Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Part One The Pacific To 1941
- 1 Contending Approaches
- 2 Human Settlement
- 3 Pacific Edens? Myths and Realities of Primitive Affluence
- 4 Discovering Outsiders
- 5 Land, Labour and Independent Development
- 6 New Political Orders
- 7 New Economic Orders: Land, Labour and Dependency
- 8 Colonial Administration and the Invention of the Native
- Part Two The Pacific Since 1941
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
- Map
- Map 17: Maximum expansion of Japanese control
- References
3 - Pacific Edens? Myths and Realities of Primitive Affluence
from Part One - The Pacific To 1941
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- Part One The Pacific To 1941
- 1 Contending Approaches
- 2 Human Settlement
- 3 Pacific Edens? Myths and Realities of Primitive Affluence
- 4 Discovering Outsiders
- 5 Land, Labour and Independent Development
- 6 New Political Orders
- 7 New Economic Orders: Land, Labour and Dependency
- 8 Colonial Administration and the Invention of the Native
- Part Two The Pacific Since 1941
- Abbreviations
- Glossary
- Bibliography
- Index
- Map
- Map 17: Maximum expansion of Japanese control
- References
Summary
PRIMITIVE AFFLUENCE
What is loosely described as ‘subsistence’ production has a poor reputation among economic planners, and so has stone technology. In 1975, for example, a World Bank mission to Papua New Guinea tied both concepts together to dismiss the whole pre-colonial record:
the original stone-age tribes have lived unto themselves in conditions of primitive isolation … [Modernisation] began among a people who had no alphabet and hence no writing, knew neither the knife nor axe nor any form of metal, used only stones for cutting, hunted and killed with bows and arrows and clubs, knew neither wool nor cotton, used only pounded bark as cloth, and used no bullock, ox, horse or cow in their subsistence agriculture. Subsistence agriculture is relatively easy and has bred an agricultural labor force that has not had to acquire disciplined work habits …
This critique is unusually crude, but its elements are widely accepted—stages of development, the stagnation of isolated communities, denigration of stone technology, a sharp dichotomy between subsistence and market production, and subsistence as a school of idleness. These assumptions impede appreciation of the systems of production which Islanders refined over centuries, the strategic alliances they created and maintained, the environmental imperatives they accommodated, and the threats they averted. Many planners assume that all pre-colonial production and consumption can be described as subsistence, and that trade and exchange were incidental. They also imagine that subsistence has not been modified to meet changing needs, and that it demands little labour, expertise or planning.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of the Pacific Islanders , pp. 80 - 118Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1997
References
- 4
- Cited by