Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 August 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Divine Action and the Human Mind , pp. 351 - 369Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alexander, Samuel. Space, Time, and Deity. The Gifford Lectures for 1916–1918. London: Macmillan, 1920.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. “Divine Action, Human Freedom, and the Laws of Nature.” In Quantum Cosmology and the Laws of Nature: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey C., and Isham, C. J., 185–207. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. The Power of God, translated by Regan, Richard J.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae, translated by O’Brien, T. C.. London and New York: Eyre & Spottiswoode; McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Contra Gentiles. In Basic Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas, Vol. 2, edited by Pegis, Anton C.. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, 1945.Google Scholar
Baird, Forrest E. From Plato to Derrida. Philosophic Classics Series. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Barrett, Justin L. Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Cognitive Science of Religion Series. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Beebee, Helen, Hitchcock, Christopher, and Menzies, Peter. The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Berkouwer, G. C. Man: The Image of God. Studies in Dogmatics, translated by Jellema, Dirk. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1962.Google Scholar
Block, Ned. “Comparing the Major Theories of Consciousness.” In The Cognitive Neurosciences, 4th ed., edited by Gazzaniga, Michael S., 1111–22. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Block, Ned. “Troubles with Functionalism.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1978): 216–325.Google Scholar
Bloom, Paul. Descartes’ Baby: How the Science of Child Development Explains What Makes Us Human. London: W. Heinemann, 2004.Google Scholar
Boyd, Craig A., and Cobb, Aaron D.. “The Causality Distinction, Kenosis, and a Middle Way: Aquinas and Polkinghorne on Divine Action.” Theology and Science 7, no. 4 (2009): 391–406.Google Scholar
Bracken, Joseph A. The One in the Many: A Contemporary Reconstruction of the God-World Relationship. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Bracken, Joseph A.. “Response to Elizabeth Johnson’s ‘Does God Play Dice?’” Theological Studies 57, no. 3 (1996): 720–30.Google Scholar
Brierley, Michael W. “Naming a Quiet Revolution: The Panentheistic Turn in Modern Theology.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being. Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur, 1–17. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. The Cambridge History of Science Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Brown, Warren S., Murphy, Nancey C., and Malony, H. Newton, eds. Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Butler, Stuart. “Gage, Phineas.” In The Oxford Companion to the Mind, edited by Gregory, Richard L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662242.001.0001/acref-9780198662242.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion, Vol. 1. The Library of Christian Classics, edited by McNeill, John T.; translated by Battles, Ford Lewis. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. “Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness.” In Explaining Consciousness – The “Hard Problem.” A Bradford Book, edited by Shear, Jonathan, 9–30. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Philosophy of Mind Series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia. Brain-Wise: Studies in Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Churchland, Patricia. “The Hornswaggle Problem.” In Explaining Consciousness: The “Hard Problem.” A Bradford Book, edited by Shear, Jonathan, 37–44. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Clark, Thomas W. “Function and Phenomenology: Closing the Explanatory Gap.” In Explaining Consciousness: The “Hard Problem.” A Bradford Book, edited by Shear, Jonathan, 46–59. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. Adventures in the Spirit: God, World, Divine Action, edited by Simpson, Zachary. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “Toward a Theory of Divine Action That Has Traction.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Stoeger, William R., 85–110. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “Conceptual Foundations of Emergence Theory.” In The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion, edited by Clayton, Philip and Davies, Paul, 1–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “Forms of Freedom, As-If Freedom, and Asymptotic Freedom.” In In Quest of Freedom: The Emergence of Spirit in the Natural World. Frankfurt Templeton Lectures 2006, edited by Parker, Michael G. and Schmidt, Thomas M., 84–111. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. Mind and Emergence: From Quantum to Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. In Quest of Freedom: The Emergence of Spirit in the Natural World. Frankfurt Templeton Lectures 2006, edited by Parker, Michael G. and Schmidt, Thomas M.. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2006.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “Natural Law and Divine Action: The Search for an Expanded Theory of Causation.” Zygon 39, no. 3 (2004): 615–36.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “Panentheism in Metaphysical and Scientific Perspective.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflection on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur, 73–91. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip. “On the Value of the Panentheistic Analogy: A Response to Willem Drees.” Zygon 35, no. 3 (2000): 699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Philip. God and Contemporary Science. Edinburgh Studies in Constructive Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip, and Davies, Paul, eds. The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip, and Knapp, Steven. The Predicament of Belief: Science, Philosophy, Faith. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Clayton, Philip, and Peacocke, Arthur, eds. In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflection on God’s Presence in a Scientific World. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Cooper, John W. Panentheism, the Other God of the Philosophers: From Plato to the Present. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2013.Google Scholar
Coulson, Charles A. Science and the Idea of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Cramer, John G. The Quantum Handshake: Entanglement, Nonlocality and Transactions. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Crane, Tim. Elements of Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Crick, Francis. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. New York: Touchstone, 1994.Google Scholar
D’Aquili, Eugene G., and Newberg, Andrew B.. The Mystical Mind: Probing the Biology of Religious Experience. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Vol. 2, edited by Darwin, F.. New York: Appleton, 1901.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. “Psychology as Philosophy.” In Philosophy of Psychology, edited by Brown, Stuart, 41–52. New York: Macmillan, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, John J. “Quantum Indeterminacy and the Omniscience of God.” Science and Christian Belief 9, no. 2 (1997): 129–44.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence. Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter. New York: W. W. Norton, 2012.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence, and Cashman, Tyrone. “Eliminativism, Complexity, and Emergence.” In The Routledge Companion to Religion and Science, edited by Haag, James W., Peterson, Gregory R., and Spezio, Michael L., 193–205. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
De Caro, Mario, and Macarthur, David. “Introduction: The Nature of Naturalism.” In Naturalism in Question, edited by De Caro, Mario and Macarthur, David, 1–17. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Delaplane, Keith S. “Emergent Properties in the Honey Bee Superorganism.” Bee World 94, no. 1 (2017): 8–15.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. “Facing Backwards on the Problem of Consciousness.” In Explaining Consciousness: The “Hard Problem.” A Bradford Book, edited by Shear, Jonathan, 33–36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Dilley, Frank. “Does the ‘God Who Acts’ Really Act?” In God’s Activity in the World: The Contemporary Problem, edited by Thomas, Owen C., 45–60. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael. Unlocking Divine Action: Contemporary Science and Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2012, https://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/ti00/dodds.htm.Google Scholar
Dodds, Michael. “The Doctrine of Causality in Aquinas and The Book of Causes: One Key to Understanding the Nature of Divine Action.” Lecture given at the Summer Thomistic Institute, University of Notre Dame, IN, July 14–21, 2000, https://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/ti00/dodds.htm.Google Scholar
Drees, Willem B.. Religion, Science and Naturalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Maureen. “Functionalism.” In Theories of Mind: An Introductory Reader, edited by Eckert, Maureen, 46–50. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2006.Google Scholar
Edelman, Gerald M. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of the Mind. New York: Basic Books, 1992.Google Scholar
Edwards, Denis. “Toward a Theology of Divine Action: William R. Stoeger, S.J., on the Laws of Nature.” Theological Studies 76, no. 3 (2015): 485–502.Google Scholar
Edwards, Denis. How God Acts: Creation, Redemption, and Special Divine Action. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Ellis, George. “Ordinary and Extraordinary Divine Action.” In Philosophy, Science and Divine Action. Philosophical Studies in Science and Religion, Vol. 1, edited by Shults, F. LeRon, Murphy, Nancey C., and Russell, Robert J., 305–41. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Ellis, George F. R., ed. The Far-Future Universe: Eschatology from a Cosmic Perspective. Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin. Faith and Speculation: An Essay in Philosophical Theology. London: A. & C. Black, 1967.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin. Love Almighty and Ills Unlimited: An Essay on Providence and Evil, Containing the Nathaniel Taylor Lectures for 1961. London: Collins Clear-Type Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Owen. “Varieties of Naturalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, edited by Clayton, Philip and Simpson, Zachary, 430–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Green, Joel B. “‘Bodies – That Is, Human Lives’: A Re-examination of Human Nature in the Bible.” In Whatever Happened to the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature. Theology and the Sciences, edited by Brown, Warren S., Murphy, Nancey C., and Newton Malony, H., 149–73. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Green, Joel B., ed. What about the Soul? Neuroscience and Christian Anthropology. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Niels Henrik. “Special Divine Action and the Quilt of Laws.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Stoeger, William R., 179–200. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Gregersen, Niels Henrik. “Three Varieties of Panentheism.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur, 19–35. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Griffin, David Ray. Panentheism and Scientific Naturalism: Rethinking Evil, Morality, Religious Experience, Religious Pluralism, and the Academic Study of Religion. Toward Ecological Civilization Series. Claremont, CA: Process Century Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Hans. “Collapsing the Sacred and the Profane: Pan-Sacramental and Panentheistic Possibilities in Aquinas and Their Implications for Spirituality.” The Heythrop Journal (2011): 1–14, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00684.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Lindsay, Rae, Murray, and Holmes, Steve, eds. Christian Doctrine: A Reader. London: SCM Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, Valerie Gray. “The Why of Consciousness: A Non-Issue for Materialists.” In Explaining Consciousness: The “Hard Problem.” A Bradford Book, edited by Shear, Jonathan, 61–68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hartshorne, Charles. “Introduction: The Standpoint of Panentheism.” In Philosophers Speak of God, edited by Hartshorne, Charles and Reese, William R., 1–25. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Harvie, Timothy. “God as a Field of Force: Personhood and Science in Wolfhart Pannenberg’s Pneumatology.” The Heythrop Journal 52 (2011): 250–59.Google Scholar
Hebblethwaite, Brian. The Philosophical Theology of Austin Farrer. Studies in Philosophical Theology. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters, 2007.Google Scholar
Helbing, Dirk, Yu, Wenjian, and Rauhut, Heiko. “Self-Organization and Emergence in Social Systems: Modeling the Coevolution of Social Environments and Cooperative Behavior.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 35, no. 1–3 (2011): 177–208.Google Scholar
Hodgson, David. “The Easy Problems Ain’t So Easy.” In Explaining Consciousness: The “Hard Problem.” A Bradford Book, edited by Shear, Jonathan, 125–31. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.Google Scholar
Ismael, Jenann. “Quantum Mechanics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N., Spring 2015 edition, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/qm/.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank. “Mind and Illusion.” In Minds and Persons, edited by O’Hear, Anthony, 251–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank. “Epiphenomenal Qualia.” Philosophical Quarterly 32, no. 127 (1982): 127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, Lydia, and Peterson, Michael L.. “Against Physicalism-Plus-God: How Creation Accounts for Divine Action in Nature’s World.” Faith and Philosophy 29, no. 3 (2012): 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Elizabeth A. “Does God Play Dice? Divine Providence and Chance.” Theological Studies 57, no. 1 (1996): 3–19.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. “From Naturalism to Physicalism: Supervenience Redux.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 85, no. 2 (2011): 109–34.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. “The Non-Reductivist’s Troubles with Mental Causation.” In Mental Causation, edited by Heil, John and Mele, Alfred R., 189–210. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon. “The Myth of Nonreductive Physicalism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63, no. 3 (1989): 31–47.Google Scholar
Kirk, Robert. “The Non-Reductivist’s Troubles with Mental Causation.” In Mental Causation, edited by Heil, John and Mele, Alfred R., 189–210. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C. “An Eastern Orthodox Critique of the Science-Theology Dialogue.” Zygon 51, no. 3 (2016): 573–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Christopher C. “Theistic Naturalism and ‘Special’ Divine Providence.” Zygon 44, no. 3 (2009): 533–42.Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C. “Emergence, Naturalism, and Panentheism: An Eastern Christian Perspective.” In All That Is: A Naturalistic Faith for the Twenty-First Century. Theology and the Sciences, edited by Clayton, Philip, 81–92. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C. The God of Nature: Incarnation and Contemporary Science. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher C. “Theistic Naturalism and the Word Made Flesh.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflection on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur, 48–61. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Laroche, Rebecca. Medical Authority and Englishwomen’s Herbal Texts, 1550–1650. Literary and Scientific Cultures of Early Modernity. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Larvor, Brendan. “Naturalism.” In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Humanism, edited by Copson, Andrew and Grayling, A. C., 37–54. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David K. “An Argument for the Identity Theory.” The Journal of Philosophy 63, no. 1 (1966): 17–25.Google Scholar
Lossky, Vladimir. The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church. Cambridge: James Clarke, 1991.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Peter, Nagasawa, Yujin, and Stoljar, Daniel. There’s Something about Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Cynthia, and Macdonald, Graham. “Emergence and Downward Causation.” In Emergence in Mind, edited by Macdonald, Graham and Macdonald, Cynthia, 139–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, Kenan. Man, Beast and Zombie: What Science Can and Cannot Tell Us about Human Nature. London: Phoenix, 2001.Google Scholar
Manning, Russell Re. “Mere Summing Up? Some Considerations on the History of the Concept of Emergence and Its Significance for Science and Religion.” Science and Christian Belief 19, no. 1 (2007): 37–58.Google Scholar
Maximus the Confessor. On the Cosmic Mystery of Jesus Christ, translated by Blowers, Paul and Wilson, Robert Louis. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2003.Google Scholar
McNamara, Patrick. The Neuroscience of Religious Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Miller, Peter. The Smart Swarm: How Understanding Flocks, Schools, and Colonies Can Make Us Better at Communicating, Decision Making, and Getting Things Done. New York: Avery, 2010.Google Scholar
Morowitz, Harold J. The Emergence of Everything: How the World Became Complex. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mullins, Ryan. “The Difficulty with Demarcating Panentheism.” Sophia 55, no. 3 (2016): 325–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Divine Action, Emergence and Scientific Explanation.” In The Cambridge Companion to Science and Religion, edited by Harrison, Peter, 244–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Arthur Peacocke’s Naturalistic Christian Faith for the Twenty-First Century: A Brief Introduction.” Zygon 43, no. 1 (2008): 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Emergence, Downward Causation and Divine Action.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Stoeger, William R.. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Science and the Problem of Evil: Suffering as a By-Product of a Finely Tuned Cosmos.” In Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, Vol. 1, edited by Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 131–52. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Foundation, 2007.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Physicalism without Reductionism: Toward a Scientifically, Philosophically, and Theologically Sound Portrait of Human Nature.” Zygon 34, no. 4 (1999): 551–71.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Nonreductive Physicalism: Philosophical Issues.” In What About the Soul? Scientific and Theological Portraits of Human Nature. Theology and the Sciences, edited by Brown, Warren S., Murphy, Nancey C., and Newton Malony, H., 127–39. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. “Divine Action in the Natural Order: Buridan’s Ass and Schrodinger’s Cat.” In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey, and Peacocke, Arthur R., 289–324. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory, 1997.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey, John Russell, Robert, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., eds. Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, Vol. 1. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Foundation, 2007.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review 83, no. 4 (1974): 435–50.Google Scholar
Neander, Karen. “Teleological Theories of Mental Content: Can Darwin Solve the Problem of Intentionality?” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, edited by Ruse, Michael, 381–409. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Newberg, Andrew B. Principles of Neurotheology. Ashgate Science and Religion Series. Surrey: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Northoff, Georg. Minding the Brain: A Guide to Philosophy and Neuroscience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar
Oord, Thomas J. “The Divine Spirit as Causal and Personal.” Zygon 48, no. 2 (2013): 466–77.Google Scholar
Padgett, Alan G. “God and Miracle in an Age of Science.” In The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity, edited by Stump, J. B. and Padgett, Alan G., 533–42. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. “Theological Appropriation of Scientific Understandings: Response to Hefner, Wicken, Eaves, and Tipler.” In Beginning with the End: God, Science, and Wolfhart Pannenberg, edited by Albright, Carol Rausch and Haugen, Joel, 427–44. Chicago: Open Court, 1997.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. Systematic Theology: Volume 1, translated by Bromiley, G.. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar
Pannenberg, Wolfhart. “The Doctrine of Creation and Modern Science.” In Cosmos as Creation, edited by Peters, Ted, 152–76. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 1989.Google Scholar
Papineau, David. “What Exactly Is the Explanatory Gap?” Philosophia 39, no. 1 (2011): 5–19.Google Scholar
Papineau, David. “The Causal Closure Principle and Naturalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, edited by McLaughlin, Brian P., Beckermann, Ansgar, and Walter, Sven, 53–65. Oxford: Clarendon, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, David. “The Rise of Physicalism.” In Physicalism and Its Discontents, edited by Gillett, Carl and Loewer, Barry, 3–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Parmar, Arpit. “Gut–Brain Axis, Psychobiotics, and Mental Health.” Asian Journal of Psychiatry 22 (2016): 84–85.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R. All That Is: A Naturalistic Faith for the Twenty-First Century, edited by Clayton, Philip. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R.. “Emergence, Mind, and Divine Action: The Hierarchy of the Sciences in Relation to the Human Mind–Brain–Body.” In The Re-emergence of Emergence: The Emergentist Hypothesis from Science to Religion, edited by Clayton, Philip and Davies, Paul, 257–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R.. The Palace of Glory: God’s World and Science. Adelaide, Australia: ATF Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R.. “Introduction: ‘In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being’?,” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur, xvii–iix. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R.. “Kenotic Creation and Divine Action.” In The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis, edited by Polkinghorne, John C., 90–106. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R.. Paths from Science toward God: The End of All Our Exploring. Oxford: OneWorld, 2001.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Arthur R.. Theology for a Scientific Age: Being and Becoming – Natural, Divine, and Human. Theology and the Sciences. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Pegis, Anton C., ed. Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Vol. 2. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1945.Google Scholar
Peters, Ted, Russell, Robert John, and Welker, Michael, eds. Resurrection: Theological and Scientific Assessments. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Place, U. T. “Is Consciousness a Brain Process?” In The Philosophy of Mind: Classical Problems/Contemporary Issues, edited by Beakley, Brian and Ludlow, Peter, 33–40. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. “What Is ‘Intervention’?” Theology and Science 6, no. 4 (2008): 369–401.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. “The Hidden Spirit and the Cosmos.” In The Work of the Spirit: Pneumatology and Pentecostalism, edited by Welker, Michael, 169–82. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. Science and Providence: God’s Interaction with the World. London: Templeton Foundation Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. Science and the Trinity: The Christian Encounter with Reality. London: SPCK, 2004.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. “Eschatological Credibility: Emergent and Teleological Processes.” In Resurrection: Theological and Scientific Assessments, edited by Peters, Ted, Russell, Robert John, and Welker, Michael, 43–55. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. The Faith of a Physicist: Reflections of a Bottom-Up Thinker. The Gifford Lectures for 1993–1994. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John. Science and Christian Belief: Theological Reflections of a Bottom-Up Thinker. The Gifford Lectures for 1993–1994. London: SPCK, 1994.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, John, ed. The Work of Love: Creation as Kenosis. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2001.Google Scholar
Porter, Andrew. By the Waters of Naturalism: Theology Perplexed among the Sciences. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
Prabhakar, Balaji, Dektar, Katherine N., Gordon, Deborah M., and Couzin, Iain D.. “The Regulation of Ant Colony Foraging Activity without Spatial Information (Regulation of Ant Colony Foraging Activity).” PLoS Computational Biology 8, no. 8 (2012): E1002670.Google Scholar
Price, Mark. “Should We Expect to Feel as If We Understand Consciousness?” In Explaining Consciousness: The “Hard Problem.” A Bradford Book, edited by Shear, Jonathan, 83–93. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. “Challenge and Progress in ‘Theology and Science’: An Overview of the VO/CTNS Series.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 3–56. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. “Quantum Physics and the Theology of Non-Interventionist Objective Divine Action.” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, edited by Clayton, Philip and Simpson, Zachary, 579–94. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. “Eschatology and Physical Cosmology: A Preliminary Reflection.” In The Far-Future Universe, edited by Ellis, George F. R., 266–315. Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Russell, Robert J. “Does the ‘God Who Acts’ Really Act? New Approaches to Divine Action in Light of Science.” Theology Today 54, no. 1 (1997): 43–65.Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas. Divine Action and Modern Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Saunders, Nicholas. “Does God Cheat at Dice? Divine Action and Quantum Possibilities.” Zygon 35, no. 3 (2000): 517–44.Google Scholar
Saunders, Simon, Barrett, Jonathan, Kent, Adrian, and Wallace, David. Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Scruton, Roger. The Face of God. The Gifford Lectures 2010. New York: Continuum, 2012.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no. 3 (1980): 417–24.Google Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood. “Why Naturalism and Not Materialism?” The Philosophical Review 36, no. 3 (1927): 216–25.Google Scholar
Silberstein, Michael, and McGeever, John. “The Search for Ontological Emergence.” Philosophical Quarterly 49, no. 195 (1999): 182–200.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “Divine Action and Thomism: Why Thomas Aquinas’ Thought Is Attractive Today.” Acta Philosophica 1, no. 25 (2016): 65–84.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “A Cause among Causes? God Acting in the Natural World.” The European Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 7, no. 4 (2015): 99–114.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “Revisiting Aquinas on Providence and Rising to the Challenge of Divine Action in Nature.” The Journal of Religion 94, no. 3 (2014): 277–91.Google Scholar
Silva, Ignacio. “Thomas Aquinas Holds Fast: Objections to Aquinas within Today’s Debate on Divine Action.” Heythrop Journal 54, no. 4 (2013): 658–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Zachary. “Emergence and Non-Personal Theology.” Zygon 48, no. 2 (2013): 405–27.Google Scholar
Simpson, Zachary. “Editor’s Introduction: Adventures in Dialogue.” In Adventures in the Spirit: God, World, Divine Action, edited by Simpson, Zachary, 1–20. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” The Philosophical Review 68, no. 2 (1959): 141–56.Google Scholar
Smedes, Taede. “Beyond Barbour or Back to Basics? The Future of Science-and-Religion and the Question for Unity.” Zygon 43, no. 1 (2008): 235–58.Google Scholar
Smedes, Taede. “Chaos: Where Science and Religion Meet? A Critical Evaluation of the Use of Chaos Theory in Theology.” In Studies in Science and Theology 8: Yearbook of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology 2001–2002, edited by Henrik Gregersen, Niels, Görman, Ulf, and Meisinger, Hubert, 277–94. Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, James K. A. Thinking in Tongues: Pentecostal Contributions to Christian Philosophy. Pentecostal Manifestos. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Smith, James K. A. “Is the Universe Open for Surprise? Pentecostal Ontology and the Spirit of Naturalism.” Zygon 43, no. 4 (2008): 879–96.Google Scholar
Smith, James K. A. “The Spirit, Religions, and the World as Sacrament: A Response to Amos Yong’s Pneumatological Assist.” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 15, no. 2 (2007): 251–61.Google Scholar
Smith, James K. A. Introducing Radical Orthodoxy: Mapping a Post-Secular Theology. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2004.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. The Groaning of Creation. London: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher., ed. God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion, 3rd ed. London: T&T Clark International, 2011.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher, and Robinson, Andrew. “Varieties of Theodicy: An Exploration of Responses to the Problem of Evil Based on a Typology of Good-Harm Analyses.” In Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, Vol. 1, edited by Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 67–90. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Foundation, 2007.Google Scholar
Stearns, Beverley Peterson, and Stearns, Stephen C.. Watching, from the Edge of Extinction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Leslie, Haberman, David L., and Matthews Wright, Peter. Twelve Theories of Human Nature, 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Stoeger, William R. “Describing God’s Action in the World in Light of Scientific Knowledge of Reality.” In Philosophy, Science, and Divine Action. Philosophical Studies in Science and Religion, Vol. 1, edited by Shults, F. LeRon, Murphy, Nancey C., and Russel, Robert J., 111–39. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar
Stoeger, William R. “Conceiving Divine Action in a Dynamic Universe.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 225–47. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Stoeger, William R. “Entropy, Emergence, and the Physical Roots of Natural Evil.” In Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, Vol. 1, edited by Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 93–108. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Foundation, 2007.Google Scholar
Stoeger, William R. “Epistemological and Ontological Issues Arising from Quantum Theory.” In Quantum Mechanics: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Clayton, Philip, Wegter-McNelly, Kirk, and Polkinghorne, John, 81–98. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. “The Charm of Naturalism.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 70, no. 2 (1996): 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. Mind, Brain, and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Swinburne, Richard. “Soul, Nature and Immortality of the Soul.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Craig, Edward. London: Routledge, 2005, www.rep.routledge.com/article/K096.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. “Eschatology without a Future?” In The End of the World and the Ends of God, edited by Polkinghorne, John and Welker, Michael, 222–37. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Tennyson, Alfred. “In Memoriam A.H.H.” LVI: 13–16. In Tennyson: A Selected Edition, edited by Ricks, Christopher, 399. Harlow: Longman, 1989.Google Scholar
Thomas, Owen C. “Chaos, Complexity, and God: A Review Essay.” Theology Today 54, no. 1 (1997): 66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, Andrew. “Should a Christian Adopt Methodological Naturalism?” Zygon 52, no. 3 (2017): 691–725.Google Scholar
Tracy, Thomas F. “Special Divine Action and the Laws of Nature.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Stoeger, William R., 249–83. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Tracy, Thomas F. “The Lawfulness of Nature and the Problem of Evil.” In Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, Vol. 1, edited by Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 153–78. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Foundation, 2007.Google Scholar
Tracy, Thomas F. “Particular Providence and the God of the Gaps.” In Chaos and Complexity: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Murphy, Nancey, and Peacocke, Arthur R., 289–324. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory, 1997.Google Scholar
Van Gulick, Robert. “Functionalism.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, edited by McLaughlin, Brian P., Beckermann, Ansgar, and Walter, Sven, 128–51. Oxford: Clarendon, 2009.Google Scholar
Van Gulick, Robert. “Functionalism and Qualia.” In The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness, edited by Velmans, Max and Schneider, Susan, 381–95. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
Van Gulick, Robert. “Who’s in Charge Here? And Who’s Doing All the Work?” In Mental Causation, edited by Heil, John and Mele, Alfred, 233–56. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995.Google Scholar
Van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel. “Emergence and Human Uniqueness: Limiting or Delimiting Evolutionary Explanation?” Zygon 41, no. 3 (2006): 649–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Jamie. The Student’s Guide to Cognitive Neuroscience. Hove: Psychology Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. Christ and the Cosmos: A Reformulation of Trinitarian Doctrine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. The Big Questions in Science and Religion. Hensley Henson Lectures. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. “God as a Principle of Cosmological Explanation.” In Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding, edited by Russell, Robert John, Stoeger, William R., S. J., and Coyne, George V., S. J., 247–61. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory, 1988.Google Scholar
Ware, Kallistos. “God Immanent Yet Transcendent: The Divine Energies According to Saint Gregory Palamas.” In In Whom We Live and Move and Have Our Being: Panentheistic Reflections on God’s Presence in a Scientific World, edited by Clayton, Philip and Peacocke, Arthur, 157–68. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar
Wasser, Michael. “The Mechanical World-View and the Decline of Witch Beliefs in Scotland.” In Witchcraft and Belief in Early Modern Scotland. Palgrave Historical Studies in Witchcraft and Magic, edited by Goodare, Julian, Martin, Lauren, and Miller, Joyce, 206–26. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
Wegter-McNelly, Kirk. “Does God Need Room to Act? Theo-Physical In/Compatibilism in Noninterventionist Theories of Objectively Special Divine Action.” In Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action: Twenty Years of Challenge and Progress, edited by Russell, Robert John, Murphy, Nancey, and Stoeger, William R., 299–314. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Wesley, John. The Westminster Confession of Faith, 3rd ed. Lawrenceville, GA: Committee for Christian Education and Publications, 1990.Google Scholar
Wesson, Robert, and Williams, Patricia A., eds. Evolution and Human Values. Value Inquiry Book Series. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Rodopi, 1995.Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Erik J. “Fiona Ellis, God, Value, and Nature.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78, no. 1 (2015): 131–35.Google Scholar
Wildman, Wesley. “The Use and Meaning of the Word ‘Suffering’ in Relation to Nature.” In Physics and Cosmology V. 1: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, edited by Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 53–66. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 2008.Google Scholar
Wildman, Wesley. “Incongruous Goodness, Perilous Beauty, Disconcerting Truth: Ultimate Reality and Suffering in Nature.” In Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Natural Evil, Vol. 1, edited by Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R., S. J., 267–94. Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Foundation, 2007.Google Scholar
Wildman, Wesley. “Robert John Russell’s Theology of God’s Action.” In God’s Action in Nature’s World: Essays in Honour of Robert John Russell, edited by Peters, Ted and Hallanger, Nathan, 147–68. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Wildman, Wesley. “The Divine Action Project, 1988–2003.” Theology and Science 2, no. 1 (2004): 31–75.Google Scholar
Yong, Amos. The Spirit of Creation: Modern Science and Divine Action in the Pentecostal-Charismatic Imagination. Pentecostal Manifestos. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar
Yong, Amos. “How Does God Do What God Does? Pentecostal-Charismatic Perspectives on Divine Action in Dialogue with Modern Science.” In Science and the Spirit: A Pentecostal Engagement with the Sciences, edited by Smith, James K. A. and Yong, Amos, 50–71. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Yong, Amos. “The Spirit at Work in the World: A Pentecostal-Charismatic Perspective on the Divine Action Project.” Theology and Science 7, no. 2 (2009): 123–40.Google Scholar
Yong, Amos. “Radically Orthodox, Reformed, and Pentecostal: Rethinking the Intersection of Post/Modernity and the Religions in Conversation with James K. A. Smith.” Journal of Pentecostal Theology 15, no. 2 (2007): 233–50.Google Scholar