Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Academic Cheating
- Part II Academic Excuses and Fairness
- Part III Authorship and Credit
- Part IV Confidentiality’s Limits
- 24 Ethics in Service
- 25 Protecting Confidentiality in a Study of Adolescents’ Digital Communication
- 26 Commentary to Part IV
- Part V Data Analysis, Reporting, and Sharing
- Part VI Designing Research
- Part VII Fabricating Data
- Part VIII Human Subjects
- Part IX Personnel Decisions
- Part X Reviewing and Editing
- Part XI Science for Hire and Conflict of Interest
- Epilogue Why Is Ethical Behavior Challenging?
- Index
26 - Commentary to Part IV
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Academic Cheating
- Part II Academic Excuses and Fairness
- Part III Authorship and Credit
- Part IV Confidentiality’s Limits
- 24 Ethics in Service
- 25 Protecting Confidentiality in a Study of Adolescents’ Digital Communication
- 26 Commentary to Part IV
- Part V Data Analysis, Reporting, and Sharing
- Part VI Designing Research
- Part VII Fabricating Data
- Part VIII Human Subjects
- Part IX Personnel Decisions
- Part X Reviewing and Editing
- Part XI Science for Hire and Conflict of Interest
- Epilogue Why Is Ethical Behavior Challenging?
- Index
Summary
All kinds of psychologists confront the limits of confidentiality – most starkly when clinical research reveals a participant’s possible intent to harm self or others, as described in the contributions comprising this part. Even less clinically oriented research can present ethical challenges regarding confidentiality.
For example, a researcher using a common depression or self-esteem inventory may discover that one (anonymous) participant scores three standard deviations lower than everyone else. In our case, we decided to e-mail the entire sample, referring anyone distressed to the local mental health resources.
As another example, researchers using neuroimaging may detect incidental findings that look abnormal to a nonspecialist. In this case, the consent form must clarify that any such results would not be medically diagnostic, but that the researchers would communicate and refer the participant accordingly, unless the data were completely anonymous.
Finally, as a teacher, one sometimes encounters a disturbing essay from a fully identii able student. Although coni dentiality is not the main issue here, a personal approach, along with a referral to mental health counseling, seems in order.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain SciencesCase Studies and Commentaries, pp. 80Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015