–58.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38–57.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C., eds. Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 235–53.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2006), ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Willis, D. and Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: From theory to practice. In Johnson, R. K., ed. The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 269–293.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Identifying target tasks. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 117–68.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013). Needs analysis for task-based language teaching: A case study of Indigenous vocational education and training students who speak EAL/EAD. TESOL in Context, 22(2), 36–50.Google Scholar
Riestenberg, K. and Sherris, A. (2018). Task-based teaching of indigenous languages: Investment and methodological principles in Macuiltianguis Zapotec and Salish Qlispe revitalization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(3), 434–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (2012). Introduction: Broadening the perspective of task-based language teaching scholarship: The contribution of research in foreign language contexts. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Van Avermaet, P. and Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In Van den Branden, K., ed., Task-based language teaching in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, A. and Martínez, G. (2018). Spanish for the professions and community service learning: Applications with heritage learners. In Potowski, K., ed. The Routledge handbook of Spanish as a heritage language. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R. and Newton, J. (2009). TBLT in Asia: Constraints and opportunities. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 1–17.Google Scholar
Adendorff, E. (2014). A task-based approach to improving the communicative skills of university students learning Afrikaans as an additional language. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 43, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bao, R. and Du, X. (2015). Implementation of task-based language teaching in Chinese as a foreign language: Benefits and challenges. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(3), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 723–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesch, S. (1999). Rights analysis: studying power relations in an academic setting. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 313–27.Google Scholar
Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: From theory to practice. In Johnson, R. K., ed. The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48–62.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 269–93.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. (1984). Needs analysis and objective setting in the Adult Migrant Education Program. Sydney: Adult Migrant Education Service.Google Scholar
Bryfonski, L. and McKay, T. H. (2019). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(5), 603–32.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (2016). Sources, developments and directions of task-based language teaching. Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 381–400.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595–608.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2012). TBLT in EFL settings: Looking back and moving forward. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 345–58.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C., Doughty, C., Kim, Y., Kong, D., Lee, J., Lee, Y., Long, M. H., Rivers, R., and Urano, K. (2005). A task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 105–24.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (2009). Radical language teaching. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 595–609.Google Scholar
Cumaranatunge, L. K. (1988). An EOP case study: Domestic aids in West Asia. In Chamberlain, D., and Baumgardener, R. J., eds. ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation. ELT document 129. London: Modern English Publications/The British Council, pp. 127–33.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. with Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T. and St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In McHoul, A. and Rapley, M., eds. How to analyze talk in institutional settings: A casebook of methods. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 25–28.Google Scholar
Flores, N. and García, O. (2017). A critical review of bilingual education in the United States: From basements and pride to boutiques and profit. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 14–29.Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2005). Integrating traditional and critical approaches to syllabus design: The ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘why’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 135–47.Google Scholar
Freire, P. (1970/2005). The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder/Continuum.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R. (2005). Evaluating the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis: A case study of journalists in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–99.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M. and Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19, 525–49.Google Scholar
Hult, F. M. and Hornberger, N. H. (2016). Revisiting orientations in language planning: Problem, right, and resource as an analytical heuristic. Bilingual Review/Revista Bilingüe, 33, 30–49.Google Scholar
Hutchison, T., and Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iizuka, T. (2019). Task-based needs analysis:Identifying communicative needs for study abroad students in Japan. System, 80, 134–42.Google Scholar
Jasso-Aguilar, R. (1999) Sources, methods and triangulation in needs analysis:A critical perspective in a case study of Waikiki hotel maids. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
Jasso-Aguilar, R. (2005). Sources, methods and triangulation in needs analysis: A critical perspective in a case study of Waikiki hotel maids. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–58.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2006). Current perspectives on teaching world Englishes and English as a lingua franca. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 157–81.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Konoeda, K. and Watanabe, Y. (2008). Task-based critical pedagogy in Japanese EFL classrooms: Rationale, principles, and examples. In Mantero, M., Miller, C. P. and Watzke, J. L., eds. Readings in language studies. Vol. 1. St. Louis: International Society for Language Studies.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis:Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99–112.Google Scholar
Leeman, J., Rabin, L., and Román-Mendoza, E. (2011). Identity and activism in heritage language education. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 481–95.Google Scholar
Leeman, J. and Serafini, E. J. (2016). Sociolinguistics in heritage language education: Promoting critical translingual competence. In Beaudrie, S. and Fairclough, M., eds. Innovative approaches in heritage language pedagogy: From research to practice. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 56–79.Google Scholar
Leung, C., Harris, R., and Rampton, B. (2004). Living with inelegance in qualitative research on task-based learning. In Norton, B. and Toohey, K., eds. Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–68.Google Scholar
Li, G. and Ni, X. (2013). Effects of a technology-enriched, task-based language teaching curriculum on Chinese elementary students’ achievement in English as a foreign language. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3, 33–49.Google Scholar
Liakina, N. and Michaud, G. (2018). Needs analysis for task-based curriculum design: How useful can it be for general purpose L2 courses? Nouvelle Revue Synergies Canada, 11.Google Scholar
Lin, T. and Wu, C. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching in English classrooms in Taiwanese junior high schools. TESOL Journal, 3, 586–609.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243–49.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M., eds. Modeling and assessing second language development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005a) Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005b). A rationale for needs analysis and needs analysis research. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005c). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological principles for language teaching. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 373–94.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2013). Needs analysis. In Chapelle, C. A., ed. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015a). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. K. and Uscinski, I. (2012). Evolution of languages for specific purposes programs in the United States: 1990–2011. Modern Language Journal, 96, 173–89.Google Scholar
Malicka, A., Gilabert, R., and Norris, J. M. (2019). From needs analysis to task design:Insights from an English for specific purposes context, 23(1), 78–106.Google Scholar
Martin, A. and Adrada-Rafael, S. (2017). Business Spanish in the real world: A task-based needs analysis. L2 Journal, 9(1), 39–61.Google Scholar
McKay, S. L. and Rubdy, R. (2009). The social and sociolinguistic contexts of language learning and teaching. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 10–25.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. D. (2008). Traditional vs. critical service-learning: Engaging the literature to differentiate two models. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Spring, 50–65.Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. (2008). History of service-learning in higher education. New York: National Service-Learning Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
Norris, J. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C. J., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2012). Addressing the language and literacy needs of Aboriginal high school VET students who speak SAE as an additional language. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013a). A task-based needs analysis for Australian Aboriginal students: Going beyond the target situation to address cultural issues. International Journal of Training Research, 11(3), 246–59.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013b). Needs analysis for task-based language teaching: A case study of Indigenous vocational education and training students who speak EAL/EAD. TESOL in Context, 22(2), 36–50.Google Scholar
Park, M. (2012). Implementing computer-assisted task-based language teaching in the Korean secondary EFL context. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 215–40.Google Scholar
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phuong, H. Y., Van den Branden, K., Van Steendamn, E., and Sercu, L. (2015). The impact of PPP and TBLT on Vietnamese students’ writing performance and self-regulatory writing strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 116, 37–93.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rabin, L. (2015). Service-learning/Aprendizaje-servicio as a global practice in Spanish. In LaCorte, M., ed. The Routledge handbook of Hispanic applied linguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 168–83.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. and Chancerel, J.-L. (1987). Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign language. Oxford: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Riestenberg, K. and Sherris, A. (2018). Task-based teaching of indigenous languages: Investment and methodological principles in Macuiltianguis Zapotec and Salish Qlispe revitalization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74(3), 434–59.Google Scholar
Ruíz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8, 15–34.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., Bygate, M., and Van den Branden, K. (2018). Introduction: Towards a researched pedagogy for TBLT. In Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. eds. TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Sánchez-López, L. (2013). Spanish for specific purposes. In Chapelle, C. A. ed. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J. (2021). Service learning in heritage language education: A critical overview of motivation, design, and outcomes. In Torres, J. R. and Pascual y Cabo, D., eds. El español como lengua de herencia (Advances in Spanish Language Teaching Series). London and New York: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J. and Torres, J. (2015). The utility of needs analysis for non-domain expert teachers in designing task-based Spanish for the Professions curricula. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 447–72.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (2012). Broadening the perspective of task-based language teaching scholarship: The contribution of research in foreign language contexts. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C.A., eds. Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C. A. (2012). Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Cummins, J. (1988). Language for empowerment. In Skutnabb-Kangas, T. and Cummins, J., eds. Minority education: From shame to struggle. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 390–95.Google Scholar
Svendsen, C. and Krebs, K. (1984). Identifying English for the job: Examples from healthcare occupations. The ESP Journal, 3, 153–64.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tinker Sachs, G. (2009). Taking risks in task-based teaching and learning. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 91–112.Google Scholar
Torres, J. and Serafini, E. J. (2016). Micro-evaluating learners’ task-specific motivation in a task-based business Spanish course. Hispania, 99, 289–304.Google Scholar
Van Avermaet, P. and Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In Van den Branden, K., ed. Task-based language teaching in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language teaching: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J. M., eds. Task-based language teaching: A reader. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H., and Schiffrin, D., eds. The handbook of discourse analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 466–85.Google Scholar
West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27, 1–19.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A. and Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82.Google Scholar

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2016a). National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social survey. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.auGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics [ABS] (2016b). Schools, Australia. Retrieved from www.abs.gov.auGoogle Scholar
Commonwealth of Australia (2016) Finance and Public Administration References Committee: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander experience of law enforcement and justice services. Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
East, M. (2017). Task-based teaching and learning: Pedagogical implications. In Van Deusen-Scholl, N. and May, S., eds. Second and foreign language education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Grote, E. and Rochecouste, J. (2012). Language and the classroom setting. In Beresford, Q. and Partington, G., eds. Reform and resistance in Aboriginal education. Crawley, WA: UWA Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005), Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, R. (2020). Developing authentic tasks for the workplace using needs analysis: A case study of Australian Aboriginal vocational students. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2012). Addressing the language and literacy needs of Aboriginal high School VET students who speak SAE as an additional language. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 41(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013a). Needs analysis for task-based language teaching: A case study of Indigenous vocational education and training students who speak EAL/EAD. TESOL in Context, 22(2), 36–50.Google Scholar
Oliver, R., Grote, E., Rochecouste, J., and Exell, M. (2013b). A task-based needs analysis for Australian Aboriginal students: Going beyond the target situation to address cultural issues. International Journal of Training Research, 11(3), 246–59.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Long, M. H. (2005), ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar
Loewen, S. (2004). Second language concerns for refugee children. In Hamilton, R. and Moore, D., eds. Educational interventions for refugee children: Theoretical perspectives and implementing best practice. London: Routledge, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar
Miller, J., Austin Windle, J., and Yazdanpanah, L. K. (2014). Planning lessons for refugee-background students: Challenges and strategies. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 9(1), 38–48.Google Scholar
Calvert, M. and Sheen, Y. (2015). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 226–44.Google Scholar

References

Aykırı, K. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıflarındaki Suriyeli öğrencilerin eğitim durumlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Turkish Journal of Primary Education, 2, 44–56.Google Scholar
Er, A. R. and Bayındır, N. (2015). İlkokula giden mülteci çocuklara yönelik sınıf öğretmenlerinin pedagojik yaklaşımları. Uluslararası Sosyal ve Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(4), 175–85.Google Scholar
Ergen, H. and Şahin, E. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin Suriyeli öğrencilerin eğitimi ile ilgili yaşadıkları problemler. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(44), 377–405.Google Scholar
Kiremit, R. F., Akpınar, Ü., and Akcan, A. T. (2018). Suriyeli öğrencilerin okula uyumları hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(6), 2139–49.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005), ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olgun-Baytaş, M. and Toker, Ş. (2019). Translanguaging as a pedagogical approach with Syrian refugee learners in Turkey: Lessons learned from a collaborative inquiry. Individual paper presentation at the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J. and Torres, J. (2015). The utility of needs analysis for nondomain expert instructors in designing task‐based Spanish for the professions curricula. Foreign Language Annals, 48(3), 447–72.Google Scholar
UNHRC. (2018). Global trends: Forced displacement in 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf.Google Scholar
UNHRC. (2019). Syria regional refugee response. Retrieved from: https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria/location/113.Google Scholar
Uzun, E. M. and Bütün, E. (2016). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarındaki suriyeli sığınmacı çocukların karşılaştıkları sorunlar hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. Uluslararası Erken Çocukluk Eğitimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 72–83.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., and Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapters 6–7.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2004). Reverse-engineering communication tasks. ELT Journal, 58(1), 18–27.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2020). Instructional frameworks for using tasks in task-based instruction. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. and Robinson, P. (2014). Learning to perform a narrative task: A semester long study of task sequencing effects. In Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., and Robinson, P., eds. Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 207–30.Google Scholar

References

Educational Testing Service (2008). TOEIC test data and analysis 2007: Number of examinees and scores in FY2007. The Institute for International Business Corporation, TOEIC Steering Committee.Google Scholar
Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., and Lambert, C. (2020). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapters 6–7.Google Scholar
Hillman, K. and Long, M. (2020). A task-based needs analysis for US Foreign Service officers: The challenge of the Japanese celebration speech. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R, eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (1998). The role of the learner in classroom task performance. Journal of Nanzan Junior College, 26, 85–101.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2001). The viability of learner’ beliefs and opinions as input for L2 course design. RELC Journal, 32(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2002). Task sequencing and affective performance variables. Kitakyushu University Faculty of Foreign Studies Bulletin, 103, 97–175.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2004). Reverse-engineering communication tasks. ELT Journal, 58(1), 18–27.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2010). Task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99–112.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2017). Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 657–64.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2019). Referent similarity and nominal syntax in task-based language teaching. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. (2020). Instructional frameworks for using tasks in task-based instruction. In Lambert, C., andOliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. and Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in task-based research: Toward more developmentally-based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 607–14.Google Scholar
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., and Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 167–96.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. and Nakamura, S. (2019). Proficiency-related variation in syntactic complexity: A study of English L1 and L2 oral descriptive discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 29, 248–64.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. and Minn, D. (2007). Personal investment in L2 task design and learning: A study of two Japanese learners of English. ELIA: Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 7, 127–48.Google Scholar
Lambert, C., Philp, J., and Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in L2 task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–80.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. and Robinson, P. (2014). Learning to perform narrative tasks: A semester-long study of task sequencing effects. In Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., and Robinson, P., eds. Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 207–30.Google Scholar
Lambert, C. and Zhang, G. (2019). Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as second languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 391–411.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1990). Task, group and task-group interactions. In Anivan, S., ed. Language teaching methodology for the nineties. Singapore: Regional English Language Centre, pp. 31–50.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In Lambert, R. D. and Shohamy, E., eds. Language policy and pedagogy.Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 191–96.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2010). Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. In Putz, M. and Sicola, L., eds. Inside the learner’s mind: Cognitive processing in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 243–68.Google Scholar
West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language Teaching, 27(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Further reading

Baralt, M. and López-Bravo, M. (2016). Teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A classroom study on the timing of grammar around a task. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5, 27–61.Google Scholar
East, M. (2012). Task-based learning from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. and Chaitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–32.Google Scholar
Orton, J. (2011). Educating Chinese language teachers: Some fundamentals. In Tsung, L. and Cruickshank, K., eds. Teaching and learning Chinese in global contexts. London: Continuum, 151–64.Google Scholar
Zheng, X. and Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18, 205–21.Google Scholar
Zhang, E. Y. (2007). TBLT-innovation in primary school English language teaching in mainland China. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–91.Google Scholar

References

Baralt, M. (2018). Becoming a task-based teacher educator. TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Samuda, V. Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M., eds. TBLT as a Researched Pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., and Robinson, P. (2014). Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Baralt, M. and López-Bravo, M. (2016). Teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A classroom study on the timing of grammar around a task. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 5, 27–61.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Samuda, V., and Van den Branden, K., (2018), eds. Task-based Language Teaching as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639–62.Google Scholar
East, M. (2012). Task-based learning from the teachers’ perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Esteban, M. (2016). Spain’s relations with China: Friends but not partners. Chinese Political Science Review, 1, 373–86.Google Scholar
González Puy, I. (2012). El español en China. In VV. AA., El español en el mundo. Anuario del Instituto Cervantes, capítulo dos. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes.Google Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2017). Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2007). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazzaferro, G. (2018). Translanguaging as everyday practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Medgyes, P. (1994). The non-native teacher. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. and Chaitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–32.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. (2018). Study of Portuguese and Spanish explodes as China expands role in Latin America. The Guardian. Retrieved on October 10, 2019 from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/02/study-of-portuguese-and-spanish-explodes-as-china-expands-role-in-latin-americaGoogle Scholar
Phipps, S. and Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37, 380–90.Google Scholar
Sachs, G. T. (2007). The challenges of adopting and adapting task-based cooperative teaching and learning in an EFL context. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press, pp. 235–64.Google Scholar
Samuda, V. (2015). Tasks, design, and the architecture of pedagogical spaces. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 271–301.Google Scholar
Scrimgeour, A. (2010). The yin-yang of Chinese language teaching in Australia: The challenges native speaker trainee teachers face in the Chinese classroom. In Liddicoat, A. J., ed. Languages in Australian education: Problems, prospects and future directions. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, pp. 127–44.Google Scholar
Wang, F. (2019). The status of Spanish language teachers in China. Paper presented at Qingdao University, June, 2019.Google Scholar
Willis, D. and Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2006), ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–81.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J. (2009), eds, Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zheng, X. and Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China:Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18, 205–21.Google Scholar
Zhang, E. Y. (2007). TBLT-innovation in primary school English language teaching in mainland China. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–91.Google Scholar
Zhou, W. and Li, G. (2015). Chinese language teachers’ expectations and perceptions of American students’ behavior: Exploring the nexus of cultural differences and classroom management. System, 49, 17–27.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Granena, G. (2008). Elaboration and simplification in scripted and genuine telephone service encounters. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 46(2), 137–66.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Analyzing target discourse. In Long, M. H., Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2020). Optimal input for language learning: genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated? Language Teaching, 53(2), 169–82.Google Scholar
O’Connell, S. P. (2014). A task-based language teaching approach to the police traffic stop. TESL Canada, 31(8), 116–31.Google Scholar
Oh, S.-Y. (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69–96.Google Scholar

References

Bartlett, N. D. (2005). A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 305–43.Google Scholar
Borro, I. (2020). Enhanced incidental learning of formulaic sequences by Chinese learners of Italian. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Portsmouth.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C. J., eds. Handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 269–93.Google Scholar
Brown, J. D. (2016). Introducing needs analysis and English for specific purposes. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cathcart, R. (1989). Authentic discourse and the survival English curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 23(1), 105–26.Google Scholar
Chaudron, C. (1982). Vocabulary elaboration in teachers’ speech to L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 170–80.Google Scholar
Farshi, N. and Tavakoli, M. (2019). Effects of differences in language aptitude on learning grammatical collocations under elaborated input conditions. Language Teaching Research. DOI: 10.1177/1362168819858443Google Scholar
Gilabert, R. and Castellvi, J (2019). Task and syllabus design for morphologically complex languages. In Schwieter, J. W. and Benati, A., eds. Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 527–49.Google Scholar
Granena, G. (2008). Elaboration and simplification in scripted and genuine telephone service encounters. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 46(2), 137–66.Google Scholar
Hillman, K. (2021). Effects of different types of auditory input on incidental vocabulary learning by L2 Japanese learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation in second language acquisition. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Hillman, K. and Long, M. H. (2020). A task-based needs analysisfor US Foreign Service Officers, and the challenge of the Japanese celebration speech. InLambert, C. and, Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–45.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983a). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–93.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983b). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–41.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needsanalysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2009). Methodological principles in language teaching. InLong, M. H. and Doughty, C. J., eds. Handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 373–94.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Analyzing target discourse. InLong, M. H., Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2018). Needs analysis. InChapelle, C., ed. The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2020). Optimal input for language learning: genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated? Language Teaching, 53(2), 169–82.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., Lee, J., and Hillman, K. (2019). Task-based language learning. InSchwieter, J. W. and Benati, A., eds. Cambridge handbook of language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 500–26.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Ross, S. (1993). Modifications that preserve language and content. In Tickoo, M., ed. Simplification: Theory and application. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Malicka, A., Gilabert Guerrero, R., and Norris, J. M. (2019).From needs analysisto task design: Insights from an English for specific purposes context. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 78–106.Google Scholar
O’Connell, S. P. (2014). A task-based language teaching approach to the police traffic stop. TESL Canada, 31(8), 116–31.Google Scholar
Oh, S.-Y. (2001). Two types of input modification and EFL reading comprehension: simplification versus elaboration. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 69–96.Google Scholar
Scotton, C. M. and Bernsten, J. (1988). Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics, 9, 372–84.Google Scholar
Serafini, E. J., Lake, J. B., and Long, M. H. (2015). Needs analysis for specialized learner populations: Essential methodological improvements. English for Specific Purposes, 40, 11–26.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. H. and Coulthard, M. (1975). The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taborn, S. (1983). The transactional dialogue: Misjudged, misused, misunderstood. ELT Journal, 37(3), 207–12.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2016). The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 164–81.Google Scholar
White, L. (1989). Against comprehensible input. The Input Hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 95–110.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (1988). Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 45–58.Google Scholar
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., and Ross, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44(2), 189–219.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Chaudron, C. J., Doughty, C. J., Kim, Y., Kong, D.-K, Lee, J., Lee, Y.-G., Long, M. H., Rivers, R., and Urano, K. (2005). A task-based needs analysisof a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–61.Google Scholar
Bartlett, N. D. (2005). A double shot 2% mocha latte, please, with whip: Service encounters in two coffee shops and at a coffee cart. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 305–43.Google Scholar
Hillman, K. and Long, M. H. (2020). A task-based needs analysis for US Foreign Service Officers, and the challenge of the Japanese celebration speech. In Lambert, C., and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–145Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–76.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Analyzing target discourse. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 169–204.Google Scholar
O’Connell, S. P. (2014). A task-based language teaching approach to the police traffic stop, TESL Canada, 31(8), 116–31.Google Scholar

References

Anthony, L. (2017). AntConc (Version 3.5.2) [Windows]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from: http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1988). Sub-technical vocabulary and the ESP teacher: An analysis of some rhetorical items in medical journal articles. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4, 91–105.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2008-) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 600 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. and Berenz, N. (1993). Transcribing conversational exchanges. In Edwards, J. A. and Lampert, M. D., eds. Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 91–121.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. and Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly, 41, 235–54.Google Scholar
Keith, M. C. (1993). AM radio: The status and struggle. Journal of Radio Studies, 2, 1–10.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2019). Optimal input for language learning: Genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated? Language Teaching, 53(2) 169–82.Google Scholar
Maie, R. and Salen, B. (2018, March). Task-based analysis of target discourse in media weather forecasts. Paper presented for the TESOL 2018 International Convention & English Language Expo, Chicago: IL.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. H. and Brown, B. G. (1983a). Forecast terminology: Composition and interpretation of public weather forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 64, 13–22.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. H. and Brown, B. G. (1983b). Interpretation of some terms and phrases in public weather forecasts. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 64, 1283–89.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2010). When weather matters: Science and services to meet critical societal needs. Washington DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center (2018). Audio and podcasting fact sheet. Retrieved from: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2018/07/State-of-the-News-Media_2017-Archive.pdf.Google Scholar
Winn, M. (2005). Collecting target discourse:The case of the US naturalization interview. In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265–304.Google Scholar
Wissler, L., Almashraee, M., Díaz, D. M., and Paschke, A. (2014, June). The gold standard in corpus annotation. Paper presented for the IEEE German Student Conference, University of Passau, Germany.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Lloret, M. (2019). TBLT and L2 pragmatics. In Taguchi, N., ed. The Routledge handbook of SLA and pragmatics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, M. H., ed. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R. C. and Leicher, S. (2006). The MICASE handbook: A resource for users of the Michigan corpus of academic spoken English. Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. and Kim, Y. (2018), eds. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Youn, S. J. (2018). Task-based needs analysis of L2 pragmatics in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 86–98.Google Scholar

References

Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Hartford, B. S. (1993). Learning the rules of academic talk: A longitudinal study of pragmatic change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 279–304.Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–57.Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Mackey, A., and Taguchi, N. (2018). Second language pragmatics: From theory to research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W., and Schneider, S., eds. New approaches to hedging. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 15–34.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R. (2005). Evaluation the use of multiple sources and methods in needs analysis:A case study of journalists in the Autonomous Community of Catalonia (Spain). In Long, M. H., ed. Second language needs analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–99.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M. (2008). “No me llames de usted, tratame de tu”: L2 address behavior development through synchronous computer-mediated communication Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M. and Nielson, K. B. (2014). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 525–49.Google Scholar
Hillman, K. K. and Long, M. H. (2020). Target tasks for US foreign service officers: The challenge for TBLT of the Japanese celebration speech. In Lambert, C. and Oliver, R., eds. Using tasks in diverse contexts. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 123–145.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Reagan, D. and Payant, C. (2018). Task modality effects on Spanish learners’ interlanguage pragmatic development. In Taguchi, N. and Kim, Y., eds. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar
Ren, W. and Han, Z. (2016). The representation of pragmatic knowledge in recent ELT textbooks. ELT Journal, 70(4), 424–34.Google Scholar
Sağdıç, A. (2019). From researchers to L2 classrooms: Teaching pragmatics through collaborative tasks. In Anwaruddin, S., ed. Knowledge mobilization in TESOL: Connecting research and practice. Leiden: Brill Publishing, pp. 113–27.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. C., Briggs, S. L., Ovens, J., and Swales, J. M. (2002). The Michigan corpus of academic spoken English (MICASE). Ann Arbor: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Skyrme, G. (2010). Is this a stupid question? International undergraduate students seeking help from teachers during office hours. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 211–21.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. and Kim, Y. (2018), eds. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vellenga, H. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ, 8(2).Google Scholar
Youn, S. J. (2018). Task-based needs analysis of L2 pragmatics in an EAP context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 86–98.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×