Book contents
- Due Diligence Obligations in International Law
- Due Diligence Obligations in International Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Foundations of Due Diligence in International Law
- 2 The Nature of Due Diligence Obligations
- 3 The Scope and Content of Due Diligence Obligations
- 4 Due Diligence Obligations in the Law of International Responsibility
- 5 The Proceduralisation of Due Diligence Obligations
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2022
Book contents
- Due Diligence Obligations in International Law
- Due Diligence Obligations in International Law
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 The Foundations of Due Diligence in International Law
- 2 The Nature of Due Diligence Obligations
- 3 The Scope and Content of Due Diligence Obligations
- 4 Due Diligence Obligations in the Law of International Responsibility
- 5 The Proceduralisation of Due Diligence Obligations
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Due Diligence Obligations in International Law , pp. 273 - 293Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Abi-Saab, G., ‘Introduction: A Meta-Question’, in Abi-Saab, G., Keith, K., Marceau, G., Marquet, C. (eds.), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar
Ago, R., ‘La colpa nell’illecito internazionale’, in Scritti Giuridici in Onore di Santi Romano (Padua: CEDAM, 1940), vol. 3.Google Scholar
Ago, R., ‘Le délit international’ (1939) 68 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 415.Google Scholar
Ago, R., ‘Positive Law and International Law’ (1957) 51 American Journal of International Law 691.Google Scholar
Ambrus, M., Rayfuse, R., Werner, W. (eds.), Risk and the Regulation of Uncertainty in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Andenas, M., Chiussi, L., ‘Cohesion, Convergence and Coherence of International Law’, in Wouters, J., Andenas, M., Fitzmaurice, M., Tanzi, A. (eds.), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D., ‘La responsabilité internationale des Etats à raison des dommages soufferts par des étrangers’ (1906) 13 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 5.Google Scholar
Anzilotti, D., Teoria generale della responsabilità dello Stato, Part 1 (Florence: Lumachi Libraio Editore, 1902).Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G., ‘Dualism Revisited: International Law and Interindividual Law’ (2003) 86 (Supplement to issue 1) Rivista di diritto internazionale, 909.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G., ‘State Fault and the Forms and Degrees of International Responsibility: Questions of Attribution and Relevance’, in Mélanges Michel Virally: Le droit international au service de la paix de la justice et du développement (Paris: Pedone, 1991).Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, G., ‘State Responsibility Revisited: The Factual Nature of the Attribution of Conduct to the State’ (2017) 100 (Supplement to issue 1) Rivista di diritto internazionale 1.Google Scholar
Arangio-Ruiz, V., Istituzioni di Diritto Romano (15th ed., Naples: Jovene Editore, 2006).Google Scholar
Arcari, M., ‘La responsabilité en droit international: un “systeme”?’, in Tomkiewicz, V. (ed.), Organisation mondiale du commerce et responsabilité (Paris: Pedone, 2014).Google Scholar
Arcari, M., ‘Le juge et la codification du droit de la responsabilité: quelques remarques concernant l’application judiciaire des articles de la CDI sur la responsabilité de l’État pour fait internationalement illicite’, in Boschiero, N., Scovazzi, T., Pitea, C., Ragni, C., International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (The Hague: Asser Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Arnardóttir, O. M., ‘The “Procedural Turn” under the European Convention on Human Rights and Presumptions of Convention Compliance’ (2017) 15 International Journal of Constitutional Law 9.Google Scholar
Aust, H. P., ‘The UN Human Rights Due Diligence Policy: An Effective Mechanism against Complicity of Peacekeeping Forces?’ (2014) 20 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 61.Google Scholar
Aust, H. P., Complicity in the Law of State Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Aust, H. P., Feihle, P., ‘Due Diligence in the History of the Codification of the Law of State Responsibility’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Azaria, D., Treaties on Transit of Energy via Pipelines and Countermeasures (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Baade, B., ‘Due Diligence and the Duty to Protect Human Rights’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Barnidge, R., ‘The Due Diligence Principle Under International Law’ (2006) 8 International Community Law Review 81.Google Scholar
Barnidge, R., Non-State Actors and Terrorism: Applying the Law of State Responsibility and the Due Diligence Principle (Berlin: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar
Bartolini, G., ‘Cultural Heritage and Disasters’, in Francioni, F., Vrdoljak, A. F. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Bartolini, G., ‘Il concetto di “controllo” sulle attivitá di individui quale presupposto della responsabilitá dello stato’, in Spinedi, M., Gianelli, A., Alaimo, M. L. (eds.), La codificazione della responsabilitá internazionale degli Stati alla prova dei fatti (Milan: Giuffré, 2006).Google Scholar
Bartolini, G., ‘The Failure of “Core Capacities” under the WHO International Health Regulations’ (2020) 70 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 233.Google Scholar
Bartolini, G., ‘The Historical Roots of the Due Diligence Standard’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Beck, U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, trans. M. Ritter (London: Sage Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar
Becker, T., Terrorism and the State: Rethinking the Rules of State Responsibility (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2006).Google Scholar
Belli, P., De Re Militari et Bello Tractactus, trans. H. C. Nutting, The Classics of International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Benninger-Budel, C. (ed.), Due Diligence and Its Application to Protect Women from Violence (Leiden: Brill, 2008).Google Scholar
Bennouna, M., ‘Le droit international entre la lettre et l’esprit: cours général de droit international public’ (2017) 383 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 1.Google Scholar
Berkes, A., ‘The Standard of “Due Diligence” as a Result of Interchange between the Law of Armed Conflict and General International Law’ (2018) 23 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 433.Google Scholar
Besson, S., ‘Les obligations de protection de droit fondamentaux: un essai en dogmatique comparative’ (2003) 1 Revue de Droit Suisse 49.Google Scholar
Besson, S., ‘The Extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights: Why Human Rights Depend on Jurisdiction and What Jurisdiction Amounts To’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 857.Google Scholar
Besson, S., ‘La “Due Diligence” en droit international’ (2020) 409 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 153.Google Scholar
Bingham, T., ‘The Alabama Claims Arbitration’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.Google Scholar
Birnie, P., Boyle, A., Redgwell, C., International Law and the Environment (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Blanco, S. M., Full Protection and Security in International Law (Berlin: Springer, 2018).Google Scholar
Bleckmann, A., ‘General Theory of Obligations under Public International Law’ (1995) 38 German Yearbook of International Law 26.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., Hey, E., ‘International Environmental Law: Mapping the Field’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Bodansky, D., Crook, J. R., ‘Symposium: The ILC’S State Responsibility Articles Introduction and Overview’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 773.Google Scholar
Bonafé, B., Palchetti, P., ‘Relying on General Principles in International Law’, in Brölmann, C., Radi, Y. (eds.), Research Handbook on the Theory and Practice of International Lawmaking (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016).Google Scholar
Bonfanti, A., ‘Attacchi cibernetici in tempo di pace e intrusioni nelle elezioni presidenziali alla luce del diritto internazionale’ (2019) 102 Rivista di diritto internazionale 694.Google Scholar
Bonnitcha, J., McCorquodale, R., ‘The Concept of “Due Diligence” in the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 899.Google Scholar
Boon, K. E., ‘Are Control Tests Fit for The Future? The Slippage Problem in Attribution Doctrines’ (2014) 15 Melbourne Journal of International Law 330.Google Scholar
Borchard, E. M., ‘Theoretical Aspects of the International Responsibility of States’ (1929) 1 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 225.Google Scholar
Borchard, E. M., The Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (New York: The Banks Law Publishing Company, 1915).Google Scholar
Bowman, M., Davies, P., Redgwell, C., Lyster’s International Wildlife Law (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Boyle, A., ‘Liability for Injurious Consequence of Acts not Prohibited by International Law’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Boyle, A., ‘State Responsibility and International Liability for Injurious Consequences of Acts not Prohibited by International Law: A Necessary Distinction?’ (1990) 39 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, A., Chinkin, C., The Making of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Brems, E., ‘Procedural Protection’, in Brems, E., Gerards, J. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR : The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Brown, D., ‘Use of Force Against Terrorism After September 11th: State Responsibility, Self- Defence and Other Responses’ (2003–2004) 11 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 13.Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., Principles of International Law (6th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Brownlie, I., System of the Law of Nations, State Responsibility, Part I (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Brunnée, J., ‘International Environmental Law and Community Interests’, in Benvenisti, E., Nolte, G. (eds.), Community Interests Across International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Brunnée, J., ‘Procedure and Substance in International Environmental Law’ (2020) 405 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 87.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, T., ‘Self-Executing and Non-Self-Executing Treaties in National and International Law’ (1992) 235 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 303.Google Scholar
Campbell, E., Dominic, E., Stadnik, S., Wu, Y., ‘Due Diligence Obligations of International Organizations under International Law’ (2018) 50 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 541.Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, E., ‘Considerazioni in merito al ruolo della ragionevolezza e della proporzionalità nel diritto internazionale’ (2002) 7 Ars Interpretandi 347.Google Scholar
Cannizzaro, E., Il principio della proporzionalità nell’ordinamento internazionale (Milan: Giuffrè, 2000).Google Scholar
Caron, D., ‘The Basis of Responsibility: Attribution and Other Trans-Substantive Rules’, in Lillich, R. B., Magraw, D. B. (eds.), The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal: Its Contribution to the Law of State Responsibility (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Cassella, S., ‘Le travaux de la Commission du droit international sur la responsabilité internationale et le standard de due diligence’ in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Cazala, J., Le principe de précaution en droit international (Paris: Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence, 2006).Google Scholar
Cheng, B., General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Chinkin, C., ‘A Critique of the Public/Private Dimension’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 387.Google Scholar
Chinkin, C., ‘Normative Development in the International Legal System’, in Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance: The Role of Non-binding Norms in the International Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar
Chircop, L., ‘A Due Diligence Standard of Attribution in Cyberspace’ (2018) 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiussi, L., ‘Corporate Human Rights Due Diligence: From Process to the Principle’, in Buscemi, M., Lazzerini, N., Magi, L., Russo, D. (eds.), Legal Sources in Business and Human Rights: Evolving Dynamics in International and European Law (Leiden: Brill, 2020).Google Scholar
Clapham, A., Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Combacau, J., ‘La responsabilité internationale’, in Thierry, H., Combacau, J., Sur, S., Vallée, C. (eds.), Droit International Public (Paris: Editions Mont-Chrestien, 1981).Google Scholar
Combacau, J., ‘Obligations de résultat et obligations de comportement: Quelques questions et pas de réponse’, in Le droit international: unité et diversité. Melanges offerts à Paul Reuter (Paris: Pedone, 1981).Google Scholar
Condorelli, L., ‘The Imputability to States of Acts of International Terrorism’ (1989) 19 Israel Yearbook of Human Rights 233.Google Scholar
Condorelli, L., Kress, C., ‘The Rules of Attribution: General Considerations’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Conforti, B., ‘Obblighi di mezzo e obblighi di risultato nelle convenzioni di diritto uniforme’ (1989) 25 Rivista di diritto privato e processuale 373.Google Scholar
Corten, O., ‘La “complicité” dans le droit de la responsabilité internationale: Un concept inutile?’ (2011) 57 Annuaire Français de Droit International 57.Google Scholar
Corten, O., L’utilisation du “raisonnable” par le juge international: Discours juridique, raison et contraditions (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1997).Google Scholar
Corten, O., ‘Reasonableness’ in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Corten, O., ‘The Notion of “Reasonable” in International Law: Legal Discourse, Reason and Contradiction’ (1999) 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 613.Google Scholar
Corten, O., Klein, O., ‘The limits of complicity as a ground for responsibility: Lessons learned from the Corfu Channel case’, in Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Heathcote, S. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 874.Google Scholar
Crawford, J., ‘The System of International Responsibility’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., Grant, T., Messineo, F., ‘Toward an International Law of Responsibility: Early Doctrine’, in Boisson de Chazournes, L. and Kohen, M. (eds.), International Law and the Quest of its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., State Responsibility: The General Part (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Crawford, J., Watkins, J., ‘International Responsibility’, in Besson, S., Tasioulas, J. (eds.), The Philosophy of International Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Crema, L., ‘The Interpretative Work of Treaty Bodies: How They Look at Evolutionary Interpretation, and How Other Courts Look at Them’, in Abi-Saab, G., Keith, K., Marceau, G., Marquet, C. (eds.), Evolutionary Interpretation and International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2019).Google Scholar
d’Argent, P., ‘Les principes généraux à la Cour internationale de Justice’, in Besson, S., Pichonnaz, P. (eds.), Les principes de droit européen (Paris: Librairie Général de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 2011).Google Scholar
d’Argent, P., ‘Reparation, Cessation, Assurance and Guarantees of Non-Repetition’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
d’Argent, P. , ‘State Organs Placed at the Disposal of the UN, Effective Control, Wrongful Abstention and Dual Attribution of Conduct’ (2014) 1 QIL–Questions of International Law 17.Google Scholar
d’Argent, P. , De Vaucleroy, A. , ‘Le contenu de l’omission illicite: La non utilisation de moyens raisonnables’, in Cassella, S (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
d’Aspremont, J., ‘The Multidimensional Process of Interpretation’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D., Windsor, M. (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Dailler, P., Forteau, M., Pellet, A., Droit International Public (Paris: Librairie Général de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 2009).Google Scholar
Dannenbaum, T., ‘Public Power and Preventive Responsibility’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Daugirdas, K., ‘Member States’ Due Diligence Obligations to Supervise International Organizations’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
David, E., ‘Primary and Secondary Rules’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlett, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
De Brabandere, E., ‘Host States’ Due Diligence Obligations in International Investment Law’ (2015) 42 Syracuse Journal of International and Comparative Law 319.Google Scholar
De Sena, P., ‘Condotta di singoli organi e condotta dell’apparato statale in tema di colpa nell’illecito internazionale’ (1988) 71 Rivista di diritto internazionale 525.Google Scholar
De Sena, P., ‘La “due diligence” et le lien entre le sujet et le risqué qu’il faut prévenir: quelques observations’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
De Sena, P., La nozione di giurisdizione statale nei trattati sui diritti dell’uomo (Turin: Giappichelli, 2020).Google Scholar
De Vaucleroy, A., ‘Les obligations de comportement en droit international public. Due diligence et responsabilité internationale’, PhD thesis, Université catholique de Louvain (2021).Google Scholar
Deeks, A., ‘Unwilling or Unable: toward a Normative Framework for Extraterritorial Self-Defence’ (2012) 53 Virginia Journal of International Law 483.Google Scholar
Delerue, F., Cyber Operations and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Demogue, R., Traité des Obligations en General (Paris: Librairie Arthur Rousseau, 1925).Google Scholar
Desierto, D. A., ‘Due Diligence in World Bank and Project Financing’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Diggelmann, O., ‘Fault in the Law of State Responsibility: Pragmatism ad Infinitum’ (2006) 49 German Yearbook of International Law 293.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Donati, D., I trattati internazionali nel diritto costituzionale (Turin: Unione tipografico-editrice torinese, 1906).Google Scholar
Dubuisson, F., ‘Vers un Renforcement des Obligations de Diligence en Matière de Lutte Contre le Terrorism ?’, in Christakis-Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Corten, O., Delcourt, B. (eds.), Le Droit International Face au Terrorisme (Paris: Pedone 2002).Google Scholar
Dupuy, P. M., ‘Faute de l’Etat et “fait internationalement illicite”’ (1987) 5 Droit 54.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P. M., ‘Infraction’, in Répertoire de Droit International (Paris: Dalloz, 1999).Google Scholar
Dupuy, P. M., ‘La diligence due dans le droit international et la résponsabilité’ in Organisation de coopération and développement économique (ed.), Aspects Juridiques de la Pollution Transfrontière (Paris: OECD, 1977).Google Scholar
Dupuy, P. M., ‘Le fait générateur de la responsabilité internationale des Etats’ (1984) 188 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 9.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P. M., ‘Reviewing the Difficulties of Codification: On Ago’s Classification of Obligations of Means and Obligations of Result in Relation to State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 371.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P. M., Hoss, C., ‘Trail Smelter and International Terrorism: International Mechanisms to Combat Transboundary Harm’, in Walter, C., Vöneky, C., Schorkopf, F., Roeben, V. (eds.), Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law: Security versus Liberty? (Berlin: Springer, 2004).Google Scholar
Duvic-Paoli, L. A., The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R., ‘The Modes of Rules I’, in Taking Rights Seriously: New Impression with a Reply to Critics (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar
Eagleton, C., Responsibility of States in International Law (New York: New York University Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Fiandaca, G., Musco, E., Diritto Penale: Parte Generale (Bologna: Zanichelli Editore, 2014).Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G., ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957) 92 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 7.Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, M., ‘International Responsibility and Liability’, in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Focarelli, C., International Law as Social Construct: The Struggle for Global Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Forlati, S., ‘L’objet des différentes obligations primaires de diligence: prévention, cessation, répression … ?’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Forlati, S., ‘The Legal Obligation to Prevent Genocide: Bosnia v. Serbia and Beyond’ (2011) 31 Polish Yearbook of International Law 189.Google Scholar
Gaja, G., ‘Do States Have a Duty to Ensure Compliance with Obligations Erga Omnes by Other States?’, in Ragazzi, M. (ed.), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter (Leiden: Brill, 2005).Google Scholar
Gaja, G., ‘General Principles of Law’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Gaja, G., ‘Primary and Secondary Rules in the International Law on State Responsibility’ (2014) 97 Rivista di diritto internazionale 981.Google Scholar
Garcìa Mora, M. R., International Responsibility for Hostile Acts of Private Persons Against Foreign States (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 1962).Google Scholar
Gasbarri, L., ‘The European Union is not a State: International Responsibility for Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing Activities’ (2020) 7 Maritime Safety and Security Law Journal 54.Google Scholar
Gattini, A., ‘Breach of International Obligations’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I. (eds.), Principles of Shared Responsibility: An Appraisal of the State of the Art (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Gattini, A., ‘Breach of the Obligation to Prevent and Reparation Thereof in the ICJ’s Genocide Judgement’ (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 695.Google Scholar
Gattini, A., ‘Smoking/No Smoking: Some Remarks on the Current Place of Fault in the ILC Draft Articles on State Responsibility’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 397.Google Scholar
Gentili, A., De Legationibus Libri Tres, Vol II, trans. J. Laing, The Classics of International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924).Google Scholar
Gianelli, A., ‘Il contributo della dottrina italiana al tema della responsabilitá internazionale degli Stati per fatto illecito: qualche osservazione’ (2016) 99 Rivista di diritto internazionale 1042.Google Scholar
Grans, L., ‘The Concept of Due Diligence and the Positive Obligations to Prevent Honour-Related Violence: Beyond Deterrence’ (2018) 22 The International Journal of Human Rights 733.Google Scholar
Griebel, J., Plücken, M., ‘New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? The International Court Justice’s Decision in Bosnia v. Serbia’ (2008) 21 Leiden Journal of International Law 601.Google Scholar
Grotius, H., De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, trans. by Kelsey, The Classics of International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Hackworth, H., ‘Responsibility of States for Damages Caused in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’ (1930) 24 American Journal of International Law 500.Google Scholar
Hakimi, M., ‘State Bystander Responsibility’ (2010) 21 European Journal of International Law 341.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., Honoré, T., Causation in the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Harvard Law School Project, ‘The Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Persons or Property of Foreigners’ (1929) American Journal of International Law 131.Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A., Chertoff, E. et al., ‘Ensuring Responsibility: Common Article 1 and State Responsibility for Non-State Actors’ (2017) 95 Texas Law Review 539.Google Scholar
Hautefeuille, L. B., Des droits et des devoirs des nations neutres en temps de guerre maritime, Tome premier (Paris: Guillaumin et C, Libraires, 1858).Google Scholar
Heathcote, S., ‘State Omission and Due Diligence: Aspects of Fault, Damage, and Contribution to Injury in the Law of State Responsibility’, in Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Heathcote, S. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Heieck, J., A Duty to Prevent Genocide: Due Diligence Obligations Among the P5 (Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018).Google Scholar
Hernandez, G. , ‘Interpretative Authority and the International Judiciary’, in Bianchi, A, Peat, D, Windsor, M (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Hershey, A. S., The Essentials of International Public Law (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1912).Google Scholar
Hessbruegge, J. A., ‘The Historical Doctrine of Attribution and Due Diligence in International Law’ (2004) 36 New York University Journal of International law and Politics 265.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Hollis, D. H., ‘The Existential Function of Interpretation in International Law’, in Bianchi, A., Peat, D., Windsor, M. (eds.), Interpretation in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Horbach, N. L. J. T., ‘The Confusion about State Responsibility and International Liability’ (1991) 4 Leiden Journal of International Law 47.Google Scholar
Hull, D., ‘Taxonomy’, in Craig, E., Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1998).Google Scholar
Hyde, C., ‘Concerning Damages Arising from Neglect to Prosecute’ (1928) 22 American Journal of International Law 140.Google Scholar
ILA Study Group on Due Diligence in International Law, ‘Due Diligence in International Law: Second Report’ (Johannesburg, 2016).Google Scholar
Jacob, D., Le contenu de la responsabilité de l’Etat négligent’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Jinks, D., ‘State Responsibility for the Acts of Private Harm Groups’ (2003) 4 Chicago Journal of International Law 83.Google Scholar
Joel-Proux, V., ‘Babysitting Terrorists: Should States Be Strictly Liable for Failing to Prevent Transborder Attacks’ (2005) 23 Berkeley Journal of International Law 615.Google Scholar
Kamminga, M., ‘Due Diligence Mania: The Misguided Introduction of and Extraneous Concept into Human Rights Discourse’ (2011) Maastricht Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 07.Google Scholar
Kanehara, A., ‘Reassessment of the Acts of the State in the Law of State Responsibility’ (2019) 399 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 9.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H., Principles of Public International Law (New York: Rinehart & Company, 1952).Google Scholar
Kerbrat, Y., ‘Le standard de due diligence, catalyseur d’obligations conventionnelles et coutumières pour les Etats’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Kerbrat, Y., ‘Obligations procédurales et obligations de fond en droit international des dommages transfrontières’, in Prezas, I. (ed.), Substance and procédure en droit international public: dialectique et influences croisées (Paris: Pedone, 2019).Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., ‘Reflections on Role Responsibility: The Responsibility of International Organizations for Failing to Act’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 1133.Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., ‘The Redundancy of Soft Law’ (1996) 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 167.Google Scholar
Klabbers, J., Peters, A., Ulfstein, G., The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kleinlein, T., ‘The Procedural Approach of the European Court of Human Rights: Between Subsidiarity and Dynamic Evolution’ (2019) 68 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 91.Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., ‘Due Diligence’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Koivurova, T., ‘What is the Principle of Due Diligence?’, in Petman, J., Klabbers, J. (eds.), Nordic Cosmopolitanism: Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (Leiden: Brill, 2003).Google Scholar
Kolb, R., ‘Reflections on Due Diligence Duties in Cyberspace’ (2015) 58 German Yearbook of International Law 114.Google Scholar
König, D., ‘The Elaboration of Due Diligence Obligations as a Mechanism to Ensure Compliance with International Legal Obligations by Private Actors’, in ITLOS (ed.), The Contribution of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea to the Rule of Law: 1996–2016 (Leiden: Brill, 2018).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration’ (2004) 17 Cambridge Review of International Affairs 197.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ‘Peaceful Settlement of Environmental Disputes’ (1991) 60 Nordic Journal of International Law 73.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M., ’The Politics of International Law: 20 Years Later’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 7.Google Scholar
Krieger, H., Nolte, G., ‘The International Rule of Law: Rise or Decline? Points of Departure’ (KFG Working Paper Series No 1 2016) 12.Google Scholar
Krieger, H., Peters, A., ‘Due Diligence and Structural Change in the International Legal Order’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Krieger, H., Peters, A., ‘Due Diligence in the International Legal Order’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020)Google Scholar
Lagrange, E., ‘La responsabilité des organisations internationales pour violation d’une obligation de diligence’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Lanovoy, V., ‘The Use of Force by Non-State Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 587.Google Scholar
Lanovoy, V., Complicity and Its Limits in the Law of International Responsibility (London: Hart Publishing, 2016).Google Scholar
Latty, F., ‘Actions and Omissions’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H., ‘Revolutionary Activities by Private Persons Against Foreign States’ (1928) 22 American Journal of International Law 105.Google Scholar
Lavrysen, L., ‘Protection by the Law: The Positive Obligation to Develop a Legal Framework to Adequately Protect ECHR’, in Haeck, Y., Brems, E. (eds.), Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century (Berlin: Springer, 2014).Google Scholar
Lavrysen, L., Human Rights in a Positive State: Rethinking the Relationship between Positive and Negative Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar
Lawrence, W. B., ‘Opinion exprimé sur les Trois Règles de Washington’ (1974) 27 Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 570.Google Scholar
Le Bonniec, N., La procéduralisation des droits substantiels par la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme: réflexion sur le côntrole juridictionnel du respect des droits garantis par la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme (Brussels: Bruylant, 2017).Google Scholar
Lemoine-Schonne, M., ‘Substance et procédure en droit international du climat’, in Prezas, I. (ed.), Substance and procédure en droit international public: dialectique et influences croisées (Paris: Pedone, 2019).Google Scholar
Lévy, D., ‘La responsabilité pour omission et la responsabilité pour risque en droit international public’ (1961) 65 Revue Générale de Droit International Public 744.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, U., ‘State Responsibility and the Primary-Secondary Rules Terminology: The Role of Language for an Understanding of the International Legal System’ (2009) 78 Nordic Journal of International Law 53.Google Scholar
Longobardo, M., ‘L’obbligo di prevenzione del genocidio e la distinzione fra obblighi di condotta e obblighi di risultato’ (2019) 2 Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale 237.Google Scholar
Longobardo, M., ‘The Relevance of the Concept of Due Diligence for International Humanitarian Law’ (2019) 37 Wisconsin International Law Journal 44.Google Scholar
Lowe, V., ‘Responsibility for the Conduct of other States’ (2002) 101 Japanese Journal of International Law and Diplomacy 1.Google Scholar
Luzzatto, R., ‘Responsabilitá e colpa in diritto internazionale’ (1968) 51 Rivista di diritto internazionale 53.Google Scholar
Maiorca, C., ‘Colpa (teoria generale)’, in Enciclopedia del diritto (Milan: Giuffré, 1960).Google Scholar
Mallory, C., Human Rights Imperialists: The Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Hart Publishing, 2020).Google Scholar
Mann, F. A., ‘The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law’ (1964) 111 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 1.Google Scholar
Marchesi, A., ‘The Distinction Between Obligations of Conduct and Obligations of Result Following its Deletion from the Draft Articles on State Responsibility’, in Studi in onore di Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz (Naples: Editoriale Scientifica, 2004), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Marchesi, A., Obblighi di Condotta e obblighi di risultato: Contributo allo studio degli obblighi internazionali (Milan: Giuffré, 2005).Google Scholar
Mbengue, M. M., ‘The South China Sea Arbitration: Innovations in Marine Environmental Fact-Finding and Due Diligence Obligations’ (2016) 110 American Journal of International Law Unbound 285.Google Scholar
Mbengue, M. M., Essai sur une théorie du risqué en droit international public (Paris: Pedone, 2009).Google Scholar
McDonald, N., ‘The Role of Due Diligence in International Law’ (2019) 68 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1041.Google Scholar
Mendelson, M., ‘The International Court of Justice and the Sources of International Law’, in Lowe, V., Fitzmaurice, M. (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Milano, E., ‘Occupation’, in Nollkaemper, A., Plakokefalos, I (eds.), The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 733.Google Scholar
Milanović, M., Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Milanović, M., Papić, T., ‘The Applicability of the ECHR in Contested Territories’ (2018) 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 779.Google Scholar
Monaco, R., ‘La responsabilità internazionale dello Stato per fatti degli individui’ (1939) 18 Rivista di diritto internazionale 3.Google Scholar
Moore, J. B., History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States Has Been a Party (Washington: US Government Printing, 1943).Google Scholar
Moore, M. S., Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Morriss, P., Power: A Philosophical Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Newcombe, A., Paradell, L., Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009).Google Scholar
Nielsen, F. K., American-Turkish Claims Settlement under the Agreement of December 24, 1923, and Supplemental Agreements Between the United States and Turkey, Opinions and Reports (Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1937).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A., ‘Power and Responsibility’, in di Stefano, A. (ed.), Un diritto senza terra? Funzioni e limiti del principio di territorialitá nel diritto internaizonale e dell’Unione Europea? A Lackland Law? Territory, Effectiveness and Jurisdiction in International and European Law (Turin: Giappichelli, 2014).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A., d’Aspremont, J., et al., ‘Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility in International Law’ (2020) 31 European Journal of International Law 15.Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A., Jacobs, D., ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (2013) 34 Michigan Journal of International Law 359.Google Scholar
Okowa, P., ‘Procedural Obligations in International Environmental Agreements’ (1997) 67 British Yearbook of International Law 275.Google Scholar
Ollino, A., ‘A “Missed” Secondary Rule? Causation in the Breach of Preventive and Due Diligence Obligations’, in Kajtar, G., Çali, B., Milanovic, M. (eds.), Attribution, Causality and Evidentiary Rules: Secondary Rules of Primary Importance (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise, Vol II War and Neutrality (London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1912).Google Scholar
Österdahl, I., ‘Due Diligence in International Anti-Terrorism Law: Developments in the Resolutions of the UN Security Council’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Ouedraogo, A., ‘La due diligence en droit international: de la règle de la neutralité au principe général’ (2012) 42 Revue Général de Droit 641.Google Scholar
Ouedraogo, A., ‘La neutralité et l’emergence du concept de due diligence en droit international : l’affaire de l’Alabama revisité’ (2011) 13 Journal of the History of International Law 307.Google Scholar
Paddeu, F., Justification and Excuses in International Law: Concept and Theory of General Defences (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Palchetti, P., ‘La violation par l’Union européenne d’une obligation de diligence’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Palchetti, P., L’organo di fatto dello Stato nell’illecito internazionale (Milan: Giuffré, 2007).Google Scholar
Palchetti, P., ‘State Responsibility for Complicity in Genocide’, in Gaeta, P., The UN Genocide Convention (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Palchetti, P., ‘The Role of General Principles in Promoting the Development of Customary International Rules’, in Wouters, J., Andenas, M., Fitzmaurice, M., Tanzi, A. (eds.), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar
Palmisano, G., ‘Colpa dell’organo e colpa dello Stato nella responsabilitá internazionale: Spunti critici di teoria e di prassi’ (1992) 19 Comunicazioni e Studi 623.Google Scholar
Palmisano, G., ‘Fault’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Papanicolopulu, I., ‘Due Diligence in the Law of the Sea’ in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M., The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J., Wessel, R. A., Wouters, J., ‘When Structures Become Shackles: Stagnation and Dynamics in International Lawmaking’ (2014) 25 European Journal of International Law 733.Google Scholar
Peat, D., Comparative Reasoning in International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Pellet, A., ‘Les Articles de la CDI sur la responsabilité de l’État pour faits internationalement illicite : suite – et fin?’ (2002) 48 Annuaire Français de Droit International 1.Google Scholar
Pellet, A., ‘Remarques sur une révolution inachevée, le projet d’articles de la Commission du Droit International sur la responsabilité des Etats’ (1996) Annuaire Français de Droit International 7.Google Scholar
Pellet, A., Müller, D., ‘Article 38’, in Zimmermann, A., Tams, C., Oeller-Frahn, K. (eds.), The Statute of the International Court of Justice: A Commentary (3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Perassi, G., Introduzione alle scienze giuridiche (Cittá di Castello: Unione Arti Grafiche, 1938).Google Scholar
Perelman, C., ‘The Rational and the Reasonable’, in Perelman, C. (ed.), The New Rhetoric and the Humanities (Berlin: Springer, 1989).Google Scholar
Pineschi, L., ‘The Duty of Environmental Impact Assessment in the First ITLOS Chamber’s Advisory Opinion: Towards the Supremacy of the General Rule to Protect and Preserve the Marine Environment as a Common Value?’, in Boschiero, N., Scovazzi, T., Pitea, C., Ragni, C. (eds.), International Courts and the Development of International Law: Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (The Hague: Asser Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., Due diligence e responsabiitá internazionale degli stati (Milan: Giuffré, 1989).Google Scholar
Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., ‘Le chemin étranger de la due diligence: d’un concept mystérieux à un concept surévalué’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., ‘Responsabilité de l’état pour violation des obligations positives relatives aux droits de l’homme’ (2008) 333 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 175.Google Scholar
Pisillo-Mazzeschi, R., ‘The Due Diligence Rule and the Nature of International Responsibility of States’ (1992) 35 German Yearbook of International Law 9.Google Scholar
Plakokefalos, I., ‘Causation in the Law of State Responsibility and the Problem of Overdetermination: In Search of Clarity’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 471.Google Scholar
Plakokefalos, I., ‘Prevention Obligations in International Environmental Law’ (2012) 23 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 5.Google Scholar
Plakokefalos, I., ‘The Use of Force by Non-State Actors and the Limits of Attribution of Conduct: A Reply to Vladyslav Lanovoy’ (2017) 28 European Journal of International Law 587.Google Scholar
Pradier-Fodéré, P., Traité de Droit International Public Européen et Américain (Paris: Pedone, 1885–1906).Google Scholar
Puma, G., Complicitá di Stati nell’Illecito Internazionale (Turin: Giappichelli, 2018).Google Scholar
Radi, Y., La standardisation et le droit international: contours d’une théorie dialectique de la formation du droit (Paris: Bruylant, 2013).Google Scholar
Radi, Y., ‘Standardization: A Dynamic and Procedural Conceptualization of International Law-Making’ (2012) 25 Leiden Journal of International Law 283.Google Scholar
Ragazzi, M., The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Raible, L., Human Rights Unbound: A Theory of Extraterritoriality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Rajput, A., ‘Due Diligence in International Investment Law’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Rawl, J., ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ (1997) 64 The University of Chicago Law Review 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redgwell, C., ‘General Principles of International Law’, in Vogenauer, S., Weatherill, S. (eds.), General Principles of Law: European and Comparative Perspectives (London: Hart Publishing, 2017).Google Scholar
Reisman, W. M., ‘International Lawmaking: A Process of Communication’ (1981) 75 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting, American Society of International Law 101.Google Scholar
Reuter, P., ‘Principes de droit international public’ (1961) 103 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 431.Google Scholar
Roucounas, E., A Landscape of Contemporary Theories of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C., ‘State Responsibility and Non-State Actors’, in Noortmann, M, Reinisch, A, Ryngaert, C (eds.), Non-State Actors and International Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2015).Google Scholar
Salerno, F., ‘Genesi e usi della nozione di organo nella dottrina internazionalistica italiana’ (2009) 92 Rivista di diritto internazionale 921.Google Scholar
Salmon, J., ‘Le Concept de raisonnable en droit international public’, in Le droit international, unite et diversité: mélanges offerts à Paul Reuter (Paris: Pedone, 1981).Google Scholar
Salmon, J., ‘Le fait étatique complexe: un notion contestable’ (1982) 28 Annuaire Français de Droit International 709.Google Scholar
Salmon, J., ‘Les notions à contenu variable en droit international public’, in Perelman, C., Vander Elst, R. (eds.), Les notions à contenu variable en droit (Paris: Bruylant, 1984).Google Scholar
Schachter, O., International Law in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1991).Google Scholar
Schachter, O., ‘Toward a Theory of International Obligation’ (1968) 8 Virginia Journal of International Law 300.Google Scholar
Scheinin, M., ‘Just Another World? Jurisdiction in the Roadmaps of State Responsibility and Human Rights’, in Langford, M., Vandenhole, W., Scheinin, M. (eds.), Global Justice, State Duties: The Extraterritorial Scope of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Schmitt, M., ‘In Defence of Due Diligence in Cyberspace’, (2015) 125 The Yale Law Journal Forum 68.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M., ‘Sovereignty in Cyberspace: Lex Lata Vel Non’ (2017) 111 American Journal of International Law Unbound 213.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Seibert-Fohr, A., ‘From Complicity to Due Diligence: When Do States Incur Responsibility for Their Involvement in Serious International Wrongdoing?’ (2017) 60 German Yearbook of International Law 667.Google Scholar
Seminara, L., ‘Risk Regulation and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2016) 4 European Journal of Risk Regulation 733.Google Scholar
Seršić, M., ‘Due Diligence: Fault-Based Responsibility of Autonomous Standard?’, in Wolfrum, R., Seršić, M., Šošić, T. (eds.), Contemporary Developments in International Law: Essays in Honour of Budislav Vukas (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar
Shany, Y., The Extraterritorial Application of International Human Rights Law (2020) 409 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 9.Google Scholar
Shelton, D., Gould, A., ‘Positive and Negative Obligations’, in Shelton, D. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook on International Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Shibatam, A., ‘The Court’s Decision In Silentium on the Sources of International Law’, in Bannelier, K., Christakis, T., Heathcote, S. (eds.), The ICJ and the Evolution of International Law: The Enduring Impact of the Corfu Channel Case (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Shue, H., Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Sicilianos, L., ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’ (2002) 13 EJIL 1127.Google Scholar
Sperduti, G., Contributo alla teoria delle situazioni giuridiche soggettive (Milan: Giuffré, 1944).Google Scholar
Sperduti, G., ‘Sulla colpa in diritto internazionale’ (1950) 3 Comunicazioni e Studi 93.Google Scholar
Starita, M., ‘Négligence illicite et responsabilité multiples: partage ou cumul de responsabilités?’, in Cassella, S. (ed.), Le standard de due diligence et la responsabilité internationale (Paris: Pedone, 2018).Google Scholar
Stern, B., ‘The Elements of An Internationally Wrongful Act’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Stern, B., ‘The Obligation to Make Reparation’, in Crawford, J., Pellet, A., Olleson, S., Parlet, K. (eds.), The Law of International Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Stoyanova, V., ‘Causation between State Omission and Harm within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2018) 18 Human Rights Law Review 309.Google Scholar
Stoyanova, V., ‘Due Diligence versus Positive Obligations: Critical Reflections on the Council of Europe Convention on Violence Against Women’, in Niemi, J., Peroni, L., Stoyanova, V. (eds.), International Law and Violence Against Women (London: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar
Stoyanova, V., ‘Fault, Knowledge and Risk Within the Framework of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2020) Leiden Journal of International Law 1.Google Scholar
Talbot Jensen, E., ‘Cyber Sovereignty: The Way Ahead’ (2015) 50 Texas International Law Review 275.Google Scholar
Talmon, S., ‘Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion’ (2015) 26 European Journal of International Law 417.Google Scholar
Tams, C., Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Tancredi, A., ‘Doctrinal Alternatives to Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors’ (2017) 77 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 69.Google Scholar
Tancredi, A., ‘Il problema della legittima difesa nei confronti di milizie non statali alla luce dell’ultima crisi tra Israele e Libano’ (2007) 90 Rivista di diritto internazionale 969.Google Scholar
Tanzi, A., ‘Liability for Lawful Acts’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Tanzi, A., Kolliopoulos, A., ‘The No-Harm Rule’, in Tanzi, A., McIntyre, O., Kolliopoulos, A., Rieu-Clarke, A., Kinna, R. (eds.), The UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes: Its Contribution to International Water Cooperation (Leiden: Brill, 2015).Google Scholar
Thirlway, H., The Sources of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C., ‘Obligations Arising for States without or against Their Will’ (1993) 241 Recueil des Course de l’Académie de Droit International de la Haye 209.Google Scholar
Tomuschat, C., ‘What Is a “Breach” of the European Convention on Human Rights?’, in Lawson, R., de Blois, M. (eds.), The Dynamics of the Protection of Human Rights in Europe: Essays in Honour of Henry G. Schermers (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1994).Google Scholar
Tonkin, H., State Control over Private Military and Security Companies in Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Townley, S., ‘The Rise of Risk in International Law’ (2016) 18 Chicago Journal of International Law 594.Google Scholar
Trapp, K., State Responsibility for International Terrorism: Problems and Prospects (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Treves, T., ‘“Due Regard” Obligations under the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: The Laying of Cables and Activities in the Area’ (2019) 34 International Journal of Marine Coastal Law 167.Google Scholar
Treves, T., ‘Environmental Impact Assessment and the Precautionary Approach: Why Are International Courts and Tribunal Reluctant to Consider Them as General Principles of Law?’, in Andenas, M., Fitzmaurice, M., Tanzi, A., Wouters, J. (eds.), General Principles and the Coherence of International Law (Leiden: Brill, 2019).Google Scholar
Triepel, E., Völkerrecht und landesrecht, trans. by R. Brunet, Droit international et droit interne (first published 1899, Oxford: Pedone, 1920).Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N., ‘Cyber Attacks, Self-Defence and the Problem of Attribution’ (2012) 17 Journal of Conflict and Security Law 229.Google Scholar
Tsagourias, N., ‘State Obligations in Cyber Operations’ (2015) 14 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 71.Google Scholar
Tzevelekos, V. P., ‘Reconstructing the Effective Control Criterion in Extraterritorial Human Rights Breaches: Direct Attribution of Wrongfulness, Due Diligence and Concurrent Responsibility’ (2014) 36 Michigan Journal of International Law 129.Google Scholar
Valentine, S, Sprague, R., ‘Due Diligence’, in Encyclopedia Britannica, www.britannica.com/topic/due-diligence.Google Scholar
Vattel, E., The Law of Nations, Or, Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, Book II, ed. by Kapossy, B., Whatmore, R. (first published 1758, Carmel: Liberty Fund, 2008).Google Scholar
Venzke, I., How Interpretation Makes International Law: On Semantic Change and Normative Twists (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Violi, F., ‘The Function of the Triad “Territory”, “Jurisdiction” and “Control” in Due Diligence Obligations’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., Venzke, I., ‘Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 979.Google Scholar
Vordermayer, M., ‘The Extraterritorial Application of Multilateral Environmental Agreements’ (2018) 59 Harvard International Law Journal 59.Google Scholar
Westlake, J., International Law, Part II, War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913).Google Scholar
White, N., ‘Due Diligence, the UN, and Peacekeeping’, in Krieger, H., Peters, A., Kreuzer, L. (eds.), Due Diligence in the International Legal Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar
Wilde, R., ‘Compliance with Human Rights Norms Extraterritoriality: Human Rights Imperialism?’, in Boisson, L. de Chazournes, M. Kohen, (eds.), International Law and the Quest for Its Implementation: Liber Amicorum Vera Gowlland-Debbas (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., ‘General International Law (Principles, Rules, and Standards)’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., ‘International Law of Cooperation’, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995).Google Scholar
Wolfrum, R., ‘Obligations of Result Versus Obligation of Conduct: Some Thoughts About the Implementation of International Obligations’, in Arsanjani, M. H., Cogan, J., Sloane, R., Wiessner, S. (eds.), Looking into the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Wouters, J., ‘International Law, Informal Law-Making, Global Governance in Times of Anti-Globalism and Populism’, in Krieger, H., Nolte, G., Zimmermann, A. (eds.), International Rule of Law: Rise of Decline? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Xenos, D., The Positive Obligations of the State under the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Zannas, P. A., La responsabilité internationale des Etats pour les actes de négligence (Montreaux: Ganguin & Laubscher, 1952).Google Scholar
Zarbiyev, F., ‘Judicial Activism in International Law: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis’ (2012) 3 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 247.Google Scholar