Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:19:33.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Aggression and Victimization in Children's Peer Groups: A Relationship Perspective

from PART IV - HURT IN RELATIONAL CONTEXTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Get access

Summary

Children's peer relations play an important role in their psychological, academic, and social development. Although peers offer many positive benefits, such as friendships and opportunities to enact and receive prosocial behavior, on occasion, they are the source of harmful influences that result in immediate hurt feelings as well as short- and long-term negative consequences. One of the more salient aspects of peer relations is the occurrence of aggression. Immediate consequences of this aggression include fear, sadness, humiliation, and diminished self-concept for the victim; in contrast, the aggressors often experience immediate positive affect (happiness, feeling powerful) from the aggression itself or the rewards it brings. This does not imply that the hurtfulness of childhood aggression is one-sided, however. Moving beyond the immediate affect in aggressive encounters, we next review evidence that these acts of aggression have negative psychological, academic, and social consequences for both the aggressors and victims. Consistent with the theme of this book, we then turn our focus to the dyadic relationships between aggressors and victims. In this chapter we describe the conceptual, empirical, and theoretical support for this relationship perspective and then review research showing that certain aggressor–victim relationships are especially hurtful. Given that this relationship approach to studying aggression is relatively novel, we conclude with a discussion of its opportunities and challenges and a call for future research.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alsaker, F., & Olweus, D. (2002). Stability and change in global self-esteem and self-related affect. In Brinthaupt, T. M. & Lipka, R. P. (Eds.), Understanding early adolescent self and identity: Applications and interventions (pp. 193–223). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 212–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W. M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 765–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldizar, J. P., Perry, D. G., & Perry, L. C. (1989). Outcome values and aggression. Child Development, 60, 571–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, M. J. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal relations between children's playground behavior and social preference, victimization, and bullying. Child Development, 70, 944–954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., Chau, C., Whitehand, C., & Amatya, K. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal links between friendships and peer victimization: Implications for befriending interventions. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S., & Gariépy, J. L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection?Child Development, 65, 1068–1079.Google Scholar
Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 186–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Card, N. A. (2001). Who aggresses against whom?: An examination of aggressors and victims in a school setting. Unpublished masters thesis, St. John's University.Google Scholar
Card, N. A. (2003, April). Victims of peer aggression: A meta-analytic review. In Card, N. A. & Nishina, A. (Chairs), Whipping boys and other victims of peer aggression: 25 years of research, now where do we go? Poster symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar
Card, N. A. (2007). “I hated her guts!”: Emerging adults' recollections of the formation, maintenance, and termination of antipathetic relationships during high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 32–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2006). Shared targets for aggression by early adolescent friends. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1327–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Victimization within mutually antipathetic peer relationships. Social Development, 16, 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (in press). It takes two to fight in school too: A social relations model of the psychometric properties and relative variance of dyadic aggression and victimization in middle school. Social Development.
Card, N. A., Isaacs, J., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2000, March). Dynamics of interpersonal aggression in the school context: Who aggresses against whom? In Juvonen, J. & Nishina, A. (Chairs), Harassment across diverse contexts. Poster symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Chicago.Google Scholar
Card, N. A., Isaacs, J., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Correlates of school victimization: Recommendations for prevention and intervention. In Zins, J. E., Elias, M. J., & Maher, C. A. (Eds.), Bullying, victimization, and peer harassment: A handbook of prevention and intervention (pp. 339–366). New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2007). The adaptivity of instrumental and reactive aggression. In Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 107–134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Card, N. A., Selig, J. P., & Little, T. D. (Eds.)(2008). Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in developmental research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of intercorrelations, gender differences, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (Eds.). (2000). New directions in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 88. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coie, J. D., Cillessen, A. H. N., Dodge, K. A., Hubbard, J. A., Schwartz, D., Lemerise, E. A., & Bateman, H. (1999). It takes two to fight: A test of relational factors and a method for assessing aggressive dyads. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1179–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age comparison. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coie, J. D., Lochman, J. E., Terry, R., & Hyman, C. (1992). Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 783–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coie, J. D., Terry, R., Lenox, K., Lochman, J., & Hyman, C. (1995). Childhood peer rejection and aggression as predictors of stable adolescent disorders. Development and Psychology, 7, 697–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression: Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33, 610–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and instrumental aggression. Child Development, 67, 993–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRosier, M. E., & Thomas, T. J. (2003). Strengthening sociometric prediction: Scientific advances in the assessment of children's peer relations. Child Development, 74, 1379–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional processes. Child Development, 66, 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. M., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1990). Mechanisms in the cycle of violence. Science, 250, 1678–1683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Valente, E. (1995). Social information-processing patterns partially mediate the effects of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 632–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodge, K. A., Price, J. M., Coie, J. D., & Christopoulos, C. (1990). On the development of aggressive dyadic relationships in boys' peer groups. Human Development, 33, 260–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, R. D. (1999). Maltreatment by parents and peers: The relationship between child abuse, bully victimization, and psychological distress. Child Maltreatment, 4, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, S. K., Monson, T. C., Perry, D. G. (1998). Social-cognitive influences on change in aggression over time. Developmental Psychology, 34, 996–1006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization?Developmental Psychology, 34, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrington, D. P. (1991). Childhood aggression and adult violence: Early precursors and life outcomes. In Pepler, D. J. & Rubin, K. H. (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 5–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1996). Preoccupied and avoidant coping during middle childhood. Child Development, 67, 1318–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Victimization by peers: Associations with children's reports of mother–child interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fontaine, R. G., & Dodge, K. A. (2006). Real-time decision making and aggressive behavior in youth: A heuristic model of Response Evaluation and Decision (RED). Aggressive Behavior, 32, 604–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Rabiner, D. L. (2004). Social information processing and children's social adjustment. In Kupersmidt, J. B. & Dodge, K. A. (Eds.), Children's peer relations: From development to intervention (pp. 61–79). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmartin, B. G. (1987). Peer group antecedents of severe love-shyness in males. Journal of Personality, 55, 467–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffin, K. W., Botvin, G. J., Scheier, L. M., Diaz, T., & Miller, N. L. (2000). Parenting practices as predictors of substance use, delinquency, and aggression among urban minority youth: Moderating effects of family structure and gender. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. H. (2002). Peer victimization, global self-worth, and anxiety in middle school children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haselager, G. J. T., Hartup, W. W, Lieshout, C. F. M., & Riksen-Walraven, J. M. (1998). Similarities between friends and nonfriends in middle childhood. Child Development, 69, 1198–1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 170–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Pasupathi, M. (2002). Winning friends and influencing peers: Strategies of peer influence in late childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 466–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A. D., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, E. V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., & Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: Protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, E. V. E., Card, N. A., & Isaacs, J. (2003). Learning of aggression in the home and the peer group. In Heitmeyer, W. & Hagan, J. (Eds.), International handbook of research on violence (pp. 495–509). New York: Westview Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M. J., & Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubbard, J. A., Dodge, K. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., Coie, J. D., & Schwartz, D. (2001). The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys' reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 268–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacs, J., Hodges, E. V. E., & Salmivalle, C. (2008). Long-term consequences of victimization by peers. European Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 387–397.Google Scholar
Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Peer harassment, psychological adjustment, and social functioning in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.Google ScholarPubMed
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Kochenderfer, B. J., & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment?Child Development, 67, 1305–1317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochenderfer-Ladd, B., & Wardrop, J. L. (2001). Chronicity and instability of children's peer victimization experiences as predictors of loneliness and social satisfaction trajectories. Child Development, 72, 134–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladd, G. W., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (1998). Parenting behaviors and parent-child relationships: Correlates of peer victimization in kindergarten?Developmental Psychology, 34, 1450–1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003). The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children's psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74, 1344–1367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, T. D., & Card, N. A. (2005). On the use of social relations and actor–partner interdependence models in developmental research. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon-Lewis, C. E., Starnes, R., Volling, B., & Johnson, S. (1997). Perceptions of parenting as predictors of boys' sibling and peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1024–1031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McHale, J. P., Johnson, D., & Sinclair, R. (1999). Family dynamics, preschoolers' family representations, and preschool peer relationships. Early Education and Development, 10, 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, S. B., & Stipek, D. (2006). Contemporaneous and longitudinal associations between social behavior and literacy achievement in a sample of low-income elementary school children. Child Development, 77, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children's peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, R. S., & Murray, B. J. (2005). How students and teachers view the seriousness of peer harassment: When is it appropriate to seek help?Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
O'Moore, A. M., Kirkham, C., & Smith, M. (1997). Bullying behavior in Irish schools: A nationwide survey. Irish Journal of Psychology, 18, 141–169.Google Scholar
Parker, J. G., & Gamm, B. K. (2003). Describing the dark side of preadolescents' peer experiences: Four questions (and data) on preadolescents' enemies. In Hodges, E. V. E. & Card, N. A. (Eds.), Enemies and the darker side of peer relations: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development (pp. 55–72). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (1986). Performance models for aggressive boys. American Psychologist, 41, 432–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peets, K., Hodges, E. V. E., Kikas, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2007). Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: Does relationship type matter?Developmental Psychology, 43, 889–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peets, K., Hodges, E. V. E., & Salmivalli, C. (2008). Affect-congruent social-cognitive evaluations and behaviors. Child Development, 79, 170–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). A longitudinal study of boys' rough-and-tumble play and dominance during early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 16, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. G., Hodges, E. V. E., & Egan, S. K. (2001). Determinants of chronic victimization by peers: A review and a new model of family influence. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 73–104). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, D. G, Perry, L. C., & Kennedy, E. (1992). Conflict and the development of antisocial behavior. In Shantz, C. U. & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 301–329). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., & Rasmussen, P. (1986). Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development, 57, 700–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, D. G., Williard, J. C., & Perry, L. C. (1990). Peers' perceptions of the consequences that victimized children provide aggressors. Child Development, 61, 1310–1325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, K. A., & Cohen, R. (1995). Aggressors and their victims: Toward a contextual framework for understanding children's aggressor-victim relationships. Developmental Review, 15, 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, A. W., & Bierman, K. L. (1999). Predicting adolescent peer problems and antisocial activities: The relative roles of aggression and dysregulation. Developmental Psychology, 35, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prinstein, M. J., Boergers, J., & Vernberg, E. M. (2001). Overt and relational aggression in adolescents: Social-psychological adjustment of aggressors and victims. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 479–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rigby, K. (2000). Effects of peer victimization in schools and perceived social support on adolescent well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 57–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodkin, P., Farmer, T., Pearl, R., & Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group view on victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. In Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 398–419). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 38, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. Child Development, 64, 1755–1772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer Gorman, A. H., Toblin, R. L., & Abou-ezzedine, T. (2003). Mutual antipathies in the peer group as a moderating factor in the association between community violence exposure and psychosocial maladjustment. In Hodges, E. V. E. & Card, N. A. (Eds.), Enemies and the darker side of peer relations: New directions for child and adolescent development (pp. 39–54). San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D., & Proctor, L. J. (2000). Community violence exposure and children's social adjustment in the school peer group: The mediating roles of emotional regulation and social cognition. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 670–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shields, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2001). Parental maltreatment and emotion dysregulation as risk factors for bullying and victimization in middle childhood. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 349–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. F., & Slee, P. (Eds.). (1998). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. New York: Routledge.
Smith, P. K., & Shu, S. (2000). What good schools can do about bullying: Findings from a survey in English schools after a decade of research and action. Childhood, 7, 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, J. J., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). Individual differences in social aggression: A test of a reinforcement model of socialization in the natural environment. Behavior Therapy, 26, 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troop-Gordon, W., & Brock, R. L. (2005, April). Peer-identified aggressor-victim dyads: Prevalence and associated adjustment outcomes. In Card, N. A. & Hodges, E. V. E. (Chairs), Aggressor-victim relationships: Toward a dyadic perspective. Paper symposium presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Troy, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (1987). Victimization among preschoolers: Role of attachment relationship history. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 166–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernberg, E. M. (1990). Psychological adjustment and experiences with peers during early adolescence: Reciprocal, incidental, or unidirectional relationships?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×