Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:37:41.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 15 - Persuasion in Early Modern English Medical Recipes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2022

Irma Taavitsainen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Turo Hiltunen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Jeremy J. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow
Carla Suhr
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
Get access

Summary

The study of persuasion in texts focuses on the means and strategies to alter the audience’s attitude and on bringing about a change in their minds. Persuasion can seldom be associated with linguistic phenomena or categories, or in other words, linguistic categories often contribute towards the persuasiveness of a text, carrying other functions at the same time. This chapter will investigate the ways in which persuasion is interlaced with the informative and instructive contents of Early Modern English medical recipes, looking beyond the customary recipe collections into other medical genres and the recipes embedded in their texts. The approach adopts metadiscourse analysis as a tool to map linguistic item inventories by which to anchor the classical concepts of persuasion to linguistic phenomena. The study suggests that persuasion in medical recipes resides in such linguistic phenomena that can be identified by metadiscourse categories. The approach provides a useful tool for triangulating one’s observations about the persuasiveness of a text. One of the trends emerging in the Early Modern English period is the increasing variety of metadiscourse classes used in recipes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use
, pp. 254 - 277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alonso-Almeida, Francisco, & Álvarez-Gil, Francisco J.. 2020. ‘So that it may reach to the jugular’: Modal verbs in Early Modern English recipes. Studia Neofilologiczne XVI, Special issue: Instructional writing across times and languages, 6188.Google Scholar
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco, & Cabrera-Abreu, Mercedes. 2002. The formulation of promise in medieval English medical recipes: A relevance-theoretic approach. Neophilologus 86: 137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2011. Discursive control and persuasion in early modern news discourse: The case of English witchcraft pamphlets and their prefaces (1579–1621). English Text Construction 4(2): 228–56.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, & Tyrkkö, Jukka. 2011. Verbs of knowing: Discursive practices in early modern vernacular medicine. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical writing in Early Modern English, 4473. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 1998. Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437–55.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 113: 1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Claire. 1998. Formula and formulation: ‘Efficacy phrases’ in medieval English medical manuscripts. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 99(2): 199210.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. Persuasion by inference: Analysis of a party political broadcast. In Blommaert, Jan & Bulcaen, Chris (eds.), Belgian Journal of Linguistics. 11, Special edition: Political linguistics, 121–37.Google Scholar
Kinneavy, James L. 1971. A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna. 2013. Formulaic discourse across Early Modern English medical genres. In Jucker, Andreas, Landert, Daniela, Seiler, Annina, & Studer-Joho, Nicole (eds.), Meaning in the history of English. Words and texts in context, 257300. Studies in language companion series 148. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kuna, Ágnes. 2014. Illness-conceptions in the persuasive sections of Hungarian medical recipes from the 16th and 17th centuries. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 2: 5168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkinen, Martti. 2011. Efficacy phrases in Early Modern English medical recipes. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical writing in Early Modern English, 158–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mäkinen, Martti. 2021. Rhetorical re-analysis of metadiscourse items in Henry Daniel’s Middle English prologue to Liber uricrisiarum. In Vezzosi, Letizia (ed.), Current Issues in Medieval England, 171–94. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Marttila, Ville. 2011. New arguments for new audiences: A corpus-based analysis of interpersonal strategies in Early Modern English medical recipes. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), Medical writing in Early Modern English, 135–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nwogu, K. N. 1997. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. 2005. Persuasion as implicit anchoring: The case of collocations. In Halmari, Helena & Virtanen, Tuija (eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach, 185212. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Perelman, C. 1979. The New Rhetoric and the humanities. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Quintana-Toledo, Elena. 2009. Middle English medical recipes: A metadiscursive approach. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 45(2): 2138.Google Scholar
Ritivoi, A. D. 2008. Rhetorics: New Rhetorics. In Donsbach, W. (ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecr093.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy. 1990. Medieval and early Renaissance medicine: An introduction to knowledge and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1994. On the evolution of scientific writings between 1375 and 1675: repertoire of emotive features. In Fernández, Francisco, Márquez, Miguel Fuster, & Calvo, Juan Jose (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, Valencia, Sept. 1992, 329–42. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2000. Metadiscursive practices and the evolution of early English medical writing 1375–1550. In Kirk, John M. (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 191207. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001a. Evidentiality and scientific though-styles: English medical writing in Late Middle English and Early Modern English. In Gotti, Maurizio & Dossena, Marina (eds.), Modality in specialized texts: Selected papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference, 2152. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001b. Middle English recipes: Genre characteristics, text type features and underlying traditions of writing. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(1): 85113.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2004. Genres of secular instruction: A linguistic history of useful entertainment. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies 29: 7594.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, & Pahta, Päivi. 1997. The corpus of Early English Medical Writing: Linguistic variation and prescriptive collocation in scholastic style. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen, 209–25. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Pahta, Päivi, Hiltunen, Turo, Marttila, Ville, Ratia, Maura, Suhr, Carla, & Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.). 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts, corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. H. 1967. Medicine in medieval England. London: Oldbourne.Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija, & Halmari, Helena. 2005. In Halmari, Helena & Virtanen, Tuija (eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach, 324. Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew. 1998 [1992]. Health and healing in Early Modern England: Studies in social and intellectual history. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wear, Andrew. 2000. Knowledge and practice in English medicine, 1550–1680. Port Chester, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×