Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:30:40.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 18 - Fitness to Plead and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

from Section 3 - Criminal Justice Pathways and Legal Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2023

By
Penelope Brown ,
Salma Ali  and
Elizabeth Harris
Edited by
Jane M. McCarthy ,
Regi T. Alexander  and
Eddie Chaplin
Jane M. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and University of Auckland
Regi T. Alexander
Affiliation:
Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust and University of Hertfordshire
Eddie Chaplin
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University
Get access

Summary

The right to a fair trial is embedded in human rights law. For a trial to be fair, the accused needs to be an active participant – to understand what they have been charged with and to be able answer that charge in a meaningful way. Laws relating to fitness to plead, or competence to stand trial, have developed in many jurisdictions and are designed to protect vulnerable defendants and in some cases divert them into healthcare. There are concerns that the law is not currently fit for purpose. Defendants with neurodevelopmental disorders face particular challenges when accused of a criminal charge at court. Many present with communication deficits, poor understanding and cognitive impairments, stereotyped and other abnormal behaviours, and lack of theory of mind. Identifying those who are unfit to plead can be problematic. In this chapter, we describe legal frameworks for fitness to plead and consider how neurodevelopmental disorders can impact an individual’s ability to participate effectively in their trial. We consider how best to identify, assess and support vulnerable defendants to improve their experience at court and ensure their fair trial rights are upheld.

Keywords

fitness to pleadcompetence to stand trialmentally disordered offendersmental health lawforensic psychiatryneurodevelopmental disordershuman rights
Type
Chapter
Information
Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
A Clinician's Guide
 , pp. 217 - 233
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rossner, M, Tait, D, McKimmie, B, Sarre, R. The dock on trial: courtroom design and the presumption of innocence. Journal of Law and Society 2017; 44(3): 317–44.Google Scholar
Young, S, Moss, D, Sedgwick, O, Fridman, M, Hodgkins, P. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in incarcerated populations. Psychological Medicine 2015; 45(2): 247–58.Google Scholar
Hellenbach, M, Karatzias, T, Brown, M. Intellectual disabilities among prisoners: prevalence and mental and physical health comorbidities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2017; 30(2): 230–41.Google Scholar
Allely, CS, Cooper, P. Jurors’ and judges’ evaluation of defendants with autism and the impact on sentencing: a systematic Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) review of autism spectrum disorder in the courtroom. Journal of Law and Medicine 2017; 25(1): 105–23.Google Scholar
Chaplin, E, McCarthy, J, Forrester, A. Defendants with autism spectrum disorders: what is the role of court liaison and diversion? Advances in Autism 2017; 3(4): 220–8.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, G, Joyce, T. Interviewing adults with intellectual disabilities. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 2011; 5(2): 16–21.Google Scholar
Søndenaa, E, Palmstierna, T, Iversen, VC. A stepwise approach to identify intellectual disabilities in the criminal justice system. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 2010; 2: 183–98.Google Scholar
Talbot, J, Jacobson, J. Adult defendants with learning disabilities and the criminal courts. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 2010; 1(2): 16–26.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Council of Europe Treaty Series 005. Council of Europe, 1950.Google Scholar
Duff, RA. Trials and Punishments. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
R v. Pritchard (1836) 7 C&P 303.Google Scholar
Brown, P. Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: historical development and contemporary dilemmas. Medicine, Science and the Law 2019; 59(3): 187–96.Google Scholar
R v. Davies (1853) 3 C&K 328.Google Scholar
R v. M(John) [2003] EWCA Crim 3452.Google Scholar
R v. Marcantonio [2016] EWCA Crim 14.Google Scholar
Exworthy, T. Commentary: UK perspective on competency to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2006; 34(4): 466–71.Google Scholar
Rogers, TP, Blackwood, NJ, Farnham, F, Pickup, GJ, Watts, MJ. Fitness to plead and competence to stand trial: a systematic review of the constructs and their application. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2008; 19 (4): 576–96.Google Scholar
Owusu-Bempah, A. The interpretation and application of the right to effective participation. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 2018; 22(4): 321–41.Google Scholar
Stanford v. UK [1994] ECHR 6.Google Scholar
T and V v. UK [2000] 30 EHRR 121.Google Scholar
Law Commission of England and Wales. Unfitness to Plead – Volume 2: Draft Legislation. The Stationary Office, 2016.Google Scholar
Vassall-Adams, G, Scott-Moncrieff, L. Capacity and fitness to plead: the yawning gap. Counsel 2006; 3: 2–3.Google Scholar
R v. Presser [1958] VR 45.Google Scholar
Freckleton, I. Fitness to stand trial under Australian law. In Mackay, R, Brookbanks, W, eds., Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2018: 153–174.Google Scholar
Dusky v. United States, 362 US 402 (1960); 80 S Ct 788.Google Scholar
Bonnie, RJ. Fitness for criminal adjudication: the emerging significance of decisional competence in the United States. In Mackay, R, Brookbanks, W, eds., Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2018; 175–206.Google Scholar
Morse, SJ. Involuntary competence in united states criminal law. In Mackay, R, Brookbanks, W, eds., Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2018; 207–30.Google Scholar
Shah, A. Making fitness to plead fit for purpose. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 2012; 1: 176–97.Google Scholar
Brown, P. Modernising fitness to plead. Medicine, Sciences and the Law 2019; 59(3): 131–4.Google Scholar
Victorian Law Reform Commission. Review of the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997. Victorian Law Reform Commission, 2014.Google Scholar
Law Commission of England and Wales. Unfitness to Plead (Consultation Paper No.197). The Stationery Office, 2010.Google Scholar
Mental Capacity Act 2005. Available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents.Google Scholar
Brown, P. Unfitness to plead in England and Wales: historical development and contemporary dilemmas. Medicine, Science and the Law 2019; 59(3): 187–96.Google Scholar
Peay, J. Fitness to plead and core competencies: problems and possibilities. LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No 2/2012. 2012. Available at: https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/44734/1/Fitness_plead_author.pdf.Google Scholar
R v. Murray (Aisling) [2008] EWCA Crim 1792.Google Scholar
Maher, G. Unfitness for trial in Scots law. In Mackay, R, Brookbanks, W, eds., Fitness to Plead: International and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2018; 81–104.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. On being insane in Jersey: Part 3 – the case of Attorney General v. O’Driscoll. Criminal Law Reports 2004; April: 291–6.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J, Chaplin, E, Hayes, S, Søndenaa, E, Chester, V, Morrissey, C, et al. Defendants with intellectual disability and autism spectrum conditions: the perspective of clinicians working across three jurisdictions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2021: 29(5): 698–717.Google Scholar
Mackay, R, Kearns, G. An upturn in unfitness to plead? Disability in relation to the trial under the 1991 Act. Criminal Law Review 2000; July: 532–46.Google Scholar
Mudathikundan, F, Chao, O, Forrester, A. Mental health and fitness to plead proposals in England and Wales. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2014; 37(2): 135–41.Google Scholar
Rogers, TP, Blackwood, N, Farnham, F, Pickup, G, Watts, M. Reformulating fitness to plead: a qualitative study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2009; 20 (6): 815–34.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH, Sigurdsson, J, Bragason, O, Newton, A, Einarsson, E. Interrogative suggestibility, compliance and false confessions among prisoners and their relationship with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Psychological Medicine 2008; 38(7): 1037–44.Google Scholar
Law Commission of England and Wales. Unfitness to Plead – Volume 1: Report (Law Com. No 364). The Stationery Office, 2016.Google Scholar
NHS England. Liaison and diversion standard service specification 2019. Available at: www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/national-liaison-and-diversion-service-specification-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Lally, SJ. What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluations? A survey of experts. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 2003; 34(5): 491.Google Scholar
Warren, JI, Chauhan, P, Kois, L, Dibble, A, Knighton, J. Factors influencing 2,260 opinions of defendants’ restorability to adjudicative competency. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2013; 19(4): 498–508.Google Scholar
Fogel, MH, Schiffman, W, Mumley, D, Tillbrook, C, Grisso, T. Ten year research update (2001–2010): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence). Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2013; 31(2): 165–91.Google Scholar
Brown, P, Stahl, D, Appiah-Kusi, E, Brewer, R, Watts, M, Peay, J, et al. Fitness to plead: development and validation of a standardised assessment instrument. PLOS One. 2018; 13(4): e0194332.Google Scholar
Brewer, RJ, Davies, GM, Blackwood, NJ. Fitness to plead: the impact of autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 2016; 16(3): 182–97.Google Scholar
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: general comment No. 1 (2014) Article 12: equal recognition before the law. UNCRPD, 2014.Google Scholar
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Concluding observations on the initial report of Republic of Korea, 29 October 2014, CRPD/C/KOR/CO/1. UNCRPD, 2014.Google Scholar
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Concluding observations on the initial report of Ecuador, 27 October 2014, CRPD/C/ECU/CO/1. UNCRPD, 2014.Google Scholar
Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 of the Optional Protocol, concerning communication No. 7/2012 (Noble vs Australia). UNCRPD, 2016.Google Scholar
Minkowitz, T. Rethinking criminal responsibility from a critical disability perspective: the abolition of insanity/incapacity acquittals and unfitness to plead, and beyond. Griffith Law Review 2014; 23(3): 434–66.Google Scholar
Freckelton, I, Keyzer, P. Fitness to stand trial and disability discrimination: an international critique of Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. 2017; 24(5): 770–83.Google Scholar
Faraone, SV, Sergeant, J, Gillberg, C, Biederman, J. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: is it an American condition? World Psychiatry 2003; 2(2): 104.Google Scholar
Kirley, A. Diagnosis and classification of ADHD in adulthood. In Fitzgerald, M, Bellgrove, M, Michael Gill, M, eds.,Handbook of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. John Wiley & Sons, 2007: 37–52.Google Scholar
McCarthy, S, Wilton, L, Murray, ML, Hodgkins, P, Asherson, P, Wong, IC. The epidemiology of pharmacologically treated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children, adolescents and adults in UK primary care. BMC Pediatrics 2012; 12(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Mohr-Jensen, C, Steinhausen, H-C. A meta-analysis and systematic review of the risks associated with childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder on long-term outcome of arrests, convictions, and incarcerations. Clinical Psychology Review. 2016; 48: 32–42.Google Scholar
Satterfield, JH, Faller, KJ, Crinella, FM, Schell, AM, Swanson, JM, Homer, LD. A 30-year prospective follow-up study of hyperactive boys with conduct problems: adult criminality. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2007; 46(5): 601–10.Google Scholar
Savolainen, J, Mason, WA, Bolen, JD, Chmelka, MB, Hurtig, T, Ebeling, H, et al. The path from childhood behavioural disorders to felony offending: investigating the role of adolescent drinking, peer marginalisation and school failure. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2015; 25(5): 375–88.Google Scholar
Young, S, Goodwin, EJ, Sedgwick, O, Gudjonsson, GH. The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. BMC Medicine 2013; 11(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Brown, P, Bakolis, I, Appiah-Kusi, E, Hallett, N, Hotopf, M, Blackwood, N. Prevalence of mental disorder in defendants at criminal court in submission. BJPsych Open. 2022; 8(3): E92.Google Scholar
Young, SJ, Adamou, M, Bolea, B, Gudjonsson, G, Müller, U, Pitts, M, et al. The identification and management of ADHD offenders within the criminal justice system: a consensus statement from the UK Adult ADHD Network and criminal justice agencies. BMC Psychiatry 2011; 11(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Buitelaar, NJ, Ferdinand, RF. ADHD undetected in criminal adults. Journal of Attention Disorders 2016; 20(3): 270–8.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH, Young, S. An overlooked vulnerability in a defendant: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and a miscarriage of justice. Legal and Criminological Psychology 2006; 11(2): 211–18.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH, Young, S, Bramham, J. Interrogative suggestibility in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A potential vulnerability during police questioning. Personality and Individual Differences 2007; 43(4): 737–45.Google Scholar
Kassin, SM, Gudjonsson, GH. The psychology of confessions: a review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2004; 5(2): 33–67.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH. The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook John Wiley & Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
Young, S. Coping strategies used by adults with ADHD. Personality and Individual Differences 2005; 38(4): 809–16.Google Scholar
Young, S, Thome, J. ADHD and offenders. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 2011; 12(sup1): 124–8.Google Scholar
Mackay, R, Mitchell, B, Howe, L. A continued upturn in unfitness to plead: more disability in relation to the trial under the 1991 Act. Criminal Law Review 2007; July: 530–45.Google Scholar
Crown Prosecution Service v. P [2007] EWHC 946 (Admin), [2008] 1 WLR 1005 at [10].Google Scholar
Attwood, B. Make Your Own Picture Stories for Kids with ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder): A DIY Guide for Parents and Carers: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2015.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. Autism and Asperger Syndrome. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Korkmaz, B. Theory of mind and neurodevelopmental disorders of childhood. Pediatric Research 2011; 69(8): 101–8.Google Scholar
Ali, S. Autistic spectrum disorder and offending behaviour: a brief review of the literature. Advances in Autism 2018; 4(3): 109–21.Google Scholar
Lerner, MD, Haque, OS, Northrup, EC, Lawer, L, Bursztajn, HJ. Emerging perspectives on adolescents and young adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders, violence, and criminal law. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 2012; 40(2): 177–90.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. Understanding offenders with autism-spectrum disorders: what can forensic services do?: commentary on … Asperger syndrome and criminal behaviour. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2010; 16(1): 44–6.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. Extreme violence in a man with an autistic spectrum disorder: assessment and treatment within high-security psychiatric care. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2010; 21(3): 462–77.Google Scholar
Woodbury-Smith, M, Clare, I, Holland, AJ, Watson, PC, Bambrick, M, Kearns, A, et al. Circumscribed interests and ‘offenders’ with autism spectrum disorders: a case-control study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2010; 21(3): 366–77.Google Scholar
Sabet, J, Underwood, L, Chaplin, E, Hayward, H, McCarthy, J. Autism spectrum disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and offending. Advances in Autism 2015; 1(2): 98–107.Google Scholar
Maras, KL, Bowler, DM. Eyewitness testimony in autism spectrum disorder: a review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 2014; 44(11): 2682–97.Google Scholar
Berryessa, C. Defendants with autism spectrum disorder in criminal court: a judges’ toolkit. SSRN Electronic Journal 2021; June.Google Scholar
Taylor, K, Mesibov, G, Debbaudt, D. Autism in the criminal justice system. North Carolina Bar Journal 2009; 14(4): 32–6.Google Scholar
Cooper, P, Backen, P, Marchant, R. Getting to grips with ground rules hearings: a checklist for judges, advocates and intermediaries to promote the fair treatment of vulnerable people in court. Criminal Law Review 2015; 6: 417–32.Google Scholar
Barry-Walsh, JB, Mullen, PE. Forensic aspects of Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2004; 15(1): 96–107.Google Scholar
Freckelton, I. Autism spectrum disorder: forensic issues and challenges for mental health professionals and courts. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2013; 26(5): 420–34.Google Scholar
Haskins, BG, Silva, JA. Asperger’s disorder and criminal behavior: forensic–psychiatric considerations. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2006; 34(3): 374–84.Google Scholar
Katz, N, Zemishlany, Z. Criminal responsibility in Asperger’s syndrome. Israel Journal of Psychiatry 2006; 43(3): 166.Google Scholar
McKinnon, I, Thorp, J, Grubin, D. Improving the detection of detainees with suspected intellectual disability in police custody. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 2015; 9(4): 174–85.Google Scholar
White, AJ, Batchelor, J, Pulman, S, Howard, D. The role of cognitive assessment in determining fitness to stand trial. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2012; 11(2): 102–9.Google Scholar
Brewster, E, Willox, EG, Haut, F. Assessing fitness to plead in Scotland’s learning disabled. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2008; 19(4): 597–602.Google Scholar
Murphy, GH, Clare, IC. Adults’ capacity to make decisions affecting the person: psychologists’ contribution. In Bull, R, Carson, D, eds., Handbook of Psychology in Legal Contexts. Wiley, 1995: 97–128.Google Scholar
Talbot, J. Prisoners’ voices: experiences of the criminal justice system by prisoners with learning disabilities. Tizard Learning Disability Review 2010; 15(3): 33–41.Google Scholar
Howard, K, McCann, C, Dudley, M. ‘I was flying blind a wee bit’: professionals’ perspectives on challenges facing communication assistance in the New Zealand youth justice system. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 2019; 24(2): 104–20.Google Scholar
Molyneaux, E, Vera San Juan, N, Brown, P, Lloyd-Evans, B, Oram, S. A pilot programme to facilitate the use of mental health treatment requirements: professional stakeholders’ experiences. The British Journal of Social Work 2021; 51(3): 1041–59.Google Scholar
Forrester, A, Till, A, Simpson, A, Shaw, J. Mental illness and the provision of mental health services in prisons. British Medical Bulletin 2018; 127(1): 101–9.Google Scholar
Ali, A, Ghosh, S, Strydom, A, Hassiotis, A. Prisoners with intellectual disabilities and detention status. Findings from a UK cross sectional study of prisons. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2016; 53–54: 189–97.Google Scholar
Hensel, JM, Casiano, H, Chartier, MJ, Ekuma, O, MacWilliam, L, Mota, N, et al. Prevalence of mental disorders among all justice-involved: a population-level study in Canada. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2020; 68: 101523.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. ‘A very valuable tool’: judges, advocates and intermediaries discuss the intermediary system in England and Wales. International Journal of Evidence and Proof 2015; 19(3): 154–71.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×