Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- General editors' preface
- Notes on the contributors
- Table of treaties
- Table of legislation
- List of abbreviations
- Part I Environmental liability in Europe
- 1 International and supranational systems of environmental liability in Europe
- 2 Some observations on the law applicable to transfrontier environmental damage
- Part II The case studies
- Part A Scope of liable persons
- Case 1 Industrial plant
- Case 2 Sudden incident
- Case 3 Dangerous substances
- Case 4 Genetically modified organisms
- Case 5 Micro-organisms
- Case 6 Waste disposal site
- Case 7 Producer of waste
- Case 8 Nuclear power plant
- Case 9 The harmless substance
- Case 10 Historic pollution
- Part B Causation and multiple tortfeasors
- Part C Remedies and legal standing
- Part III Comparison, summary and conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
Case 8 - Nuclear power plant
from Part A - Scope of liable persons
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- General editors' preface
- Notes on the contributors
- Table of treaties
- Table of legislation
- List of abbreviations
- Part I Environmental liability in Europe
- 1 International and supranational systems of environmental liability in Europe
- 2 Some observations on the law applicable to transfrontier environmental damage
- Part II The case studies
- Part A Scope of liable persons
- Case 1 Industrial plant
- Case 2 Sudden incident
- Case 3 Dangerous substances
- Case 4 Genetically modified organisms
- Case 5 Micro-organisms
- Case 6 Waste disposal site
- Case 7 Producer of waste
- Case 8 Nuclear power plant
- Case 9 The harmless substance
- Case 10 Historic pollution
- Part B Causation and multiple tortfeasors
- Part C Remedies and legal standing
- Part III Comparison, summary and conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
A is the operator of a nuclear power plant. Due to a sudden breakdown of the cooling system, the surrounding land is contaminated by radioactive substances. The breakdown was caused by company C who had been in charge of the recent revision of the cooling system. Neighbour B suffers a loss.
Who is liable? What kind of damage may B claim?
Would it make any difference if the contamination was the result of a continuous process instead of a sudden incident?
Comparative remarks
Comparison
Liability for nuclear power plants is mainly regulated by international law, namely, the Paris and Brussels Conventions. In Belgium, the Paris and Brussels Conventions were implemented by the Act of 22 July 1985, which was amended by the Act of 11 July 2000. Under the amendment, liability for the operator is limited to €300 million. In France, nuclear power plants are operated by the state-owned Electricité de France (EDF). As an établissement public industriel et commercial, EDF can be sued in civil court, though, according to special legislation, only the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris has jurisdiction. Liability is governed by Law No. 68-943 of 30 October 1968, as amended by Law No. 90-488 of 16 June 1990, and is limited to €90 million per accident. In the United Kingdom, the Paris Convention was implemented by the Nuclear Installations Acts of 1965 and 1969. The liability cap is currently £140 million.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Environmental Liability and Ecological Damage In European Law , pp. 290 - 314Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008