BUDDHISM AMONG IRANIAN PEOPLES

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521246934.011

26 - BUDDHISM AMONG IRANIAN PEOPLES

from PART 6 - RELIGIOUS HISTORY

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

R. E. Emmerick

Edited by

E. Yarshater

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The historical Buddha, Śākyamuni, lived in north-east India in the 6th to 5th century b.c. He died at the age of eighty in about 483 b.c., leaving no written records of his teaching. At that time, northern India was dominated by the kingdoms Avanti, Kosala, Vatsa and Magadha. In the north-west, Gandhāra was a province of the Achaemenian empire. In the 4th century the Achaemenian empire fell to the all-conquering Alexander, who came in person to north-west India, the furthest east he ventured. The Indian parts of the Achaemenian empire had in practice under the last Achaemenians recovered their independence. Alexander's control of these regions, which he conquered during 327–324 b.c, was short-lived. His death in 323 b.c. was followed by widespread disaffection in the east. The Indian emperor Chandragupta annexed the Indian kingdoms of the Punjab in 317 b.c. Seleucus Nicator attempted to regain all the possessions lost, but he was not exactly successful, and he was obliged to negotiate with Chandragupta about 304 b.c.

During this period of nearly two hundred years after the death of Śākyamuni, his followers were active in establishing the canonical scriptures and the religious rules for daily life among Buddhist communities. Despite the considerable number and variety of literary sources concerning the events which occurred during this process, few details can be regarded as having any marked degree of authenticity. Prominent in the sources are the events concerning two councils held in order to obtain some measure of agreement among the Buddha's followers.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Iran
Seleucid Parthian
, pp. 949 - 964

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521246934.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, H. W. “Saka studies: the ancient kingdom of Khotan”, Iran VIII (1970).Google Scholar

Bareau, A. Les sectes bouddhiques dupetit véhicule, Saigon, 1955 (Publications de l'école française d'extrême-orient 38).Google Scholar

Barthoux, J. Les fouilles de Haḍḍa. Paris, 1933 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 4).Google Scholar

Basham, A. L. (ed.) Papers on the date of Kani⊡ka. Leiden, 1968.Google Scholar

Belenitsky, A. Central Asia, translated from the Russian by Hogarth, J.. London, 1969.Google Scholar

Benveniste, É and Dupont-Sommer, A. “Une inscription indo-araméenne d'Asoka provenant de Kandahar (Afghanistan)”, Journal Asiatique (Paris) 1966.Google Scholar

Benveniste, É. “fidits d'Asoka en traduction grecque”, Journal Asiatique (Paris) 1964.Google Scholar

Bivar, A. D. H. “Hāritī and the chronology of the Ku⊡āṇas”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar

Brough, J. “A Kharo⊡ṭhī inscription from China”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXIV (1961).Google Scholar

Brough, J. The Gāndhārī Dharmapada. Oxford, 1962.Google Scholar

Brough, J. “Comments on third-century Shan-shan and the history of Buddhism”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXVIII (1965).Google Scholar

Brough, J. “Supplementary notes on third-century Shan-shan”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar

Bussagli, M. “Afghanistan” in Encyclopedia of World Art (New York, 1959), vol. I.Google Scholar

Daffinà, P. L'immigrazione dei Sakā nella Drangiana. Rome, 1967.Google Scholar

Deydier, H. Contribution à I'étude de I'art du Gandhāra. Paris, 1950.Google Scholar

Emmerick, R. E. ed. and tr.The book of Zambasta,(Oxford, 1968.Google Scholar

Emmerick, R. E. Tibetan texts concerning Khotan. Oxford, 1967 (London Oriental Series 19).Google Scholar

Foucher, A. C. A. “Notes sur la géographie ancienne du Gandhâra (commentaire à un chapitre de Hiuen-tsang)”, Bulletin de l'École Française d'Extrême Orient (Hanoi-Paris) I (1901).Google Scholar

Foucher, A. C. A. L'art gréco-bouddhique du Gandhâra I (Paris, 1905); II (Paris, 1951).Google Scholar

Foucher, A. C. A. La vieille route de I'lnde de Bactres à Taxila I (Paris, 1942); II (Paris, 1947) (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) I).Google Scholar

Frye, R.N. “The significance of Greek and Kushan archaeology in the history of Central Asia”, Journal of Asian History I (Wiesbaden, 1967).Google Scholar

Fuchs, W. “Huei-ch'ao's Pilgerreise durch Nordwest-Indien und Zentral-Asien um 726”, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen (Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil. Hist. Klasse) (Berlin) 1938.Google Scholar

Fujita, Kotatsu A study of early pure land Buddhism. Tokyo, 1970.Google Scholar

Gabain, A. von, “Der Buddhismus in Zentralasien”, in Religionsgeschichte des Orients in der Zeit der Weltreligionen (Leiden, 1961), (Handbuch der Orientalistik, ed. Spuler, B. (Leiden-Cologne) I. VIII. 2).Google Scholar

Gafurov, B. Kushan civilisation and world culture. Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar

Ghirshman, R. Iran: From the earliest times to the Islamic conquest. Harmonds-worth, 1954 (Pelican Archaeology Series).Google Scholar

Gray, B. Buddhist cave paintings at Tun-huang. London, 1959.Google Scholar

Hackin, J. Recherches archéologiques à Begram. Paris, 1939 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 9).Google Scholar

Hackin, J. and Carl, J. Nouvelles recherches archéologiques à Bāmiyān. Paris, 1933 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 3).Google Scholar

Hambis, L. “Asia, Central” in Encyclopedia of World Art (New York, 1959), vol. I.Google Scholar

Hambly, G. R. G. (ed.) Zentralasien. Frankfurt am Main, 1966 (Fischer Weltgeschichte 16).Google Scholar

Hofinger, M. Étude sur le concile de Vaiśālī. Louvain, 1946 (Bibliothèque du Museon 20).Google Scholar

Humbach, H. “Die aramäische Inschrift von Taxila”, Akademie der Wissen-schaften und der Literatur (Mainz-Wiesbaden 1969.I).Google Scholar

Humbach, H. “Additional notes on the Aramaic inscription of Taxila”, Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft XXVI (Munich, 1969).Google Scholar

Konow, S. Kharoshṭhī Inscriptions. Calcutta, 1929 (Corpus Inscriptionum Indkarum (Oxford) 11.1).Google Scholar

Lamotte, É. “Sur la formation du Mahāyāna” in Asiatica, Festschrift Friedrich Weller (Leipzig, 1954).Google Scholar

Lamotte, É. Histoire du bouddhisme indien des origines à l'ère Śaka. Louvain, 1958 (Biblio-thèque du Muséon 43).Google Scholar

Le Coq, A. von, Auf Hellas Spuren in Ostturkistan, Berichte und Abenteuer der ii. und iii. deutschen Turfan-expedition. Leipzig, 1926.Google Scholar

Le Coq, A. von, Buried treasures of Chinese Turkestan, tr. Barwell, A.. London, 1928.Google Scholar

Litvinsky, B. A. Outline history of Buddhism in Central Asia. Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar

Loewe, M.A.N. “Chinese relations with Central Asia, 260–90”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXII (1969).Google Scholar

Malalasekera, G. P. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Buddhism. Ceylon, 1961–.Google Scholar

Marie-Thérese de Mallmann, , Introduction à l'étude d'Avalokiteçvara. Paris, 1967.Google Scholar

Melikian-Chirvani, A. S. “L'évocation littéraire du Bouddhisme dans l'lran musulman”, Le monde iranien et I'Islam II (Geneva, 1974).Google Scholar

Melikian-Chirvani, A. S. “Recherches sur l'architecture de l'lran bouddhique I”, Le monde iranien et l'Islam III (Paris, 1975).Google Scholar

MeuniÉ, J. Shotorak. Paris, 1942 (Memoires de la delegation archeologique frangaise en Afghanistan (Paris) 10).Google Scholar

Narain, A. K. The Indo-Greeks. Oxford, 1957.Google Scholar

Nobel, J. “Kumārajīva”, Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen (Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften (Phil. Hist. Klasse) (Berlin) 1927.Google Scholar

Norman, K. R. “Some aspects of the phonology of the Prakrit underlying the Aśokan inscriptions”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar

Petech, L. Northern India according to the Shui-ching-chu. Rome, 1950 (Serie orientale Roma 2).Google Scholar

Przyluski, J. La légende de l'empereur Açoka (Açoka-avadāna) dans les textes indiens et chinois. Paris, 1923.Google Scholar

Przyluski, J. Le concile de Rājagṛha. Paris, 1926–8.Google Scholar

Pulleyblank, E. G. “The Wu-sun and Sakas and the Yüch-chih migration”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental (and African) Studies (University of London) XXXIII (1970).Google Scholar

Rapson, E. J. (ed.) The Cambridge history of India, vol. I, Ancient India. Cambridge, 1922.Google Scholar

Rosenfield, J. M. The dynastic arts of the Kushans. Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1967.Google Scholar

Seckel, D. The Art of Buddhism. London, 1964.Google Scholar

Smith, V. A. The early history of India, 4th ed. revised by Edwardes, S. M.. Oxford, 1957; repr. 1967.Google Scholar

Stavisky, B. Y. and Bongard-Levin, G. M. Central Asia in the Kushan period. Moscow, 1968.Google Scholar

Takakusu, J. (tr.) A record of the Buddhist religion as practised in India and the Malay archipelago (AD 671–695), by I-Tsing. London, 1896.Google Scholar

Waldschmidt, E. (ed.) Indologen-tagung. Göttingen, 1960.Google Scholar

Zeimal, E. V. Kushan chronology: Review of data bearing on the problem. Moscow, 1968 (in Russian but with detailed English summary).Google Scholar

Zürcher, E. Buddhism, its origin and spread in words, maps and pictures. London, 1962.Google Scholar

Book contents

26 - BUDDHISM AMONG IRANIAN PEOPLES

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive