Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:54:09.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Factors determining Microcebus abundance in a fragmented landscape in Ankarafantsika National Park, Madagascar

from Part V - Cheirogaleidae: conservation biogeography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Travis S. Steffens
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada
Shawn M. Lehman
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada
Shawn M. Lehman
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Ute Radespiel
Affiliation:
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Elke Zimmermann
Affiliation:
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A fundamental issue in conservation biogeography is determining how and why population density (the number of individuals per unit area) and abundance (number of individual animals) vary across the geographic range of plant and animal species (Whittaker et al., 2005). Understanding these relationships is critical because they provide information on population dynamics and extinction probabilities (Wilcox and Murphy, 1985; Lima and Zollner, 1996). For example, Davidson et al. (2009) conducted a meta-analysis of 4500 mammal species and found that population density was one of the main predictors of extinction risk. Consequently, researchers have explored numerous covariates to primate density and abundance, including food quality and amount (Stevenson, 2001; Chapman et al., 2004), temporal distribution of key food resources (Terborgh, 1986), habitat structure such as basal area, stem density, tree height and size (Rovero and Struhsaker, 2007; Pozo-Montuy et al., 2011; Grow et al., 2013), habitat quality such as plant productivity (Janson and Chapman, 1999), rainfall and temperature (Pinto et al., 2009), distribution (Harcourt and Doherty, 2005), fragment area and isolation (Anzures-Dadda and Manson, 2007), and anthropogenic disturbance (Peres, 1990; Ganzhorn and Schmid, 1998; Anzures-Dadda and Manson, 2007; Peres and Palacios, 2007). Despite the wide range of species and habitats studied, few consistent patterns have emerged that explain spatial variations in primate density and abundance. Moreover, those patterns that have found statistical support tend to have been focused on large-bodied, diurnal species, leaving many unanswered questions on the conservation biogeography of small-bodied, nocturnal taxa (McGoogan et al., 2007).

Food availability

Food availability typically refers to temporal and spatial variations in food quantity and quality, and has long been considered one of the main drivers of primate abundance and density. Despite extensive investigations into the relationship between food quality and amount and primate density and abundance (Hanya and Chapman, 2012), it is often difficult to determine quantitatively rigorous measures of food availability. This issue arises due to the high plant diversity at many primate research sites in the tropics, as well as stochastic variations in the temporal availability of food resources. Many researchers have employed plant dendrometrics as proxies for food availability, such as diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area, and stem density (e.g., Wieczkowski, 2004; Anzures-Dadda and Manson, 2007; Grow et al., 2013).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Dwarf and Mouse Lemurs of Madagascar
Biology, Behavior and Conservation Biogeography of the Cheirogaleidae
, pp. 477 - 497
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso, LE, Schulenberg, TS, Radilofe, S, Missa, O. 2002. A Biological Assessment of the Réserve Naturelle Intégrale d'Ankarafantsika, Madagascar. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment, Vol. 23. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
Anzures-Dadda, A, Manson, RH. 2007. Patch- and landscape-scale effects on howler monkey distribution and abundance in rainforest fragments. Animal Conservation 10(1):69–76.Google Scholar
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V, Dias, PAD. 2010. Effects of habitat fragmentation and disturbance on howler monkeys: a review. American Journal of Primatology 72(1):1–16.Google Scholar
Atsalis, S. 1999. Diet of the brown mouse lemur (Microcebus rufus) in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 20(2):193–229.Google Scholar
Balko, EA, Underwood, HB. 2005. Effects of forest structure and composition on food availability for Varecia variegata at Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. Journal of Primatology 66(1):45–70.Google Scholar
Bloesch, U. 1999. Fire as a tool in the management of a savanna/dry forest reserve in Madagascar. Applied Vegetation Science 2(1):117–124.Google Scholar
Burke, RJ, Lehman, SM. 2014. Edge effects on morphometrics and body mass in two sympatric species of mouse lemurs in Madagascar. Folia Primatologica 85(5):277–291.Google Scholar
Chiarello, A, Melo, FR. de 2001. Primate population densities and sizes in Atlantic forest remnants of northern Espirito Santo, Brazil. International Journal of Primatology 22(3):379–396.Google Scholar
Chapman, C, Chapman, L, Naughton-Treves, L, Lawes, MJ, McDowell, LR. 2004. Predicting folivorous primate abundance: validation of a nutritional model. American Journal of Primatology 62:55.Google Scholar
Chevan, A, Sutherland, M. 1991. Hierarchical partitioning. The American Statistician 45(2):90–96.Google Scholar
Connor, E, Courtney, A, Yoder, J. 2000. Individuals–area relationships: the relationship between animal population density and area. Ecology 81(3):734–748.Google Scholar
Corbin, GD, Schmid, J. 1995. Insect secretions determine habitat use patterns by a female lesser mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). American Journal of Primatology 37(4):317–324.Google Scholar
Dammhahn, M, Kappeler, PM. 2008. Small-scale coexistence of two mouse lemur species (Microcebus berthae and M. murinus) within a homogeneous competitive environment. Oecologia 157(3):473–483.Google Scholar
Davidson, AD, Hamilton, MJ, Boyer, AG, Brown, JH, Ceballos, G. 2009. Multiple ecological pathways to extinction in mammals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(26):10702–10705.Google Scholar
Eichmueller, P, Thorén, S, Radespiel, U. 2013. The lack of female dominance in golden-brown mouse lemurs suggests alternative routes in lemur social evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 150(1):158–164.Google Scholar
Fa, JE, Purvis, A. 1997. Body size, diet and population density in afrotropical forest mammals: a comparison with neotropical species. Journal of Animal Ecology 66(1):98–112.Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:487–515.Google Scholar
Fernández, C, Acosta, FJ, Abellá, G, López, F, Díaz, M. 2002. Complex edge effect fields as additive processes in patches of ecological systems. Ecological Modelling 149:273–283.Google Scholar
Gade, DW. 1996. Deforestation and its effects in highland Madagascar. Mountain Research and Development 16(2):101–116.Google Scholar
Ganzhorn, JU, Schmid, J. 1998. Different population dynamics of Microcebus murinus in primary and secondary deciduous dry forests of Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 19(5):785–796.Google Scholar
Ganzhorn, JU, Fietz, J, Rakotovao, E, Schwab, D, Zinner, D. 1999. Lemurs and the regeneration of dry deciduous forest in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 13(4):794–804.Google Scholar
García, G, Goodman, SM. 2003. Hunting of protected animals in the Parc National d'Ankarafantsika, north-western Madagascar. Oryx 37(1):115–118.Google Scholar
Gerber, BD, Arrigo-Nelson, S, Karpanty, SM, Kotschwar, M, Wright, PC. 2012. Spatial ecology of the endangered Milne-Edwards' sifaka (Propithecus edwardsi): do logging and season affect home range and daily ranging patterns?International Journal of Primatology 33(2):305–321.Google Scholar
Grow, N, Gursky, S, Duma, Y. 2013. Altitude and forest edges influence the density and distribution of pygmy tarsiers (Tarsius pumilus). American Journal of Primatology 75(5):464–477.Google Scholar
Guschanski, K, Olivieri, GL, Funk, SM, Radespiel, U. 2007. MtDNA reveals strong genetic differentiation among geographically isolated populations of the golden brown mouse lemur, Microcebus ravelobensis. Conservation Genetics 8(4):809–821.Google Scholar
Hanya, G, Chapman, CA. 2012. Linking feeding ecology and population abundance: a review of food resource limitation on primates. Ecological Research 28(2):183–190.Google Scholar
Harcourt, AH, Doherty, DA. 2005. Species–area relationships of primates in tropical forest fragments: a global analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 42(4):630–637.Google Scholar
Harper, KA, Macdonald, SE, Burton, P, et al. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19(3):768–782.Google Scholar
Irwin, MT. 2008a. Diademed sifaka (Propithecus diadema) ranging and habitat use in continuous and fragmented forest: higher density but lower viability in fragments?Biotropica 40(2):231–240.Google Scholar
Irwin, MT. 2008b. Feeding ecology of Propithecus diadema in forest fragments and continuous forest. International Journal of Primatology 29(1):95–115.Google Scholar
Isaac, NJB, Jones, KE, Gittleman, JL, Purvis, A. 2005. Correlates of species richness in mammals: body size, life history, and ecology. The American Naturalist 165(5):600–607.Google Scholar
Janson, CH, Chapman, CA. 1999. Resources and primate community structure. In Fleagle, JG, Janson, CH, Reed, KE (eds.), Primate Communities (pp. 237–267). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lahann, P. 2007. Feeding ecology and seed dispersal of sympatric cheirogaleid lemurs (Microcebus murinus, Cheirogaleus medius, Cheirogaleus major) in the littoral rainforest of south-east Madagascar. Journal of Zoology 271(1):88–98.Google Scholar
Lahann, P, Schmid, J, Ganzhorn, JU. 2006. Geographic variation in populations of Microcebus murinus in Madagascar: resource seasonality or Bergmann's rule?International Journal of Primatology 27(4):983–999.Google Scholar
Laurance, WF, Camargo, JLC, Luizão, RCC, et al. 2011. The fate of Amazonian forest fragments: a 32-year investigation. Biological Conservation 144(1):56–67.Google Scholar
Lehman, SM. 2006. Conservation biology of Malagasy strepsirrhines: a phylogenetic approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 130(2):238–253.Google Scholar
Lima, SL, Zollner, PA. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11(3):131–135.Google Scholar
MacArthur, RH. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography, Vol. 1. Princeton University Press, Chicago.
Nally, R. Mac 1996. Hierarchical partitioning as an interpretative tool in multivariate inference. Australian Journal of Ecology 21 (2):224–228.Google Scholar
Nally, R. Mac 2000. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between – and reconciliation of – ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodiversity and Conservation 9(5):655–671.Google Scholar
Nally, R. Mac 2002. Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodiversity and Conservation 11(8):1397–1401.Google Scholar
McGoogan, K, Kivell, T, Hutchison, M. 2007. Phylogenetic diversity and the conservation biogeography of African primates. Journal of Biogeography 34(11):1962–1974.Google Scholar
Michalski, F, Peres, CA. 2007. Disturbance-mediated mammal persistence and abundance–area relationships in Amazonian forest fragments. Conservation Biology 21(6):1–15.Google Scholar
Müller, P, Velo, A, Raheliarisoa, EO. 2000. Surveys of sympatric lemurs at Anjamena, north-west Madagascar. African Journal of Ecology 38:248–257.Google Scholar
Murcia, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10(2):58–62.Google Scholar
Olea, PP, Mateo-Tomás, P, Frutos, A. de 2010. Estimating and modelling bias of the hierarchical partitioning public-domain software: implications in environmental management and conservation. PLoS ONE 5(7):e11698.Google Scholar
Paciulli, L. 2010. The relationship between nonhuman primate densities and vegetation on the Pagai, Mentawai Islands, Indonesia. In Gursky-Doyen, S, Supriatna, J (eds.), Indonesian Primates. Springer, New York.
Peres, CA. 1990. Effects of hunting on western Amazonian primate communities. Biological Conservation 54 :47–59.Google Scholar
Peres, CA, Dolman, PM. 2000. Density compensation in neotropical primate communities: evidence from 56 hunted and nonhunted Amazonian forests of varying productivity. Oecologia 122(2):175–189.Google Scholar
Peres, CA, Palacios, E. 2007. Basin-wide effects of game harvest on vertebrate population densities in amazonian forest: implications for animal-mediated seed dispersal. Biotropica 39(3):304–315.Google Scholar
Pinto, N, Lasky, J, Bueno, R, Keitt, TH, Galetti, M. 2009. Primate densities in the Atlantic forest of southeast Brazil: the role of habitat quality and anthropogenic disturbance. In South American Primates (pp. 413–431). Springer, New York.
Plumptre, AJ, Reynolds, V. 1994. The effect of selective logging on the primate populations in the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda. Journal of Applied Ecology 31(4):631–641.Google Scholar
Pozo-Montuy, G, Serio-Silva, JC, Bonilla-Sánchez, YM. 2011. Influence of the landscape matrix on the abundance of arboreal primates in fragmented landscapes. Primates 52(2):139–147.Google Scholar
Pyritz, L, Büntge, A, Herzog, S. 2010. Effects of habitat structure and fragmentation on diversity and abundance of primates in tropical deciduous forests in Bolivia. International Journal of Primatology 31:796–812.Google Scholar
Quinn, GP, Keough, MJ. 2002 Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rabesandratana, AZ, Rakotondravony, R, Zimmermann, E. 2012. Distribution and abundance of Milne Edwards' sportive lemur Lepilemur edwardsi in the Ankarafantsika National Park, northwestern Madagascar. Lemur News 16:57–59.Google Scholar
Radespiel, U, Bruford, MW. 2014. Fragmentation genetics of rainforest animals: insights from recent studies. Conservation Genetics 15(2):245–260.Google Scholar
Radespiel, U, Cepok, S, Zietemann, V, Zimmermann, E. 1998. Sex-specific usage patterns of sleeping sites in grey mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) in northwestern Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology 46:77–84.Google Scholar
Radespiel, U, Ehresmann, P, Zimmermann, E. 2003. Species-specific usage of sleeping sites in two sympatric mouse lemur species (Microcebus murinus and M. ravelobensis) in northwestern Madagascar. American Journal of Primatology 59(4):139–151.Google Scholar
Rakotondravony, R, Radespiel, U. 2009. Varying patterns of coexistence of two mouse lemur species (Microcebus ravelobensis and M. murinus) in a heterogeneous landscape. American Journal of Primatology 71(11):928–938.Google Scholar
Randrianambinina, B, Rasoloharijaona, S, Rakotondravony, R, Zimmermann, E, Radespiel, U. 2010. Abundance and conservation status of two newly described lemur species in northwestern Madagascar (Microcebus danfossi, Lepilemur grewcockorum). Madagascar Conservation & Development 5(2):95–102.Google Scholar
Fara, L. Razafy 2003. Rapport sur l'actualisation de la carte de végétation du parc national à Ankarafantsika. ANGAP, GFA, Antananarivo, Madagascar. p. 26.
Remis, MJ, Robinson, CAJ. 2012. Reductions in primate abundance and diversity in a multiuse protected area: synergistic impacts of hunting and logging in a Congo Basin forest. American Journal of Primatology 74(7):602–612.Google Scholar
Rendigs, A, Radespiel, U, Wrogemann, D, Zimmermann, E. 2003. Relationship between microhabitat structure and distribution of mouse lemurs (Microcebus spp.) in northwestern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 24(1):47–64.Google Scholar
Ries, L, Sisk, T. 2004. A predictive model of edge effects. Ecology 85(11):2917–2926.Google Scholar
Robinson, JG, Redford, KH. 1986. Body size, diet, and population density of neotropical forest mammals. The American Naturalist 128(5):665–680.Google Scholar
Rovero, F, Struhsaker, TT. 2007. Vegetative predictors of primate abundance: utility and limitations of a fine-scale analysis. American Journal of Primatology 69(11):1242–1256.Google Scholar
Schwitzer, C, Mittermeier, RA, Johnson, SE, et al. 2014. Conservation. Averting lemur extinctions amid Madagascar's political crisis. Science 343(6173):842–843.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S, Wilk, M. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3–4):591.Google Scholar
Skole, D, Tucker, C. 1993. Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science 260(5116):1905.Google Scholar
Smith, RJ, Jungers, WL. 1997. Body mass in comparative primatology. Journal of Human Evolution 32(6):523–559.Google Scholar
Stevenson, PR. 2001. The relationship between fruit production and primate abundance in Neotropical communities. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 72:161–178.Google Scholar
Teelen, S. 2007. Primate abundance along five transect lines at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology 69(9):1030–1044.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J. 1986. Keystone plant resources in the tropical forest. In Soule, ME, Wilcox, BA (eds.), Conservation Biology: an evolutionary–ecological perspective (pp. 330–344). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Thorén, S, Quietzsch, F, Radespiel, U. 2010 Leaf nest use and construction in the golden-brown mouse lemur (Microcebus ravelobensis) in the Ankarafantsika National Park. American Journal of Primatology 72(1):48–55.Google Scholar
Thorén, S, Quietzsch, F, Schwochow, D, et al. 2011. Seasonal changes in feeding ecology and activity patterns of two sympatric mouse lemur species, the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) and the golden-brown mouse lemur (M. ravelobensis), in northwestern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 32: 566–586.Google Scholar
Whittaker, RJ, Araújo, MB, Paul, J, et al. 2005. Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Diversity and Distributions 11(1):3–23.Google Scholar
Wieczkowski, J. 2004. Ecological correlates of abundance in the Tana mangabey (Cercocebus galeritus). American Journal of Primatology 63(3):125–138.Google Scholar
Wilcox, BA, Murphy, DD. 1985. Conservation strategy: the effects of fragmentation on extinction. The American Naturalist 125(6):879–887.Google Scholar
Wright, PC, Razafindratsita, VR, Pochron, ST, Jernvall, J. 2005. The key to Madagascar frugivores. In Dew, J, Boubli, J (eds.), Tropical Fruits and Frugivores: The Search for Strong Interactors (pp. 121–138). Springer, Dordrecht.
Zimmermann, E, Cepok, S, Rakotoarison, N, Zietemann, V, Radespiel, U. 1998. Sympatric mouse lemurs in north-west Madagascar: a new rufous mouse lemur species (Microcebus ravelobensis). Folia Primatologica 69:106–114.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×