Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Circulation
- Part II Governance
- 9 Central goverment and the towns
- 10 The changing functions of urban government: councillors, officials and pressure groups
- 11 The political economy of urban utilities
- 12 The provision of social services
- 13 Structure, culture and society in British towns
- Part III Construction
- Part IV Getting and spending
- Part V Images
- Select bibliography
- Index
- Plates 1-7
- Plates 8-14
- Plates 15-20
- Plates 21-27
- Plates 28-34
- Plates 35-41
- Plates 42-48>
- Plates 49-53
- References
11 - The political economy of urban utilities
from Part II - Governance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Circulation
- Part II Governance
- 9 Central goverment and the towns
- 10 The changing functions of urban government: councillors, officials and pressure groups
- 11 The political economy of urban utilities
- 12 The provision of social services
- 13 Structure, culture and society in British towns
- Part III Construction
- Part IV Getting and spending
- Part V Images
- Select bibliography
- Index
- Plates 1-7
- Plates 8-14
- Plates 15-20
- Plates 21-27
- Plates 28-34
- Plates 35-41
- Plates 42-48>
- Plates 49-53
- References
Summary
AN OVERALL PERSPECTIVE: FROM INVIOLATE PROPERTY TO NATIONALISATION
The growth of the urban infrastructure was the most dynamic element in the British economy from the 1870s to the 1930s. Even if one ignores housing, the investment in public health, local transport, policing, water, electricity and gas was accounting, by the early 1900s, for one quarter of all capital formation in Britain and the local government component of that was nearly as large as the annual investment by the whole of manufacturing industry. The mushrooming of electricity systems, waterworks, tramways, harbours and gasworks was a key element, and the interplay between their economic development and the interests of parliament and town councils is the subject of this chapter. Superficially it appears to be about ideology, and municipal socialism in particular. In practice this had a limited role. Certainly there were fears about the growth of government. In 1900 Lord Avebury listed his objections to municipal trading as:
1) The enormous increase in debt …;
2) The check to industrial progress;
3) The demand on the time of municipal councillors …;
4) The undesirability of involving Governments and Municipalities …in labour questions;
5) The fact that the interference with natural laws …[defeats] …the very object aimed at;
6) The risk, not to say, certainty of loss.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Urban History of Britain , pp. 315 - 350Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2001
References
- 7
- Cited by