Book contents
32 - Gender
from Part IV - Cultural Meanings of Natural Knowledge
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
Summary
Historians have often linked two quite separate phenomena: the gendering of early modern natural inquiry as a masculine form of activity in theory and, to a large extent, in practice, and the gendering of nature as female in many early modern texts and images. There is no necessary logical connection between these two phenomena, despite persistent and profound historiographical investments in their linkage, most notably as part of broader critiques of the scientific enterprise by writers with feminist commitments. But there are important and interesting historical connections, which this chapter seeks to explore.
The critical focus on the masculine nature of scientific activity has had the longer history. Antivivisection campaigns in nineteenth-century Britain and America, for example, often (though not always) overlapped with feminist concerns. Antivivisectionists saw biological science in particular as indelibly marked by cruelty toward the animals it used as experimental subjects and by an attitude toward nature that placed more emphasis on advancing scientific knowledge than on respect for the natural world. Others claimed more generally that certain qualities of the scientific enterprise reflected its “masculine” character, that is, were rooted in force and power, as were gender relations in society as a whole. One such writer was Clémence Royer (1830–1902), the first French translator of the works of Charles Darwin (1809–1882), a member of Paul Broca’s (1824–1880) Anthropological Society, and a lifelong activist for feminist and other movements of social reform. In her Le bien et la loi morale (The Good and the Moral Law) of 1881, she described science as masculine in its practitioners and thereby “masculine” in its practices.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 797 - 817Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
References
, Declamation on the Nobility and Pre-Eminence of the Female Sex, ed. and trans. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Of the Vanitie and Uncertaintie of Artes and Sciences [1575], ed. (Northridge: California State University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
The Anatomy of Man’s Body, in The Works of that Famous Chirurgeon Ambrose Parey, trans. (London: Richard Cotes and Willi Dugard for John Clarke, 1649).Google Scholar
, On the Generation of Animals, 737a28, in The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. , 2 vols. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
“Knowledge, Freedom, and Brotherly Love: Homosociality and the Accademia dei Lincei”, onfigurations, 3 (1995).Google Scholar
, The Flight to Objectivity: Essays in Cartesianism and Culture (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Free Enquiry into the Vulgarly Received Notion of Nature, in Works, ed. , 6 vols. (London, 1772; repr. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1966).Google Scholar
The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science: A Historical and Critical Essay (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964).Google Scholar
Meanings of Sex Difference in the Middle Ages: Medicine, Science, and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), chap. 4.Google Scholar
ed., Race, Gender, and Rank: Early Modern Ideas of Humanity (Rochester, N.Y.: University of Rochester Press, 1992).Google Scholar
“The Body as a Historical Category: Science and Imagination, 1660–1760”, in The Good Body: Asceticism in Contemporary Culture, ed. and (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et atrium atque excellentia Verbi Dei declamatio (Antwerp: Joannes Grapheus, 1530).Google Scholar
De nobilitate et praecellentia foeminei sexus: Édition critique d’après le texte d’Anvers 1529, ed. , trans. (Geneva: Droz, 1990).Google Scholar
The True Intellectual System of the Universe [1678], in The Collected Works of Ralph Cudworth, ed. , 2 vols. (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1977).Google Scholar
and , Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750 (New York: Zone Books, 1998), esp. chaps. 4–8.Google Scholar
“How Nature Became the Other: Anthropomorphism and Anthropocentrism in Early Modern Natural Philosophy”, in Biology as Society, Society as Biology, ed. , , and (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995).Google Scholar
ed., Choosing the Better Part: Anna Maria van Schurman, 1607–1678, trans. (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Examen de ingenios: The Examination of Men’s Wits, tran and (London: Adam Islip, 1604).Google Scholar
Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Goddess Natura in Medieval Literature (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
“A Womb of His Own: Male Renaissance Poets and the Female Body,” in Sexuality and Gender in Early Modern Europe: Institutions, Texts, Images, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Encomium matrimonii, ed. , in Opera omnia Desiderii Erasmi Roterdami, 25 vols. to date (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969–), ordo 1, vol. 5.Google Scholar
Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).Google Scholar
“Baconian Science: The Arts of Mastery and Obedience,” in Reflections on Gender and Science (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Anti-Vivisection in Victorian Society (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
, On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, ed. and trans. (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Reordering Marriage and Society in Reformation Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Cartesian Women: Versions and Subversions of Rational Discourse in the Old Regime (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
“Almost a Man of Genius”: Clémence Royer, Feminism, and Nineteenth-Century Science (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
“A Woman Down to Her Bones: The Anatomy of Sexual Difference in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries”, Isis, 94 (2003).Google Scholar
“Die Polarisierung der Geschlechtscharakter”, in Sozialgeschichte der Familie in der Neuzeit Europas, ed. (Stuttgart: Klett, 1976).Google Scholar
Changing Sex: Transsexualism, Technology, and the Idea of Gender (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Man’s Estate: Masculine Identity in Shakespeare (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981).Google Scholar
including From the Closed World to the Infinite Universe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955).Google Scholar
The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990), esp. chap. 2.Google Scholar
The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Renaissance Notion of Woman: A Study in the Fortunes of Scholasticism and Medical Science in European Intellectual Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), chap. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woman Triumphant: Feminism in French Literature, 1610–1652 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964).Google Scholar
“Equality of Souls, Inequality of Sexes: Medieval Theology”, in Religion and Sexism: Images of Women in the Jewish and Christian Traditions, ed. (New York: Herder and Herder, 1974).Google Scholar
The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution (New York: Harper and Row, 1980).Google Scholar
How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Natura als Göttin im Mittelalter: Ikonographische Studien zu Darstellungen der personifizierten Natur (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Birth of a New Physics or Death of Nature?,” in Women and Reason, ed. and (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1992).Google Scholar
and , “The Hermaphrodite and the Orders of Nature: Sexual Ambiguity in Early Modern France,” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay studies, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
“Nature in Person: Renaissance Allegories and Emblems”, in The Moral Authority of Nature, ed. and (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar
“The Rediscovery of the Clitoris: French Medicine and the Tribade,” in The Body in Parts: Discourses and Anatomies in Early Modern Europe, ed. and (New York: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
“Radical Doubt and the Liberation of Women”, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 18 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Uomini mestruanti: Somiglianze e differenze fra i sessi in Europa in età moderna,” Quaderni storici, n.s., 79 (1996).Google Scholar
; De l’éducation des dames pour la conduite de l’esprit dans les sciences et dans les moeurs, De l’égalité des deux sexes, discours physique et moral, où l’on voit l’importance de se défaire des préjugez (Paris: Jean Du Puis, 1673).Google Scholar
; see his De l’égalité des deux sexes: Discours physique et moral (Paris, 1673; repr. Paris: Fayard, 1984).Google Scholar
Relations, lettres, et discours de M. de Sorbière sur diverses matières curieuses (Paris: Robert de Ninuille, 1660).Google Scholar
, The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Medieval and Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason’s Disciples: Seventeenth-Century English Feminists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
“Erotic Fantasy and Male Libertinism in Enlightenment England”, in The Invention of Pornography, ed. (New York: Zone Books, 1996).Google Scholar
“De ipsa natura: Sources of Leibniz’s Doctrine of Force, Activity, and Natural Law”, Studia Leibnitiana, 19 (1987).Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by