Book contents
- Complementarity, Catalysts, Compliance
- Reviews
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 147
- Complementarity, Catalysts, Compliance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases and Pleadings
- Table of Statutes and Statutory Instruments
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The ICC and Complementarity: Evolutions, Interpretations and Implementation
- Part II The ICC in Uganda, Kenya and the Democratic Republic of Congo
- 5 Compliance and Performance
- 6 Competing, Complementing, Copying
- 7 Catalysing Opportunity
- 8 Conclusions and Recommendations
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 147
8 - Conclusions and Recommendations
from Part II - The ICC in Uganda, Kenya and the Democratic Republic of Congo
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020
- Complementarity, Catalysts, Compliance
- Reviews
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 147
- Complementarity, Catalysts, Compliance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases and Pleadings
- Table of Statutes and Statutory Instruments
- Abbreviations
- Preface
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The ICC and Complementarity: Evolutions, Interpretations and Implementation
- Part II The ICC in Uganda, Kenya and the Democratic Republic of Congo
- 5 Compliance and Performance
- 6 Competing, Complementing, Copying
- 7 Catalysing Opportunity
- 8 Conclusions and Recommendations
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 147
Summary
This final, concluding chapter summarizes the book’s key findings and concludes that the ICC’s interventions and complementarity are better understood as axes around which advocacy for a global accountability norm has turned. Rather than a catalyst in itself, it is the court’s mediated relationship with non-state actors that has had the greatest ‘catalytic effect’ on domestic accountability efforts. In this sense, civil society organizations are both object and subject of this effect: They seek to expand complementarity’s normative influence, while having themselves been transformed by it. The chapter also offers a number of recommendations for future inquiry and practice: It urges a critical rethinking of the ICC’s politics, greater use of the Rome Statute’s cooperation and dialogue regimes (rather than admissibility) as an approach to encouraging domestic accountability, greater experimentalism, and a reorientation towards international criminal justice as a project of global legal pluralism.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Complementarity, Catalysts, ComplianceThe International Criminal Court in Uganda, Kenya, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, pp. 267 - 297Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020