Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Academic Cheating
- Part II Academic Excuses and Fairness
- Part III Authorship and Credit
- Part IV Confidentiality’s Limits
- Part V Data Analysis, Reporting, and Sharing
- 27 Clawing Back a Promising Paper
- 28 When the Data and Theory Don’t Match
- 29 Desperate Data Analysis by a Desperate Job Candidate
- 30 Own Your Errors
- 31 Caution in Data Sharing
- 32 The Conflict Entailed in Using a Post Hoc Theory to Organize a Research Report
- 33 Commentary to Part V
- Part VI Designing Research
- Part VII Fabricating Data
- Part VIII Human Subjects
- Part IX Personnel Decisions
- Part X Reviewing and Editing
- Part XI Science for Hire and Conflict of Interest
- Epilogue Why Is Ethical Behavior Challenging?
- Index
- References
30 - Own Your Errors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2015
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Academic Cheating
- Part II Academic Excuses and Fairness
- Part III Authorship and Credit
- Part IV Confidentiality’s Limits
- Part V Data Analysis, Reporting, and Sharing
- 27 Clawing Back a Promising Paper
- 28 When the Data and Theory Don’t Match
- 29 Desperate Data Analysis by a Desperate Job Candidate
- 30 Own Your Errors
- 31 Caution in Data Sharing
- 32 The Conflict Entailed in Using a Post Hoc Theory to Organize a Research Report
- 33 Commentary to Part V
- Part VI Designing Research
- Part VII Fabricating Data
- Part VIII Human Subjects
- Part IX Personnel Decisions
- Part X Reviewing and Editing
- Part XI Science for Hire and Conflict of Interest
- Epilogue Why Is Ethical Behavior Challenging?
- Index
- References
Summary
Several years ago, after an especially grueling review process, I got a paper accepted for publication in one of the best journals in the field. It was a big deal for me. The paper addressed an important and controversial issue, and my colleague and I had spent hundreds of hours collecting the data and hundreds more writing and revising the paper. This paper was also going to be good for my career. I had gotten tenure a few years before but had hit a publication dry spell. I needed to make something happen if I wanted to stay on track for promotion to full professor. This paper was going to give me the momentum I needed. I was elated and proud. This was one of my biggest accomplishments as a researcher to date.
One thing I have learned in my twenty or so years of doing research and writing scientific papers is that errors are unavoidable. In his book Brilliant Blunders, Mario Livio (2013) writes that 20% of Einstein’s papers contain errors. I believe it. So, as I always do when I have a paper accepted for publication, I immediately went about checking everything for accuracy. Even though I had been very careful in writing the paper before submitting it for publication, I checked every statement, every statistic, every quotation, and every reference, and when I was done, I did it again. Everything was right, and I breathed a sigh of relief. One of my worst nightmares – which will probably become one of yours if you’re just getting started in research – is to have a paper accepted for publication only to discover that I have to withdraw it because of a catastrophic error.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Ethical Challenges in the Behavioral and Brain SciencesCase Studies and Commentaries, pp. 89 - 90Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015