Book contents
- Curbing the Court
- Curbing the Court
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Guardians of Judicial Independence
- 2 Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing
- 3 A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support
- 4 General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing
- 5 Specific Policy Disagreement and Support for Court-Curbing
- 6 Partisan Polarization and Support for Court-Curbing
- 7 Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning
- 8 Reconsidering the Public Foundations of Judicial Independence
- References
- Index
2 - Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 August 2020
- Curbing the Court
- Curbing the Court
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Guardians of Judicial Independence
- 2 Theories of Public Support for Court-Curbing
- 3 A Deep Dive into Supreme Court Evaluation and Support
- 4 General Policy Disagreement and Broadly Targeted Court-Curbing
- 5 Specific Policy Disagreement and Support for Court-Curbing
- 6 Partisan Polarization and Support for Court-Curbing
- 7 Procedural Perceptions and Motivated Reasoning
- 8 Reconsidering the Public Foundations of Judicial Independence
- References
- Index
Summary
Chapter 2 develops a policy-based theory of public support for Court-curbing, which represents an alternative to process-based perspectives popular in the literature. The chapter distinguishes “broadly targeted Court-curbing,” or support for attacks on the institution’s powers and independence, from “narrowly targeted Court-curbing,” or support for attacks on the Court’s specific rulings. While disagreement with the general ideological direction of the Supreme Court strongly impacts support for broadly targeted Court-curbing, disagreement with specific rulings has a larger effect on narrowly targeted curbing. The theory also explains how and why partisan polarization reduces citizens’ willingness to defend the Court and discusses competing perspectives for how citizens’ level of political engagement moderates the effect of policy disagreement.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Curbing the CourtWhy the Public Constrains Judicial Independence, pp. 27 - 59Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020