Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:08:00.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Seed dispersal by mouse lemurs: do Microcebus represent a unique frugivorous guild?

from Part IV - Cheirogaleidae: sensory ecology, communication, and cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Kim Valenta
Affiliation:
McGill University, Canada
Shawn M. Lehman
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada
Shawn M. Lehman
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Ute Radespiel
Affiliation:
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Elke Zimmermann
Affiliation:
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Seed dispersal by animals

Plants vary in the mechanisms by which they disperse their seeds. Plant dispersal mechanisms are either abiotic (wind, water and ballistic dispersal), or biotic (endozoochory and epizoochory) (Howe and Smallwood, 1982). Epizoochory refers to dispersal of seeds via adhesion to animal fur, while endozoochory refers to the consumption of fleshy fruits and seeds by frugivores, and their subsequent deposition, through either spitting or defecation (Couvreur et al., 2005). While the latter mechanism is relatively rare in temperate forests, up to 90% of tropical tree species depend on endozoochory, relying on animals as dispersal vectors (Howe and Smallwood, 1982). Different animal dispersers affect seed dispersal and seed viability via seed handling (Lambert, 1999), gut passage (Knogge et al., 2003; Valenta and Fedigan, 2009) and the spatial location of seed deposition (Valenta and Fedigan, 2010).

The effect of gut passage on seeds is a potentially crucial determinant of plant reproductive success. In some cases, studies have shown that gut passage neither helps nor hinders a seed's chance of germinating (Smith, 2004). However, the majority of research on the effect of gut passage suggests that it increases the potential for germination for numerous species (Knogge et al., 2003). For some plant species, passage through a specific animal dispersal vector is necessary for successful seed germination (Temple, 1977; Chapman et al., 1992).

Other processes influencing the success of seed dispersal are secondary dispersal and predation (Nathan and Mueller-Landau, 2000; Valenta and Fedigan, 2009). The deposition of a seed is not necessarily the final step in the plant–animal interaction, because the forest floor is home to invertebrates and vertebrates that variously prey on, or safely redeposit, dispersed seeds. One study of primate-dispersed seeds in Costa Rica found that approximately 80% (N = 793) of seeds were removed from animal feces a mere week after initial deposition (Chapman, 1989). A study of howler monkey (Alouatta palliata)-dispersed seeds in Mexico found that a majority of the dung beetle species in the area were overwhelmingly attracted to howler dung, steering clear of the feces of other, more folivorous, herbivores, resulting in the massive redeposition of defecated seeds (Estrada and Coates-Estrada, 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Dwarf and Mouse Lemurs of Madagascar
Biology, Behavior and Conservation Biogeography of the Cheirogaleidae
, pp. 353 - 365
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atsalis, S. 1999. Diet of the brown mouse lemur (Microcebus rufus) in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 20:193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthlott, W, Lauer, W, Placke, A. 1996. Global distribution of species diversity in vascular plants: towards a world map of phytodiversity. Erdkunde 50:317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, RA, Purvis, A, Harvey, PH. 1995. Evolutionary radiation of visual and olfactory brain systems in primates, bats and insectivores. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 348:381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhning-Gaese, K, Gaese, B, Rabemanantsoa, S. 1995. Seed dispersal by frugivorous tree visitors in the Malagasy tree species Commiphora guillaumini. Ecotropica 1:41–50.Google Scholar
Böhning-Gaese, K, Gaese, BH, Rabemanantsoa, SB. 1999. Importance of primary and secondary seed dispersal in the Malagasy tree Commiphora guillaumini. Ecology 80(3):821–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, A, Elsacker, LV, Ganzhorn, JU. 2004. Tree dispersal strategies in the littoral forest of Sainte Luce (SE-Madagascar). Oecologia 139(4):604–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadenasso, ML, Pickett, ST. 2001. Effect of edge structure on the flux of species into forest interiors. Conservation Biology 15(1):91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, CA. 1989. Primate seed dispersal: the fate of dispersed seeds. Biotropica 21(2):148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, CA, Chapman, LJ. 1996. Frugivory and the fate of dispersed and non-dispersed seeds of six African tree species. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12(04):491–504.Google Scholar
Chapman, CA, Onderdonk, DA. 1998. Forests without primates: primate/plant codependency. American Journal of Primatology 45:127–141.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, CA, Chapman, LJ, Wrangham, R, et al. 1992. Estimators of fruit abundance of tropical trees. Biotropica 24(4):527–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, JS, Silman, M, Kern, R, Macklin, E, HilleRisLambers, J. 1999. Seed dispersal near and far: patterns across temperate and tropical forests. Ecology 80(5):1475–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, JH. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In Boer, P van, Gradwell, G (eds.), Dynamics of Populations (pp. 298–312). Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.
Cordeiro, N, Howe, H. 2001. Low recruitment of trees dispersed by animals in African forest fragments. Conservation Biology 15(6):1733–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couvreur, M, Cosyns, E, Hermy, M, Hoffmann, M. 2005. Complementarity of epi- and endozoochory of plant seeds by free ranging donkeys. Ecography 28(1):37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, BE, McGoogan, KC, Lehman, SM. 2012. Edge effects on foliar stable isotope values in a Madagascan tropical dry forest. PLoS ONE 7(9):1–9.Google Scholar
Dammhahn, M, Kappeler, PM. 2008. Comparative feeding ecology of sympatric Microcebus berthae and M. murinus. International Journal of Primatology 29:1567–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dausmann, K, Glos, J, Linsenmair, K, Ganzhorn, J. 2008. Improved recruitment of a lemur-dispersed tree in Malagasy dry forests after the demise of vertebrates in forest fragments. Oecologia 157(2):307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debussche, M, Isenmann, P. 1989. Fleshy fruit characters and the choices of bird and mammal seed dispersers in a Mediterranean region. Oikos 56:327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleporte, P, Randrianasolo, J, Rakotonirina, G. 1996. Sylviculture in the dry dense forest of western Madagascar. In Ganzhorn, JU, Sorg, JP (eds.), Ecology and Economy of a Tropical Dry Forest in Madagascar, Primate Report (pp. 89–116). Goltze, Gottingen.
Dewar, RE, Richard, AF. 2007. Evolution in the hypervariable environment of Madagascar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(34):13723–13727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrada, A, Coates-Estrada, R. 1991. Howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata), dung beetles (Scarabaeidae) and seed dispersal: ecological interactions in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 7(4):459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K, Chapman, C. 1993. Frugivores and fruit syndromes: differences in patterns at the genus and species level. Oikos 66(3):472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T, Breitwisch, R, Whitesides, G. 1987. Patterns of tropical vertebrate frugivore diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galetti, M. 2000. Frugivory by toucans (Rhampastidae) at two altitudes in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Biotropica 32:842–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galetti, M, Donatti, C, Pires, A, Guimaraes, P, Jordano, P. 2006. The palms: seed survival and dispersal of an endemic Atlantic forest palm: the combined effects of defaunation and forest fragmentation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151(1):141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganzhorn, JU, Fietz, J, Rakotovao, E, Schwab, D, Zinner, D. 1999. Lemurs and the regeneration of dry deciduous forest in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 13(4):794–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, PA, Lambert, JE. 1998. Primates as seed dispersers: ecological processes and directions for future research. American Journal of Primatology 45:3–8.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, SM, Benstead, JP. 2005. Updated estimates of biotic diversity and endemism for Madagascar. Oryx 39(01):73–77.Google Scholar
Goodman, SM, Ganzhorn, JU, Wilme, L. 1997. Observations at a Ficus tree in Malagasy humid forest. Biotropica 29(4):480–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, K, Wright, S, Calderón, O, Hernández, A, Herre, E. 2000. Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature 404(6777):493–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, G, Steininger, M, Tucker, C, Juhn, D, Hawkins, F. 2007. Fifty years of deforestation and forest fragmentation in Madagascar. Environmental Conservation 34(04):325–333.Google Scholar
Herrera, C. 1992. Interspecific variation in fruit shape: allometry, phylogeny, and adaptation to dispersal agents. Ecology 73(5):1832–1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiramatsu, C, Melin, AD, Aureli, F, et al. 2008. Importance of achromatic contrast in short-range fruit foraging of primates. PLoS ONE 3(10):e3356.Google Scholar
Hodgkison, R, Ayasse, M, Kalko, E, et al. 2007. Chemical ecology of fruit bat foraging behavior in relation to the fruit odors of two species of paleotropical bat-dispersed figs (Ficus hispida and Ficus scortechinii). Journal of Chemical Ecology 33(11):2097–2110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohenbrink, P, Mundy, NI, Zimmerman, E, Radespiel, U. 2013. First evidence for functional comeronasal 2 receptor genes in primates. Biology Letters 9(1):20121006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holl, KD, Lulow, ME. 1997. Effects of species, habitat, and distance from edge on post-dispersal seed predation in a tropical rainforest. Biotropica 29(4):459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, H, Smallwood, J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, HF, Miriti, MN. 2004. When seed dispersal matters. BioScience 54(7):651–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, CH. 1983. Adaptation of fruit morphology to dispersal agents in a neotropical forest. Science 219(4581):187–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, DH. 1970a. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. The American Naturalist 104(940):501.Google Scholar
Janzen, DH. 1970b. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist 104:501.Google Scholar
Knogge, C, Herrera, ERT, Heymann, EW. 2003. Effects of passage through tamarin guts on the germination potential of dispersed seeds. International Journal of Primatology 24(5):1121–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahann, P. 2006. Feeding ecology and seed dispersal of sympatric cheirogaleid lemurs (Microcebus murinus, Cheirogaleus medius, Cheirogaleus major) in the littoral rainforest of south-east Madagascar. Journal of Zoology 271(1):88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, JE. 1999. Seed handling in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius): implications for understanding hominoid and cercopithecine fruit-processing strategies and seed dispersal. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 109(3):365–386.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, JE, Garber, PA. 1998. Evolutionary and ecological implications of primate seed dispersal. American Journal of Primatology 45(1):9–28.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, EG, Wright, SJ, Herre, EA, Putz, FE. 1993. The decline of tree diversity on newly isolated tropical islands: a test of a null hypothesis and some implications. Evolutionary Ecology 7(1):76–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loiselle, BA, Blendinger, PG, Blake, JG, Ryder, TB. 2007. Ecological redundancy in seed dispersal systems: a comparison between manakins (Aves: Pipridae) in two tropical forests. In Dennis, AJ, Schupp, EW, Green, R, Westcott, DW (eds.), Seed Dispersal: Theory and its Application in a Changing World (pp. 178–196). CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
Lomáscolo, S, Schaefer, H. 2010. Signal convergence in fruits: a result of selection by frugivores?Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:614–624.Google Scholar
Lomáscolo, S, Levey, D, Kimball, R, Bolker, B, Alborn, H. 2010. Dispersers shape fruit diversity in Ficus (Moraceae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(33):14668–14672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKey, D. 1975. The ecology of coevolved seed dispersal systems. In Gilbert, LE, Raven, PH (eds.), Coevolution of Animals and Plants (pp. 155–191). University of Texas Press, Austin.
Melin, AD, Fedigan, LM, Hiramatsu, C, et al. 2009. Fig foraging by dichromatic and trichromatic Cebus capucinus in a tropical dry forest. International Journal of Primatology 30(6):753–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittermeier, R, Ganzhorn, J, Konstant, W, et al. 2008. Lemur diversity in Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 29(6):1607–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, MJ, Adam, A, Mollon, JD. 1992. Dichromats detect colour-camouflaged objects that are not detected by trichromats. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 248(1323):291–295.Google Scholar
Myers, N, Mittermeier, RA, Mittermeier, CG, Fonseca, GAB da, Kent, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403(6772):853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, R, Mueller-Landau, HC. 2000. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:278–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piep, M, Radespiel, U, Zimmermann, E, Schmidt, S, Siemers, BM. 2008. The sensory basis of prey detection in captive-born grey mouse lemurs, Microcebus murinus. Animal Behaviour 75(3):871–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Cabal, M, Aizen, M, Novaro, A. 2007. Habitat fragmentation disrupts a plant-disperser mutualism in the temperate forest of South America. Biological Conservation 139(1–2):195–202.Google Scholar
Russo, S. 2003. Responses of dispersal agents to tree and fruit traits in Virola calophylla (Myristicaceae): implications for selection. Oecologia 136(1):80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, SE, Augspurger, CK. 2004. Aggregated seed dispersal by spider monkeys limits recruitment to clumped patterns in Virola calophylla. Ecology Letters 7:1058–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzer, C, Mittermeier, RA, Johnson, SE, et al. 2014. Averting lemur extinctions amid Madagascar's political crisis. Science 343(6173):842–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemers, BM, Goerlitz, HR, Robsomanitrandrasana, E, et al. 2007. Sensory basis of food detection in wild Microcebus murinus. International Journal of Primatology 28:291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AC, Buchanan-Smith, HM, Surridge, AK, Osorio, D, Mundy, NI. 2003. The effect of colour vision status on the detection and selection of fruits by tamarins (Saguinus spp.). The Journal of Experimental Biology 206(Pt 18):3159–3165.Google Scholar
Smith, S. 2004. A preliminary study of seed dispersal by white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) and mantled howlers (Alouatta palliata) in Costa Rica. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 123(S1):184.Google Scholar
Snow, DW. 1981. Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: a world survey. Biotropica 13:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, M, Paraga, CA, Cuthill, IC, Partridge, JC, Troscianko, TOMS. 2007. Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 90(2):211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, M, Stoddard, MC, Higham, JP. 2009. Studying primate color: towards visual system-dependent methods. International Journal of Primatology 30(6):893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, P, Aldana, A. 2008. Potential effects of ateline extinction and forest fragmentation on plant diversity and composition in the western Orinoco Basin, Colombia. International Journal of Primatology 29(2):365–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, PR. 2004. Fruit choice by woolly monkeys in Tinigua National Park, Colombia. International Journal of Primatology 25(2):367–381.Google Scholar
Tan, Y, Li, WH. 1999. Trichromatic vision in prosimians. Nature 402:36.Google Scholar
Temple, SA. 1977. Plant–animal mutualism: coevolution with dodo leads to near extinction of plant. Science 197(4306):885–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoren, S, Quietzsch, F, Schwochow, D, et al. 2011. Seasonal changes in feeding ecology and activity patterns of two sympatric mouse lemur species, the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus) and the golden-brown mouse lemur (M. ravelobensis) in northwestern Madagascar. International Journal of Primatology 32:566–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenta, K, Fedigan, LM. 2009. Effects of gut passage, feces, and seed handling on latency and rate of germination in seeds consumed by capuchins (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology 13:486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenta, K, Fedigan, LM. 2010. Spatial patterns of seed dispersal by white-faced capuchins in Costa Rica: evaluating distant-dependent seed mortality. Biotropica 42(2):223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenta, K, Burke, RJ, Styler, SA, et al. 2013. Colour and odour drive fruit selection and seed dispersal by mouse lemurs. Scientific Reports 3(2424):1–5.Google Scholar
Vieites, DR, Wollenberg, KC, Andreone, F, et al. 2009. Vast underestimation of Madagascar's biodiversity evidenced by an integrative amphibian inventory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106(20):8267–8272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voigt, F, Bleher, B, Fietz, J, et al. 2004. A comparison of morphological and chemical fruit traits between two sites with different frugivore assemblages. Oecologia 141(1):94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, PC, Tecot, SR, Erhart, EM, et al. 2011. Frugivory in four sympatric lemurs: implications for the future of Madagascar's forests. American Journal of Primatology 73:585–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S, Duber, H. 2001. Poachers and forest fragmentation alter seed dispersal, seed survival, and seedling recruitment in the palm Attalea butyraceae, with implications for tropical tree diversity. Biotropica 33(4):583–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×