Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:10:02.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Remembering Cheaters

The Influence of Social Relevance on Source Memory

from Part II - Evolution of Memory Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

By
Meike Kroneisen
Edited by
Mark A. Krause ,
Karen L. Hollis  and
Mauricio R. Papini
Mark A. Krause
Affiliation:
Southern Oregon University
Karen L. Hollis
Affiliation:
Mount Holyoke College, Massachusetts
Mauricio R. Papini
Affiliation:
Texas Christian University
Get access

Summary

A popular assumption in evolutionary psychology claims that reciprocal altruism is supported by a cognitive module that helps individuals to detect and remember cheaters. Enhanced memory for cheaters would be suited to avoid social exchange situations in which we run the risk of getting exploited by others. In line with this idea, previous studies found a source memory advantage for faces of cheaters relative to faces of cooperators. However, such findings should not be interpreted uncritically. This effect can also be explained with more general cognitive mechanisms. A general preference to attend to and remember negative and unexpected information may ensure that our limited processing resources are focused on relevant information. Therefore, enhanced source memory should be found for a variety of situations, proving to be more adaptive than a mechanism exclusively focused on cheating.

Keywords

cheater avoidancesource memorysocial exchangeevolutionlearningadaptive memorysocial expectancies
Type
Chapter
Information
Evolution of Learning and Memory Mechanisms , pp. 424 - 437
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aktipis, C. A. (2006). Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: How simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world. Adaptive Behavior, 14, 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/105971230601400301Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay, P. (2008). Enhanced recognition of defectors depends on their rarity. Cognition, 107, 817–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barclay, P., & Lalumière, M. L. (2006). Do people differentially remember cheaters? Human Nature, 17, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1022-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323Google Scholar
Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2009). Enhanced source memory for names of cheaters. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490900700213Google Scholar
Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2010). Valence modulates source memory for faces. Memory & Cognition, 38, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.1.29CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2011). Source memory for faces is determined by their emotional evaluation. Emotion, 11, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022597CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2012). How adaptive is memory for cheaters? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412458525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R., Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Giang, T., Schain, C., & Riether, N. (2012a). How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026017Google Scholar
Bell, R., Buchner, A., Kroneisen, M., & Giang, T. (2012b). On the flexibility of social source memory: A test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 38, 1512–1529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028219Google Scholar
Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Musch, J. (2010). Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117, 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R., Giang, T., & Buchner, A. (2012c). Partial and specific source memory for faces associated to other- and self-relevant negative contexts. Cognition and Emotion, 26, 1036–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.633988Google Scholar
Bell, R., Mieth, L., & Buchner, A. (2015). Appearance-based first impressions and person memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 41, 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000034Google ScholarPubMed
Bell, R., Sasse, J., Möller, M., Czernochowski, D., Mayr, S., & Buchner, A. (2016). Event-related potentials in response to cheating and cooperation in a social dilemma game. Psychophysiology, 53, 216–228. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R., Schain, C., & Echterhoff, G. (2014). How selfish is memory for cheaters? Evidence for moral and egoistic biases. Cognition, 132, 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchner, A., Bell, R., Mehl, B., & Musch, J. (2009). No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.01.004Google Scholar
Buchner, A., Mehl, B., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2006). Artificially induced valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193252Google Scholar
Buchner, A., Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & Mehl, B. (2004). Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 32, 722–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195862CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buller, D. J. (2005a). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. (2005b). Evolutionary psychology: The emperor’s new paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.003Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. (2005c). Get over: Massive modularity. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 881–891.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2003). Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal, 12, 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00073-9Google Scholar
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(89)90023-1Google Scholar
D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2004). Influence of affective meaning on memory for contextual information. Emotion, 4, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.2.173Google Scholar
Doerksen, S., & Shimamura, A. P. (2001). Source memory enhancement for emotional words. Emotion, 1, 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.1.1.5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenberg, K., & Klauer, K. C. (2005). Flexible use of source information: Processing components of the inconsistency effect in person memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.001Google Scholar
Erdfelder, E., & Kroneisen, M. ( 2014). Proximate cognitive mechanisms underlying the survival processing effect. In Schwartz, B. L., Howe, M., Toglia, M., & Otgaar, H. (Eds.), What is adaptive about adaptive memory? (pp. 172–198). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90, 980–994. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.4.980Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., & Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In Bower, G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 16, pp. 59–109). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Janssen, M. A. (2008). Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot prisoner’s dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 65, 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.02.004Google Scholar
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, S. B. (2013). The temporal orientation of memory: It’s time for a change of direction. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 222–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.08.001Google Scholar
Kroneisen, M. (2018). Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1129–1137. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1345-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroneisen, M., & Bell, R. (2013). Sex, cheating, and disgust: Enhanced source memory for trait information that violates gender stereotypes. Memory, 21, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.713971Google Scholar
Kroneisen, M., Woehe, L., & Rausch, L. S. (2015). Expectancy effects in source memory: How moving to a bad neighborhood can change your memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0655-9Google Scholar
Mealey, L., Daood, C., & Krage, M. (1996). Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Ethology & Sociobiology, 17, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00131-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehl, B., & Buchner, A. (2008). No enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.08.001Google Scholar
Mieth, L., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2016). Cognitive load does not affect the behavioral and cognitive foundations of social cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1312. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.201601312Google Scholar
Murty, V. P., FeldmanHall, O., Hunter, L. E., Phelps, E. A., & Davachi, L. (2016). Episodic memories predict adaptive value-based decision-making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 548–558. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000158Google Scholar
Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2016). Adaptive memory: The evolutionary significance of survival processing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 496–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635613Google Scholar
Nairne, J. S., Thompson, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263 UID 2007-02740-001Google Scholar
Over, D. E. (Ed.) (2003). Evolution and the psychology of thinking: The debate. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Rothermund, K. (2011). Counter-regulation and control-dependency: Affective processing biases in the service of action regulation. Social Psychology, 42, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothermund, K., Voss, A., & Wentura, D. (2008). Counter-regulation in affective attentional biases: A basic mechanism that warrants flexibility in emotion and motivation. Emotion, 8, 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.34Google Scholar
Schaper, M. L., Mieth, L., & Bell, R. (2019). Adaptive memory: Source memory is positively associated with adaptive social decision making. Cognition, 186, 7–14. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.2.233Google Scholar
Suzuki, A., & Suga, S. (2010). Enhanced memory for the wolf in sheep’s clothing: Facial trustworthiness modulates face–trait associative memory. Cognition, 117, 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, A., Honma, Y., & Suga, S. (2013). Indelible distrust: Memory bias toward cheaters revealed as high persistence against extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 39, 1901–1913. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033335Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In Buss, D. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5–67). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755Google Scholar
Volstorf, J., Rieskamp, J., & Stevens, J. R. (2011). The good, the bad, and the rare: Memory for partners in social interactions. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e18945. www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0018945Google Scholar
Wentura, D., Voss, A., & Rothermund, K. (2009). Playing TETRIS for science counter-regulatory affective processing in a motivationally “hot” context. Acta Psychologica, 131, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×