Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-zc66z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-03T19:34:18.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2025

Amy Catalinac
Amy Catalinac
Affiliation:
New York University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Dominance Through Division
Group-Based Clientelism in Japan
 , pp. 345 - 362
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACE: The Electoral Knowledge Network. 2013. “The ACE Encyclopaedia: Parties and Candidates.” http://aceproject.org/ace-en/topics/pc/pca/pca02/pca02b.Google Scholar
Akizuki, Kengo. 1995. Institutionalizing the Local System: The Ministry of Home Affairs and Intergovernmental Relations in Japan. In The Japanese Civil Service and Economic Development: Catalysts of Change, ed. Kim, Hyung-Ki, Michio Muramatsu, T. J. Pempel and Yamamura, Kozo. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 337–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertus, Michael. 2019. “Theory and Methods in the Study of Distributive Politics.” Political Science Research and Methods 7(3):629–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Oliver E. 1993. The Tiger: The Rise and Fall of Tammany Hall. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Amano, Kenya and Katada, Saori N.. N.D. “Economic Policy Trilemma and Longevity of a Political Party: A Study of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party in a Comparative Perspective.” Paper Presented at the American Political Science Association Meeting, Los Angele, CA, September 2023.Google Scholar
Arase, David. 2010. “Japan in 2009: A Historic Election Year.” Asian Survey 50(1):40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ariga, Kenichi. 2015. “Incumbency Disadvantage under Electoral Rules with Intraparty Competition: Evidence from Japan.” The Journal of Politics 77(3):874–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimbun, Asahi. 2003. “Jimin Otosu Aichi ‘Chinjyo Hodo Hodo Ni’ Soumusho Yatsu Atari? Nagoya.” Asahi Shimbun p. 2. November 18.Google Scholar
Shimbun, Asahi. 2017. “Jimin: Ishizaki Shi ‘Kuni Yosan, Niigata Ni Oritekonai’ ‘Mousou wo Motomeru,’ Jimin Ga Hihan, Niigata Ken.” Asahi Shimbun pp. Niigata Edition, p. 25. November 9.Google Scholar
Shimbun, Asahi. 2021. “Jimin Daburu Rakusen. Kita Kyushu, Hajimete Jimoto Yoto Daigishi ga Fuzai ni.” Asahi Shimbun p. 2. November 5.Google Scholar
Aspinall, Edward, Weiss, Meredith L., Hicken, Allen and Hutchcroft, Paul D.. 2022. Mobilizing for Elections: Patronage and Political Machines in Southeast Asia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Kate. 2013. “Why Vote with the Chief? Political Connections and Public Goods Provision in Zambia.” American Journal of Political Science 57(4): 794–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banful, Afua Branoah. 2011. “Do Formula-Based Intergovernmental Transfer Mechanisms Eliminate Politically Motivated Targeting? Evidence from Ghana.” Journal of Development Economics 96(2):380–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen and Thies, Michael. 2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized under PR, Plurality and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 5(1):5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Matthew E., Struthers, Cory L., Shugart, Matthew S., Pekkanen, Robert J. and Krauss, Ellis S.. 2022. “The Party Personnel Datasets: Advancing Comparative Research in Party Behavior and Legislative Organization across Electoral Systems.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47(3):741–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessho, Shunichiro. 2016. Case Study of Central and Local Government Finance in Japan. ADBI Working Paper Series 599 Asian Development Bank Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote?: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattman, Christopher, Emeriau, Mathilde and Fiala, Nathan. 2018. “Do Anti-Poverty Programs Sway Voters? Experimental Evidence from Uganda.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 100(5):891–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouissou, Jean-Marie. 1999. Organizing One’s Support Base under SNTV: The Case of the Japanese Koenkai. In Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote, ed. Grofman, Bernard, Lee, Sung-Chull, Winckler, Edwin and Woodall, Brian. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press pp. 87–120.Google Scholar
Brierley, Sarah and Nathan, Noah L.. 2021. “The Connections of Party Brokers: Which Brokers Do Parties Select?” The Journal of Politics 83(3):884–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brun, Diego Abente and Diamond, Larry. 2014. Clientelism, Social Policy, and the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo and Stokes, Susan C.. 2004. “Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 39(2):66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussell, Jennifer. 2019. Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto and Victoria Murillo, Maria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4):742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cammett, Melani and Issar, Sukriti. 2010. “Bricks and Mortar Clientelism: Sectarianism and the Logics of Welfare Allocation in Lebanon.” World Politics 62(3):381–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Camp, Edwin, Dixit, Avinash and Stokes, Susan. 2014. “Catalyst or Cause? Legislation and the Demise of Machine Politics in Britain and the United States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 39(4):559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancela, João and Geys, Benny. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42: 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14:417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Matthew and Reed, Steven R.. 2018 a. Political Corruption and Scandals in Japan. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Matthew and Reed, Steven R.. 2018 b. Scandals during the Abe Administrations. In Japan Decides 2017: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan and Smith, Daniel. London: Palgrave MacMillan pp. 109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, Mauro and Falco, Paolo. 2019. Your Vote Is (No) Secret! How Low Voter Density Harms Voter Anonymity and Biases Elections in Italy. EconPol Working Paper 26 Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.Google Scholar
Catalinac, Amy. 2015. “From Pork to Policy: The Rise of Programmatic Campaigning in Japanese Elections.” Journal of Politics 78(1).Google Scholar
Catalinac, Amy. 2016. Electoral Reform and National Security in Japan: From Pork to Foreign Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy. 2018. “Positioning under Alternative Electoral Systems: Evidence from Japanese Candidate Election Manifestos.” American Political Science Review 112(1):31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy, Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and Smith, Alastair. 2020. “A Tournament Theory of Pork Barrel Politics: The Case of Japan.” Comparative Political Studies 53(10–11):1619–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy and Motolinia, Lucia. 2021 a. “Geographically-Targeted Spending in Mixed-Member Majoritarian Electoral Systems.” World Politics 73(4): 668–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catalinac, Amy and Motolinia, Lucia. 2021 b. “Why Geographically-Targeted Spending Under Closed-List Proportional Representation Favors Marginal Districts.” Electoral Studies 71:102329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2007. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ray. 2006. “An Analysis of the 2005 Japanese General Election: Will Koizumi’s Political Reforms Endure?” Asian Survey 46(4):497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ray and Sawat Selway, Joel. 2017. “Pork-Barrel Politics and Electoral Reform: Explaining the Curious Differences in the Experiences of Thailand and Japan.” The Journal of Asian Studies 76(2):283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ray and Colvin, Kyle. 2009. Stealing Elections: A Comparison of Election Night Corruption in Japan, Canada, and the United States. In Political Change in Japan: Electoral Behavior, Party Realignment, and the Koizumi Reforms, ed. Shimizu, Kay, Reed, Steven R. and McElwain, Kenneth. Stanford University: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
Chubb, Judith. 1982. Patronage, Power and Poverty in Southern Italy: A Tale of Two Cities. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conover, Emily, Zárate, Román A., Camacho, Adriana and Baez, Javier E.. 2020. “Cash and Ballots: Conditional Transfers, Political Participation, and Voting Behavior.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 68(2):541–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooperman, Alicia Dailey. 2024. “Bloc Voting for Electoral Accountability.” American Political Science Review 118(3):1222–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correa, Diego Sanches and Antonio Cheibub, Jose. 2016. “The Anti-Incumbent Effects of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs.” Latin American Politics and Society 58(1):49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4):903–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2009. “Swing Voters, Core Voters, and Distributive Politics.” In Political Representation, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Sue C., Wood, Elisabeth Jean, and Kirshner, Alexander S.. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press pp. 342–357.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Niou, Emerson. 1994. “Seat Bonuses under the Single Nontransferable Vote System: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan.” Comparative Politics 26(2):221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Rosenbluth, Frances M. and Thies, Michael F.. 1998. “Mobilization, Social Networks, and Turnout: Evidence from Japan.” World Politics 50(3):447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Rosenbluth, Frances. 1995. “Anatomy of a Split: The Liberal Democrats of Japan.” Electoral Studies 14(4):355–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Fiva, Jon H. and Smith, Daniel M.. 2016. “The Contraction Effect: How Proportional Representation Affects Mobilization and Turnout.” The Journal of Politics 78(4):1249–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Matthew D.. 1986. “Electoral Politics as a Redistributive Game.” Journal of Politics 48(2):370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Munger, Michael C.. 1989. “Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 US House Elections.” American Political Science Review 83(1):217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Karen E. and Schoppa, Leonard. 2002. “Interaction Effects in Mixed Member Electoral Systems: Theory and Evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy.” Comparative Politics 35(9):1027–1053.Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Schneider, Benjamin, Catalinac, Amy and Muraoka, Taishi. 2021. “Capturing Vote-Seeking Incentives and the Cultivation of a Personal and Party Vote.” Electoral Studies 72:102369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, Cesi. 2019. “Social Networks and the Targeting of Vote Buying.” Comparative Political Studies 52(3):382–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, Gerald. 1971. Election Campaigning, Japanese Style. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Gerald. 1999. The Logic of Japanese Politics: Leaders, Institutions, and the Limits of Political Change. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, Matz and Johansson, Eva. 2002. “On the Vote-Purchasing Behavior of Incumbent Governments.” American Political Science Review 96(1):27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yomiuri, Daily. 2009. “DPJ Grabs Tokyo Poll Spoils. Becomes Largest Party in Assembly; LDP Left Licking Wounds.” Daily Yomiuri. July 13.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2003. Food Fights over Free Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. and Oh, Jennifer. 2007. “Repeal of the Rice Laws in Japan: The Role of International Pressure to Overcome Vested Interests.” Comparative Politics 40(1):21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kadt, Daniel and Lieberman, Evan S.. 2020. “Nuanced Accountability: Voter Responses to Service Delivery in Southern Africa.” British Journal of Political Science 50(1):185–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De La, O., Lorena, Ana. 2015. Crafting Policies to End Poverty in Latin America: The Quiet Transformation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellmuth, Lisa Maria and Stoffel, Michael F.. 2012. “Distributive Politics and Intergovernmental Transfers: The Local Allocation of European Union Structural Funds.” European Union Politics 13(3):413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denemark, David. 2000. “Partisan Pork Barrel in Parliamentary Systems: Australian Constituency-Level Grants.” Journal of Politics 62(3):896–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desposato, Scott and Scheiner, Ethan. 2008. “Governmental Centralization and Party Affiliation: Legislator Strategies in Brazil and Japan.” The American Political Science Review 102(4):509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWit, Andrew. 2002. “Dry Rot: The Corruption of General Subsidies in Japan.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 7(3):355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, Estévez, Federico and Magaloni, Beatriz. 2016. The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Avinash and Londregan, John. 1996. “The Determinants of Success of Special Interests in Redistributive Politics.” Journal of Politics 58:1132–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, Keith. 2005. “Is It Rational to Vote? Five Types of Answer and a Suggestion.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7(3):442–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Endersby, James W., Galatas, Steven E. and Rackaway, Chapman B.. 2002. “Closeness Counts in Canada: Voter Participation in the 1993 and 1997 Federal Elections.” Journal of Politics 64(2):610–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, Masahisa, Pekkanen, Robert J. and Reed, Steven R.. 2013. The LDP’s Path Back to Power. In Japan Decides 2012: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eshima, Shusei, Horiuchi, Yusaku, Kuriwaki, Shiro and Smith, Daniel M.. N.D. “Winning Elections with Unpopular Policies: Valence Advantage and Single-Party Dominance in Japan.” Unpublished https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4371978Google Scholar
Estevez-Abe, Margarita. 2008. Welfare and Capitalism in Postwar Japan. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedderson, Timothy J. 2004. “Rational Choice Theory and the Paradox of Not Voting.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(1):99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finan, Federico and Schechter, Laura. 2012. “Vote Buying and Reciprocity.” Econometrica 80(2):863–881.Google Scholar
Fouirnaies, Alexander and Mutlu-Eren, Hande. 2015. “English Bacon: Copartisan Bias in Intergovernmental Grant Allocation in England.” The Journal of Politics 77(3):805–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, Naofumi. 2020. “Effect of Malapportionment on Voter Turnout: Evidence from Japan’s Upper House Elections.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 19(4):542–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Haruhiro and Fukai, Shigeko N.. 1999. Campaigning for the Japanese Diet. In Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote, ed. Grofman, B., Lee, S. C., Winckler, E. A. and Woodall, B.. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press pp. 121–152.Google Scholar
Fukui, Haruhiro and Fukai, Shigeko N.. 1996. “Pork Barrel Politics, Networks, and Local Economic Development in Contemporary Japan.” Asian Survey 36(3):268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukumoto, Kentaro, Horiuchi, Yusaku and Tanaka, Shoichiro. 2020. “Treated Politicians, Treated Voters: A Natural Experiment on Political Budget Cycles.” Electoral Studies 67:102206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, Patricia and Gathmann, Christina. 2013. “How Do Electoral Systems Affect Fiscal Policy? Evidence from Cantonal Parliaments, 1890–2000.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11(5):1178–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc and Palay, Thomas. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael. 1991. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 10(1):33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans-Morse, Jordan, Mazzuca, Sebastián and Nichter, Simeon. 2014. “Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics during Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 58(2):415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, Hope Dewell. 2021. “The Political Strategy of Appealing to Religious Nationalism: Examining Motivations to Join Religious Organizations by Japanese LDP Politicians.” Politics and Religion 14(4):691–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geys, Benny 2006. “Rational Theories of Voter Turnout: A Review.” Political Studies Review 4(1):16–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam A. and Nazrullaeva, Eugenia. 2023. The Puzzle of Clientelism: Political Discretion and Elections around the World. Elements in Political Economy. Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/core/elements/puzzle-of-clientelism/88A948968E0C25B29A31BCDEB2DCE4DFGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam A. and Picci, Lucio. 2008. “Pork-Barrel Politics in Postwar Italy, 1953–94.” American Journal of Political Science 52(2):268–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam A. and Min, Brian. 2013. “Distributive Politics around the World.” Annual Review of Political Science 16(1):73–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goplerud, Max and Smith, Daniel M.. 2023. “Who Answers for the Government? Bureaucrats, Ministers, and Responsible Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 67(4):963–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Jessica, Grossman, Guy, Larreguy, Horacio and Marx, Benjamin. 2019. “A Signaling Theory of Distributive Policy Choice: Evidence from Senegal.” The Journal of Politics 81(2):631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Jessica and Larreguy, Horacio. 2020. “An Informational Theory of Electoral Targeting in Young Clientelistic Democracies: Evidence from Senegal.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15(1):73–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. Andrew and Posner, Daniel N.. 2019. “(Under What Conditions) Do Politicians Reward Their Supporters? Evidence from Kenya’s Constituencies Development Fund.” American Political Science Review 113(1): 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashida, Kazuhiro. 1967. “Development of Election Law in Japan.” Hosei Kenkyu 34(1):51–104.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2007. How Do Rules and Institutions Encourage Vote Buying? In Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying, ed. Schaffer, Frederic Charles. Lynne Rienner Boulder, CO pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2011. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14(1):289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen and Nathan, Noah L.. 2020. “Clientelism’s Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Nonprogrammatic Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 23(1):277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higashijima, Masaaki and Washida, Hidekuni. 2024. “Varieties of Clientelism across Political Parties: New Measures of Patron–Client Relationships.” European Political Science Review 16(2):260–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo. 2006. “Electoral Institutions, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities: Evidence from Japanese Electoral Reforms.” World Politics 58:51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo. 2011. “Do Individual Representatives Influence Government Transfers? Evidence from Japan.” Journal of Politics 73(4):1081–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Michisada. 1993. Hojokin to Seikento. Tokyo: Asahi Shimbunsha.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha C. and Palmer-Rubin, Brian. 2015. “Beyond the Machine: Clientelist Brokers and Interest Organizations in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 48(9):1186–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku. 2005. Institutions, Incentives and Electoral Participation in Japan: Cross-level and Cross-national Perspectives. London: Routledge Curzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku, Smith, Daniel M. and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2018. “Measuring Voters’ Multidimensional Policy Preferences with Conjoint Analysis: Application to Japan’s 2014 Election.” Political Analysis 26(2):190–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku, Smith, Daniel M. and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2020. “Identifying Voter Preferences for Politicians’ Personal Attributes: A Conjoint Experiment in Japan.” Political Science Research and Methods 8(1):75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku and Saito, Jun. 2003. “Reapportionment and Redistribution: Consequences of Electoral Reform in Japan.” American Journal of Political Science 47(4):669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horiuchi, Yusaku, Saito, Jun and Yamada, Kyohei. 2015. “Removing Boundaries, Losing Connections: Electoral Consequences of Local Government Reform in Japan.” Journal of East Asian Studies 15:99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshi, Takeo and Lipscy, Phillip Y., eds. 2021. “The Political Economy of the Abe Government.” In The Political Economy of the Abe Government and Abenomics Reforms, ed. Hoshi, Takeo and Lipscy, Phillip Y.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. and Ting, Michael M.. 2013. “Redistribution, Pork, and Elections.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11(6):1382–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchcroft, Paul D. et al. 2014. Linking Capital and Countryside: Patronage and Clientelism in Japan, Thailand, and the Philippines. In Clientelism, Social Policy, and the Quality of Democracy, ed. Brun, Diego Abente and Diamond, Larry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press pp. 174–203.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary and Velasco Rivera, Carlos. 2019. “Do Nonpartisan Programmatic Policies Have Partisan Electoral Effects? Evidence from Two Large Scale Experiments.” Journal of Politics 81(2):714–730.Google Scholar
Ishihara, Nobuo. 1986. The Local Public Finance System. In Japan’s Public Sector: How Government Is Financed, ed. Shibata, Tokue. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press pp. 132–155.Google Scholar
Jensenius, Francesca R. and Chhibber, Pradeep. 2023. “Privileging One’s Own? Voting Patterns and Politicized Spending in India.” Comparative Political Studies 56(4):503–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jou, Willy. 2009. “Electoral Reform and Party System Development in Japan and Taiwan: A Comparative Study.” Asian Survey 49(5):759–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jou, Willy. 2010. “Voter Turnout in Japan: An Aggregate-Level Analysis of the 2005 and 2009 General Elections.” Asian Survey 50(6):1032–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabashima, Ikuo and Steel, Gill. 2007. “How Junichiro Koizumi Seized the Leadership of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 8(1):95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Junko. 1998. “When the Party Breaks Up: Exit and Voice among Japanese Legislators.” The American Political Science Review 92(4):857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip and Khemani, Stuti. 2009. “When Do Legislators Pass on Pork? The Role of Political Parties in Determining Legislator Effort.” American Political Science Review 103(1):99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, Valdimer O. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.” Comparative Political Studies 33(6–7):845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Kselman, Daniel M.. 2013. “Economic Development, Democratic Experience, and Political Parties’ Linkage Strategies.” Comparative Political Studies 46(11):1453–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Singer, Matthew. 2018. Linkage Strategies of Authoritarian Successor Parties. In Life after Dictatorship: Authoritarian Successor Parties Worldwide, ed. Loxton, James and Mainwaring, Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 53–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. 2007. Citizen–Politician Linkages: An Introduction. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I.. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press pp. 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert et al. 2013. Democratic Accountability and Linkages Project. Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar
Koellner, Patrick. 2009. “Japanese Lower House Campaigns in Transition: Manifest Changes or Fleeting Fads?” Journal of East Asian Studies 9(1): 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohno, Masaru. 1997 a. The Creation of the Liberal Democratic Party in 1955. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press pp. 68–90.Google Scholar
Kohno, Masaru. 1997 b. “Voter Turnout and Strategic Ticket-Splitting under Japan’s New Electoral Rules.” Asian Survey 37(5):429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohno, Masaru and Nishizawa, Yoshitaka. 1990. “A Study of the Electoral Business Cycle in Japan: Elections and Government Spending on Public Construction.” Comparative Politics 22(2):151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, Weston. 2009. “The Democratic Party of Japan: Its Foreign Policy Position and Implications for U.S. Interests.” Congressional Research Report for Congress. August 17.Google Scholar
Kostelka, Filip, Krejcova, Eva, Sauger, Nicolas and Wuttke, Alexander. 2023. “Election Frequency and Voter Turnout.” Comparative Political Studies 56(14):2231–2268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramon, Eric. 2017. Money for Votes: The Causes and Consequences of Electoral Clientelism in Africa. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S., Nemoto, Kuniaki and Pekkanen, Robert J.. 2012. “Reverse Contamination: Burning and Building Bridges in Mixed-Member Systems.” Comparative Political Studies 45(6):747–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S. and Pekkanen, Robert J.. 2010. The Rise and Fall of Japan’s LDP. Political Party Organizations as Historical Institutions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S. and Pekkanen, Robert J.. 2004. “Explaining Party Adaptation to Electoral Reform: The Discreet Charm of the LDP.” Journal of Japanese Studies 30:1–34.Google Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S., Pekkanen, Robert J. and Nyblade, Benjamin. 2006. “Electoral Incentives in Mixed-Member Systems: Party, Posts, and Zombie Politicians in Japan.” American Political Science Review 100(2):183–193.Google Scholar
Kuo, Didi. 2018. Clientelism, Capitalism, and Democracy: The Rise of Programmatic Politics in the United States and Britain. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushida, Kenji E. and Lipscy, Phillip Y.. 2013. The Rise and Fall of the Democratic Party of Japan. In Japan under the DPJ: The Politics of Transition and Governance, ed. Kushida, Kenji E. and Lipscy, Phillip Y.. Stanford, CA: The Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Labonne, Julien. 2012. The Local Electoral Impacts of Conditional Cash Transfers: Evidence from a Field Experiment. CSAE Working Paper Series 2012–09 Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Montiel Olea, Cesar E. and Querubin, Pablo. 2017. “Political Brokers: Partisans or Agents? Evidence from the Mexican Teachers’ Union.” American Journal of Political Science 61(4):877–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larreguy, Horacio, Marshall, John and Querubín, Pablo. 2016. “Parties, Brokers, and Voter Mobilization: How Turnout Buying Depends upon the Party’s Capacity to Monitor Brokers.” American Political Science Review 110(1):160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layton, Matthew L. and Erica Smith, Amy. 2015. “Incorporating Marginal Citizens and Voters: The Conditional Electoral Effects of Targeted Social Assistance in Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 48(7):854–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, Edward P. and Rosen, Sherwin. 1981. “Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts.” The Journal of Political Economy 89(5): 841–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2004. “Bicameralism and Geographic Politics: Allocating Funds in the House and Senate.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2):185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Hongbin and Zhou, Li-An. 2005. “Political Turnover and Economic Performance: The Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China.” Journal of Public Economics 89(9–10):1743–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liff, Adam P. 2021. “Japan in 2020: COVID-19 and the End of the Abe Era.” Asian Survey 61(1):49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liff, Adam P. 2022. “Japan in 2021: COVID-19 (Again), the Olympics, and a New Administration.” Asian Survey 62(1):29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liff, Adam P. and Maeda, Ko. 2019. “Electoral Incentives, Policy Compromise, and Coalition Durability: Japan’s LDP–Komeito Government in a Mixed Electoral System.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 20(1):53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar and Weibull, Jörgen W.. 1987. “Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition.” Public Choice 52(3):273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan I. and Morrison, Minion K. C.. 2008. “Are African Voters Really Ethnic or Clientelistic? Survey Evidence from Ghana.” Political Science Quarterly 123(1):95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linos, Elizabeth. 2013. “Do Conditional Cash Transfers Shift Votes? Evidence from the Honduran PRAF.” Electoral Studies 32(4):864–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machidori, Satoshi. 2023. Political Reform Reconsidered: The Trajectory of a Transformed Japanese State. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-19-9433-3Google Scholar
Maclachlan, Patricia L. 2004. “Post Office Politics in Modern Japan: The Postmasters, Iron Triangles, and the Limits of Reform.” Journal of Japanese Studies 30(2):281–313.Google Scholar
Maclachlan, Patricia L. 2006. “Storming the Castle: The Battle for Postal Reform in Japan.” Social Science Japan Journal 9(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclachlan, Patricia L. 2014. “The Electoral Power of Japanese Interest Groups: An Organizational Perspective.” Journal of East Asian Studies 14(3):429–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclachlan, Patricia L. and Shimizu, Kay. 2022. Betting on the Farm: Institutional Change in Japanese Agriculture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Maeda, Ko. 2023. The 2021 Election Results: Continuity and Change. In Japan Decides 2021: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Smith, Daniel M.. Springer International Publishing pp. 23–39. eBook.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, Ko. 2010. “Factors behind the Historic Defeat of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party in 2009.” Asian Survey 50(5):888–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, Ko. 2012. “An Irrational Party of Rational Members: The Collision of Legislators’ Reelection Quest with Party Success in the Japan Socialist Party.” Comparative Political Studies 45(3):341–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maeda, Yukio. 2016. The Abe Cabinet and Public Opinion: How Abe Won Reelection by Narrowing Public Debate. In Japan Decides 2014: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 89–102.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Vol. 296 New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto and Estévez, Federico. 2007. Clientelism and Portfolio Diversification: A Model of Electoral Investment with Applications to Mexico. In Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven I. Editors. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press pp. 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, Rabia. 2019. “(A) Political Constituency Development Funds: Evidence from Pakistan.” British Journal of Political Science 51(3): 963–980.Google Scholar
Malik, Rabia. 2023. “Lesser of Two Evils: Allocating Resources to Opposition Districts in Pakistan.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 48(2):241–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela, 2015. From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela and Young, Lauren E.. 2019. Conditionality & Coercion: Electoral Clientelism in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela and Young, Lauren E.. 2016. “Buying, Expropriating, and Stealing Votes.” Annual Review of Political Science 19:267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masumi, Junnosuke. 1995. Contemporary Politics in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press. Trans. Carlisle, L. E..Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Tomoko, Mori McElwain, Kenneth, Okada, Kensuke, and Kato, Junko. 2024. “Generational differences in economic perceptions”, Electoral Studies 91, 102830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew D. and Rosenbluth, Frances. 1995. Party Provision for Personal Politics. Dividing the Vote in Japan. In Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States, ed. Cowhey, Peter F. and McCubbins, Matthew D.. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press pp. 35–55.Google Scholar
McElwain, Kenneth Mori. 2008. “Manipulating Electoral Rules to Manufacture Single-Party Dominance.” American Journal of Political Science 52(1):32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElwain, Kenneth Mori. 2012. “The Nationalization of Japanese Elections.” Journal of East Asian Studies 12(3):323–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGillivray, Fiona. 2004. Privileging Industry: The Comparative Politics of Trade and Industrial Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKean, Margaret and Scheiner, Ethan. 2000. “Japan’s New Electoral System: La Plus ça Change.” Electoral Studies 19:447–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMichael, Taylor C. 2017. “When Formulas Go Political: The Curious Case of Japan’s Financial Index.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 18(3):407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMichael, Taylor C. 2018. “Electoral Strategy and Intergovernmental Transfers in Postwar Japan.” Asian Survey 58(5):847–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medina, Luis Fernando and Stokes, Susan. 2007. Monopoly and Monitoring: An Approach to Political Clientelism. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press pp. 68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Stephen A. and Naka, Shigeto. 1998. “Legislative Influences in Japanese Budgetary Politics.” Public Choice 94:267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Stephen A. and Naka, Shigeto. 1999. “The Determinants of Japanese Local Benefit-Seeking.” Contemporary Economic Policy 17(1):87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mihaljek, Dubravko. 1997. Japan. In Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. USA: International Monetary Fund. www.elibrary.imf.org/view/book/9781557756633/ch012.xmlGoogle Scholar
Mizusaki, Tokifumi. 2014. Sosenkyo Deta Besu. JED-M Deta. Tokyo: LDB.Google Scholar
Mochida, Nobuki. 2001. Taxes and Transfers in Japan’s Local Public Finance. In Local Government Development in Post-War Japan, ed. Muramatsu, Michio, Kume, Ikuo and Iqbal, Farrukh. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochida, Nobuki. 2008. Fiscal Decentralization and Local Public Finance in Japan. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B. 1991. “Groups in Rational Turnout Models.” American Journal of Political Science 35(3):758–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motolinia, Lucia. 2021. “Electoral Accountability and Particularistic Legislation: Evidence from an Electoral Reform in Mexico.” American Political Science Review 115(1):97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Wolfgang C. 2007. Political Institutions and Linkage Strategies. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press pp. 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muraközy, Balázs and Telegdy, Almos. 2016. “Political Incentives and State Subsidy Allocation: Evidence from Hungarian Municipalities.” European Economic Review 89:324–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muraoka, Taishi and Barceló, Joan. 2019. “The Effect of District Magnitude on Turnout: Quasiexperimental Evidence from Nonpartisan Elections under SNTV.” Party Politics 25(4):632–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myerson, Roger W. 1993. “Incentives to Cultivate Favored Minorities under Alternative Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 87(4): 856–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nabeshima, Kenny and Maekawa, Tsukasa. 1989. Hyoden no Torakuta. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Nam, Koon Woo. 1977. “The Crisis of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party.” Asian Affairs 4(6):356–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naoi, Megumi. 2015. Building Legislative Coalitions for Free Trade in Asia: Globalization as Legislation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemoto, Kuniaki, Krauss, Ellis S. and Pekkanen, Robert J.. 2008. “Policy Dissension and Party Discipline: The July 2005 Vote on Postal Privatization in Japan.” British Journal of Political Science 38(3):499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemoto, Kuniaki and Shugart, Matthew S.. 2013. “Localism and Coordination under Three Different Electoral Systems: The National District of the Japanese House of Councillors.” Electoral Studies 32(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102(1):19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2014. “Conceptualizing Vote Buying.” Electoral Studies 35: 315–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2018. Votes for Survival: Relational Clientelism in Latin America. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noble, Gregory W. 2010. “The Decline of Particularism in Japanese Politics.” Journal of East Asian Studies 10:239–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, Gregory W. 2016. Abenomics in the 2014 Election: Showing the Money (Supply) and Little Else. In Japan Decides 2014: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 155–169.Google Scholar
Nyblade, Benjamin. 2013. Keeping It Together: Party Unity and the 2012 Election. In Japan Decides 2012: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyblade, Benjamin and Reed, Steven R.. 2008. “Who Cheats? Who Loots? Political Competition and Corruption in Japan, 1947–1993.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4):926–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otake, Hideo. 1996. “Forces for Political Reform: The Liberal Democratic Party’s Young Reformers and Ozawa Ichiro.” Journal of Japanese Studies 22(2): 269–294.Google Scholar
Otake, Hideo. 1998. Overview. In How Electoral Reform Boomeranged. Continuity in Japanese Campaigning Style, ed. Otake, Hideo. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange pp. ix–xxxi.Google Scholar
Patterson, Dennis and Maeda, Ko. 2007. “Prime Ministerial Popularity and the Changing Electoral Fortunes of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party.” Asian Survey 47(3):415–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert J. and Pekkanen, Saadia M.. 2015. “Japan in 2014: All about Abe.” Asian Survey 55(1):103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert J. and Reed, Steven R.. 2016. From Third Force to Third Party: Duverger’s Revenge? In Japan Decides 2014: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 62–71.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert J. and Reed, Steven R.. 2023. Japanese Politics between 2017 and 2021. In Japan Decides 2021: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Smith, Daniel M.. Springer International Publishing pp. 13–22. eBook.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Smith, Daniel M.. 2016. Japanese Politics between the 2012 and 2014 Elections. In Japan Decides 2014: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 9–21.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. 2016. Introduction: Take a Second Look at the 2014 Election, It’s Worth It. In Japan Decides 2014: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 3–8.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert J. and Reed, Steven R.. 2013. Japanese Politics between the 2009 and 2012 Elections. In Japan Decides 2012: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkanen, Robert J. and Reed, Steven R.. 2018. The Opposition: From Third Party Back to Third Force. In Japan Decides 2017: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan and Smith, Daniel. London: Palgrave MacMillan pp. 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 1990. Introduction: Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 1998. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 2010. “Between Pork and Productivity: The Collapse of the Liberal Democratic Party.” Journal of Japanese Studies 36(2):227–254.Google Scholar
Piattoni, Simona et al. 2001. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark and Rosenbluth, Frances. 1993. Japan’s Political Marketplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ravanilla, Nico, Haim, Dotan and Hicken, Allen. 2022. “Brokers, Social Networks, Reciprocity, and Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 66(4):795–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Stephen R. 2009. “Party Strategy or Candidate Strategy? How Does the LDP Run the Right Number of Candidates in Japan’s Multi-Member Districts?” Party Politics 15:295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Stephen R. and Smith, Daniel M.. 2015. “The Reed-Smith Japanese House of Representatives Elections Data Set.” https://sites.google.com/site/danielmarkhamsmith/dataGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1986. Japanese Prefectures and Policymaking. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1990. “Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger’s Law to the Japanese Case.” British Journal of Political Science 20(3):335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 1995. “The Nomination Process for Japan’s Next General Election: Waiting for the Heiritsu-sei.” Asian Survey 35(12):1075–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 2001. Impersonal Mechanisms and Personal Networks in the Distribution of Grants. In Local Government Development in Post-war Japan, ed. Muramatsu, Michio, Kume, Ikuo and Iqbal, Farrukh. New York, NY: Oxford University Press pp. 112–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 2007. “Duverger’s Law Is Working in Japan.” Senkyo Kenkyu (Electoral Studies) 22:96–106.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. 2021. “Patronage and Predominance: How the LDP Maintains Its Hold on Power.” Social Science Japan Journal 25(1):83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan, Smith, Daniel M. and Thies, Michael F.. 2013. The 2012 Election Results: The LDP Wins Big by Default. In Japan Decides 2012: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan and Thies, Michael F.. 2012. “The End of LDP Dominance and the Rise of Party-Oriented Politics in Japan.” Journal of Japanese Studies 38(2):353–375.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. and Shimizu, Kay. 2009. Avoiding a Two-Party System: The Liberal Democratic Party versus Duverger’s Law. In Political Change in Japan: Electoral Behavior, Party Realignment, and the Koizumi Reforms, ed. Shimizu, Kay, Reed, Steven R. and McElwain, Kenneth. Stanford: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Reed, Steven R. and Thies, Michael. 2001. The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan. In Mixed Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press pp. 152–172.Google Scholar
Repeta, Lawrence. 2014. “Japan’s 2013 State Secrecy Act – The Abe Administration’s Threat to News Reporting 2013.” The Asia-Pacific Journal Japan Focus 12(10). https://apjjf.org/2014/12/10/lawrence-repeta/4086/articleGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley M. 1973. “Urbanization and Political Participation: The Case of Japan.” American Political Science Review 67(2):433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, Stephanie J. 2018. Spending to Win: Political Institutions, Economic Geography, and Government Subsidies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William H. and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62(1):25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, Tessalia. N.D. “When Clients Exit: Breaking the Clientelist Feedback Loop.” www.dropbox.com/s/mg56bfukhqm15fr/Rizzo-WhenClientsExit_Draft_MostRecent.pdf?dl=0Google Scholar
Rosas, Guillermo, Johnston, Noel P. and Hawkins, Kirk. 2014. “Local Public Goods as Votepurchasing Devices? Persuasion and Mobilization in the Choice of Clientelist Payments.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 26(4):573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances and Thies, Michael. 2010. Japan Transformed. Political Change and Economic Restructuring. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, Miguel R. 2017. “Small Aggregates, Big Manipulation: Vote Buying Enforcement and Collective Monitoring.” American Journal of Political Science 61(1):163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Jun. 2010. Jiminto Choki Seiken no Seiji Keizaigaku. Tokyo: Keiso Shobo.Google Scholar
Sakaiya, Shiro. 2009. “Nihoin Seiji no Hoshuka to Senkyo Kyouso.” Senkyo Kenkyu 25(2):5–17.Google Scholar
Sasada, Hironori. 2010. “The Electoral Origin of Japan’s Nationalistic Leadership: Primaries in the LDP Presidential Election and the ‘Pull Effect’.” Journal of East Asian Studies 10:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2005. “Pipelines of Pork: A Model of Local Opposition Party Failure.” Comparative Political Studies 38:799–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. Democracy without Competition in Japan. Opposition Failure in a One-Party Dominant State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan. 2007. Clientelism in Japan: The Importance and Limits of Institutional Explanations. In Patrons, Clients, and Policies, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press pp. 276–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan, Smith, Daniel M. and Thies, Michael F.. 2016. The 2014 Japanese Election Results: The Opposition Cooperates but Fails to Inspire. In Japan Decides 2014: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 22–38.Google Scholar
Scheiner, Ethan, Smith, Daniel M. and Thies, Michael F.. 2018. The 2017 Election Results: An Earthquake, a Typhoon, and Another Landslide. In Japan Decides 2017: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan and Smith, Daniel M.. Cham: Springer International Publishing pp. 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, Jacob M. 1997. Shadow Shoguns. The Rise and Fall of Japan’s Postwar Political Machine. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas. 1987. “Your Vote Counts on Account of the Way It Is Counted: An Institutional Solution to the Paradox of Not Voting.” Public Choice 54:101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1972. “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia.” American Political Science Review 66(1):91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1977. “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and Italy.” Politics & Society 7(4):403–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shirai, Sayuri. 2005. “Growing Problems in the Local Public Finance System of Japan.” Social Science Japan Journal 8(2):213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair and Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2012. “Contingent Prize Allocation and Pivotal Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 42:371–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair and Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 2019. “Motivating Political Support with Group-Based Rewards.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 31(2): 156–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Alastair, Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and LaGatta, Tom. 2017. “Group Incentives and Rational Voting.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 29(2):299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Daniel M. 2016. Candidates in the 2014 Election: Better Coordination and Higher Candidate Quality. In Japan Decides 2014: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 118–133.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel M. 2018 a. Dynasties and Democracy: The Inherited Incumbency Advantage in Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel M. 2018 b. Electoral Systems and Voter Turnout. In The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press pp. 193–212.Google Scholar
Smith, Sheila. 2018 c. Foreign Policy. In Japan Decides 2017: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R., Scheiner, Ethan and Smith, Daniel. London: Palgrave MacMillan pp. 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sone, Yasunori and Kanazashi, Masao, eds. 1989. Bijual Zeminaaru: Nihon no Seiji [Visual Seminar: Politics in Japan]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shinbunsha.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99:315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan C. 2007. Political Clientelism. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 604–627.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan C., Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugawara, Taku. 2002. Heiritsu Seika no Senkyo Undo. In Senkyo Posuta no Kenkyuu, ed. Hen, Todai Ho Kabashima Ikuo Zemi. Tokyo: Bokutakusha chapter 7, pp. 197–211.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Satoshi. 2020. “Japan’s DPP Approves CDP Merger as Snap Poll Speculation Grows.” Japan Times. August 19.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. and Takahashi, Y.. 2015. “Kokkoshishutsukin no Kouzou Henka ni Tsuite Yubarishi no Jirei.” Ikoma Keizai Ronsou [Ikoma Journal of Economics] 13(1):41–68.Google Scholar
Szwarcberg, Mariela. 2015. Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, Selb, Peter and Grofman, Bernard. 2014. “How Turnout Depends on the Number of Parties: A Logical Model.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 24(4):393–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tani, Satomi. 1998. Political Realignment in Hyogo and Okayama. In How Electoral Reform Boomeranged. Continuity in Japanese Campaigning Style, ed. Otake, Hideo. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange pp. 59–96.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Masaki and Shimbun, Asahi. 2019. “The University of Tokyo-Asahi Survey.” www.masaki.j.u-tokyo.ac.jp/utas/utasindex_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tatebayashi, Masahiko. 2004. Giin Kodo no Seiji Keizaigaku. Jiminto Shihai no Seido Bunseki. [The Political Economy of Politician’s Behavior]. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2009. “Geographically Targeted Spending: Exploring the Electoral Strategies of Incumbent Governments.” European Political Science Review 1(1):103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, Nathaniel. 1969. How the Conservatives Rule Japan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
The Japan Times. 2002. “Package of Redistricting Bills Approved by Lower House.” Japan Times. July 19.Google Scholar
Thies, Michael F. and Yanai, Yuki. 2013. Governance with a Twist: How Bicameralism Affects Japanese Lawmaking. In Japan Decides 2012: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiberghien, Yves. 2013. Election Surprise: Abenomics and Central Bank Independence Trump Nationalism and Fukushima. In Japan Decides 2012: The Japanese General Election, ed. Pekkanen, Robert J., Reed, Steven R. and Scheiner, Ethan. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK pp. 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobias, Julia E., Sumarto, Sudarno and Moody, Habib. 2014. “Assessing the Political Impacts of a Conditional Cash Transfer: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in Indonesia.” The SMERU Research Institute.Google Scholar
Shimbun, Tokushima. 2019. “‘Senkyo Ganbaru Chiho ni Yosan’ Nikai Jiminto Kanjicho, Tokushima hi De Hatsugen.” Tokushima Shimbun. June 30.Google Scholar
Tsurutani, Taketsugu. 1980. “The LDP in Transition? Mass Membership Participation in Party Leadership Selection.” Asian Survey 20(8):844–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchiyama, Yu. 2010. Koizumi and Japanese Politics: Reform Strategies and Leadership Style. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Chin-Shou and Kurzman, Charles. 2007. The Logistics: How to Buy Votes. In Elections for Sale: The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying, ed. Schaffer, Frederic Charles. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Wantchekon, Leonard. 2003. “Clientelism and Voting Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Benin.” World Politics pp. 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Hugh and John, Peter. 1999. “Targeting Benefits for Electoral Gain: Constituency Marginality and the Distribution of Grants to English Local Authorities.” Political Studies 47(1):32–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Robert E. 1966. “Recent Electoral Developments in Japan.” Asian Survey pp. 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weese, Eric. 2015. “Political Mergers as Coalition Formation: An Analysis of the Heisei Municipal Amalgamations.” Quantitative Economics 6(2):257–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2012. “What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt Out of Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3):568–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2014. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Kyohei. 2016. “Crucial Decisions by Small Towns and Villages: Why Did Some Municipalities Choose to Merge but Others Did Not during the Nationwide Wave of Municipal Mergers in Japan?” International Journal of Public Administration 39(6):480–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Kyohei. 2018. “From a Majority to a Minority: How Municipal Mergers in Japan Changed the Distribution of Political Powers and the Allocation of Public Services within a Merged Municipality.” Urban Affairs Review 54(3):560–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamada, Kyohei and Arai, Kiichiro. 2021. “Do Boundary Consolidations Alter the Relationship between Politicians and Voters? The Case of Municipal Mergers in Japan.” Local Government Studies 47(4):519–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yıldırım, Kerem and Kitschelt, Herbert. 2020. “Analytical Perspectives on Varieties of Clientelism.” Democratization 27(1):20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokomichi, Kiyotaka. 2007. “The Development of Municipal Mergers in Japan.” COSLOG Up-to-Date Documents on Local Autonomy in Japan 1:1–22.Google Scholar
Yomiuri Shimbun. 2009. “Hirei ha Minshu 42 Pasento. Yusei Iji. Yomiuri Shimbun Seron Chosa.” Yomiuri Shimbun. July 24.Google Scholar
Yonehara, Junshichiro. 1986. Financial Relations between National and Local Governments. In Japan’s Public Sector: How Government Is Financed, ed. Shibata, Tokue. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press pp. 156–168.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, Rodrigo. 2016. “Party Machines and Voter-Customized Rewards Strategies.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 28(4):678–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar. 2013. “When Payouts Pay Off: Conditional Cash Transfers and Voting Behavior in Brazil 2002–10.” American Journal of Political Science 57(4):810–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×