Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:46:36.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Why Task? Task as a Unit of Analysis for Language Education

from Part II - Tasks and Needs Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2021

By
Shoko Sasayama
Edited by
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian  and
Michael H. Long
Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Michael H. Long
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

This chapter reviews the arguments that support the use of task as a unit of analysis for second language education. The chapter first considers the origin of the idea of tasks in education, surveys the definition of a task in the task-based language teaching (TBLT) literature, and summarizes the roles played by tasks in TBLT. It then articulates why the use of tasks makes sense from the perspectives of (a) TBLT as a researched pedagogy, (b) motivation and engagement, (c) assessment, and (d) program design.

Keywords

assessmentexperiential learningmotivationprogram designresearched pedagogy
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching , pp. 55 - 72
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further Reading

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. (2018). TBLT as a researched pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

References

Annenberg Learner. (n.d.). Teaching foreign languages K-12: A library if classroom practices. Retrieved from: https://www.learner.org/series/teaching-foreign-languages-k-12-a-library-of-classroom-practices/creating-travel-advice/view-analyze-video/.Google Scholar
Benevides, M. and Valvona, C. (2018). Widgets Inc: A task-based course in workplace English. 2nd ed. Tokyo: Atama-ii Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57.Google Scholar
Butler, Y. G. (2016). Communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. In Van Deusen-Scholl, N. and May, S., eds. Second and foreign language education, encyclopedia of language and education. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, pp. 327–38.Google Scholar
Bygate, M., Norris, J. M., and Van den Branden, K. (2015). Task-based language teaching. In Chapelle, C. A., ed. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. and Samuda, V. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639–62.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595–608.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1968). Social processes and social simulation games. In Boocock, S. S. and Schild, E. O., eds. Simulation games in learning. Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. (1986). Task classification: A cross disciplinary review (Technical Report No. 4). Honolulu: Center for Second Language Classroom Research, Social Science Research Institute, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Crookes, G. and Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469–512.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2017). Position paper: Moving task-based language teaching forward. Language Teaching, 50(4), 507–26.Google Scholar
Fortune, A. E., Lee, M., and Cavazos, A. (2005). Achievement motivation and outcome in social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 41(1), 115–30.Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. T. and Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D. and Barr, R., eds. Reading research handbook. Vol. III. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 403–24.Google Scholar
Hu, G. W. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15, 93–105.Google Scholar
Hu, G. W. (2005). Contextual influences on instructional practices: A Chinese case for an ecological approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 635–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In Reigelruth, C. M., ed. Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 383–434.Google Scholar
Klein, J. D. and Freitag, E. (1991). Effects of using an instructional game on motivation and performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 84(5), 303–8.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, M., Toprac, P., and Yuen, T. T. (2009). What factors make a multimedia learning environment engaging: A case study. In Zheng, R. Z., ed. Cognitive effects of multimedia learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 173–92.Google Scholar
Long, K. J. (2004). Unit of analysis. In Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., and Futing Liao, T., eds. The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 1157–58.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–78.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M., eds. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bahtia, T. K., eds. Handbook of second language acquisition. New York: Academic Press, pp. 413–68.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015a). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (2015b). TBLT: Building the road as we travel. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In Crookes, G. and Gass, S., eds. Tasks in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 9–54.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. and Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–27.Google Scholar
Luo, S. and Xing, J. (2015). Teachers’ perceived difficulty in implementing TBLT in China. In Thomas, M. and Reinders, H., eds. Contemporary Task-based language teaching in Asia: Contemporary studies in linguistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 139–55.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. and Doughty, C., eds. Handbook of language teaching. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2018). Task-based language assessment: Aligning designs with intended uses and consequences. Japan Language Testing Association (JLTA) Journal, 21, 3–20.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. and Rogers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuda, V., Van den Branden, K., and Bygate, M. (2018). TBLT as a research pedagogy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasayama, S. (2018). An evidence-based approach to L2 task design. Taking it to Task, 3(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38–57.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C., eds. Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 235–53.Google Scholar
Van den Branden, K. (2006), ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G. and McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Willis, D. and Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×