Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:09:18.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2020

Lora Anne Viola
Lora Anne Viola
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Closure of the International System
How Institutions Create Political Equalities and Hierarchies
 , pp. 237 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew. 1995. “Things of Boundaries.” Social Research 62(2): 857–882.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2017. “After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order.” Ethics and International Affairs 31(3): 271–285.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2014. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds.” International Studies Quarterly 58(4): 647–659.Google Scholar
Adams, Charles. 1853. The Works of John Adams, Second President of the United States. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2015. “Just Greasing the Wheels? Mediating Difference or the Evasion of Power and Responsibility in Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 10(2): 22–28.Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. 2014. “Stigma Management in International Relations: Transgressive Identities, Norms, and Order in International Society.” International Organization 68(1): 143–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, Joachim, Hoen, Herman W. and Ohr, Renate. 2005. “Deepening Integration in an Enlarged EU: A Club-theoretical Perspective.” European Integration 27(4): 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajami, Fouad. 1978. “The Global Logic of the Neoconservatives.” World Politics 30(3): 450–468.Google Scholar
Albert, Mathias. 2016. A Theory of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry and Zürn, Michael. 2013. Bringing Sociology to International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albin, Cecilia and Druckman, Daniel. 2017. “Negotiating Effectively: Justice in International Environmental Negotiations.” Group Decision and Negotiation 26(1): 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albin, Cecilia and Druckman, Daniel. 2014. “Procedures Matter: Justice and Effectiveness in International Trade Negotiation.” European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 1014–1042.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Baqir, Reza and Easterly, William. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4): 1243–1284.Google Scholar
Amorim, Celso. 2015. “UN Security Council Reform Now: Start with the G20!” https://medium.com/the-future-of-conflict/un-security-council-reform-now-start-with-the-g20-118f1364f886.Google Scholar
Anand, Ram Prakash. 1986. Sovereign Equality of States in International Law. Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Volume 197. Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Anderson, Matthew S. 1993. The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450–1919. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2015. “Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order.” Humanity 6(1): 145–158.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2009. “Rethinking Sovereignty in International Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5: 291–310.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2007. Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 1999. “Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law.” Harvard International Law Journal 40(1): 1–71.Google Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele. 2003. “Cosmopolitical Democracy.” In Archibugi, Daniele (ed.), Debating Cosmopolitics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele. 1993. “The Reform of the UN and Cosmopolitan Democracy: A Critical Review.” Journal of Peace Research 30(3): 301–315.Google Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias and Marchetti, Raffaele. 2011. “Mapping Global Democracy.” In Archibugi, Daniele, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, Marchetti, Raffaele et al. (eds.), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1988. “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 17(2): 227–262.Google Scholar
Aydin, Cemil. 2017. “Lost Futures of Cosmopolitan Empires.” 100 Years of Now Journal. https://journal.hkw.de/en/das-verlorene-erbe-der-kosmopolitischen-grossreiche/.Google Scholar
Ayres, William. 2000. “A World Flying Apart? Violent Nationalist Conflict and the End of the Cold War.” Journal of Peace Research 37(1): 105–117.Google Scholar
Bacevich, Andrew J. 2014. “The Duplicity of the Ideologues.” Commonweal Magazine 141(12). www.commonwealmagazine.org/duplicity-ideologues.Google Scholar
Bacevich, Andrew. 2002. American Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bain, William. 2003. Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Peter. 1979. Diplomacy: The World of the Honest Spy. London: The British Library.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel 1998. “The Evolution of the Constitution of Sovereignty and the Emergence of Human Rights Norms.” Millennium 27: 229–252.Google Scholar
Barkin, J. Samuel and Cronin, Bruce. 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations.” International Organization 48(1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan and Kenny, Anthony. 2014. Aristotle’s Ethics: Writings from the Complete Works. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnhart, Joslyn. 2016. “Status Competition and Territorial Aggression: Evidence from the Scramble for Africa.” Security Studies 25(3): 385–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, Scott. 2007. Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Provide Global Public Goods. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 2009. Visions of World Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bearce, David H. and Bondanella, Stacy. 2007. “Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence.” International Organization 61(4): 703–733.Google Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane. 2004. The Power of Language in the Making of International Law: The Word Sovereignty in Bodin and Vattel and the Myth of Westphalia. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane. 2003. “Emer de Vattel and the Externalization of Sovereignty.” Journal of the History of International Law 5: 237–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckfield, Jason. 2008. “The Dual World Polity: Fragmentation and Integration in the Network of Intergovernmental Organizations.” Social Problems 55(3): 419–442.Google Scholar
Beckfield, Jason. 2003. “Inequality in the World Polity: The Structure of International Organization.” American Sociological Review 68(3): 401–424.Google Scholar
Behrens, Betty. 1933. “The Office of the English Resident Ambassador: Its Evolution as Illustrated by the Career of Sir Thomas Spinelly, 1509–1522.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 16(4): 161–195.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2007. “Twilight of Sovereignty of the Emergence of Cosmopolitan Norms? Rethinking Citizenship in Volatile Times.” Citizenship Studies 11(1): 19–36.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berg, Andrew. 1999. “The Asia Crisis: Causes, Policy Responses, and Outcomes.” IMF Working Paper. www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2016/12/30/The-Asia-Crisis-Causes-Policy-Responses-and-Outcomes-3295.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, Kalbhenn, A., Koubi, V. and Spilker, G.. 2013. “Is There a ‘Depth versus Participation’ Dilemma in International Cooperation?” Review of International Organizations 8(4): 477–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bexell, Magdalena, Tallberg, Jonas and Uhlin, Anders. 2010. “Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 16(1): 81–101.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1978. The New International Economic Order: The North-South Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bhandar, Brenna. 2018. Colonial Lives of Property: Law, Land, and Racial Regimes of Ownership. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bially-Mattern, Janice and Zarakol, Ayse. 2016. “Hierarchies in World Politics.” International Organization 70(3): 623–654.Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J. and Weber, Cynthia (eds.). 2011. State Sovereignty as Social Construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boli, John and Thomas, George M.. 1997. “World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Non-Governmental Organization.” American Sociological Review 62(2): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosco, David. 2009. Five to Rule Them All. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boswell, Terry and Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 2000. The Spiral of Capitalism and Socialism: Toward Global Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourantonis, Dimitris. 2005. The History and Politics of UN Security Council Reform. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett. 2009. The Empire of Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, Brett. 2004. “In the Name of Progress and Peace: The ‘Standard of Civilization’ and the Universalizing Project.” Alternatives 29(1): 43–68.Google Scholar
Bowden, Brett and Seabrooke, Leonard. 2006. Global Standards of Market Civilization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brandt, Willy. 1980. North-South: A Program for Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
BRICS. 2018. “BRICS in Africa: Collaboration for Inclusive Growth and Shared Prosperity in the 4th Industrial Revolution. Johannesburg, South Africa.” www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/180726-johannesburg.html.Google Scholar
BRICS. 2017. “BRICS Leaders Xiamen Declaration. Xiamen, China.” www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/170904-xiamen.html.Google Scholar
BRICS. 2009. “Joint Statement of the BRIC Countries’ Leaders. Yekaterinburg, Russia.” www.brics.utoronto.ca/docs/090616-leaders.html.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris. 2002. Sovereignty, Rights and Justice: International Political Theory Today. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Brown, W. Jethro. 1906. The Austinian Theory of Law. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2015. Grounds for Difference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brühl, Tanja. 2010. “Representing the People? NGOs in International Negotiations.” In Steffek, J. and Hahn, K. (eds.), Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 181–199.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James. 1965. “An Economic Theory of Clubs.” Economica 32: 1–14.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, Mlada, Clark, Ian, Eckersley, Robyn, Price, Richard, Reus-Smit, Christian and Wheeler, Nicholas J.. 2012. Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burbank, Jane and Cooper, Frederick. 2011. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burch, Kurt. 1998. “Property” and the Making of the International System. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Burch, Kurt. 1997. “Constituting IPE and Modernity.” In Burch, K. and Denemark, R. (eds.), Constituting International Political Economy. Boulder: Lynn-Rienner.Google Scholar
Butkevych, Olga. 2003. “History of Ancient International Law: Challenges and Prospects.” Journal of the History of International Law 5: 189–236.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: G. Bell.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin. 1966. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2017. “Universal Sovereignty.” In Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds.), The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2014. “The ‘Standard of Civilisation’ as an English School Concept.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 42(3): 576–594.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International Society to World Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2001. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.” Review of International Studies 17(1): 477.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 1993. “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School.” International Organization 47(3): 327–352.Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry and Lawson, George. 2015. The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cafaggi, Fabrizio and Caron, David. 2012. “Global Public Goods Amidst a Plurality of Legal Orders: A Symposium.” European Journal of International Law 23(2): 643–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, Mike, Strube, Daniela, Harris Rimmer, Susan and Nnadozie, Emmanuel. 2014. “G20 Outreach and Non-G20 Member Views on the G20.” G20 Studies Centre, Lowy Institute 7: 1–48.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 1995. Self-determination of Peoples. A Legal Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chaplais, Pierre. 2003. English Diplomatic Practice in the Middle Ages. London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
Chaplais, Pierre. 1981. Essays in Medieval Diplomacy and Administration. London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1998. Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy (Updated Edition). Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. “International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework.” International Organization 59(4): 801–826.Google Scholar
Chilton, Adam and Davis, Ryan. 2012. “Equality, Procedural Justice, and the World Trade Organization.” Intercultural Human Rights Law Review 7: 277–327.Google Scholar
Christakis, Theodore. 2015. “Self-Determination, Territorial Integrity and Fait Accompli in the Case of Crimea.” ZaöRV 75(1): 75–100.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore. 2005. “Liberal Internationalism Revisited: Grotius, Vattel, and the International Order of States.” The European Legacy 10(6): 561–584.Google Scholar
Chwieroth, Jeffrey. 2008. “Normative Change from Within: The International Monetary Fund’s Approach to Capital Account Liberalization.” International Studies Quarterly 52(1): 129–158.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 2005. Legitimacy in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Ian. 1989. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1974. “The Lighthouse in Economics.” Journal of Law and Economics 17(2): 357–376.Google Scholar
Coggins, Bridget. 2014. Power Politics and State Formation in the Twentieth Century: The Dynamics of Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L. 2004. “Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law.” Ethics and International Affairs 18(3): 1–24.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean and Arato, Andrew. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 1979. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Constantinou, Costas. 2013. “Between Statecraft and Humanism: Diplomacy and Its Forms of Knowledge.” International Studies Review 15(2): 141–162.Google Scholar
Constantinou, Costas. 2000. “Diplomacy, Grotesque Realism, and Ottoman Historiography.” Postcolonial Studies 3(2): 213–226.Google Scholar
Constantinou, Costas and Der Derian, James. 2010. “Sustaining Global Hope: Sovereignty, Power and the Transformation of Diplomacy.” In Constantinou, Costas and Der Derian, James (eds.), Sustainable Diplomacies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Conybeare, John A. C. 1984. “Public Goods, Prisoners’ Dilemmas and the International Political Economy.” International Studies Quarterly 28(1): 5–22.Google Scholar
Cooper, Andrew F. 2011. “The G20 and Its Regional Critics: The Search for Inclusion.” Global Policy 2(2): 203–209.Google Scholar
Cornes, Richard and Sandler, Todd. 1996. The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornes, Richard and Sandler, Todd. 1994. “Are Public Goods Myths?” Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(3): 369–385.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert. 1983. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 12(2): 162–175.Google Scholar
Dany, Charlotte. 2014. “Janus-Faced NGO Participation in Global Governance: Structural Constraints for NGO Influence.” Global Governance 20: 419–436.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights.” The American Economic Review 57(2): 347–359.Google Scholar
Der Derian, James. 1987. On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Desai, Meghnad. 2003. “Public Goods: A Historical Perspective.” In Kaul, Inge et al. (eds.), Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Destradi, Sandra. 2010. “Regional Powers and Their Strategies: Empire, Hegemony, and Leadership.” Review of International Studies 36(4): 903–930.Google Scholar
Devetak, Richard. 2015. “Historiographical Foundations of Modern International Thought: Histories of the European States-System from Florence to Göttingen.” History of European Ideas 41(1): 62–77.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Edwin D. 1920. The Equality of States in International Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, Klaus. 2014. “Global democracy and the Democratic Minimum: Why a Procedural Account Alone Is Insufficient.” European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 1124–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Sue and Kymlicka, Will. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2015. “The Discourse of Anarchy in IR.” International Theory 7(3): 393–425.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1998. “Human Rights: A New Standard of Civilization?” International Affairs 74(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M. and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. “Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Cooperation?” International Organization 50(3): 379–406.Google Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds.). 2017. The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, Tim and Little, Richard. 2014. “The International System-International Society Distinction.” In Navari, Cornelia and Green, Daniel (eds.), Guide to the English School in International Studies. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dunne, Timothy. 2007. “The English School.” In Dunne, Timothy, Kurki, Milja, and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theory: Discipline and Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Duque, Marina. 2018. “Recognizing International Status: A Relational Approach.” International Studies Quarterly 3(1): 577–592.Google Scholar
Efraim, Athena. 1999. Sovereign (In)equality in International Organizations. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2008. Sovereignty: God, State, and Self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” The American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 281–317.Google Scholar
Fabry, Mikulas. 2010. Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 1995. On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard and Strauss, Andrew. 2001. “Toward Global Parliament.” Foreign Affairs 80(1): 212–220.Google Scholar
Fanon, Franz. 1961. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fidler, David P. 2000. “A Kinder, Gentler System of Capitulation? International Law, Structural Adjustment Policies, and the Standard of Liberal, Globalized Civilization.” Texas International Law Journal 35(3): 389–400.Google Scholar
Fink, Carole. 2004. Defending the Rights of Others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2001. “Exporting the English School?” Review of International Studies 27(3): 512.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. 2014. Sovereignty, Property, and Empire, 1500–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Andrew. 2009. “The Resilience of Natural Law in the Writings of Sir Travers Twiss.” In Hall, Ian and Hill, Lisa (eds.), British International Thinkers from Hobbes to Namier. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 137–159.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Catherine. 2015. Diplomacy in Renaissance Rome: The Rise of the Resident Ambassador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann M. (ed.). 2000. The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Fogarty, Edward. 2011. “Nothing Succeeds Like Access? NGO Strategies Towards Multilateral Institutions.” Journal of Civil Society 7(2): 207–227.Google Scholar
Fowler, Michael R. and Bunck, Julie M.. 1995. Law, Power and the Sovereign State. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 2005. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas. 1999. The Empowered Self: Law and Society in an Age of Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franczak, Michael. 2019. “Losing the Battle, Winning the War: Neoconservatives versus the New International Economic Order, 1971–82.” Diplomatic History 43(5): 867–889.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Gordon, Linda. 1994. “Civil Citizenship against Social Citizenship?” In van Steenbergen, Bart (ed.), The Condition of Citizenship. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Frey, Linda and Frey, Marsha. 1999. The History of Diplomatic Immunity. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Frigo, Daniela. 2000. “Introduction.” In Frigo, Daniela (ed.), Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–24.Google Scholar
Fubini, Riccardo. 2000. “Diplomacy and Government in the Italian City-States of the Fifteenth Century.” In Frigo, Daniela (ed.), Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25–48.Google Scholar
G7 1999a. “Statement of G-7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Washington, DC.” (26 April 1999). www.g8.utoronto.ca/finance/fm042699.htmGoogle Scholar
G7. 1999b. “Report of G7 Finance Ministers to the Köln Economic Summit, Cologne, Germany.” (18–20 June 1999). www.g8.utoronto.ca/finance/fm061999.htmGoogle Scholar
G7. 1999c. “Statement of G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Washington DC.” (25 September 1999). www.g8.utoronto.ca/finance/fm992509state.htmGoogle Scholar
G7. 1998a. “Strengthening the Architecture of the Global Financial System.” Report of G7 Finance Minister to G7 Heads of State or Government for Their Meeting in Birmingham (May 1998). www.g8.utoronto.ca/summit/1998birmingham/g7heads.htmGoogle Scholar
G7. 1998b. “Declaration of G7 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors.” (30 October 1998). www.g8.utoronto.ca/finance/fm103098.htmGoogle Scholar
G20. 2009. “G20 Leaders Statement: The Pittsburgh Summit.” (24–25 September 2009). www.g20.utoronto.ca/2009/2009communique0925.htmlGoogle Scholar
G20. 2007. “The Group of Twenty: A History.” www.g20.utoronto.ca/docs/g20history.pdf.Google Scholar
Galtung, Johan. 1964. “A Structural Theory of Aggression.” Journal of Peace Research 1(2): 95–119.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik and Schneider, Christina. 2013. “Data Sets and Quantitative Research in the Study of Intergovernmental Organizations.” In Reinalda, Bob (ed.), Routledge Handbook of International Organization. New York: Routledge, 41–53.Google Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo. 2000. “Neoliberalism, Colonialism and International Governance: Decentering the International Law of Governmental Legitimacy.” Michigan Law Review 98(6): 1996–2055.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The Nation-State and Violence. Berkeley: Berkeley University Press.Google Scholar
Gilady, Lilach. 2017. The Price of Prestige: Conspicuous Consumption in International Relations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gillett, Andrew. 2003. Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 411–533.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael. 2004. “Is There a Broader-Deeper Trade-Off in International Multilateral Agreements?” International Organization 58(3): 459–484.Google Scholar
Gilman, Nils. 2015. “The New International Economic Order: A Reintroduction.” Humanity 6(1): 1–16.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilson, Bernard. 1984. The Conceptual System of Sovereign Equality. Leuven: Peters.Google Scholar
Glanville, Luke. 2010. “The Antecedents of ‘Sovereignty as Responsibility’.” European Journal of International Relations 17(2): 233–255.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie. 2006. “Uncommon Ground: Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy.” International Organization 60(1): 35–68.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack and Posner, Eric. 2007. The Limits of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gong, Gerrit W. 1984. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gosovic, Branislav and Ruggie, John Gerard. 1976. “On the Creation of a New International Economic Order: Issue Linkage and the Seventh Special Session of the UN General Assembly.” International Organization 30(2): 309–345.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1989. “Rational Hegemons, Excludable Goods, and Small Groups: An Epitaph for Hegemonic Stability Theory?” World Politics 41(3): 307–324.Google Scholar
Grandin, Greg. 2006. Empire’s Workshop: Latin America, the United States and the Rise of the New Imperialism. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Grant, Thomas D. 1999. The Recognition of States. London: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Greenhill, Brian and Lupu, Yonatan. 2017. “Clubs of Clubs: Fragmentation in the Network of Intergovernmental Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 61(1): 181–195.Google Scholar
Grigorescu, Alexandru. 2015. Democratic Intergovernmental Organizations? Normative Pressures and Decision-Making Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Groebner, Valentin. 2004. Der Schein der Person: Steckbrief, Ausweis und Kontrolle im Europa des Mittelalters. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Groebner, Valentin. 2001. “Describing the Person, Reading the Signs in Late Medieval and Renaissance Europe: Identity Papers, Vested Figures, and the Limits of Identification, 1400–1600.” In Caplan, Jane and Torpey, John (eds.), Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 15–27.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 2006 [1603]. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty [De Jure Praedae]. van Ittersum, Martine Julia (ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 2005 [1625]. The Rights of War and Peace [De Jure Belli ac Pacis], Edited and with an Introduction by Richard Tuck, from the Edition by Jean Barbeyrac (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund). 3 vols.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. 2004 [1609]. The Free Sea [Mare Liberum] trans. Richard Hakluyt, with William Welwod’s Critique and Grotius’s Reply, Armitage, David (ed.). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Group of Ten. 2001. “Report on Consolidation in the Financial Sector.” www.imf.org/external/np/g10/2001/01/Eng/pdf/file1.pdf.Google Scholar
Gruber, Lloyd. 2000. Ruling the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud. 1985. “Hugo Grotius and the History of Political Thought.” Political Theory 13(2): 239–265.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas, Held, David and Young, Kevin. 2013. Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing when We Need It Most. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hall, Ian. 2006. “Diplomacy, Anti-diplomacy, and International Society.” In Little, Richard and Williams, John (eds.), The Anarchical Society in a Globalized World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 141–161.Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 2003. “The Discursive Demolition of the Asian Development Model.” International Studies Quarterly, 47(1): 71–99.Google Scholar
Hall, William Edward. 1884. A Treatise on International Law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Fred. 1994. Rethinking International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Halperin, Morton, Scheffer, David and Small, Patricia. 1992. Self-Determination in the New World Order. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 46.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Keith and Langhorne, Richard. 1995. The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thomas Blom and Stepputat, Finn (eds.). 2005. Sovereign Bodies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Cheryl I. 1993. “Whiteness as Property.” Harvard Law Review 106(8): 1707–1791.Google Scholar
Heater, Derek. 1994. National Self-Determination: Woodrow Wilson and his Legacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heinbecker, Paul. 2011. “The Future of the G20 and Its Place in Global Governance.” CIGI G20 Paper 5: 2–18.Google Scholar
Held, David. 2010. Cosmopolitanism: Ideals, Realities and Deficiencies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederick Charles. 1908. “The Equality of States and the Hague Conferences.” The American Journal of International Law 2(3): 530–561.Google Scholar
Hillgruber, Christian. 1998. “The Admission of New States to the International Community.” European Journal of International Law 9: 491–509.Google Scholar
Hinsley, Francis H. 1986. Sovereignty, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. 2017. “A Critical-Sympathetic Introduction to Linklater’s Odyssey: Bridge Over Troubled (Euro-Centric) Water?” Review of International Studies 43(4): 581–601.Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. and Sharman, Jason C.. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1): 63–98.Google Scholar
Holland, Ben. 2010. “Sovereignty as Dominium? Reconstructing the Constructivist Roman Law Thesis.” International Studies Quarterly 54(2): 449–480.Google Scholar
Hollunder-Blumoff, Rebecca and Tyler, Tom. 2008. “Procedural Justice in Negotiation: Procedural Fairness, Outcome Acceptance, and Integrative Potential.” Law and Social Inquiry 33: 473–500.Google Scholar
Holsti, K. J. 2004. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel. 2009. “The Diversity Discount: When Increasing Ethnic and Racial Diversity Prevents Tax Increases.” Journal of Politics 71(1): 160–177.Google Scholar
Howland, Douglas R. 2014. “An Alternative Mode of International Order: The International Administrative Union in the Nineteenth Century.” Review of International Studies 41(1): 161–183.Google Scholar
Hughes, Michael. 2000. Diplomacy Before the Russian Revolution: Britain, Russia and the Old Diplomacy, 1894–1917. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian. 2011. “Law, War and Casuistry in Vattel’s Ius Gentium.” Parergon 28: 87–104.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2017. How to Do Things with International Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 1996. “Vattel: Pluralism and Its Limits.” In Clark, Ian and Neumann, Iver (eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. “Why the Liberal World Order Will Survive.” Ethics and International Affairs 32(1): 17–29.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011a. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011b. “The Future of Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America.” Foreign Affairs 90(3): 56–68.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jackman, Mary R. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus and Nexon, Daniel H.. 1999. “Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 5(3): 291–332.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, Alan. 2002. “A Response to Kurtulus.” Review of International Studies 28(4): 779–782.Google Scholar
James, Alan. 1986. Sovereign Statehood: The Basis of International Society. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jones, Bruce. 2010. “Making Multilateralism Work: How the G-20 Can Help the United Nations.” The Stanley Foundation Policy Analysis Brief (April 2010), 1–10.Google Scholar
Jönsson, Christer. 2002. “Diplomacy, Bargaining and Negotiation.” In Carlsnaes, Walter, Simmons, Beth and Risse, Thomas (eds.), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage, 212–234.Google Scholar
Jönsson, Christer and Hall, Martin. 2005. Essence of Diplomacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jouannet, Emmanuelle. 1998. Emer de Vattel et l’Emergence Doctrinale du Droit International Classique. Paris: Pedone.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1992. “Multilateralism with Small and Large Numbers.” International Organization 46(3): 681–708.Google Scholar
Karns, Margaret and Mingst, Karen. 2013. “International Organizations and Diplomacy.” In Cooper, Andrew, Heine, Jorge and Thakur, Ramesh (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 142–159.Google Scholar
Kaul, Inge, Conceição, Pedro, Le Goulven, Katell and Mendoza, Ronald U.. 2003. Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaul, Inge, Grunberg, Isabelle and Stern, Marc. 1999. Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kayaoglu, Turan. 2010. “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 12(2): 193–217.Google Scholar
Keblusek, Marika and Noldus, Badeloch Vera (eds.). 2011. Double Agents: Cultural and Political Brokerage in Early Modern Europe. Leiden: Brill Publishers.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2014. “The Standard of ‘Civilization’, the Expansion Thesis and the 19th Century International Social Space.” Millennium 42(3): 651–673.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2013. “Social Status, Social Closure, and the Idea of Europe as a ‘Normative Power’.” European Journal of International Relations 19(4): 939–956.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. “Reciprocity in International Relations.” International Organization 40(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert. 1982. “The Demand for International Regimes.” International Organization 36(2): 325–355.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1999. “Sovereignty and Inequality.” In Hurrell, Andrew and Woods, Ngaire (eds.), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict. 1998. “Sovereignty and Inequality.” European Journal of International Law 9: 599–625.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict and Straumann, Benjamin (eds.). 2010. The Roman Foundation of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirton, John J. 2013. G20 Governance for a Globalized World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kissling, Claudia. 2008. “The Evolution of CSOs’ Legal Status in International Governance and Its Relevance for the Legitimacy of International Organizations.” In Steffek, J., Kissling, C. and Nanz, P. (eds.), Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 30–52.Google Scholar
Klein, Robert A. 1974. Sovereign Equality among States: The History of an Idea. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Knecht, Sebastian. 2019. The Politics of Tiered Membership in Intergovernmental Organizations. Dissertation Manuscript, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55(4): 761–799.Google Scholar
Korman, Sharon. 1996. The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law, 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999a. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999b. “Westphalia and All That.” In Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 235–264.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables.” International Organization 36(2): 185–205.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1981. “Transforming International Regimes: What the Third World Wants and Why.” International Studies Quarterly 25(1): 119–148.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1995. “Sovereignty as Dominium: Is There a Right of Humanitarian Intervention?” In Lyons, Gene M. and Mastanduno, Michael (eds.), Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System.” World Politics 39(1): 27–52.Google Scholar
Krauske, Otto. 1884. Beiträge zur Geschichte der ständige Diplomatie. Leipzig: Duncker und Humboldt.Google Scholar
Kurtulus, Ersun. 2002. “Sovereign Rights in International Relations: A Futile Search for Regulated or Regular State Behaviour.” Review of International Studies 28(4): 759–777.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell Studies in Political Economy.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch, Paul, T. V. and Wohlforth, William C.. 2014. “Status and World Order.” In Paul, T.V., Larson, Deborah Welch and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.), Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei. 2010. “Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy.” International Security 34(4): 63–95.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch. 1947. Recognition in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Thomas. 1987 [1895]. The Principles of International Law. Littleton: Rothman.Google Scholar
Leinen, Jo and Brummel, Andreas. 2018. A World Parliament: Governance and Democracy in the 21st Century. Berlin: Democracy Without Borders.Google Scholar
Lesaffer, Randall. 2004. Peace Treaties and International Law in European History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Michael. 2005. Agents of Empire: Spanish Ambassadors in Sixteenth-Century Italy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Leyser, Karl. 1981. “Ottonian Government.” The English Historical Review 96(381): 721–753.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew. 2017. Violence and Civilization in the Western States-Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linton, Ralph. 1936. The Study of Man. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lorimer, James. 1883. The Institutes of the Law of Nations: A Treatise of the Jural Relations of Separate Political Communities. Edinburgh: Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackert, Jürgen. 2004. “Die Theorie sozialer Schliessung.” In Mackert, Jürgen, Die Theorie Sozialer Schliessung: Tradition, Analysen, Perspektiven. Springer Verlag, 9–24.Google Scholar
Macklem, Patrick. 2015. The Sovereignty of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magliveras, Konstantinos D. 2011. “Membership in International Organizations.” In Klabbers, Jan and Wallendahl, Åsa (eds.), Research Handbook on the Law of International Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 84–107.Google Scholar
Malkin, Jesse and Wildavsky, Aaron. 1991. “Why the Traditional Distinction between Public and Private Goods Should Be Abandoned.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 3(4): 355–378.Google Scholar
Mallett, Michael. 1994. “Ambassadors and Their Audiences in Renaissance Italy.” Renaissance Studies 8(3): 229–243.Google Scholar
Mallett, Michael. 1981. “Diplomacy and War in Late Fifteenth-Century Italy.” Proceedings of the British Academy, lxvii, 268–269.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 2010. “Responsibility to Protect or Right to Punish?” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 4(1): 53–67.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 2007. “Predation and Production in European Imperialism.” In Maleŝević, Siniŝa and Haugaard, Mark (eds.), Ernest Gellner and Contemporary Social Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1984. “The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results.” European Journal of Sociology 25(2): 185–213.Google Scholar
Manning, Charles A. 1962. The Nature of International Society. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D. and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2008. “Democratization and the Varieties of International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(2): 269–294.Google Scholar
Mantilla, Giovanni. 2018. “Forum Isolation: Social Opprobrium and the Origins of the International Law of Internal Conflict.” International Organization 72: 317–349.Google Scholar
Marchetti, Raffaele. 2005. “Interaction-Dependent Justice and the Problem of International Exclusion.” Constellations 12(4): 487–501.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul. 2013. “The G20: From Global Crisis Responder to Steering Committee.” In Cooper, Andrew, Heiner, Jorge and Thakur, Ramesh (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Garrett. 1988 [1955]. Renaissance Diplomacy. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2012. Governing the World. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mazower, Mark. 2009. No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCourt, David. 2016. “Practice Theory and Relationalism as the New Constructivism.” International Studies Quarterly 60(3): 475–485.Google Scholar
McKitterick, Rosamond (ed.). 1992. The Uses of Literacy in Early Medieval Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, Victor. 2015. “The New International Economic Order, Interdependence, and Globalization.” Humanity 6(1): 217–233.Google Scholar
Merriman, John. 1996. A History of Modern Europe from the Renaissance to the Present. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M. and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–181.Google Scholar
Mieville, China. 2005. Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
Milanovic, Branko. 2016. Global Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 2000. Citizenship and National Identity. Malden: Polity.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1991. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations: A Critique.” Review of International Studies 17(1): 67–85.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2015. “From Representation to Governing: Diplomacy and the Constitution of International Public Power.” In Sending, Ole, Pouliot, Vincent and Neumann, Iver (eds.), Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 111–139.Google Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2013. Power in Concert: The Nineteenth-Century Origins of Global Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mongia, Radhika V. 2007. “Historicizing State Sovereignty: Inequality and the Form of Equivalence.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 29(2): 38–411.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: A.A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C. and Keohane, Robert O. 2014. “Contested Multilateralism.” The Review of International Organizations 9(4): 385–412.Google Scholar
Mosely, D. J. 1971. “Diplomacy and Disunion in Ancient Greece.” Phoenix 25(4): 319–330.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1978. A Dangerous Place. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel Patrick. 1975. “The United States in Opposition.” Commentary, March.Google Scholar
Müller, Joachim. 2001. Reforming the United Nations. A Quiet Revolution. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change: Global Governance since 1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, David. 2015. “Huayuquan: Speak and Be Heard.” In Barme, Geremie, Javin, Linda and Goldkorn, Jeremy (eds.), Shared Destiny. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Raymond. 1988. Social Closure: The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Raymond. 1986. “Weberian Closure Theory: A Contribution to the Ongoing Assessment.” The British Journal of Sociology 37(1): 21–41.Google Scholar
Murphy, Raymond. 1984. “The Structure of Closure: A Critique and Development of the Theories of Weber, Collins, and Parkin.” British Journal of Sociology 35(4): 547–567.Google Scholar
Murray, Michelle. 2019. The Struggle for Recognition in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Paul and Nexon, Daniel. 2018. “Defending Hierarchy from the Moon to the Indian Ocean: Symbolic Capital and Political Dominance in Early Modern China and the Cold War.” International Organization 72(3): 591–626.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1991. Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nel, Phillip, Nabers, Dirk and Hanif, Melanie. 2012. “Introduction: Regional Powers and Global Redistribution.” Global Society 26(3): 279–287.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. 2011. “Status Is Cultural: Durkheimian Poles and Weberian Russians Seek Great-Power Status.” In Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah W. and Wohlforth, William (eds.), Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–114.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2005. “To Be a Diplomat.” International Studies Perspectives 6(1): 72–93.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 2003. “The English School on Diplomacy: Scholarly Promise Unfulfilled.” International Relations 17(3): 341–369.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver. 1996. “Self and Other in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 2(2): 139–174.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel. 2003. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe: Religious Conflict, Dynastic Empires, and International Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nexon, Daniel and Wright, Thomas. 2007. “What’s at Stake in the American Empire Debate?” American Political Science Review 101(2): 253–271.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Harold. 1969. Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, Thomas. 1983. “In Search of Identity: Romantic Nationalism, Its Intellectual, Political and Social Background.” In Eade, J. C. (ed.), Romantic Nationalism in Europe. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Malley, Michael. 2012. Face Value: The Entwined Histories of Money and Race in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Okagaki, Tomoko. 2013. The Logic of Conformity: Japan’s Entry into International Society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas. 1998. The Republican Legacy in International Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas and Onuf, Peter. 2006. Nations, Markets, and War: Modern History and the American Civil War. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. 1912. International Law, 2nd ed. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Organski, A. F. K. 1968. World Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Organski, A. F. K. and Kugler, Jacek. 1980. The War Ledger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2007. Before the State: Systemic Political Change in the West from the Greeks to the French Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 2001. “Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth.” International Organization 55(2): 251–287.Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 1994. The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Österud, Öyvind. 1997. “The Narrow Gate: Entry to the Club of Sovereign States.” Review of International Studies 23: 167–184.Google Scholar
Oye, Kenneth (ed.). 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Geoffrey. 1996. The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkin, Frank. 1979. Marxism and Class Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Parlett, Kate. 2011. The Individual in the International Legal System: Continuity and Change in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, John. 2014. “What Is the Grotian Tradition in International Law?” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 35(2): 300–377.Google Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki and Teivainen, Teivo. 2004. A Possible World: Democratic Transformation of Global Institutions. London: ZED.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah Welch and Wohlforth, William C. (eds.). 2014. Status in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Anthony. 2010. “How Many Gs Are There in ‘Global Governance’ After the Crisis? The Perspectives of the ‘Marginal Majority’ of the World’s States.” International Affairs 86(3): 729–740.Google Scholar
Pearcey, Mark. 2016. The Exclusions of Civilization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Perlez, Jane. 2014. “US Opposing China’s Answer to World Bank.” New York Times. (9 October). www.nytimes.com/2014/10/10/world/asia/chinas-plan-for-regional-development-bank-runs-into-us-opposition.html?_r=0Google Scholar
Peters, Anne. 2016. Beyond Human Rights: The Status of the Individual in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2002. “Democracy from the Outside In? International Organizations and Democracy.” International Organization 56(3): 515–549.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon, Nordstrom, Timothy and Warnke, Kevin. 2004. “The COW-2 International Organizations Dataset, Version 2.0.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 21(2): 101–119.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Picot, Emile. 1901. “Les Italiens en France au XVI siècle.” Bulletin Italien I: 92–137.Google Scholar
Pieters, Janene. 2017. “Netherlands Pushing for Permanent G20 Position.” NL Times (7 April 2017). https://nltimes.nl/2017/04/07/netherlands-pushing-permanent-g20-positionGoogle Scholar
Pillalamarri, Akhilesh. 2016. “It’s Time to Make the G20 More Asian.” The Diplomat (2 September 2016). https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/its-time-to-make-the-g20-more-asian/Google Scholar
Pillinger, Mara, Hurd, Ian and Barnett, Michael N.. 2016. “How to Get Away with Cholera: The UN, Haiti, and International Law.” Perspectives on Politics 14(1): 70–86.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2018. Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2017. “International Relations and the Critical History of International Law.” International Relations 3(3): 282–298.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2013. “Intervention and Sovereign Equality: Legacies of Vattel.” In Recchia, Stefano and Welsh, Jennifer (eds.), Just and Unjust Military Intervention: European Thinkers from Vitoria to Mill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132–153.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 1992. “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty.” Ethics 103(1): 48–75.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, Cornut, Jeremie and Cooper, Andrew. 2015. “How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice.” Cooperation and Conflict 50(3): 334–350.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent and Therien, Jean-Philippe. 2014. “The Politics of Inclusion: Changing Patterns in the Governance of International Security.” Review of International Studies 41(2): 211–237.Google Scholar
Prantl, Jochen. 2005. “Informal Groups of States and the UN Security Council.” International Organization 59(3): 559–592.Google Scholar
Prashad, Vijay. 2014. The Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st Century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30: 137–174.Google Scholar
Queller, Donald. 1967. The Office of the Ambassador in the Middle Ages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramos, Jennifer. 2013. Changing Norms Through Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ravndal, Ellen. 2016. “From an Inclusive to an Exclusive International Order: Membership of International Organisations from the 19th to the 20th Century.” STANCE Working Paper Series Lund University 2016(8): 1–28.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Renshon, Jonathan. 2017. Fighting for Status. Hierarchy and Conflict in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2017. “Cultural Diversity and International Order.” International Organization 71(4): 851–885.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2006. “Liberal Hierarchy and the Licence to Use Force.” Review of International Studies 31(1): 71–92.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2002. “Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(3): 489–490.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 1999. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian and Dunne, Tim. 2017. “The Globalization of International Society.” In Dunne, Tim and Reus-Smit, Christian (eds.), The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea. 2017. Is International Law International? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roelofsen, Cornelius G. 1997. “Grotius and the International Politics of the Seventeenth Century.” In Bull, Hedley, Kingsbury, Benedict and Roberts, Adam (eds.), Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 95–133.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Rossi, Christopher. 2017. Sovereignty and Territorial Temptation: The Grotian Tendency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roth, Kenneth. 2004. “The Law of War in the War on Terror.” Foreign Affairs Jan./Feb.Google Scholar
Roth, Brad. 2011. Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47(1): 139–174.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1992. “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution.” International Organization 46(3): 561–598.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis.” World Politics 35(2): 261–285.Google Scholar
Ruhlman, Molly. 2015. Who Participates in Global Governance? States, Bureaucracies, and NGOs in the United Nations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Jocelyn. 1992. Diplomats at Work: Three Renaissance Studies. London: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Russell, Ruth. 1958. A History of the United Nation Charter. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1996. “Ten Balances for Weighing UN Reform Proposals.” Political Science Quarterly 111(2): 259–269.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. and Oneal, John R.. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 36(4): 387–389.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd. 2013. “Buchanan Clubs.” Constitutional Political Economy 24: 265–284.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd and Tschirhart, John. 1997. “Club Theory: Thirty Years Later.” Public Choice 93(3–4): 335–355.Google Scholar
Sargent, Daniel. 2015. “North/South: The United States Responds to the New International Economic Order.” Humanity 6(1): 201–216.Google Scholar
Sartori, Anne. 2002. “The Might of the Pen: A Reputational Theory of Communication in International Disputes.” International Organization 56(1): 121–149.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Kai. 2017. “Reforming the United Nations Security Council: Feasibility or Utopia?” International Negotiation 22(1): 62–91.Google Scholar
Schiff, Stacy. 2005. A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Volker H. 2013. “Gradual and Categorical Inequalities.” In Arjomand, Said and Reis, Elisa (eds.), Worlds of Difference. London: Sage, Chapter 11.Google Scholar
Schrijver, Nico J. 1997. Sovereignty over Natural Resources: Balancing Rights and Duties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sekara, June. 2014. “Re-thinking the Definition of ‘Public Goods’.” https://rwer.wordpress.com/2014/07/09/re-thinking-the-definition-of-public-goods/.Google Scholar
Selwyn, Benjamin. 2014. The Global Development Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole, Pouliot, Vincent and Neumann, Iver. 2015a. Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sending, Ole, Pouliot, Vincent and Neumann, Iver. 2015b. “Introduction.” In Sending, Ole, Pouliot, Vincent and Neumann, Iver (eds.), Diplomacy and the Making of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–28.Google Scholar
Shahabuddin, Mohammad. 2019. “The ‘Standard of Civilization’ in International Law: Intellectual Perspectives from Pre-War Japan.” Leiden Journal of International Law 32(2): 13–32.Google Scholar
Sharp, Paul. 2009. Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharp, Paul. 2003. “Herbert Butterfield, the English School, and the Civilizing Virtues of Diplomacy.” International Affairs 79(4): 855–878.Google Scholar
Sharp, Paul. 1999. “For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations.” International Studies Review 1(1): 33–57.Google Scholar
Shaw, Martin. 1994. Global Society and International Relations. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Shinoda, Hideaki. 2000. Re-examining Sovereignty: From Classical Theory to the Global Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shorr, David and Wright, Thomas. 2010. “The G20 and Global Governance: An Exchange.” Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 52(2): 181–198.Google Scholar
Simons, Penelope. 2003. “The Emergence of the Idea of the Individualized State in the International Legal System.” Journal of the History of International Law 5: 293–336.Google Scholar
Simpson, Gerry. 2004. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David and Small, Melvin. 1966. “The Composition and Status Ordering of the International System, 1815–1940.” World Politics 18(2): 236–282.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Steven. 2015. “Building G20 Outreach: The Role of Transnational Policy Networks in Sustaining Effective and Legitimate Summitry.” Global Summitry 1(2): 171–186.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Steven. 2013. “The Prospects of Deliberative Global Governance in the G20: Legitimacy, Accountability, and Public Contestation.” Review of International Studies 39(1): 71–90.Google Scholar
Smaga, Pawel. 2014. “The Concept of Systemic Risk.” LSE Systemic Risk Centre Special Paper No. 5.Google Scholar
Small, Melvin and Singer, J. David. 1982. Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816–1980. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1995. “Endogenous Actors, Heterogeneity and Institutions.” In Keohane, Robert and Ostrom, Elinor (eds.), Local Commons and Global Interdependence. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1985. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory.” International Organization 39(4): 579–614.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1979. “Public Goods, Property Rights, and Political Organizations.” International Studies Quarterly 23(4): 532–566.Google Scholar
Sobczyk, Marcin. 2010. “G20 Needs Poland.” The Wall Street Journal (3 February 2010). https://blogs.wsj.com/emergingeurope/2010/02/03/g20-needs-poland/Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stirk, Peter. 2012. “The Westphalian Model and Sovereign Equality.” Review of International Studies 38(3): 641–660.Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis. 2015. “Liberal Democracy, Market Economy, and International Conduct as Standards of ‘Civilization’ in Contemporary International Society: The Case of Russia’s Entry into the ‘Community of Civilized States’.” Journal of Eurasian Studies 6(2): 130–142.Google Scholar
Stivachtis, Yannis. 2008. “Civilization and International Society: The Case of European Union Expansion.” Contemporary Politics 14(1): 71–89.Google Scholar
Strang, David. 1991. “Anomaly and Commonplace in European Political Expansion: Realist and Institutional Accounts.” International Organization 45(2): 143–162.Google Scholar
Strang, David and Meyer, John W.. 1993. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” Theory and Society 22: 487–511.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin. 2015. “Early Modern Sovereignty and Its Limits.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16(2): 423–446.Google Scholar
Strayer, Joseph. 1970. On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Suganami, Hidemi. 1992. “Grotius and International Equality.” In Bull, Hedley, Kingsbury, Benedict and Roberts, Adam (eds.), Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–241.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo. 2009. Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Shogo, Zhang, Yongjin and Quirk, Joel. 2014. International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. London and NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sverdrup, Ulf and Nahem, Joachim. 2017. “The G20: Inclusivity and Legitimacy A Nordic Perspective.” Berlin: German Federal Academy for Security Policy, Security Policy Working Paper, No. 12, 1–4.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2015. “Orchestrating Enforcement: International Organizations Mobilizing Compliance Constituencies.” In Abbott, Kenneth, Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.), International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 166–188.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas and Uhlin, Ander. 2011. “Civil Society and Global Democracy: An Assessment.” In Archibugi, Daniele, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, Marchetti, Raffaele et al. (eds.), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa and Jönsson, Christer. 2014. “Explaining the Transnational Design of International Organizations.” International Organization 68(4): 741–774.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa and Jönsson, Christer. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul. W. 1986. Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tedesco, Laura and Youngs, Richard. 2009. “The G20: A Dangerous ‘Multilateralism’?” FRIDE Policy Brief 18. (1 October 2017). http://fride.org/download/PB18_Dangerous_multila_ENG_agos09.pdfGoogle Scholar
Teschke, Benno. 2009. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Teschke, Benno. 1998. “Geopolitical Relations in the European Middle Ages: History and Theory.” International Organization 52(2): 325–358.Google Scholar
Thompson, Helen. 2006. “The Case for External Sovereignty.” European Journal of International Relations 12(2): 251–274.Google Scholar
Thomson, David. 1949. Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thrandardottir, Erla and Keating, Vincent Charles. 2018. “Bridging the Legitimacy Gap: A Proposal for the International Legal Recognition of INGOS.” International Politics 55(2): 207–220.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian. 1997. The Idea of Natural Rights. Grand Rapids: Scholars Press for Emory University.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2005. Identities, Boundaries and Social Ties. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2000. “Relational Studies of Inequality.” Contemporary Sociology 29(6): 782–785.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1998a. Durable Inequality. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1998b. “International Communities, Secure or Otherwise.” In Alder, Emanuel and Barnett, Michael (eds.), Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 397–412.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Luke. 2015. Procedural Justice in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Torfason, Magnus T. and Ingram, Paul. 2010. “The Rise of Global Democracy: A Network Account.” American Sociological Review 75(3): 355–377.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann. 2009. “The Status of Women as a Standard of ‘Civilization.’” European Journal of International Relations 15(4): 681–706.Google Scholar
Trexler, Richard. 1978. The Libro Ceremoniale of the Florentine Republic. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1999. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1979. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 2005. “Exclusion and Assimilation: Two Forms of Domination in Relation to Freedom.” Nomos 46: 191–229.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Twiss, Travers. 1861. The Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. 1996. “Secretary-General Says Democraization of International Relations Fundamental Requirement for Today’s World.” Press Release SG/SM/5883. www.un.org/press/en/1996/19960125.sgsm5883.htm.Google Scholar
Van Ittersum, Martine Julia. 2010. “The Long Goodbye: Hugo Grotius’ Justification of Dutch Expansion Overseas, 1615–1645.” History of European Ideas 36(4): 386–411.Google Scholar
Vattel, Emer de. 2008 [1758]. The Law of Nations. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund Inc.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, Jakob and Wade, Robert H.. 2015. “Still in the Woods: Gridlock in the IMF and World Bank Puts Multilateralism at Risk.” Global Policy 6(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, Jakob and Wade, Robert H.. 2012. “Establishing a New Global Economic Council: Governance Reform at the G20, the IMF and the World Bank.” Global Policy 3(3): 257–269.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2020. “‘Systemically Significant States’: Tracing the G20’s Membership Category as a New Logic of Stratification in the International System.” Global Society. DOI: 10.1080/13600826.2020.1739630.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2015a. “Orchestration by Design: The G-20 in International Financial Regulation.” In Abbott, Kenneth, Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.), International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 88–113.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2015b. “The Governance Shift: From Multilateral IGOs to Orchestrated Networks.” In Mayntz, Renate (ed.), Negotiated Reform: The Multilevel Governance of Financial Regulation. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2013. “Stratificatory Differentiation as a Constitutive Principle of the International System.” In Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry and Zürn, Michael (eds.), Bringing Sociology to International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 112–131.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne. 2008. Governing the Club of Sovereigns: Inequality and the Politics of Membership in the International System. Dissertation Manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Viola, Lora Anne, Snidal, Duncan and Zürn, Michael. 2015. “Sovereign (In)equality in the Evolution of the International System.” In Leibfied, Stephan, Huber, Evelyne, Lange, Matthew, Levy, Jonah D., Nullmeier, Frank and Stephens, John D. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Transformation of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–236.Google Scholar
Volgy, Thomas J. and Mayhall, Stacey. 1995. “Status Inconsistency and International War: Exploring the Effects of Systemic Change.” International Studies Quarterly 39(1): 67–84.Google Scholar
Volgy, Thomas J., Corbetta, Renato, Grant, Keith A. and Baird, Ryan G. (eds.). 2011. Majors Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
Wallace, Michael. 1971. “Power, Status, and International War.” Journal of Peace Research 8(1): 23–35.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 16(4): 387–415.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wang, Hongying. 2016. “New Multilateral Development Banks: Opportunities and Challenges for Global Governance.” New York: Council on Foreign Relations, Discussion Paper Series on Global and Regional Governance, 1–16.Google Scholar
Warwick Commission. 2007. The Multilateral Trade Regime: Which Way Forward? The University of Warwick. https://warwick.ac.uk/research/warwickcommission/worldtrade/report/.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam. 1981. Diplomacy: The Dialogue between States. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, Cynthia. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society. Roth, Guenther and Wittich, Claus (eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weitz, Eric. 2015. “Self-Determination: How a German Enlightenment Idea Became the Slogan of National Liberation and a Human Right.” The American Historical Review 120(2): 462–496.Google Scholar
Welsh, Jennifer. 2013. “Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect.” Global Responsibility to Protect 5(4): 365–396.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2): 391–425.Google Scholar
Westen, Peter. 1982. “The Empty Idea of Equality.” Harvard Law Review 95(3): 537–596.Google Scholar
Westlake, John. 1894. Chapters on the Principles of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Henry. 1880 [1836]. Elements of International Law, 2nd ed. London: Stevens and Sons.Google Scholar
Whelan, Frederick. 2015. The Political Thought of Hume and His Contemporaries. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, Nigel D. 2005. The Law of International Organisations, 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Wiesner-Hanks, Merry (ed.). 2006. The Cambridge History of Europe, Vol. 2 Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1978. Power Politics. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1972. “International Legitimacy.” International Relations 4(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1966. “Western Values in International Relations.” In Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (Eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Eric. 2008. Savage Republic: De Indis of Hugo Grotius, Republicanism and Dutch Hegemony within the Early Modern World-System (c. 1600–1619). Leiden: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2002. Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflicts. Shadows of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Reinhard. 2011. “Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition.” International Theory 3(1): 105–142.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. 2003. “Order, Justice, the IMF, and the World Bank.” In Foot, Rosemary, Gaddis, John Lewis and Hurrell, Andrew (eds.), Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford Scholarship Online.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. 1999. “Good Governance in International Organizations.” Global Governance 5(1): 39–61.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1986. “The Ideal of Community and the Politics of Difference.” Social Theory and Practice 12(1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Zacher, Mark W. 2001. “The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force.” International Organization 55(2): 215–250.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2017. “Theorising Hierarchies.” In Zarakol, Ayse (ed.), Hierarchies in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Zarakol, Ayse. 2010. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zolberg, Aristide R. and Woon, Long Litt. 1999. “Why Islam Is like Spanish: Cultural Incorporation in Europe and the United States.” Politics & Society 27: 5–38.Google Scholar
Zongyi, Liu. 2015. “BRICS Cooperation Helps Build New International Framework.” Global Times (15 October 2017). www.globaltimes.cn/content/931748.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2006. Institutionalisierte Ungleichheit: Jenseits der Alternative “Global Governance” versus “American Empire.” WZB Vorlesungen 18. Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
Zweifel, Thomas. 2005. International Organizations and Democracy: Accountability, Politics, and Power. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Lora Anne Viola, Freie Universität Berlin
  • Book: The Closure of the International System
  • Online publication: 16 June 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612562.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Lora Anne Viola, Freie Universität Berlin
  • Book: The Closure of the International System
  • Online publication: 16 June 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612562.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Lora Anne Viola, Freie Universität Berlin
  • Book: The Closure of the International System
  • Online publication: 16 June 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612562.007
Available formats
×